ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Philip K. Howard - Legal activist
Philip K. Howard is the founder of Common Good, a drive to overhaul the US legal system. His new book is 'The Rule of Nobody.'

Why you should listen

We love to laugh at America’s warning-label culture (the bag of airline peanuts that says Caution: Contains Nuts). But more troubling are the everyday acts of silence and loss promoted by the fear of being sued. Your doctor might not speak to you frankly; your kids’ principal might not feel he has the right to remove bad teachers.

Attorney Philip K. Howard founded the nonpartisan group Common Good to combat this culture and reform several key areas of our legal system. Among Common Good’s suggestions: specialized health care courts, which would give lower but smarter awards, and a project with the NYC Board of Ed and the Teachers Union to overhaul the disciplinary system in New York public schools. His new book is The Rule of Nobody: Saving America from Dead Laws and Broken Government.

More profile about the speaker
Philip K. Howard | Speaker | TED.com
TED2010

Philip K. Howard: Four ways to fix a broken legal system

Filmed:
713,820 views

The land of the free has become a legal minefield, says Philip K. Howard -- especially for teachers and doctors, whose work has been paralyzed by fear of suits. What's the answer? A lawyer himself, Howard has four propositions for simplifying US law.
- Legal activist
Philip K. Howard is the founder of Common Good, a drive to overhaul the US legal system. His new book is 'The Rule of Nobody.' Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:15
I've always been interested in
0
0
3000
00:18
the relationship of formal structures and human behavior.
1
3000
4000
00:22
If you build a wide road out to the outskirts of town, people will move there.
2
7000
4000
00:26
Well, law is also a powerful driver
3
11000
4000
00:30
of human behavior.
4
15000
2000
00:32
And what I'd like to discuss today
5
17000
2000
00:34
is the need to overhaul and simplify the law
6
19000
3000
00:37
to release the energy and passion
7
22000
3000
00:40
of Americans, so that we can begin
8
25000
2000
00:42
to address the challenges of our society.
9
27000
3000
00:45
You might have noticed that law has grown
10
30000
3000
00:48
progressively denser in your lives over the last decade or two.
11
33000
3000
00:51
If you run a business, it's hard to do much of anything
12
36000
4000
00:55
without calling your general counsel.
13
40000
2000
00:57
Indeed, there is this phenomenon now
14
42000
2000
00:59
where the general counsels are becoming the CEOs.
15
44000
3000
01:02
It's a little bit like the Invasion Of The Body Snatchers.
16
47000
3000
01:05
You need a lawyer to run the company,
17
50000
2000
01:07
because there's so much law.
18
52000
2000
01:09
But it's not just business that's affected by this,
19
54000
3000
01:12
it's actually pressed down into the daily activities
20
57000
2000
01:14
of ordinary people.
21
59000
2000
01:16
A couple of years ago I was hiking near Cody, Wyoming.
22
61000
4000
01:20
It was in a grizzly bear preserve,
23
65000
2000
01:22
although no one told me that before we went.
24
67000
2000
01:24
And our guide was a local science teacher.
25
69000
4000
01:28
She was wholly unconcerned about the bears,
26
73000
2000
01:30
but she was terrified of lawyers.
27
75000
3000
01:33
The stories started pouring out.
28
78000
2000
01:35
She'd just been involved in an episode where a parent
29
80000
2000
01:37
had threatened to sue the school
30
82000
3000
01:40
because she lowered the grade of the student by 10 percent
31
85000
2000
01:42
when he turned the paper in late.
32
87000
2000
01:44
The principal didn't want to stand up to the parent
33
89000
2000
01:46
because he didn't want to get dragged into some legal proceedings.
34
91000
3000
01:49
So, she had to go to meeting after meeting, same arguments made
35
94000
2000
01:51
over and over again.
36
96000
2000
01:53
After 30 days of sleepless nights, she finally capitulated
37
98000
3000
01:56
and raised the grade.
38
101000
2000
01:58
She said, "Life's too short, I just can't keep going with this."
39
103000
3000
02:01
About the same time, she was going to take two students to a leadership conference
40
106000
3000
02:04
in Laramie, which is a couple of hours away,
41
109000
3000
02:07
and she was going to drive them in her car,
42
112000
2000
02:09
but the school said, "No, you can't drive them in the car
43
114000
2000
02:11
for liability reasons.
44
116000
2000
02:13
You have to go in a school bus."
45
118000
2000
02:15
So, they provided a bus that held 60 people
46
120000
3000
02:18
and drove the three of them back and forth
47
123000
2000
02:20
several hours to Laramie.
48
125000
2000
02:22
Her husband is also a science teacher,
49
127000
3000
02:25
and he takes his biology class on a hike
50
130000
3000
02:28
in the nearby national park.
51
133000
3000
02:31
But he was told he couldn't go on the hike this year
52
136000
2000
02:33
because one of the students in the class was disabled,
53
138000
3000
02:36
so the other 25 students didn't get to go on the hike either.
54
141000
4000
02:40
At the end of this day I could have filled a book
55
145000
3000
02:43
just with stories about law
56
148000
2000
02:45
from this one teacher.
57
150000
2000
02:47
Now, we've been taught to believe that law
58
152000
2000
02:49
is the foundation of freedom.
59
154000
3000
02:52
But somehow or another, in the last couple of decades,
60
157000
2000
02:54
the land of the free has become a legal minefield.
61
159000
4000
02:58
It's really changed our lives in ways
62
163000
3000
03:01
that are sort of imperceptible;
63
166000
2000
03:03
and yet, when you pull back, you see it all the time.
64
168000
2000
03:05
It's changed the way we talk. I was talking to a
65
170000
2000
03:07
pediatrician friend
66
172000
2000
03:09
in North Carolina. He said,
67
174000
2000
03:11
"Well you know, I don't deal with patients the same way anymore.
68
176000
3000
03:14
You wouldn't want to say something off-the-cuff
69
179000
3000
03:17
that might be used against you."
70
182000
3000
03:20
This is a doctor, whose life is caring for people.
71
185000
3000
03:23
My own law firm has a list of questions
72
188000
3000
03:26
that I'm not allowed to ask
73
191000
2000
03:28
when interviewing candidates,
74
193000
2000
03:30
such as the sinister question,
75
195000
2000
03:32
bulging with hidden motives and innuendo,
76
197000
4000
03:36
"Where are you from?"
77
201000
2000
03:38
(Laughter)
78
203000
2000
03:40
Now for 20 years, tort reformers have been sounding the alarm
79
205000
4000
03:44
that lawsuits are out of control.
80
209000
2000
03:46
And we read every once in while
81
211000
2000
03:48
about these crazy lawsuits, like the guy
82
213000
2000
03:50
in the District of Columbia who sued his dry cleaners for 54 million dollars
83
215000
4000
03:54
because they lost his pair of pants.
84
219000
2000
03:56
The case went on for two years; I think he's still appealing the case.
85
221000
3000
03:59
But the reality is, these crazy cases
86
224000
3000
04:02
are relatively rare. They don't usually win.
87
227000
3000
04:05
And the total of direct tort cost
88
230000
2000
04:07
in this country is about two percent,
89
232000
2000
04:09
which is twice as much as in other countries
90
234000
3000
04:12
but, as taxes go, hardly crippling.
91
237000
4000
04:16
But the direct costs are really only the tip of the iceberg.
92
241000
4000
04:20
What's happened here, again,
93
245000
2000
04:22
almost without our knowing,
94
247000
2000
04:24
is our culture has changed.
95
249000
3000
04:27
People no longer feel free
96
252000
2000
04:29
to act on their best judgment.
97
254000
2000
04:31
So, what do we do about it?
98
256000
2000
04:33
We certainly don't want to give up the rights,
99
258000
2000
04:35
when people do something wrong, to seek redress in the courts.
100
260000
3000
04:38
We need regulation to make sure
101
263000
2000
04:40
people don't pollute and such.
102
265000
2000
04:42
We lack even a vocabulary to deal with
103
267000
2000
04:44
this problem,
104
269000
2000
04:46
and that's because we have the wrong frame of reference.
105
271000
3000
04:49
We've been trained to think that the way to look at every dispute,
106
274000
3000
04:52
every issue, is a matter of kind of individual rights.
107
277000
3000
04:55
And so we peer through a legal microscope, and look at everything.
108
280000
3000
04:58
Is it possible that there are extenuating circumstances
109
283000
4000
05:02
that explain why Johnny
110
287000
2000
05:04
turned his paper in late in Cody, Wyoming?
111
289000
4000
05:08
Is it possible that the doctor
112
293000
2000
05:10
might have done something differently when the sick person gets sicker?
113
295000
3000
05:13
And of course the hindsight bias is perfect.
114
298000
3000
05:16
There's always a different scenario that you can sketch out
115
301000
3000
05:19
where it's possible that something could have been done differently.
116
304000
2000
05:21
And yet, we've been trained to squint into this legal microscope,
117
306000
5000
05:26
hoping that we can judge any dispute
118
311000
3000
05:29
against the standard of a perfect society,
119
314000
3000
05:32
where everyone will agree what's fair,
120
317000
2000
05:34
and where accidents will be extinct,
121
319000
3000
05:37
risk will be no more.
122
322000
3000
05:40
Of course, this is Utopia;
123
325000
2000
05:42
it's a formula for paralysis, not freedom.
124
327000
3000
05:45
It's not the basis of the rule of law,
125
330000
2000
05:47
it's not the basis of a free society.
126
332000
3000
05:50
So, now I have the first of four propositions
127
335000
3000
05:53
I'm going to leave with you about how you simplify the law:
128
338000
3000
05:56
You've got to judge law mainly
129
341000
2000
05:58
by its effect on the broader society,
130
343000
3000
06:01
not individual disputes.
131
346000
2000
06:03
Absolutely vital.
132
348000
2000
06:05
So, let's pull back from the anecdotes for a second
133
350000
2000
06:07
and look at our society from high above.
134
352000
2000
06:09
Is it working?
135
354000
2000
06:11
What does the macro-data show us?
136
356000
2000
06:13
Well, the healthcare system has been transformed:
137
358000
3000
06:16
a culture pervaded with defensiveness,
138
361000
3000
06:19
universal distrust of the system of justice,
139
364000
3000
06:22
universal practice of defensive medicine.
140
367000
3000
06:25
It's very hard to measure
141
370000
2000
06:27
because there are mixed motives.
142
372000
2000
06:29
Doctors can make more on ordering tests sometimes,
143
374000
3000
06:32
and also they no longer even know what's right or wrong.
144
377000
3000
06:35
But reliable estimates
145
380000
2000
06:37
range between 60 billion and
146
382000
2000
06:39
200 billion dollars per year.
147
384000
4000
06:43
That's enough to provide care to all the people
148
388000
3000
06:46
in America who don't have it.
149
391000
2000
06:48
The trial lawyers say, "Well, this legal fear
150
393000
2000
06:50
makes doctors practice better medicine."
151
395000
2000
06:52
Well that's been studied too, by the Institute of Medicine
152
397000
2000
06:54
and others. Turns out that's not the case.
153
399000
3000
06:57
The fear has chilled professional interaction
154
402000
3000
07:00
so thousands of tragic errors occur
155
405000
3000
07:03
because doctors are afraid
156
408000
3000
07:06
to speak up: "Are you sure that's the right dosage?"
157
411000
3000
07:09
Because they're not sure,
158
414000
2000
07:11
and they don't want to take legal responsibility.
159
416000
3000
07:14
Let's go to schools.
160
419000
2000
07:16
As we saw with the teacher in Cody, Wyoming,
161
421000
3000
07:19
she seems to be affected by the law.
162
424000
2000
07:21
Well it turns out the schools are literally drowning in law.
163
426000
4000
07:25
You could have a separate section of a law library
164
430000
3000
07:28
around each of the following legal concepts:
165
433000
3000
07:31
due process, special education,
166
436000
2000
07:33
no child left behind,
167
438000
3000
07:36
zero tolerance, work rules ...
168
441000
2000
07:38
it goes on. We did a study
169
443000
2000
07:40
of all the rules that affect one school
170
445000
3000
07:43
in New York. The Board of Ed. had no idea.
171
448000
3000
07:46
Tens of thousands of discreet rules,
172
451000
2000
07:48
60 steps to suspend a student from school:
173
453000
4000
07:52
It's a formula for paralysis.
174
457000
2000
07:54
What's the effect of that? One is a decline in order.
175
459000
3000
07:57
Again, studies have shown
176
462000
2000
07:59
it's directly attributable
177
464000
2000
08:01
to the rise of due process.
178
466000
2000
08:03
Public agenda did a survey for us a couple of years ago
179
468000
3000
08:06
where they found that 43 percent of the high school teachers in America
180
471000
3000
08:09
say that they spend at least half of their time
181
474000
3000
08:12
maintaining order in the classroom.
182
477000
3000
08:15
That means those students are getting half the learning
183
480000
3000
08:18
they're supposed to, because if one child is disrupting the class
184
483000
3000
08:21
no one can learn.
185
486000
2000
08:23
And what happens when the teacher tries to assert order?
186
488000
4000
08:27
They're threatened with a legal claim.
187
492000
2000
08:29
We also surveyed that. Seventy-eight percent of the middle and high school teachers
188
494000
3000
08:32
in America have been threatened by their students
189
497000
3000
08:35
with violating their rights, with lawsuits
190
500000
2000
08:37
by their students. They are threatening, their students.
191
502000
3000
08:40
It's not that they usually sue,
192
505000
2000
08:42
it's not that they would win, but it's an
193
507000
3000
08:45
indication of the corrosion of authority.
194
510000
3000
08:48
And how has this system of law worked for government?
195
513000
4000
08:52
It doesn't seem to be working very well does it?
196
517000
2000
08:54
Neither in Sacramento nor in Washington.
197
519000
3000
08:57
The other day at the State of the Union speech,
198
522000
2000
08:59
President Obama said,
199
524000
2000
09:01
and I think we could all agree with this goal,
200
526000
2000
09:03
"From the first railroads to the interstate highway system,
201
528000
3000
09:06
our nation has always been the first to compete.
202
531000
3000
09:09
There is no reason Europe or China should have the fastest trains."
203
534000
5000
09:14
Well, actually there is a reason:
204
539000
2000
09:16
Environmental review has evolved into a process
205
541000
3000
09:19
of no pebble left unturned
206
544000
2000
09:21
for any major project taking the better part of a decade,
207
546000
4000
09:25
then followed by years of litigation
208
550000
2000
09:27
by anybody who doesn't like the project.
209
552000
3000
09:30
Then, just staying above the Earth for one more second,
210
555000
3000
09:33
people are acting like idiots,
211
558000
3000
09:36
(Laughter)
212
561000
1000
09:37
all across the country.
213
562000
2000
09:39
(Applause)
214
564000
2000
09:41
Idiots. A couple of years ago,
215
566000
2000
09:43
Broward County, Florida, banned running at recess.
216
568000
4000
09:47
(Laughter)
217
572000
1000
09:48
That means all the boys are going to be ADD.
218
573000
3000
09:51
I mean it's just absolutely
219
576000
2000
09:53
a formula for failure.
220
578000
2000
09:55
My favorite, though, are all the warning labels.
221
580000
2000
09:57
"Caution: Contents are hot,"
222
582000
2000
09:59
on billions of coffee cups.
223
584000
2000
10:01
Archeologists will dig us up in a thousand years
224
586000
3000
10:04
and they won't know about defensive medicine and stuff,
225
589000
3000
10:07
but they'll see all these labels, "Contents are extremely hot."
226
592000
3000
10:10
They'll think it was some kind of aphrodisiac.
227
595000
2000
10:12
That's the only explanation. Because why
228
597000
3000
10:15
would you have to tell people that something was actually hot?
229
600000
3000
10:18
My favorite warning was one on a five-inch fishing lure.
230
603000
3000
10:21
I grew up in the South and whiled away the summers fishing.
231
606000
3000
10:24
Five-inch fishing lure, it's a big fishing lure,
232
609000
2000
10:26
with a three pronged hook in the back,
233
611000
2000
10:28
and outside it said, "Harmful if swallowed."
234
613000
3000
10:31
(Laughter)
235
616000
7000
10:38
So, none of these people
236
623000
2000
10:40
are doing what they think is right.
237
625000
2000
10:42
And why not? They don't trust the law. Why don't they trust the law?
238
627000
2000
10:44
Because it gives us the worst of both worlds:
239
629000
2000
10:46
It's random -- anybody can sue for almost anything
240
631000
3000
10:49
and take it to a jury, not even an effort at consistency --
241
634000
3000
10:52
and it's also too detailed.
242
637000
2000
10:54
In the areas that are regulated, there are so many rules
243
639000
3000
10:57
no human could possibly know it.
244
642000
2000
10:59
Well how do you fix it? We could spend 10,000 lifetimes
245
644000
2000
11:01
trying to prune this legal jungle.
246
646000
2000
11:03
But the challenge here is not one of just
247
648000
3000
11:06
amending the law,
248
651000
2000
11:08
because the hurdle for success is trust.
249
653000
4000
11:12
People -- for law to be the platform for freedom,
250
657000
4000
11:16
people have to trust it.
251
661000
3000
11:19
So, that's my second proposition:
252
664000
2000
11:21
Trust is an essential condition
253
666000
3000
11:24
to a free society.
254
669000
2000
11:26
Life is complicated enough without legal fear.
255
671000
3000
11:29
But law is different than other kinds of uncertainties,
256
674000
2000
11:31
because it carries with it the power of state.
257
676000
3000
11:34
And so the state can come in.
258
679000
2000
11:36
It actually changes the way people think.
259
681000
3000
11:39
It's like having a little lawyer on your shoulders
260
684000
3000
11:42
all day long, whispering in your ear,
261
687000
2000
11:44
"Could that go wrong? Might that go wrong?"
262
689000
2000
11:46
It drives people from the smart part of the brain --
263
691000
4000
11:50
that dark, deep well of the subconscious,
264
695000
3000
11:53
where instincts and experience,
265
698000
2000
11:55
and all the other factors of creativity
266
700000
3000
11:58
and good judgment are --
267
703000
2000
12:00
it drives us to the thin veneer of conscious logic.
268
705000
3000
12:03
Pretty soon the doctor's saying, "Well, I doubt
269
708000
2000
12:05
if that headache could be a tumor, but who would protect me
270
710000
2000
12:07
if it were? So maybe I'll just order the MRI."
271
712000
3000
12:10
Then you've wasted 200 billion dollars in unnecessary tests.
272
715000
4000
12:14
If you make people self-conscious
273
719000
3000
12:17
about their judgments, studies show
274
722000
2000
12:19
you will make them make worse judgments.
275
724000
3000
12:22
If you tell the pianist to think about how she's hitting the notes
276
727000
4000
12:26
when she's playing the piece, she can't play the piece.
277
731000
4000
12:30
Self-consciousness is the enemy of accomplishment.
278
735000
3000
12:33
Edison stated it best. He said,
279
738000
2000
12:35
"Hell, we ain't got no rules around here,
280
740000
2000
12:37
we're trying to accomplish something."
281
742000
2000
12:39
(Laughter)
282
744000
2000
12:41
So, how do you restore trust?
283
746000
1000
12:42
Tweaking the law's clearly not good enough,
284
747000
2000
12:44
and tort reform, which is a great idea,
285
749000
3000
12:47
lowers your cost if you're a businessperson,
286
752000
2000
12:49
but it's like a Band-Aid on this gaping wound of distrust.
287
754000
3000
12:52
States with extensive tort reform
288
757000
2000
12:54
still suffer all these pathologies.
289
759000
2000
12:56
So, what's needed is not just to limit claims,
290
761000
3000
12:59
but actually create a dry ground of freedom.
291
764000
3000
13:02
It turns out that freedom actually has a formal structure.
292
767000
4000
13:06
And it is this:
293
771000
2000
13:08
Law sets boundaries,
294
773000
2000
13:10
and on one side of those boundaries are all the things
295
775000
2000
13:12
you can't do or must do --
296
777000
2000
13:14
you can't steal, you've got to pay your taxes --
297
779000
1000
13:15
but those same boundaries are supposed to define
298
780000
3000
13:18
and protect a dry ground of freedom.
299
783000
4000
13:22
Isaiah Berlin put it this way:
300
787000
2000
13:24
"Law sets frontiers, not artificially drawn,
301
789000
3000
13:27
within which men shall be inviolable."
302
792000
4000
13:31
We've forgotten that second part.
303
796000
2000
13:33
Those dikes have burst. People wade through law
304
798000
3000
13:36
all day long.
305
801000
2000
13:38
So, what's needed now
306
803000
2000
13:40
is to rebuild these boundaries.
307
805000
3000
13:43
And it's especially important to rebuild them
308
808000
2000
13:45
for lawsuits.
309
810000
2000
13:47
Because what people can sue for establishes the boundaries
310
812000
3000
13:50
for everybody else's freedom.
311
815000
2000
13:52
If someone brings a lawsuit over, "A kid fell off the seesaw,"
312
817000
3000
13:55
it doesn't matter what happens in the lawsuit,
313
820000
2000
13:57
all the seesaws will disappear.
314
822000
2000
13:59
Because no one will want to take the risk of a lawsuit.
315
824000
2000
14:01
And that's what's happened. There are no seesaws, jungle gyms,
316
826000
2000
14:03
merry-go-rounds, climbing ropes,
317
828000
2000
14:05
nothing that would interest a kid over the age of four,
318
830000
3000
14:08
because there's no risk associated with it.
319
833000
2000
14:10
So, how do we rebuild it?
320
835000
2000
14:12
Life is too complex for...
321
837000
2000
14:14
(Applause)
322
839000
5000
14:19
Life is too complex for a software program.
323
844000
2000
14:21
All these choices involve value judgments
324
846000
2000
14:23
and social norms, not objective facts.
325
848000
3000
14:26
And so here is the fourth proposition.
326
851000
3000
14:29
This is what we have, the philosophy we have to change to.
327
854000
2000
14:31
And there are two essential elements of it:
328
856000
3000
14:34
We have to simplify the law.
329
859000
3000
14:37
We have to migrate from all this complexity
330
862000
3000
14:40
towards general principles and goals.
331
865000
2000
14:42
The constitution is only 16 pages long.
332
867000
3000
14:45
Worked pretty well for 200 years.
333
870000
2000
14:47
Law has to be simple enough
334
872000
2000
14:49
so that people can internalize it
335
874000
3000
14:52
in their daily choices.
336
877000
2000
14:54
If they can't internalize it, they won't trust it.
337
879000
4000
14:58
And how do you make it simple?
338
883000
2000
15:00
Because life is complex,
339
885000
2000
15:02
and here is the hardest and biggest change:
340
887000
3000
15:05
We have to restore the authority
341
890000
2000
15:07
to judges and officials
342
892000
2000
15:09
to interpret and apply the law.
343
894000
2000
15:11
(Applause)
344
896000
3000
15:14
We have to rehumanize the law.
345
899000
3000
15:17
To make law simple so that you feel free,
346
902000
3000
15:20
the people in charge have to be free
347
905000
2000
15:22
to use their judgment to interpret and apply the law
348
907000
3000
15:25
in accord with reasonable social norms.
349
910000
2000
15:27
As you're going down, and walking down the sidewalk during the day,
350
912000
4000
15:31
you have to think that if there is a dispute,
351
916000
3000
15:34
there's somebody in society who sees it as their job
352
919000
4000
15:38
to affirmatively protect you
353
923000
2000
15:40
if you're acting reasonably.
354
925000
2000
15:42
That person doesn't exist today.
355
927000
3000
15:45
This is the hardest hurdle.
356
930000
3000
15:48
It's actually not very hard. Ninety-eight percent of cases, this is a piece of cake.
357
933000
3000
15:51
Maybe you've got a claim in small claims court
358
936000
2000
15:53
for your lost pair of pants for $100,
359
938000
2000
15:55
but not in a court of general jurisdiction for millions of dollars.
360
940000
3000
15:58
Case dismissed without prejudice or refiling in small claims court.
361
943000
3000
16:01
Takes five minutes. That's it,
362
946000
2000
16:03
it's not that hard.
363
948000
2000
16:05
But it's a hard hurdle because we got into this legal quicksand
364
950000
4000
16:09
because we woke up in the 1960s
365
954000
2000
16:11
to all these really bad values: racism,
366
956000
2000
16:13
gender discrimination, pollution --
367
958000
2000
16:15
they were bad values. And we wanted to create a legal system
368
960000
3000
16:18
where no one could have bad values anymore.
369
963000
4000
16:22
The problem is, we created a system
370
967000
2000
16:24
where we eliminated the right to have good values.
371
969000
2000
16:26
It doesn't mean that people in authority
372
971000
4000
16:30
can do whatever they want.
373
975000
2000
16:32
They're still bounded by legal goals and principles:
374
977000
3000
16:35
The teacher is accountable to the principal,
375
980000
3000
16:38
the judge is accountable to an appellate court,
376
983000
2000
16:40
the president is accountable to voters.
377
985000
3000
16:43
But the accountability's up the line
378
988000
2000
16:45
judging the decision against the effect on everybody,
379
990000
3000
16:48
not just on the disgruntled person.
380
993000
3000
16:51
You can't run a society by the lowest common denominator.
381
996000
4000
16:55
(Applause)
382
1000000
7000
17:02
So, what's needed is a basic shift in philosophy.
383
1007000
2000
17:04
We can pull the plug on a lot of this stuff if we shift our philosophy.
384
1009000
3000
17:07
We've been taught that authority is the enemy of freedom.
385
1012000
3000
17:10
It's not true. Authority, in fact,
386
1015000
2000
17:12
is essential to freedom.
387
1017000
2000
17:14
Law is a human institution;
388
1019000
2000
17:16
responsibility is a human institution.
389
1021000
2000
17:18
If teachers don't have authority to run the classroom,
390
1023000
2000
17:20
to maintain order, everybody's learning suffers.
391
1025000
3000
17:23
If the judge doesn't have the authority to toss out unreasonable claims,
392
1028000
3000
17:26
then all of us go through the day looking over our shoulders.
393
1031000
2000
17:28
If the environmental agency can't decide
394
1033000
2000
17:30
that the power lines are good for the environment,
395
1035000
3000
17:33
then there's no way to bring the power from the wind farms
396
1038000
2000
17:35
to the city.
397
1040000
2000
17:37
A free society requires red lights and green lights,
398
1042000
3000
17:40
otherwise it soon descends into gridlock.
399
1045000
3000
17:43
That's what's happened to America. Look around.
400
1048000
3000
17:46
What the world needs now
401
1051000
2000
17:48
is to restore the authority to make common choices.
402
1053000
3000
17:51
It's the only way to get our freedom back,
403
1056000
4000
17:55
and it's the only way to release the energy and passion
404
1060000
3000
17:58
needed so that we can meet the challenges
405
1063000
2000
18:00
of our time. Thank you.
406
1065000
2000
18:02
(Applause)
407
1067000
14000

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Philip K. Howard - Legal activist
Philip K. Howard is the founder of Common Good, a drive to overhaul the US legal system. His new book is 'The Rule of Nobody.'

Why you should listen

We love to laugh at America’s warning-label culture (the bag of airline peanuts that says Caution: Contains Nuts). But more troubling are the everyday acts of silence and loss promoted by the fear of being sued. Your doctor might not speak to you frankly; your kids’ principal might not feel he has the right to remove bad teachers.

Attorney Philip K. Howard founded the nonpartisan group Common Good to combat this culture and reform several key areas of our legal system. Among Common Good’s suggestions: specialized health care courts, which would give lower but smarter awards, and a project with the NYC Board of Ed and the Teachers Union to overhaul the disciplinary system in New York public schools. His new book is The Rule of Nobody: Saving America from Dead Laws and Broken Government.

More profile about the speaker
Philip K. Howard | Speaker | TED.com