ABOUT THE SPEAKER
David Autor - Economist
David Autor's work assesses the labor market consequences of technological change and globalization.

Why you should listen

David Autor, one of the leading labor economists in the world and a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, is Ford Professor of Economics and associate department head of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Economics. He is also Faculty Research Associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research, Research Affiliate of the Abdul Jameel Latin Poverty Action Lab, Co-director of the MIT School Effectiveness and Inequality Initiative, Director of the NBER Disability Research Center and former editor in chief of the Journal of Economic Perspectives. He is an elected officer of the American Economic Association and the Society of Labor Economists and a fellow of the Econometric Society.

Autor's work focuses on earnings inequality, employment and feedback between labor market opportunities, household structure and the social/intellectual development of children. He has published extensively in many major academic journals in economics. His best known research formally models and empirically analyzes how computerization substitutes for and complements human labor; asks how the rapid rise of import competition from China has reshaped U.S. manufacturing, upending the conventional economic wisdom that free trade is a free lunch; explores how the economic pressures of globalization are reshaping U.S. electoral politics; and conducts large-scale randomized experiments that test whether generous financial aid grants improve the odds of college completion and long-run economic security of students from low income families. 

Autor has received a number of prestigious prizes, the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Fellowship, the National Science Foundation Career award, and the Sherwin Rosen Prize for outstanding contributions in the field of Labor Economics, and the John T. Dunlop Outstanding Scholar Award in 2006 given by the Labor and Employment Relations Association, to name just a few. His teaching has earned several awards, including MIT’s James A. and Ruth Levitan Award for excellence in teaching, the Undergraduate Economic Association Teaching Award, and the Technology and Public Policy Program’s Best Professor Award.

More profile about the speaker
David Autor | Speaker | TED.com
TEDxCambridge

David Autor: Will automation take away all our jobs?

Filmed:
1,660,740 views

Here's a paradox you don't hear much about: despite a century of creating machines to do our work for us, the proportion of adults in the US with a job has consistently gone up for the past 125 years. Why hasn't human labor become redundant and our skills obsolete? In this talk about the future of work, economist David Autor addresses the question of why there are still so many jobs and comes up with a surprising, hopeful answer.
- Economist
David Autor's work assesses the labor market consequences of technological change and globalization. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:13
Here's a startling fact:
0
1240
1831
00:15
in the 45 years since the introduction
of the automated teller machine,
1
3095
3721
00:18
those vending machines that dispense cash,
2
6840
2856
00:21
the number of human bank tellers
employed in the United States
3
9720
3176
00:24
has roughly doubled,
4
12920
1256
00:26
from about a quarter of a million
to a half a million.
5
14200
3296
00:29
A quarter of a million in 1970
to about a half a million today,
6
17520
3036
00:32
with 100,000 added since the year 2000.
7
20580
4236
00:36
These facts, revealed in a recent book
8
24840
2416
00:39
by Boston University
economist James Bessen,
9
27280
3136
00:42
raise an intriguing question:
10
30440
2176
00:44
what are all those tellers doing,
11
32640
1896
00:46
and why hasn't automation
eliminated their employment by now?
12
34560
4016
00:50
If you think about it,
13
38600
1336
00:51
many of the great inventions
of the last 200 years
14
39960
3136
00:55
were designed to replace human labor.
15
43120
2800
00:58
Tractors were developed
16
46720
1776
01:00
to substitute mechanical power
for human physical toil.
17
48520
4336
01:04
Assembly lines were engineered
18
52880
2336
01:07
to replace inconsistent human handiwork
19
55240
3336
01:10
with machine perfection.
20
58600
1936
01:12
Computers were programmed to swap out
21
60560
3216
01:15
error-prone, inconsistent
human calculation
22
63800
2656
01:18
with digital perfection.
23
66480
1760
01:20
These inventions have worked.
24
68760
2176
01:22
We no longer dig ditches by hand,
25
70960
2056
01:25
pound tools out of wrought iron
26
73040
2056
01:27
or do bookkeeping using actual books.
27
75120
2280
01:30
And yet, the fraction of US adults
employed in the labor market
28
78240
4736
01:35
is higher now in 2016
29
83000
2856
01:37
than it was 125 years ago, in 1890,
30
85880
2736
01:40
and it's risen in just about every decade
31
88640
3016
01:43
in the intervening 125 years.
32
91680
2320
01:46
This poses a paradox.
33
94560
1680
01:48
Our machines increasingly
do our work for us.
34
96760
3056
01:51
Why doesn't this make our labor redundant
and our skills obsolete?
35
99840
4136
01:56
Why are there still so many jobs?
36
104000
3696
01:59
(Laughter)
37
107720
1736
02:01
I'm going to try to answer
that question tonight,
38
109480
2336
02:03
and along the way, I'm going to tell you
what this means for the future of work
39
111840
3736
02:07
and the challenges that automation
does and does not pose
40
115600
4176
02:11
for our society.
41
119800
1440
02:14
Why are there so many jobs?
42
122520
1760
02:17
There are actually two fundamental
economic principles at stake.
43
125680
3376
02:21
One has to do with human genius
44
129080
2696
02:23
and creativity.
45
131800
1416
02:25
The other has to do
with human insatiability,
46
133240
2856
02:28
or greed, if you like.
47
136120
1576
02:29
I'm going to call the first of these
the O-ring principle,
48
137720
2736
02:32
and it determines
the type of work that we do.
49
140480
2176
02:34
The second principle
is the never-get-enough principle,
50
142680
2616
02:37
and it determines how many jobs
there actually are.
51
145320
3480
02:41
Let's start with the O-ring.
52
149440
2336
02:43
ATMs, automated teller machines,
53
151800
2776
02:46
had two countervailing effects
on bank teller employment.
54
154600
3336
02:49
As you would expect,
they replaced a lot of teller tasks.
55
157960
2696
02:52
The number of tellers per branch
fell by about a third.
56
160680
2680
02:56
But banks quickly discovered that it
also was cheaper to open new branches,
57
164240
3816
03:00
and the number of bank branches
increased by about 40 percent
58
168080
3136
03:03
in the same time period.
59
171240
1496
03:04
The net result was more branches
and more tellers.
60
172760
4080
03:09
But those tellers were doing
somewhat different work.
61
177440
3416
03:12
As their routine,
cash-handling tasks receded,
62
180880
3656
03:16
they became less like checkout clerks
63
184560
2136
03:18
and more like salespeople,
64
186720
1816
03:20
forging relationships with customers,
65
188560
2056
03:22
solving problems
66
190640
1216
03:23
and introducing them to new products
like credit cards, loans and investments:
67
191880
4216
03:28
more tellers doing
a more cognitively demanding job.
68
196120
3840
03:32
There's a general principle here.
69
200840
1640
03:35
Most of the work that we do
70
203120
1696
03:36
requires a multiplicity of skills,
71
204840
3480
03:41
and brains and brawn,
72
209160
3176
03:44
technical expertise and intuitive mastery,
73
212360
3616
03:48
perspiration and inspiration
in the words of Thomas Edison.
74
216000
2960
03:51
In general, automating
some subset of those tasks
75
219480
3256
03:54
doesn't make the other ones unnecessary.
76
222760
2216
03:57
In fact, it makes them more important.
77
225000
2960
04:01
It increases their economic value.
78
229080
1976
04:03
Let me give you a stark example.
79
231080
2016
04:05
In 1986, the space shuttle Challenger
80
233120
3816
04:08
exploded and crashed back down to Earth
81
236960
2296
04:11
less than two minutes after takeoff.
82
239280
1920
04:13
The cause of that crash, it turned out,
83
241720
3096
04:16
was an inexpensive rubber O-ring
in the booster rocket
84
244840
3536
04:20
that had frozen on the launchpad
the night before
85
248400
2856
04:23
and failed catastrophically
moments after takeoff.
86
251280
3376
04:26
In this multibillion dollar enterprise
87
254680
2815
04:29
that simple rubber O-ring
88
257519
1697
04:31
made the difference
between mission success
89
259240
2575
04:33
and the calamitous death
of seven astronauts.
90
261839
2841
04:37
An ingenious metaphor
for this tragic setting
91
265600
3736
04:41
is the O-ring production function,
92
269360
2216
04:43
named by Harvard economist Michael Kremer
93
271600
2496
04:46
after the Challenger disaster.
94
274120
2016
04:48
The O-ring production function
conceives of the work
95
276160
2576
04:50
as a series of interlocking steps,
96
278760
2336
04:53
links in a chain.
97
281120
1256
04:54
Every one of those links must hold
for the mission to succeed.
98
282400
3696
04:58
If any of them fails,
99
286120
2136
05:00
the mission, or the product
or the service,
100
288280
3296
05:03
comes crashing down.
101
291600
1320
05:05
This precarious situation
has a surprisingly positive implication,
102
293560
4936
05:10
which is that improvements
103
298520
1896
05:12
in the reliability
of any one link in the chain
104
300440
2976
05:15
increases the value
of improving any of the other links.
105
303440
3776
05:19
Concretely, if most of the links
are brittle and prone to breakage,
106
307240
4976
05:24
the fact that your link
is not that reliable
107
312240
2456
05:26
is not that important.
108
314720
1256
05:28
Probably something else will break anyway.
109
316000
2000
05:30
But as all the other links
become robust and reliable,
110
318024
3992
05:34
the importance of your link
becomes more essential.
111
322040
3496
05:37
In the limit, everything depends upon it.
112
325560
2320
05:40
The reason the O-ring was critical
to space shuttle Challenger
113
328640
3536
05:44
is because everything else
worked perfectly.
114
332200
2720
05:47
If the Challenger were
kind of the space era equivalent
115
335480
2576
05:50
of Microsoft Windows 2000 --
116
338080
2536
05:52
(Laughter)
117
340640
2096
05:54
the reliability of the O-ring
wouldn't have mattered
118
342760
2456
05:57
because the machine would have crashed.
119
345240
1858
05:59
(Laughter)
120
347122
1480
06:01
Here's the broader point.
121
349960
1576
06:03
In much of the work that we do,
we are the O-rings.
122
351560
3816
06:07
Yes, ATMs could do
certain cash-handling tasks
123
355400
3536
06:10
faster and better than tellers,
124
358960
3016
06:14
but that didn't make tellers superfluous.
125
362000
2056
06:16
It increased the importance
of their problem-solving skills
126
364080
3296
06:19
and their relationships with customers.
127
367400
2616
06:22
The same principle applies
if we're building a building,
128
370040
3296
06:25
if we're diagnosing
and caring for a patient,
129
373360
2536
06:27
or if we are teaching a class
130
375920
3136
06:31
to a roomful of high schoolers.
131
379080
2456
06:33
As our tools improve,
132
381560
2376
06:35
technology magnifies our leverage
133
383960
2096
06:38
and increases the importance
of our expertise
134
386080
3896
06:42
and our judgment and our creativity.
135
390000
2200
06:45
And that brings me
to the second principle:
136
393000
2240
06:48
never get enough.
137
396160
1200
06:50
You may be thinking, OK, O-ring, got it,
138
398280
2416
06:52
that says the jobs that people do
will be important.
139
400720
3096
06:55
They can't be done by machines,
but they still need to be done.
140
403840
2976
06:58
But that doesn't tell me
how many jobs there will need to be.
141
406840
2896
07:01
If you think about it,
isn't it kind of self-evident
142
409760
2456
07:04
that once we get sufficiently
productive at something,
143
412240
2536
07:06
we've basically
worked our way out of a job?
144
414800
2096
07:08
In 1900, 40 percent of all US employment
145
416920
2776
07:11
was on farms.
146
419720
1256
07:13
Today, it's less than two percent.
147
421000
2256
07:15
Why are there so few farmers today?
148
423280
2176
07:17
It's not because we're eating less.
149
425480
1856
07:19
(Laughter)
150
427360
2656
07:22
A century of productivity
growth in farming
151
430040
2736
07:24
means that now,
a couple of million farmers
152
432800
2176
07:27
can feed a nation of 320 million.
153
435000
2736
07:29
That's amazing progress,
154
437760
1656
07:31
but it also means there are
only so many O-ring jobs left in farming.
155
439440
4136
07:35
So clearly, technology can eliminate jobs.
156
443600
3016
07:38
Farming is only one example.
157
446640
1736
07:40
There are many others like it.
158
448400
1640
07:43
But what's true about a single product
or service or industry
159
451440
3976
07:47
has never been true
about the economy as a whole.
160
455440
2776
07:50
Many of the industries
in which we now work --
161
458240
2496
07:52
health and medicine,
162
460760
2136
07:54
finance and insurance,
163
462920
2216
07:57
electronics and computing --
164
465160
1640
07:59
were tiny or barely existent
a century ago.
165
467720
2736
08:02
Many of the products
that we spend a lot of our money on --
166
470480
2816
08:05
air conditioners, sport utility vehicles,
167
473320
2136
08:07
computers and mobile devices --
168
475480
1696
08:09
were unattainably expensive,
169
477200
1656
08:10
or just hadn't been invented
a century ago.
170
478880
2440
08:13
As automation frees our time,
increases the scope of what is possible,
171
481920
4976
08:18
we invent new products,
new ideas, new services
172
486920
3216
08:22
that command our attention,
173
490160
1576
08:23
occupy our time
174
491760
1536
08:25
and spur consumption.
175
493320
1640
08:27
You may think some
of these things are frivolous --
176
495760
3216
08:31
extreme yoga, adventure tourism,
177
499000
2776
08:33
Pokémon GO --
178
501800
1256
08:35
and I might agree with you.
179
503080
1320
08:36
But people desire these things,
and they're willing to work hard for them.
180
504979
3477
08:40
The average worker in 2015
181
508480
2176
08:42
wanting to attain
the average living standard in 1915
182
510680
4256
08:46
could do so by working
just 17 weeks a year,
183
514960
3336
08:50
one third of the time.
184
518320
1440
08:52
But most people don't choose to do that.
185
520240
2176
08:54
They are willing to work hard
186
522440
1695
08:56
to harvest the technological bounty
that is available to them.
187
524159
3881
09:00
Material abundance has never
eliminated perceived scarcity.
188
528480
4096
09:04
In the words of economist
Thorstein Veblen,
189
532600
2576
09:07
invention is the mother of necessity.
190
535200
2640
09:11
Now ...
191
539520
1200
09:13
So if you accept these two principles,
192
541400
1856
09:15
the O-ring principle
and the never-get-enough principle,
193
543280
2896
09:18
then you agree with me.
194
546200
1336
09:19
There will be jobs.
195
547560
1400
09:21
Does that mean there's
nothing to worry about?
196
549560
2176
09:23
Automation, employment, robots and jobs --
197
551760
2776
09:26
it'll all take care of itself?
198
554560
1920
09:29
No.
199
557120
1216
09:30
That is not my argument.
200
558360
2056
09:32
Automation creates wealth
201
560440
2536
09:35
by allowing us to do
more work in less time.
202
563000
2576
09:37
There is no economic law
203
565600
1576
09:39
that says that we
will use that wealth well,
204
567200
2776
09:42
and that is worth worrying about.
205
570000
1800
09:44
Consider two countries,
206
572800
1816
09:46
Norway and Saudi Arabia.
207
574640
2136
09:48
Both oil-rich nations,
208
576800
1576
09:50
it's like they have money
spurting out of a hole in the ground.
209
578400
3576
09:54
(Laughter)
210
582000
1536
09:55
But they haven't used that wealth
equally well to foster human prosperity,
211
583560
5216
10:00
human prospering.
212
588800
1200
10:02
Norway is a thriving democracy.
213
590440
2736
10:05
By and large, its citizens
work and play well together.
214
593200
3656
10:08
It's typically numbered
between first and fourth
215
596880
3016
10:11
in rankings of national happiness.
216
599920
2736
10:14
Saudi Arabia is an absolute monarchy
217
602680
2656
10:17
in which many citizens
lack a path for personal advancement.
218
605360
3616
10:21
It's typically ranked 35th
among nations in happiness,
219
609000
3496
10:24
which is low for such a wealthy nation.
220
612520
2096
10:26
Just by way of comparison,
221
614640
1336
10:28
the US is typically ranked
around 12th or 13th.
222
616000
2800
10:31
The difference between these two countries
223
619400
2096
10:33
is not their wealth
224
621520
1256
10:34
and it's not their technology.
225
622800
1736
10:36
It's their institutions.
226
624560
1320
10:38
Norway has invested to build a society
227
626560
3176
10:41
with opportunity and economic mobility.
228
629760
3336
10:45
Saudi Arabia has raised living standards
229
633120
2176
10:47
while frustrating
many other human strivings.
230
635320
3256
10:50
Two countries, both wealthy,
231
638600
2776
10:53
not equally well off.
232
641400
1720
10:55
And this brings me
to the challenge that we face today,
233
643880
4336
11:00
the challenge that
automation poses for us.
234
648240
2136
11:02
The challenge is not
that we're running out of work.
235
650400
2456
11:04
The US has added 14 million jobs
236
652880
1936
11:06
since the depths of the Great Recession.
237
654840
2136
11:09
The challenge is that many of those jobs
238
657000
2536
11:11
are not good jobs,
239
659560
1296
11:12
and many citizens
cannot qualify for the good jobs
240
660880
3096
11:16
that are being created.
241
664000
1200
11:17
Employment growth in the United States
and in much of the developed world
242
665840
3496
11:21
looks something like a barbell
243
669360
1456
11:22
with increasing poundage
on either end of the bar.
244
670840
3376
11:26
On the one hand,
245
674240
1216
11:27
you have high-education, high-wage jobs
246
675480
2816
11:30
like doctors and nurses,
programmers and engineers,
247
678320
3576
11:33
marketing and sales managers.
248
681920
1736
11:35
Employment is robust in these jobs,
employment growth.
249
683680
3016
11:38
Similarly, employment growth
is robust in many low-skill,
250
686720
4016
11:42
low-education jobs like food service,
251
690760
3056
11:45
cleaning, security,
252
693840
2256
11:48
home health aids.
253
696120
1240
11:50
Simultaneously, employment is shrinking
254
698080
3096
11:53
in many middle-education,
middle-wage, middle-class jobs,
255
701200
4056
11:57
like blue-collar production
and operative positions
256
705280
3816
12:01
and white-collar
clerical and sales positions.
257
709120
2976
12:04
The reasons behind this contracting middle
258
712120
2256
12:06
are not mysterious.
259
714400
1216
12:07
Many of those middle-skill jobs
260
715640
1976
12:09
use well-understood rules and procedures
261
717640
2496
12:12
that can increasingly
be codified in software
262
720160
3096
12:15
and executed by computers.
263
723280
2360
12:18
The challenge that
this phenomenon creates,
264
726200
3376
12:21
what economists call
employment polarization,
265
729600
2536
12:24
is that it knocks out rungs
in the economic ladder,
266
732160
2616
12:26
shrinks the size of the middle class
267
734800
1816
12:28
and threatens to make us
a more stratified society.
268
736640
3136
12:31
On the one hand, a set of highly paid,
highly educated professionals
269
739800
4056
12:35
doing interesting work,
270
743880
1416
12:37
on the other, a large number
of citizens in low-paid jobs
271
745320
3416
12:40
whose primary responsibility is to see
to the comfort and health of the affluent.
272
748760
5656
12:46
That is not my vision of progress,
273
754440
2336
12:48
and I doubt that it is yours.
274
756800
1880
12:51
But here is some encouraging news.
275
759440
2016
12:53
We have faced equally momentous
economic transformations in the past,
276
761480
4856
12:58
and we have come
through them successfully.
277
766360
2696
13:01
In the late 1800s and early 1900s,
278
769080
4936
13:06
when automation was eliminating
vast numbers of agricultural jobs --
279
774040
4536
13:10
remember that tractor? --
280
778600
2336
13:12
the farm states faced a threat
of mass unemployment,
281
780960
2696
13:15
a generation of youth
no longer needed on the farm
282
783680
3816
13:19
but not prepared for industry.
283
787520
1760
13:22
Rising to this challenge,
284
790080
1576
13:23
they took the radical step
285
791680
1496
13:25
of requiring that
their entire youth population
286
793200
2816
13:28
remain in school
and continue their education
287
796040
2856
13:30
to the ripe old age of 16.
288
798920
2120
13:33
This was called the high school movement,
289
801600
1976
13:35
and it was a radically
expensive thing to do.
290
803600
2816
13:38
Not only did they have
to invest in the schools,
291
806440
2256
13:40
but those kids couldn't work
at their jobs.
292
808720
2696
13:43
It also turned out to be
one of the best investments
293
811440
3296
13:46
the US made in the 20th century.
294
814760
2216
13:49
It gave us the most skilled,
the most flexible
295
817000
2336
13:51
and the most productive
workforce in the world.
296
819360
2696
13:54
To see how well this worked,
imagine taking the labor force of 1899
297
822080
4536
13:58
and bringing them into the present.
298
826640
2216
14:00
Despite their strong backs
and good characters,
299
828880
2936
14:03
many of them would lack
the basic literacy and numeracy skills
300
831840
3776
14:07
to do all but the most mundane jobs.
301
835640
2936
14:10
Many of them would be unemployable.
302
838600
2240
14:13
What this example highlights
is the primacy of our institutions,
303
841840
3736
14:17
most especially our schools,
304
845600
1776
14:19
in allowing us to reap the harvest
305
847400
2536
14:21
of our technological prosperity.
306
849960
2296
14:24
It's foolish to say
there's nothing to worry about.
307
852280
2416
14:26
Clearly we can get this wrong.
308
854720
2200
14:29
If the US had not invested
in its schools and in its skills
309
857640
3496
14:33
a century ago with
the high school movement,
310
861160
2256
14:35
we would be a less prosperous,
311
863440
1656
14:37
a less mobile and probably
a lot less happy society.
312
865120
3616
14:40
But it's equally foolish
to say that our fates are sealed.
313
868760
2736
14:43
That's not decided by the machines.
314
871520
1696
14:45
It's not even decided by the market.
315
873240
1736
14:47
It's decided by us
and by our institutions.
316
875000
2640
14:50
Now, I started this talk with a paradox.
317
878360
2576
14:52
Our machines increasingly
do our work for us.
318
880960
2656
14:55
Why doesn't that make
our labor superfluous,
319
883640
2256
14:57
our skills redundant?
320
885920
1216
14:59
Isn't it obvious that the road
to our economic and social hell
321
887160
3416
15:02
is paved with our own great inventions?
322
890600
2200
15:06
History has repeatedly offered
an answer to that paradox.
323
894040
4176
15:10
The first part of the answer
is that technology magnifies our leverage,
324
898240
3616
15:13
increases the importance, the added value
325
901880
2616
15:16
of our expertise,
our judgment and our creativity.
326
904520
3536
15:20
That's the O-ring.
327
908080
1200
15:21
The second part of the answer
is our endless inventiveness
328
909880
2736
15:24
and bottomless desires
329
912640
1456
15:26
means that we never get enough,
never get enough.
330
914120
2336
15:28
There's always new work to do.
331
916480
2160
15:31
Adjusting to the rapid pace
of technological change
332
919960
3336
15:35
creates real challenges,
333
923320
1456
15:36
seen most clearly
in our polarized labor market
334
924800
2976
15:39
and the threat that it poses
to economic mobility.
335
927800
2520
15:43
Rising to this challenge is not automatic.
336
931320
2440
15:46
It's not costless.
337
934400
1496
15:47
It's not easy.
338
935920
1416
15:49
But it is feasible.
339
937360
1200
15:51
And here is some encouraging news.
340
939120
1816
15:52
Because of our amazing productivity,
341
940960
2136
15:55
we're rich.
342
943120
1256
15:56
Of course we can afford
to invest in ourselves and in our children
343
944400
3136
15:59
as America did a hundred years ago
with the high school movement.
344
947560
3336
16:02
Arguably, we can't afford not to.
345
950920
2280
16:06
Now, you may be thinking,
346
954120
1776
16:07
Professor Autor has told us
a heartwarming tale
347
955920
2856
16:10
about the distant past,
348
958800
1776
16:12
the recent past,
349
960600
1376
16:14
maybe the present,
but probably not the future.
350
962000
3296
16:17
Because everybody knows
that this time is different.
351
965320
3936
16:21
Right? Is this time different?
352
969280
2816
16:24
Of course this time is different.
353
972120
1896
16:26
Every time is different.
354
974040
1696
16:27
On numerous occasions
in the last 200 years,
355
975760
3616
16:31
scholars and activists
have raised the alarm
356
979400
2776
16:34
that we are running out of work
and making ourselves obsolete:
357
982200
3536
16:37
for example, the Luddites
in the early 1800s;
358
985760
4616
16:42
US Secretary of Labor James Davis
359
990400
2936
16:45
in the mid-1920s;
360
993360
2416
16:47
Nobel Prize-winning economist
Wassily Leontief in 1982;
361
995800
5176
16:53
and of course, many scholars,
362
1001000
3256
16:56
pundits, technologists
363
1004280
2136
16:58
and media figures today.
364
1006440
1840
17:01
These predictions strike me as arrogant.
365
1009600
3320
17:05
These self-proclaimed oracles
are in effect saying,
366
1013800
2696
17:08
"If I can't think of what people
will do for work in the future,
367
1016520
3416
17:11
then you, me and our kids
368
1019960
2896
17:14
aren't going to think of it either."
369
1022880
1715
17:17
I don't have the guts
370
1025760
1935
17:19
to take that bet against human ingenuity.
371
1027720
3176
17:22
Look, I can't tell you
what people are going to do for work
372
1030920
2976
17:25
a hundred years from now.
373
1033920
1896
17:27
But the future doesn't hinge
on my imagination.
374
1035839
2601
17:31
If I were a farmer in Iowa
in the year 1900,
375
1039280
3776
17:35
and an economist from the 21st century
teleported down to my field
376
1043079
3537
17:38
and said, "Hey, guess what, farmer Autor,
377
1046640
2520
17:42
in the next hundred years,
378
1050000
1536
17:43
agricultural employment is going to fall
from 40 percent of all jobs
379
1051560
3776
17:47
to two percent
380
1055360
1216
17:48
purely due to rising productivity.
381
1056600
2000
17:51
What do you think the other
38 percent of workers are going to do?"
382
1059400
3160
17:55
I would not have said, "Oh, we got this.
383
1063400
2816
17:58
We'll do app development,
radiological medicine,
384
1066240
2856
18:01
yoga instruction, Bitmoji."
385
1069120
2976
18:04
(Laughter)
386
1072120
1536
18:05
I wouldn't have had a clue.
387
1073680
1286
18:07
But I hope I would have had
the wisdom to say,
388
1075840
2496
18:10
"Wow, a 95 percent reduction
in farm employment
389
1078360
4016
18:14
with no shortage of food.
390
1082400
2136
18:16
That's an amazing amount of progress.
391
1084560
2416
18:19
I hope that humanity
finds something remarkable to do
392
1087000
3376
18:22
with all of that prosperity."
393
1090400
1880
18:25
And by and large, I would say that it has.
394
1093120
3080
18:29
Thank you very much.
395
1097960
1256
18:31
(Applause)
396
1099240
5055

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
David Autor - Economist
David Autor's work assesses the labor market consequences of technological change and globalization.

Why you should listen

David Autor, one of the leading labor economists in the world and a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, is Ford Professor of Economics and associate department head of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Economics. He is also Faculty Research Associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research, Research Affiliate of the Abdul Jameel Latin Poverty Action Lab, Co-director of the MIT School Effectiveness and Inequality Initiative, Director of the NBER Disability Research Center and former editor in chief of the Journal of Economic Perspectives. He is an elected officer of the American Economic Association and the Society of Labor Economists and a fellow of the Econometric Society.

Autor's work focuses on earnings inequality, employment and feedback between labor market opportunities, household structure and the social/intellectual development of children. He has published extensively in many major academic journals in economics. His best known research formally models and empirically analyzes how computerization substitutes for and complements human labor; asks how the rapid rise of import competition from China has reshaped U.S. manufacturing, upending the conventional economic wisdom that free trade is a free lunch; explores how the economic pressures of globalization are reshaping U.S. electoral politics; and conducts large-scale randomized experiments that test whether generous financial aid grants improve the odds of college completion and long-run economic security of students from low income families. 

Autor has received a number of prestigious prizes, the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Fellowship, the National Science Foundation Career award, and the Sherwin Rosen Prize for outstanding contributions in the field of Labor Economics, and the John T. Dunlop Outstanding Scholar Award in 2006 given by the Labor and Employment Relations Association, to name just a few. His teaching has earned several awards, including MIT’s James A. and Ruth Levitan Award for excellence in teaching, the Undergraduate Economic Association Teaching Award, and the Technology and Public Policy Program’s Best Professor Award.

More profile about the speaker
David Autor | Speaker | TED.com