ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Natalie Jeremijenko - Artist and engineer
Natalie Jeremijenko blends art, engineering, environmentalism, biochemistry and more to create real-life experiments that enable social change.

Why you should listen

Bridging the technical and art worlds, Natalie Jeremijenko creates socially conscious experiences that make change, both directly and indirectly. As director of the xDesign Environmental Health Clinic at NYU, she helps prescribe creative health solutions for the environment that are carried out by enthusiastic volunteers. As a professor in NYU’s Visual Art Department, she creates and supervises real-life projects for her students like HowStuffIsMade (a website that details how everyday objects are created) and Feral Robots (packs of robot dogs that have been hacked to monitor pollution or even act as breathalyzers).

Her individual work has been exhibited in the MASS MoCA, the Whitney Museum, and the Cooper-Hewitt Museum, and she is part of an artists' collective called the Bureau of Inverse Technology. Past projects include the Despondency Index -- a motion detector camera was installed on San Francisco’s Bay Bridge to record suicides, which were then graphed in relation to stock market data. Jeremijenko was named as a 1999 Rockefeller Fellow, one of the 40 most influential designers by I.D. Magazine and one of the Top 100 Young Innovators by MIT Technology Review. She was included in both the 2006 Whitney Biennial of American Art and the Cooper Hewitt Smithsonian Design Triennial 2006-7.

Read a profile of Jeremijenko in the New York Times >>

More profile about the speaker
Natalie Jeremijenko | Speaker | TED.com
Business Innovation Factory

Natalie Jeremijenko: The art of the eco-mindshift

Filmed:
458,377 views

Natalie Jeremijenko's unusual lab puts art to work, and addresses environmental woes by combining engineering know-how with public art and a team of volunteers. These real-life experiments include: Walking tadpoles, texting "fish," planting fire-hydrant gardens and more.
- Artist and engineer
Natalie Jeremijenko blends art, engineering, environmentalism, biochemistry and more to create real-life experiments that enable social change. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:15
I was informed by this kind of
0
0
3000
00:18
unoriginal and trite idea
1
3000
2000
00:20
that new technologies were an opportunity
2
5000
2000
00:22
for social transformation,
3
7000
2000
00:24
which is what drove me then,
4
9000
2000
00:26
and still, it's a delusion that drives me now.
5
11000
2000
00:28
I wanted to update what I've been doing since then --
6
13000
3000
00:31
but it's still the same theme song --
7
16000
3000
00:34
and introduce you to my lab and current work,
8
19000
3000
00:37
which is the Environmental Health Clinic
9
22000
2000
00:39
that I run at NYU.
10
24000
2000
00:41
And what it is -- it's a twist on health.
11
26000
2000
00:43
Because, really, what I'm trying to do now
12
28000
2000
00:45
is redefine what counts as health.
13
30000
2000
00:47
It's a clinic like a health clinic at any other university,
14
32000
3000
00:50
except people come to the clinic
15
35000
2000
00:52
with environmental health concerns,
16
37000
2000
00:54
and they walk out with prescriptions
17
39000
2000
00:56
for things they can do to improve environmental health,
18
41000
3000
00:59
as opposed to coming to a clinic with medical concerns
19
44000
3000
01:02
and walking out with prescriptions for pharmaceuticals.
20
47000
3000
01:05
It's a handy-dandy quote from Hippocrates of the Hippocratic oath
21
50000
3000
01:08
that says, "The greater part of the soul lays outside the body,
22
53000
3000
01:11
treatment of the inner requires treatment of the outer."
23
56000
2000
01:13
But that suggests the issue
24
58000
2000
01:15
that I'm trying to get at here,
25
60000
2000
01:17
that we have an opportunity to redefine what is health.
26
62000
3000
01:20
Because this idea that health is internal
27
65000
2000
01:22
and atomized and individual
28
67000
3000
01:25
and pharmaceutical
29
70000
2000
01:27
is largely an error.
30
72000
2000
01:29
And I would use this study,
31
74000
2000
01:31
a recent study by Philip Landrigan,
32
76000
2000
01:33
to motivate a different view of health,
33
78000
2000
01:35
where he went to most of the pediatricians in Manhattan
34
80000
3000
01:38
and the New York area
35
83000
2000
01:40
and logged what they spent their patient hours on.
36
85000
3000
01:43
80 to 90 percent of their time
37
88000
2000
01:45
was spent on five things.
38
90000
2000
01:47
Number one was asthma,
39
92000
2000
01:49
number two was developmental delays,
40
94000
3000
01:52
number three was 400-fold increases
41
97000
2000
01:54
in rare childhood cancers
42
99000
2000
01:56
in the last eight to 10, 15 years.
43
101000
3000
01:59
Number four and five were childhood obesity
44
104000
3000
02:02
and diabetes-related issues.
45
107000
3000
02:05
So all of those -- what's common about all of those?
46
110000
3000
02:08
The environment is implicated, radically implicated, right.
47
113000
3000
02:11
This is not the germs
48
116000
2000
02:13
that medicos were trained to deal with;
49
118000
3000
02:16
this is a different definition of health,
50
121000
3000
02:19
health that has a great advantage
51
124000
3000
02:22
because it's external, it's shared,
52
127000
2000
02:24
we can do something about it,
53
129000
2000
02:26
as opposed to internal, genetically predetermined
54
131000
3000
02:29
or individualized.
55
134000
2000
02:31
People who come to the clinic are called, not patients,
56
136000
2000
02:33
but impatients,
57
138000
2000
02:35
because they're too impatient to wait for legislative change
58
140000
3000
02:38
to address local and environmental health issues.
59
143000
3000
02:41
And I meet them at the University, I also have a few field offices
60
146000
3000
02:44
that I set up in various places
61
149000
2000
02:46
that provide an immersion
62
151000
2000
02:48
in some of the environmental challenges we face.
63
153000
2000
02:50
I like this one from the Belgian field office,
64
155000
3000
02:53
where we met in a roundabout,
65
158000
2000
02:55
precisely because the roundabout iconified
66
160000
2000
02:57
the headless social movement
67
162000
2000
02:59
that informs much social transformation,
68
164000
3000
03:02
as opposed to the top-down control
69
167000
2000
03:04
of red light traffic intersections.
70
169000
3000
03:07
In this case, of course, the roundabout
71
172000
3000
03:10
with that micro-decisions being made in situ
72
175000
2000
03:12
by people not being told what to do.
73
177000
3000
03:15
But, of course, affords greater throughput,
74
180000
2000
03:17
fewer accidents,
75
182000
2000
03:19
and an interesting model of social movement.
76
184000
3000
03:22
Some of the things that the monitoring protocols have developed:
77
187000
2000
03:24
this is the tadpole bureaucrat protocol,
78
189000
3000
03:27
or keeping tabs, if you will.
79
192000
3000
03:30
What they are is an addition of tadpoles
80
195000
2000
03:32
that are named after a local bureaucrat
81
197000
2000
03:34
whose decisions affect your water quality.
82
199000
3000
03:37
So an impatient concern for water quality
83
202000
3000
03:40
would raise a tadpole bureaucrat
84
205000
3000
03:43
in a sample of water in which they're interested.
85
208000
3000
03:46
And we give them a couple of things to do that,
86
211000
2000
03:48
to help them do companion animal devices
87
213000
2000
03:50
while they're blogging and doing their email.
88
215000
2000
03:52
This is a tadpole walker
89
217000
2000
03:54
to take your tadpole walking in the evening.
90
219000
3000
03:57
And the interesting thing that happens --
91
222000
2000
03:59
because we're using tadpoles, of course,
92
224000
2000
04:01
because they have the most exquisite biosenses that we have,
93
226000
3000
04:04
several orders of magnitude more sensitive
94
229000
2000
04:06
than some of our senses
95
231000
2000
04:08
for sensing,
96
233000
3000
04:11
responding in a biologically meaningful way,
97
236000
2000
04:13
to that whole class of industrial contaminants
98
238000
2000
04:15
we call endocrine disruptors
99
240000
2000
04:17
or hormone emulators.
100
242000
2000
04:19
But by taking your tadpole out for a walk in the evening --
101
244000
3000
04:22
there's a few action shots --
102
247000
2000
04:24
your neighbors are likely to say, "What are you doing?"
103
249000
3000
04:27
And then you have to introduce your tadpole
104
252000
3000
04:30
and who it's named after.
105
255000
2000
04:32
You have to explain what you're doing
106
257000
2000
04:34
and how the developmental events of a tadpole
107
259000
2000
04:36
are, of course, very observable
108
261000
2000
04:38
and they use the same T3-mediated hormones that we do.
109
263000
3000
04:43
And so next time your neighbor sees you
110
268000
3000
04:46
they'll say, "How is that tadpole doing?"
111
271000
3000
04:49
And you can let them social network with your tadpole,
112
274000
3000
04:52
because the Environmental Health Clinic has a social networking site
113
277000
3000
04:55
for, not only impatients, humans,
114
280000
3000
04:58
but non-humans,
115
283000
2000
05:00
social networking for humans and non-humans.
116
285000
2000
05:02
And of course, these endocrine disruptors
117
287000
2000
05:04
are things that are implicated in the breast cancer epidemic,
118
289000
3000
05:07
the obesity epidemic,
119
292000
2000
05:09
the two and a half year drop in the average age of onset of puberty in young girls
120
294000
3000
05:12
and other related things.
121
297000
2000
05:14
The culmination of this is if you've successfully raised your tadpole,
122
299000
3000
05:17
observing the behavioral
123
302000
2000
05:19
and developmental events,
124
304000
2000
05:21
you will then go and introduce your tadpole
125
306000
2000
05:23
to its namesake
126
308000
2000
05:25
and discuss the evidence that you've seen.
127
310000
3000
05:28
Another quick protocol -- and I'm going to go through these quickly,
128
313000
3000
05:31
but just to give you the material sense of what we're doing here --
129
316000
3000
05:34
instead of asking you for urine samples,
130
319000
2000
05:36
I'll ask you for a mouse sample.
131
321000
2000
05:38
Anyone here lucky enough to share, to cohabit with a mouse --
132
323000
3000
05:41
a domestic partnership with mice?
133
326000
2000
05:43
Very lucky.
134
328000
3000
05:46
Mice, of course, are the quintessential
135
331000
3000
05:49
model organism.
136
334000
2000
05:51
They're even better models of environmental health,
137
336000
2000
05:53
because not only the same mammalian biology,
138
338000
2000
05:55
but they share your diet, largely.
139
340000
2000
05:57
They share your environmental stressors,
140
342000
3000
06:00
the asbestos levels and lead levels,
141
345000
2000
06:02
whatever you're exposed to.
142
347000
2000
06:04
And they're geographically more limited than you are,
143
349000
2000
06:06
because we don't know if you've been exposed
144
351000
2000
06:08
to persistent organic pollutants
145
353000
2000
06:10
in your home, or occupationally
146
355000
2000
06:12
or as a child.
147
357000
2000
06:14
Mice are a very good representation.
148
359000
2000
06:16
So it starts by building a better mousetrap, of course.
149
361000
3000
06:19
This is one of them.
150
364000
2000
06:21
Coping with environmental stressors is tricky.
151
366000
2000
06:23
Is anybody here on antidepressants?
152
368000
3000
06:26
(Laughter)
153
371000
2000
06:28
There's a lot of people in Manhattan are.
154
373000
3000
06:31
And we were testing if the mice
155
376000
2000
06:33
would also self-administer SSRIs.
156
378000
3000
06:36
So this was Prozac, this was Zoloft,
157
381000
2000
06:38
this was a black jellybean and this was muscle relaxant,
158
383000
3000
06:41
all of which were the medications that the impatient was taking.
159
386000
3000
06:44
So do you think the mice
160
389000
2000
06:46
self-administered antidepressants?
161
391000
2000
06:48
What's the -- (Audience: Sure. Yes.)
162
393000
3000
06:51
How did you know that? They did.
163
396000
3000
06:54
This was vodka and solution, gin and solution.
164
399000
2000
06:56
This guy also liked plain water and the muscle relaxant.
165
401000
3000
06:59
Where's our export?
166
404000
2000
07:01
Vodka, gin --
167
406000
2000
07:03
(Audience: [unclear])
168
408000
2000
07:05
Yes. Yes. You know your mice well.
169
410000
3000
07:08
They did, yes.
170
413000
2000
07:10
So they drank as much vodka as they did plain water,
171
415000
2000
07:12
which was interesting.
172
417000
2000
07:14
Then of course, it goes into the entrapment device.
173
419000
3000
07:17
There's an old cellphone in there -- a good use for old cellphones --
174
422000
2000
07:19
which dials the clinic, we go and pick up the mouse.
175
424000
3000
07:22
We take the blood sample
176
427000
2000
07:24
and do the blood work and hair work on the mice.
177
429000
2000
07:26
And I want to sort of point out the big advantage
178
431000
2000
07:28
of framing health in this external way.
179
433000
3000
07:31
But we do have a few prescription products through this.
180
436000
3000
07:34
It's very different from the medical model.
181
439000
3000
07:37
Anything you do to improve your water quality or air quality,
182
442000
3000
07:40
or to understand it or to change it,
183
445000
3000
07:43
the benefits are enjoyed by anyone
184
448000
2000
07:45
you share that water quality or air quality with.
185
450000
3000
07:48
And that aggregating effect,
186
453000
2000
07:50
that collective action effect,
187
455000
3000
07:53
is actually something we can use to our advantage.
188
458000
3000
07:56
So I want to show you one prescription product in the clinic
189
461000
3000
07:59
called the No Park.
190
464000
2000
08:01
This is a prescription to improve water quality.
191
466000
3000
08:04
Many impatients are very concerned for water quality and air quality.
192
469000
3000
08:07
What we do is we take a fire hydrant,
193
472000
2000
08:09
a "no parking" space associated with a fire hydrant,
194
474000
3000
08:12
and we prescribe the removal of the asphalt
195
477000
3000
08:15
to create an engineered micro landscape,
196
480000
2000
08:17
to create an infiltration opportunity.
197
482000
2000
08:19
Because, many of you will know,
198
484000
2000
08:21
that the biggest pollution burden
199
486000
2000
08:23
that we have on the New York, New Jersey harbor right now
200
488000
2000
08:25
is no longer the point sources,
201
490000
2000
08:27
no longer the big polluters,
202
492000
2000
08:29
no longer the GEs,
203
494000
2000
08:31
but that massive network of roads,
204
496000
2000
08:33
[those] impervious surfaces,
205
498000
2000
08:35
that collect all that cadmium neurotoxin that comes from your brake liners
206
500000
3000
08:38
or the oily hydrocarbon waste
207
503000
2000
08:40
in every single storm event and medieval infrastructure
208
505000
3000
08:43
washes it straight into the estuary system.
209
508000
2000
08:45
That doesn't do a lot of good.
210
510000
2000
08:47
These are little opportunities to intercept those pollutants
211
512000
3000
08:50
before they enter the harbor,
212
515000
2000
08:52
and they're produced by impatients
213
517000
2000
08:54
on various city blocks
214
519000
2000
08:56
in some very interesting ways.
215
521000
2000
08:58
I just want to say it was sort of a rule of thumb though,
216
523000
2000
09:00
there's about two or three fire hydrants
217
525000
3000
09:03
on every city block.
218
528000
2000
09:05
By creating engineered micro landscapes to infiltrate in them,
219
530000
3000
09:08
we don't prevent them from being used
220
533000
2000
09:10
as emergency vehicle parking spaces,
221
535000
2000
09:12
because, of course, a firetruck can come and park there.
222
537000
3000
09:15
They flatten a few plants. No big deal, they'll regenerate.
223
540000
3000
09:19
But if we did this
224
544000
2000
09:21
in every single --
225
546000
3000
09:24
every fire hydrant
226
549000
2000
09:26
we could redefine the emergency.
227
551000
3000
09:29
That 99 percent of the time
228
554000
2000
09:31
when a firetruck is not parking there,
229
556000
3000
09:34
it's infiltrating pollutants.
230
559000
2000
09:36
It's also increasing fixing CO2s,
231
561000
3000
09:39
sequestering some of the airborne pollutants.
232
564000
3000
09:42
And aggregated,
233
567000
2000
09:44
these smaller interceptions
234
569000
2000
09:46
could actually infiltrate all the roadborne pollution
235
571000
3000
09:49
that now runs into the estuary system,
236
574000
2000
09:51
up to a seven inch rain event, up to a hundred-year storm.
237
576000
3000
09:54
So these are small actions
238
579000
2000
09:56
that can amount to a significant effect
239
581000
2000
09:58
to improve local environmental health.
240
583000
3000
10:01
This is one of the more ambitious ones.
241
586000
2000
10:03
What the climate crisis has revealed to us
242
588000
3000
10:06
is a secondary, more insidious
243
591000
2000
10:08
and more pervasive crisis,
244
593000
3000
10:11
which is the crisis of agency,
245
596000
3000
10:14
which is what to do.
246
599000
3000
10:17
Somehow buying a local lettuce, changing a light bulb,
247
602000
3000
10:20
driving the speed limit, changing your tires regularly,
248
605000
2000
10:22
doesn't seem sufficient
249
607000
2000
10:24
in the face of climate crisis.
250
609000
3000
10:27
And this is an interesting icon that happened --
251
612000
2000
10:29
you remember these: fallout shelters.
252
614000
3000
10:32
What is the fallout shelter
253
617000
2000
10:34
for the climate crisis?
254
619000
2000
10:36
This was civic mobilization.
255
621000
2000
10:38
Churches, school groups,
256
623000
2000
10:40
hospitals, private residents --
257
625000
2000
10:42
everyone built one of these in a matter of months.
258
627000
2000
10:44
And they still remain
259
629000
2000
10:46
as icons of civic response
260
631000
3000
10:49
in the face of shared, uncertain, collective threat.
261
634000
2000
10:51
Fallout shelter for the climate crisis,
262
636000
2000
10:53
I would say, looks something like this, or this,
263
638000
3000
10:56
which is an intensive urban agriculture facility
264
641000
2000
10:58
that's due to go on my lab building at NYU.
265
643000
3000
11:01
What it does
266
646000
2000
11:03
is a very simple idea
267
648000
2000
11:05
of taking --
268
650000
2000
11:07
80 to 90 percent of the CO2 produced in Manhattan
269
652000
3000
11:10
is building related --
270
655000
2000
11:12
we take, just like a commercial greenhouse,
271
657000
2000
11:14
we take the CO2 from the building --
272
659000
2000
11:16
CO2-enriched air --
273
661000
2000
11:18
we force it through the urban agriculture facility,
274
663000
3000
11:21
and then we resupply oxygen-enriched air.
275
666000
2000
11:23
You can't actually build much on a roof, they're not designed for that.
276
668000
3000
11:26
So it's on legs,
277
671000
2000
11:28
so it focuses all the load on the masonry walls and the columns.
278
673000
3000
11:31
It's built as a barn raising,
279
676000
2000
11:33
using open source hardware.
280
678000
2000
11:35
This is the quarter-scale prototype
281
680000
2000
11:37
that was functioning in Spain.
282
682000
2000
11:39
This is what it will look like, fingers crossed,
283
684000
2000
11:41
NYU willing.
284
686000
2000
11:43
And what I want to show you is --
285
688000
2000
11:45
actually this is one of the components of it that we've just recently been testing --
286
690000
3000
11:48
which is a solar chimney --
287
693000
2000
11:50
we have got 17 of them now put around New York at the moment --
288
695000
2000
11:52
that passively draws air up.
289
697000
2000
11:54
You understand a solar chimney.
290
699000
2000
11:56
Hot air rises.
291
701000
2000
11:58
You put a bit of black plastic on the side of a building,
292
703000
2000
12:00
it'll heat up, and you'll get passive airflow.
293
705000
3000
12:03
What we do is actually
294
708000
2000
12:05
put a standard HVAC filter on the top of that.
295
710000
3000
12:08
That actually removes about 95 percent
296
713000
2000
12:10
of the carbon black,
297
715000
2000
12:12
that stuff that, with ozone,
298
717000
2000
12:14
is responsible for about half of global warming's effects,
299
719000
2000
12:16
because it changes, it settles on the snow,
300
721000
2000
12:18
it changes the reflectors,
301
723000
2000
12:20
it changes
302
725000
2000
12:22
the transmission qualities of the atmosphere.
303
727000
3000
12:25
Carbon black is that grime
304
730000
2000
12:27
that otherwise lodges in your pretty pink lungs,
305
732000
2000
12:29
and it's associated with.
306
734000
2000
12:31
It's not good stuff, and it's from inefficient combustion,
307
736000
3000
12:34
not from combustion itself.
308
739000
2000
12:36
When we put it through our solar chimney,
309
741000
3000
12:39
we remove actually about 95 percent of that.
310
744000
3000
12:42
And then I swap it out
311
747000
3000
12:45
with the students
312
750000
2000
12:47
and actually re-release that carbon black.
313
752000
2000
12:49
And we make pencils the length of which measures the grime
314
754000
3000
12:52
that we've pulled out of the air.
315
757000
2000
12:54
Here's one of them that we have up now.
316
759000
2000
12:56
Here's who put them up and who are avid pencil users.
317
761000
3000
12:59
Okay, so I want to show you
318
764000
2000
13:01
just two more interfaces,
319
766000
2000
13:03
because I think one of our big challenges
320
768000
2000
13:05
is re-imagining our relationship to natural systems,
321
770000
3000
13:08
not only through this model
322
773000
3000
13:11
of twisted personalized health,
323
776000
3000
13:14
but through the animals
324
779000
2000
13:16
with whom we cohabit.
325
781000
2000
13:18
We are not alone; the animals are moving in.
326
783000
2000
13:20
In fact, urban migration now describes
327
785000
2000
13:22
the movement of animals formerly known as wild
328
787000
3000
13:25
into urban centers.
329
790000
2000
13:27
You know, coyote in Central Park, a whale in the Gowanus Canal,
330
792000
2000
13:29
elk in Westchester County.
331
794000
2000
13:31
It's happening all over the Developed World,
332
796000
2000
13:33
probably for loss of habitat,
333
798000
2000
13:35
but also because our cities are a little bit more livable
334
800000
2000
13:37
than they have been.
335
802000
2000
13:39
And every green space we create
336
804000
2000
13:41
is an invitation for non-humans to cohabit with us.
337
806000
2000
13:43
But we've kind of lacked imagination
338
808000
2000
13:45
in how we could do that well or interestingly.
339
810000
3000
13:48
And I want to show you a few of the technological interfaces
340
813000
2000
13:50
that have been developed under the moniker of OOZ --
341
815000
3000
13:53
which is zoo backwards and without cages --
342
818000
3000
13:56
to try and reform
343
821000
2000
13:58
that relationship.
344
823000
2000
14:00
This is communication technology for birds. I looks like this.
345
825000
3000
14:03
When a bird lands on it, they trigger a sound file.
346
828000
3000
14:06
This is actually in the Whitney Museum, where there were six of them,
347
831000
3000
14:09
each of which had a different argument on it,
348
834000
2000
14:11
different sound file.
349
836000
2000
14:13
They said things like this.
350
838000
2000
14:15
(Whistling)
351
840000
2000
14:17
Recorded Voice: Here's what you need to do.
352
842000
3000
14:20
Go down there and buy some of those health food bars,
353
845000
3000
14:23
the ones you call bird food,
354
848000
2000
14:25
and bring it here and scatter it around.
355
850000
2000
14:27
There's a good person.
356
852000
3000
14:30
Natalie Jeremijenko: Okay. (Laugher)
357
855000
3000
14:33
So there was several of these.
358
858000
2000
14:35
The birds were able to jump from one to the other.
359
860000
2000
14:37
These are just your average urban pigeon.
360
862000
3000
14:40
And an early test
361
865000
2000
14:42
which argument elicited cooperative behavior
362
867000
2000
14:44
from the people below --
363
869000
3000
14:47
about a hundred to one
364
872000
2000
14:49
decided that this was the argument
365
874000
2000
14:51
that worked best on us.
366
876000
2000
14:53
Recorded Voice: Tick, tick, tick.
367
878000
3000
14:56
That's the sound of genetic mutations
368
881000
2000
14:58
of the avian flu
369
883000
2000
15:00
becoming a deadly human flu.
370
885000
2000
15:02
Do you know what slows it down?
371
887000
2000
15:04
Healthy sub-populations of birds,
372
889000
2000
15:06
increasing biodiversity generally.
373
891000
3000
15:09
It is in your interests that I'm healthy,
374
894000
3000
15:12
happy, well-fed.
375
897000
2000
15:14
Hence, you could share some of your nutritional resources
376
899000
3000
15:17
instead of monopolizing them.
377
902000
2000
15:19
That is, share your lunch.
378
904000
3000
15:22
(Laughter)
379
907000
2000
15:24
NJ: It worked, and it's true.
380
909000
3000
15:27
The final project I'd like to show you
381
912000
2000
15:29
is a new interface for fish
382
914000
2000
15:31
that has just been launched --
383
916000
2000
15:33
it's actually officially launched next week --
384
918000
2000
15:35
with a wonderful commission from the Architectural League.
385
920000
2000
15:37
You may not have known that you need to communicate with fish,
386
922000
3000
15:40
but there is now a device for you to do so.
387
925000
2000
15:42
It looks like this: buoys that float on the water,
388
927000
3000
15:45
project three foot up, three foot down.
389
930000
2000
15:47
When a fish swims underneath, a light goes on.
390
932000
3000
15:50
This is what it looks like.
391
935000
2000
15:57
So there's another function on here.
392
942000
3000
16:00
This top light is -- I'm sorry if I'm making you seasick --
393
945000
3000
16:04
this top light is actually a water quality display
394
949000
2000
16:06
that shifts from red, when the dissolved oxygen is low,
395
951000
3000
16:09
to a blue/green, when its dissolved oxygen is high.
396
954000
3000
16:12
And then you can also text the fish.
397
957000
3000
16:15
So there's business cards down there
398
960000
2000
16:17
that'll give you contact details.
399
962000
2000
16:19
And they text back.
400
964000
2000
16:21
When the buoys get your text, they wink at you twice to say, we've got your message.
401
966000
3000
16:24
But perhaps the most popular has been
402
969000
2000
16:26
that we've got another array of these boys in the Bronx River,
403
971000
2000
16:28
where the first beaver --
404
973000
2000
16:30
crazy as he is --
405
975000
2000
16:32
to have moved in and built a lodge in New York
406
977000
2000
16:34
in 250 years, hangs out.
407
979000
3000
16:37
So updates from a beaver.
408
982000
2000
16:39
You can subscribe to updates from him. You can talk to him.
409
984000
3000
16:42
And what I like to think of
410
987000
3000
16:45
is this is an interface
411
990000
3000
16:48
that re-scripts how we interact with natural systems,
412
993000
3000
16:51
specifically by changing who has information,
413
996000
3000
16:54
where they have it,
414
999000
2000
16:56
who can make sense of that information,
415
1001000
2000
16:58
and what you can do about it.
416
1003000
2000
17:00
In this case, instead of throwing chewing gum,
417
1005000
3000
17:03
or Doritos or whatever you have in your pocket at the fish --
418
1008000
3000
17:06
There's a body of water in Iceland that I've been dealing with
419
1011000
2000
17:08
that's in the middle of the city,
420
1013000
2000
17:10
and the largest pollution burden on it
421
1015000
2000
17:12
is not the roadborne pollution,
422
1017000
2000
17:14
it's actually white bread
423
1019000
2000
17:16
from people feeding the fish and the birds.
424
1021000
2000
17:18
Instead of doing that actually, we've developed some fish sticks
425
1023000
2000
17:20
that you can feed the fish.
426
1025000
3000
17:23
They're delicious.
427
1028000
2000
17:25
They're cross-species delicious that is,
428
1030000
3000
17:28
delicious for humans and non-humans.
429
1033000
2000
17:30
But they also have a chelating agent in them.
430
1035000
2000
17:32
They're nutritionally appropriate,
431
1037000
2000
17:34
not like Doritos.
432
1039000
2000
17:36
And so every time
433
1041000
3000
17:39
that desire to interact with the animals,
434
1044000
3000
17:42
which is at least as ubiquitous
435
1047000
4000
17:46
as that sign: "Do not feed the animals."
436
1051000
2000
17:48
And there's about three of them on every New York City park.
437
1053000
3000
17:51
And Yellowstone National Park,
438
1056000
2000
17:53
there's more "do not feed the animals" signs
439
1058000
2000
17:55
than there are animals you might wish to feed.
440
1060000
3000
17:58
But in that action, that interaction,
441
1063000
3000
18:01
by re-scripting that,
442
1066000
2000
18:03
by changing it into an opportunity
443
1068000
2000
18:05
to offer food that is nutritionally appropriate,
444
1070000
3000
18:08
that could augment the nutritional resources
445
1073000
2000
18:10
that we ourselves have depleted
446
1075000
2000
18:12
for augmenting the fish population
447
1077000
2000
18:14
and also adding chelating agent,
448
1079000
2000
18:16
which, like any chelating agent that we use medicinally,
449
1081000
4000
18:20
binds to the bioaccumulated heavy metals and PCBs
450
1085000
3000
18:23
that are in the fish
451
1088000
2000
18:25
living in this particular habitat
452
1090000
3000
18:28
and allows them to pass it out as a harmless salt
453
1093000
2000
18:30
where it's complexed by a reactive,
454
1095000
3000
18:33
effectively removing it from bioavailability.
455
1098000
3000
18:36
But I wanted to say that interaction,
456
1101000
2000
18:38
re-scripting that interaction,
457
1103000
2000
18:40
into collective action, collective remediative action,
458
1105000
3000
18:43
very different from the approach
459
1108000
3000
18:46
that's being used on the other side on the Hudson River,
460
1111000
3000
18:49
where we're dredging the PCBs --
461
1114000
3000
18:52
after 30 years of legislative and legal struggle,
462
1117000
4000
18:56
GE's paying for the dredging
463
1121000
2000
18:58
of the largest Superfund site in the world --
464
1123000
3000
19:01
we're dredging it, and it'll probably get shipped off to Pennsylvania
465
1126000
3000
19:04
or the nearest Third World country,
466
1129000
2000
19:06
where it will continue to be toxic sludge.
467
1131000
3000
19:10
Displacement is not the way to deal with environmental issues.
468
1135000
3000
19:14
And that's typically the paradigm
469
1139000
2000
19:16
under which we've operated.
470
1141000
2000
19:18
By actually taking the opportunity
471
1143000
2000
19:20
that new technologies,
472
1145000
2000
19:22
new interactive technologies, present
473
1147000
2000
19:24
to re-script our interactions,
474
1149000
2000
19:26
to script them,
475
1151000
2000
19:28
not just as isolated, individuated interactions,
476
1153000
3000
19:31
but as collective aggregating actions
477
1156000
4000
19:35
that can amount to something,
478
1160000
2000
19:37
we can really begin to address
479
1162000
2000
19:39
some of our important environmental challenges.
480
1164000
2000
19:41
Thank you.
481
1166000
2000
19:43
(Applause)
482
1168000
2000

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Natalie Jeremijenko - Artist and engineer
Natalie Jeremijenko blends art, engineering, environmentalism, biochemistry and more to create real-life experiments that enable social change.

Why you should listen

Bridging the technical and art worlds, Natalie Jeremijenko creates socially conscious experiences that make change, both directly and indirectly. As director of the xDesign Environmental Health Clinic at NYU, she helps prescribe creative health solutions for the environment that are carried out by enthusiastic volunteers. As a professor in NYU’s Visual Art Department, she creates and supervises real-life projects for her students like HowStuffIsMade (a website that details how everyday objects are created) and Feral Robots (packs of robot dogs that have been hacked to monitor pollution or even act as breathalyzers).

Her individual work has been exhibited in the MASS MoCA, the Whitney Museum, and the Cooper-Hewitt Museum, and she is part of an artists' collective called the Bureau of Inverse Technology. Past projects include the Despondency Index -- a motion detector camera was installed on San Francisco’s Bay Bridge to record suicides, which were then graphed in relation to stock market data. Jeremijenko was named as a 1999 Rockefeller Fellow, one of the 40 most influential designers by I.D. Magazine and one of the Top 100 Young Innovators by MIT Technology Review. She was included in both the 2006 Whitney Biennial of American Art and the Cooper Hewitt Smithsonian Design Triennial 2006-7.

Read a profile of Jeremijenko in the New York Times >>

More profile about the speaker
Natalie Jeremijenko | Speaker | TED.com