ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Pia Mancini - Democracy activist
Using software to inspire public debate and enable voter engagement, Pia Mancini hopes to upgrade modern democracy in Argentina and beyond.

Why you should listen
After a disappointing brush with traditional political parties in Argentina, Pia Mancini realized that the existing democracy was disconnected from its citizens -- and that no one was likely to fix it.
 
In response, Mancini helped launch Democracy OS, an open-source mobile platform designed to provide Argentine citizens with immediate input into the legislative process. To promote it, she helped found the Partido de la Red, a new party running candidates committed to legislate only as directed by constituents using online tools for participation.
More profile about the speaker
Pia Mancini | Speaker | TED.com
TEDGlobal 2014

Pia Mancini: How to upgrade democracy for the Internet era

Filmed:
1,305,289 views

Pia Mancini and her colleagues want to upgrade democracy in Argentina and beyond. Through their open-source mobile platform they want to bring citizens inside the legislative process, and run candidates who will listen to what they say.
- Democracy activist
Using software to inspire public debate and enable voter engagement, Pia Mancini hopes to upgrade modern democracy in Argentina and beyond. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:12
I have the feeling that we can all agree
0
744
3107
00:15
that we're moving towards a new
1
3851
2227
00:18
model of the state and society.
2
6078
2865
00:20
But, we're absolutely clueless as to what this is
3
8943
4481
00:25
or what it should be.
4
13424
1686
00:27
It seems like we need to have
5
15110
2027
00:29
a conversation about democracy
6
17137
3002
00:32
in our day and age.
7
20139
2355
00:34
Let's think about it this way:
8
22494
2496
00:36
We are 21st-century citizens, doing our
9
24990
3986
00:40
very, very best to interact with 19th century-designed
institutions
10
28976
6096
00:47
that are based on an information technology of the 15th century.
11
35072
5323
00:52
Let's have a look at some of the
12
40395
1411
00:53
characteristics of this system.
13
41806
2436
00:56
First of all, it's designed for an information technology
14
44242
3505
00:59
that's over 500 years old.
15
47747
3099
01:02
And the best possible system
16
50846
2236
01:05
that could be designed for it
17
53082
1535
01:06
is one where the few make daily decisions
18
54617
4224
01:10
in the name of the many.
19
58841
1434
01:12
And the many get to vote once every
couple of years.
20
60275
5535
01:17
In the second place, the costs of
21
65810
1349
01:19
participating in this system are
22
67159
2292
01:21
incredibly high.
23
69451
1207
01:22
You either have to have a fair
bit of money
24
70658
3042
01:25
and influence, or you have to devote your entire
25
73700
4352
01:30
life to politics.
26
78052
1838
01:31
You have to become a party member
27
79890
1940
01:33
and slowly start working up the ranks
28
81830
3618
01:37
until maybe, one day, you'll get
to sit at a table
29
85448
3916
01:41
where a decision is being made.
30
89364
2569
01:43
And last but not least,
31
91933
1816
01:45
the language of the system —
32
93749
1920
01:47
it's incredibly cryptic.
33
95669
1849
01:49
It's done for lawyers, by lawyers,
34
97518
3184
01:52
and no one else can understand.
35
100702
2846
01:55
So, it's a system where we can
36
103548
2675
01:58
choose our authorities,
37
106223
1935
02:00
but we are completely left out on how
those authorities
38
108158
3836
02:03
reach their decisions.
39
111994
2851
02:06
So, in a day where a new information technology
40
114845
3315
02:10
allows us to participate globally
in any conversation,
41
118160
6296
02:16
our barriers of information are completely lowered
42
124456
3153
02:19
and we can, more than ever before,
43
127609
3479
02:23
express our desires and our concerns.
44
131088
3678
02:26
Our political system remains the same
45
134766
2753
02:29
for the past 200 years
46
137519
3616
02:33
and expects us to be contented with being
simply passive recipients
47
141135
5783
02:38
of a monologue.
48
146918
1743
02:40
So, it's really not surprising that
49
148661
2443
02:43
this kind of system is only able to produce
50
151104
3342
02:46
two kinds of results:
51
154446
1932
02:48
silence or noise.
52
156378
3669
02:52
Silence, in terms of citizens not engaging,
53
160047
3789
02:55
simply not wanting to participate.
54
163836
2896
02:58
There's this commonplace
[idea] that I truly, truly dislike,
55
166732
3278
03:02
and it's this idea that we citizens are naturally
56
170010
4059
03:06
apathetic. That we shun commitment.
57
174069
3106
03:09
But, can you really blame us
58
177175
1527
03:10
for not jumping at the opportunity of going
59
178702
2874
03:13
to the middle of the city in the middle
60
181576
2019
03:15
of a working day to attend, physically,
61
183595
3349
03:18
a public hearing that has no impact
62
186944
3420
03:22
whatsoever?
63
190364
1940
03:24
Conflict is bound to happen between a system
64
192304
4388
03:28
that no longer represents, nor has any dialogue capacity,
65
196692
6195
03:34
and citizens that are increasingly used
66
202887
3078
03:37
to representing themselves.
67
205965
2346
03:40
And, then we find noise:
68
208311
2304
03:42
Chile, Argentina, Brazil, Mexico
Italy, France, Spain, the United States,
69
210615
6379
03:48
they're all democracies.
70
216994
1859
03:50
Their citizens have access to
71
218853
1912
03:52
the ballot boxes. But they still feel the need,
72
220765
4256
03:57
they need to take to the streets in order
to be heard.
73
225021
5510
04:02
To me, it seems like the 18th-century
74
230531
4491
04:07
slogan that was the basis for the formation
75
235022
3060
04:10
of our modern democracies, "No taxation
76
238082
3652
04:13
without representation,"
77
241734
2303
04:16
can now be updated to "No representation
without a conversation."
78
244037
7131
04:23
We want our seat at the table.
79
251168
4536
04:27
And rightly so.
80
255704
2306
04:30
But in order to be part of this conversation,
81
258010
2380
04:32
we need to know what we want to do next,
82
260390
3511
04:35
because political action is being able
83
263901
3207
04:39
to move from agitation
84
267108
2321
04:41
to construction.
85
269429
1864
04:43
My generation has been incredibly good at
86
271293
3837
04:47
using new networks and technologies
87
275130
2621
04:49
to organize protests,
88
277751
2515
04:52
protests that were able to successfully
89
280266
2418
04:54
impose agendas,
90
282684
1959
04:56
roll back extremely pernicious legislation,
91
284643
3423
05:00
and even overthrow authoritarian governments.
92
288066
3201
05:03
And we should be immensely
93
291267
1996
05:05
proud of this.
94
293263
2359
05:07
But, we also must admit that we
95
295622
1848
05:09
haven't been good at using those
96
297470
2488
05:11
same networks and technologies
97
299958
2888
05:14
to successfully articulate an alternative
to what we're seeing
98
302846
5398
05:20
and find the consensus and build
the alliances that are needed
99
308244
4817
05:25
to make it happen.
100
313061
2018
05:27
And so the risk that we face
101
315079
2496
05:29
is that we can create these huge power vacuums
102
317575
3633
05:33
that will very quickly get filled up by de facto
103
321208
4087
05:37
powers, like the military or highly
104
325295
2881
05:40
motivated and already organized groups
105
328176
2899
05:43
that generally lie on the extremes.
106
331075
3670
05:46
But our democracy is neither
107
334745
1952
05:48
just a matter of voting once every
108
336697
2769
05:51
couple of years.
109
339466
1255
05:52
But it's not either the ability to bring millions
onto the streets.
110
340721
5936
05:58
So the question I'd like to raise here,
111
346657
2821
06:01
and I do believe it's the most important
question we need to answer,
112
349478
3522
06:05
is this one:
113
353000
1357
06:06
If Internet is the new printing press,
114
354357
3679
06:10
then what is democracy for the Internet era?
115
358036
4836
06:14
What institutions do we want to build
116
362872
2950
06:17
for the 21st-century society?
117
365822
3959
06:21
I don't have the answer, just in case.
118
369781
3226
06:25
I don't think anyone does.
119
373007
1434
06:26
But I truly believe we can't afford
to ignore this question anymore.
120
374441
5015
06:31
So, I'd like to share our experience
121
379456
1937
06:33
and what we've learned so far
122
381393
1726
06:35
and hopefully contribute two cents
123
383119
2423
06:37
to this conversation.
124
385542
2178
06:39
Two years ago, with a group of friends
from Argentina,
125
387720
3718
06:43
we started thinking, "how can
we get our representatives,
126
391438
4049
06:47
our elected representatives,
127
395487
1884
06:49
to represent us?"
128
397371
4348
06:53
Marshall McLuhan once said that politics
129
401719
4005
06:57
is solving today's problems with yesterday's tools.
130
405724
4695
07:02
So the question that motivated us was,
131
410419
2514
07:04
can we try and solve some of today's problems
132
412933
3894
07:08
with the tools that we use every single
day of our lives?
133
416827
4102
07:12
Our first approach was to design and develop
134
420929
2950
07:15
a piece of software called DemocracyOS.
135
423879
3251
07:19
DemocracyOS is an open-source web application
136
427130
3125
07:22
that is designed to become a bridge
137
430255
3198
07:25
between citizens and their elected representatives
138
433453
3078
07:28
to make it easier for us to participate
from our everyday lives.
139
436531
5708
07:34
So first of all, you can get informed so every new
140
442239
3339
07:37
project that gets introduced in Congress
141
445578
2676
07:40
gets immediately translated and explained
142
448254
3129
07:43
in plain language on this platform.
143
451383
2935
07:46
But we all know that social change
144
454318
3296
07:49
is not going to come from just knowing
145
457614
2758
07:52
more information,
146
460372
1272
07:53
but from doing something with it.
147
461644
2499
07:56
So better access to information
148
464143
2219
07:58
should lead to a conversation
149
466362
2331
08:00
about what we're going to do next,
150
468693
1851
08:02
and DemocracyOS allows for that.
151
470544
2082
08:04
Because we believe that democracy is
152
472626
2286
08:06
not just a matter of stacking up
153
474912
2045
08:08
preferences, one on top of each other,
154
476957
2819
08:11
but that our healthy and robust public debate
155
479776
3708
08:15
should be, once again, one of its fundamental values.
156
483484
4057
08:19
So DemocracyOS is about persuading
and being persuaded.
157
487541
4202
08:23
It's about reaching a consensus
158
491743
2731
08:26
as much as finding a proper way
159
494474
3297
08:29
of channeling our disagreement.
160
497771
2725
08:32
And finally, you can vote
161
500496
1990
08:34
how you would like your elected
representative to vote.
162
502486
4100
08:38
And if you do not feel comfortable
163
506586
1440
08:40
voting on a certain issue,
164
508026
2114
08:42
you can always delegate your vote
165
510140
1884
08:44
to someone else, allowing
166
512024
1743
08:45
for a dynamic and emerging social leadership.
167
513767
5579
08:51
It suddenly became very easy for us
168
519346
1383
08:52
to simply compare these results
169
520729
2715
08:55
with how our representatives were
170
523444
1704
08:57
voting in Congress.
171
525148
1403
08:58
But, it also became very evident that
172
526551
2433
09:00
technology was not going to do the trick.
173
528984
3958
09:04
What we needed to do to was to find
174
532942
1879
09:06
actors that were able to
175
534821
2620
09:09
grab this distributed knowledge
176
537441
2904
09:12
in society and use it to make better
and more fair decisions.
177
540345
6064
09:18
So we reached out to traditional political parties
178
546409
3288
09:21
and we offered them DemocracyOS.
179
549697
2195
09:23
We said, "Look, here you have a platform
that you can use to build
180
551892
4324
09:28
a two-way conversation with your constituencies."
181
556216
3908
09:32
And yes, we failed.
182
560124
2563
09:34
We failed big time.
183
562687
2996
09:37
We were sent to play
outside like little kids.
184
565683
4326
09:42
Amongst other things, we were called naive.
185
570009
2396
09:44
And I must be honest: I think, in hindsight, we were.
186
572405
3796
09:48
Because the challenges that we face, they're not
187
576201
2466
09:50
technological, they're cultural.
188
578667
2885
09:53
Political parties were never willing
189
581552
2394
09:55
to change the way they make their decisions.
190
583946
4004
09:59
So it suddenly became a bit obvious
191
587950
1728
10:01
that if we wanted to move forward
with this idea,
192
589678
3416
10:05
we needed to do it ourselves.
193
593094
2941
10:08
And so we took quite a leap of faith,
194
596035
2009
10:10
and in August last year, we founded
195
598044
2825
10:12
our own political party,
196
600869
2096
10:14
El Partido de la Red,
197
602965
1113
10:16
or the Net Party, in the city of
Buenos Aires.
198
604078
4172
10:20
And taking an even bigger leap of faith,
199
608250
3677
10:23
we ran for elections in October last year
200
611927
4246
10:28
with this idea:
201
616173
1596
10:29
if we want a seat in Congress,
202
617769
2597
10:32
our candidate, our representatives
203
620366
2018
10:34
were always going to vote according to
204
622384
3374
10:37
what citizens decided on DemocracyOS.
205
625758
3509
10:41
Every single project that got introduced
206
629267
2852
10:44
in Congress, we were going vote
207
632119
1727
10:45
according to what citizens decided
on an online platform.
208
633846
4742
10:50
It was our way of hacking the political system.
209
638588
3650
10:54
We understood that if we wanted
210
642238
1926
10:56
to become part of the conversation,
211
644164
2349
10:58
to have a seat at the table,
212
646513
1672
11:00
we needed to become valid stakeholders,
213
648185
3709
11:03
and the only way of doing it is to play by the
system rules.
214
651894
4222
11:08
But we were hacking it in the sense that
215
656116
2989
11:11
we were radically changing the way a political party
216
659105
4088
11:15
makes its decisions.
217
663193
1419
11:16
For the first time, we were making our decisions
218
664612
3503
11:20
together with those who we were
219
668115
2753
11:22
affecting directly by those decisions.
220
670868
4379
11:27
It was a very, very bold move for a two-month-old party
221
675247
3738
11:30
in the city of Buenos Aires.
222
678985
1679
11:32
But it got attention.
223
680664
1575
11:34
We got 22,000 votes, that's 1.2 percent of the votes,
224
682239
4713
11:38
and we came in second for the local options.
225
686952
4176
11:43
So, even if that wasn't enough to win a
226
691128
2200
11:45
seat in Congress, it was enough
227
693328
2126
11:47
for us to become part of the conversation,
228
695454
3183
11:50
to the extent that next month,
229
698637
3571
11:54
Congress, as an institution, is launching
230
702208
3021
11:57
for the first time in Argentina's history,
231
705229
2868
12:00
a DemocracyOS to discuss,
232
708097
2422
12:02
with the citizens, three pieces of legislation:
233
710519
3670
12:06
two on urban transportation and
234
714189
2107
12:08
one on the use of public space.
235
716296
2992
12:11
Of course, our elected representatives are not
236
719288
2789
12:14
saying, "Yes, we're going to vote
237
722077
2017
12:16
according to what citizens decide,"
238
724094
2573
12:18
but they're willing to try.
239
726667
2026
12:20
They're willing to open up a new space
240
728693
3230
12:23
for citizen engagement and hopefully
241
731923
2645
12:26
they'll be willing to listen as well.
242
734568
3256
12:29
Our political system can be transformed,
243
737824
4064
12:33
and not by subverting it, by destroying it,
244
741888
3678
12:37
but by rewiring it with the tools that
245
745566
3619
12:41
Internet affords us now.
246
749185
2752
12:43
But a real challenge is to find, to design
247
751937
4387
12:48
to create, to empower those connectors
248
756324
3429
12:51
that are able to innovate, to transform
249
759753
3819
12:55
noise and silence into signal
250
763572
2668
12:58
and finally bring our democracies
251
766240
1938
13:00
to the 21st century.
252
768178
2328
13:02
I'm not saying it's easy.
253
770506
2731
13:05
But in our experience, we actually stand a chance
254
773237
3583
13:08
of making it work.
255
776820
2334
13:11
And in my heart, it's most definitely
256
779154
3132
13:14
worth trying.
257
782286
1281
13:15
Thank you.
258
783567
1232
13:16
(Applause)
259
784799
6047

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Pia Mancini - Democracy activist
Using software to inspire public debate and enable voter engagement, Pia Mancini hopes to upgrade modern democracy in Argentina and beyond.

Why you should listen
After a disappointing brush with traditional political parties in Argentina, Pia Mancini realized that the existing democracy was disconnected from its citizens -- and that no one was likely to fix it.
 
In response, Mancini helped launch Democracy OS, an open-source mobile platform designed to provide Argentine citizens with immediate input into the legislative process. To promote it, she helped found the Partido de la Red, a new party running candidates committed to legislate only as directed by constituents using online tools for participation.
More profile about the speaker
Pia Mancini | Speaker | TED.com