ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Rachel Armstrong - Applied scientist, innovator
TED Fellow Rachel Armstrong is a sustainability innovator who creates new materials that possess some of the properties of living systems, and can be manipulated to "grow" architecture.

Why you should listen

Rachel Armstrong innovates and designs sustainable solutions for the built and natural environment using advanced new technologies such as, Synthetic Biology – the rational engineering of living systems - and smart chemistry. Her research prompts a reevaluation of how we think about our homes and cities and raises questions about sustainable development of the built environment. She creates open innovation platforms for academia and industry to address environmental challenges such as carbon capture & recycling, smart ‘living’ materials and sustainable design.

Her award winning research underpins her bold approach to the way that she challenges perceptions, presumptions and established principles related to scientific concepts and the building blocks of life and society. She embodies and promotes new transferrable ways of thinking ‘outside of the box’ and enables others to also develop innovative environmental solutions. Her innovative approaches are outlined in her forthcoming TED Book on Living Architecture.

Watch Rachel Armstrong's TED Fellows talk, "Creating Carbon-Negative Architecture" >>

More profile about the speaker
Rachel Armstrong | Speaker | TED.com
TEDGlobal 2009

Rachel Armstrong: Architecture that repairs itself?

Filmed:
1,344,794 views

Venice is sinking. To save it, Rachel Armstrong says we need to outgrow architecture made of inert materials and, well, make architecture that grows itself. She proposes a not-quite-alive material that does its own repairs and sequesters carbon, too.
- Applied scientist, innovator
TED Fellow Rachel Armstrong is a sustainability innovator who creates new materials that possess some of the properties of living systems, and can be manipulated to "grow" architecture. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:15
All buildings today have something in common.
0
0
4000
00:19
They're made using Victorian technologies.
1
4000
3000
00:22
This involves blueprints,
2
7000
3000
00:25
industrial manufacturing
3
10000
2000
00:27
and construction using teams of workers.
4
12000
3000
00:30
All of this effort results in an inert object.
5
15000
3000
00:33
And that means that there is a one-way transfer of energy
6
18000
3000
00:36
from our environment into our homes and cities.
7
21000
4000
00:40
This is not sustainable.
8
25000
2000
00:42
I believe that the only way that it is possible for us
9
27000
3000
00:45
to construct genuinely sustainable homes and cities
10
30000
3000
00:48
is by connecting them to nature,
11
33000
2000
00:50
not insulating them from it.
12
35000
3000
00:53
Now, in order to do this, we need the right kind of language.
13
38000
4000
00:57
Living systems are in constant conversation
14
42000
2000
00:59
with the natural world,
15
44000
2000
01:01
through sets of chemical reactions called metabolism.
16
46000
4000
01:05
And this is the conversion of one group of substances
17
50000
3000
01:08
into another, either through
18
53000
2000
01:10
the production or the absorption of energy.
19
55000
3000
01:13
And this is the way in which living materials
20
58000
2000
01:15
make the most of their local resources
21
60000
3000
01:18
in a sustainable way.
22
63000
3000
01:21
So, I'm interested in the use of
23
66000
2000
01:23
metabolic materials for the practice of architecture.
24
68000
5000
01:28
But they don't exist. So I'm having to make them.
25
73000
2000
01:30
I'm working with architect Neil Spiller
26
75000
2000
01:32
at the Bartlett School of Architecture,
27
77000
2000
01:34
and we're collaborating with international scientists
28
79000
2000
01:36
in order to generate these new materials
29
81000
2000
01:38
from a bottom up approach.
30
83000
2000
01:40
That means we're generating them from scratch.
31
85000
2000
01:42
One of our collaborators is chemist Martin Hanczyc,
32
87000
4000
01:46
and he's really interested in the transition from
33
91000
3000
01:49
inert to living matter.
34
94000
2000
01:51
Now, that's exactly the kind of process that I'm interested in,
35
96000
3000
01:54
when we're thinking about sustainable materials.
36
99000
2000
01:56
So, Martin, he works with a system called the protocell.
37
101000
5000
02:01
Now all this is -- and it's magic --
38
106000
3000
02:04
is a little fatty bag. And it's got a chemical battery in it.
39
109000
3000
02:07
And it has no DNA.
40
112000
3000
02:10
This little bag is able to conduct itself
41
115000
2000
02:12
in a way that can only be described as living.
42
117000
3000
02:15
It is able to move around its environment.
43
120000
3000
02:18
It can follow chemical gradients.
44
123000
2000
02:20
It can undergo complex reactions,
45
125000
3000
02:23
some of which are happily architectural.
46
128000
4000
02:27
So here we are. These are protocells,
47
132000
2000
02:29
patterning their environment.
48
134000
2000
02:31
We don't know how they do that yet.
49
136000
3000
02:34
Here, this is a protocell, and it's vigorously shedding this skin.
50
139000
4000
02:38
Now, this looks like a chemical kind of birth.
51
143000
2000
02:40
This is a violent process.
52
145000
3000
02:43
Here, we've got a protocell to extract carbon dioxide
53
148000
3000
02:46
out of the atmosphere
54
151000
2000
02:48
and turn it into carbonate.
55
153000
2000
02:50
And that's the shell around that globular fat.
56
155000
2000
02:52
They are quite brittle. So you've only got a part of one there.
57
157000
3000
02:55
So what we're trying to do is, we're trying to push these technologies
58
160000
3000
02:58
towards creating bottom-up construction approaches
59
163000
2000
03:00
for architecture,
60
165000
2000
03:02
which contrast the current, Victorian, top-down methods
61
167000
3000
03:05
which impose structure upon matter.
62
170000
3000
03:08
That can't be energetically sensible.
63
173000
3000
03:11
So, bottom-up materials
64
176000
2000
03:13
actually exist today.
65
178000
2000
03:15
They've been in use, in architecture, since ancient times.
66
180000
3000
03:18
If you walk around the city of Oxford, where we are today,
67
183000
3000
03:21
and have a look at the brickwork,
68
186000
2000
03:23
which I've enjoyed doing in the last couple of days,
69
188000
2000
03:25
you'll actually see that a lot of it is made of limestone.
70
190000
2000
03:27
And if you look even closer,
71
192000
2000
03:29
you'll see, in that limestone, there are little shells
72
194000
2000
03:31
and little skeletons that are piled upon each other.
73
196000
3000
03:34
And then they are fossilized over millions of years.
74
199000
3000
03:37
Now a block of limestone, in itself,
75
202000
2000
03:39
isn't particularly that interesting.
76
204000
3000
03:42
It looks beautiful.
77
207000
2000
03:44
But imagine what the properties of this limestone block might be
78
209000
4000
03:48
if the surfaces were actually
79
213000
2000
03:50
in conversation with the atmosphere.
80
215000
3000
03:53
Maybe they could extract carbon dioxide.
81
218000
3000
03:56
Would it give this block of limestone new properties?
82
221000
3000
03:59
Well, most likely it would. It might be able to grow.
83
224000
3000
04:02
It might be able to self-repair, and even respond
84
227000
2000
04:04
to dramatic changes
85
229000
2000
04:06
in the immediate environment.
86
231000
2000
04:08
So, architects are never happy
87
233000
3000
04:11
with just one block of an interesting material.
88
236000
3000
04:14
They think big. Okay?
89
239000
2000
04:16
So when we think about scaling up metabolic materials,
90
241000
3000
04:19
we can start thinking about ecological interventions
91
244000
2000
04:21
like repair of atolls,
92
246000
2000
04:23
or reclamation of parts of a city
93
248000
3000
04:26
that are damaged by water.
94
251000
2000
04:28
So, one of these examples
95
253000
2000
04:30
would of course be the historic city of Venice.
96
255000
3000
04:33
Now, Venice, as you know, has a tempestuous relationship with the sea,
97
258000
4000
04:37
and is built upon wooden piles.
98
262000
2000
04:39
So we've devised a way by which it may be possible
99
264000
3000
04:42
for the protocell technology that we're working with
100
267000
2000
04:44
to sustainably reclaim Venice.
101
269000
3000
04:47
And architect Christian Kerrigan
102
272000
2000
04:49
has come up with a series of designs that show us
103
274000
2000
04:51
how it may be possible to actually grow a limestone reef
104
276000
3000
04:54
underneath the city.
105
279000
2000
04:56
So, here is the technology we have today.
106
281000
3000
04:59
This is our protocell technology,
107
284000
2000
05:01
effectively making a shell, like its limestone forefathers,
108
286000
4000
05:05
and depositing it in a very complex environment,
109
290000
3000
05:08
against natural materials.
110
293000
2000
05:10
We're looking at crystal lattices to see the bonding process in this.
111
295000
3000
05:13
Now, this is the very interesting part.
112
298000
2000
05:15
We don't just want limestone dumped everywhere in all the pretty canals.
113
300000
3000
05:18
What we need it to do is to be
114
303000
2000
05:20
creatively crafted around the wooden piles.
115
305000
4000
05:24
So, you can see from these diagrams that the protocell is actually
116
309000
2000
05:26
moving away from the light,
117
311000
2000
05:28
toward the dark foundations.
118
313000
2000
05:30
We've observed this in the laboratory.
119
315000
2000
05:32
The protocells can actually move away from the light.
120
317000
3000
05:35
They can actually also move towards the light. You have to just choose your species.
121
320000
3000
05:38
So that these don't just exist as one entity,
122
323000
2000
05:40
we kind of chemically engineer them.
123
325000
3000
05:43
And so here the protocells are depositing their limestone
124
328000
3000
05:46
very specifically, around the foundations of Venice,
125
331000
3000
05:49
effectively petrifying it.
126
334000
2000
05:51
Now, this isn't going to happen tomorrow. It's going to take a while.
127
336000
4000
05:55
It's going to take years of tuning and monitoring this technology
128
340000
4000
05:59
in order for us to become ready
129
344000
2000
06:01
to test it out in a case-by-case basis
130
346000
2000
06:03
on the most damaged and stressed buildings within the city of Venice.
131
348000
3000
06:06
But gradually, as the buildings are repaired,
132
351000
3000
06:09
we will see the accretion of a limestone reef beneath the city.
133
354000
3000
06:12
An accretion itself is a huge sink of carbon dioxide.
134
357000
4000
06:16
Also it will attract the local marine ecology,
135
361000
3000
06:19
who will find their own ecological niches within this architecture.
136
364000
4000
06:23
So, this is really interesting. Now we have an architecture
137
368000
3000
06:26
that connects a city to the natural world
138
371000
3000
06:29
in a very direct and immediate way.
139
374000
2000
06:31
But perhaps the most exciting thing about it
140
376000
3000
06:34
is that the driver of this technology is available everywhere.
141
379000
3000
06:37
This is terrestrial chemistry. We've all got it,
142
382000
3000
06:40
which means that this technology is just as appropriate
143
385000
3000
06:43
for developing countries as it is
144
388000
2000
06:45
for First World countries.
145
390000
2000
06:47
So, in summary, I'm generating metabolic materials
146
392000
3000
06:50
as a counterpoise to Victorian technologies,
147
395000
3000
06:53
and building architectures from a bottom-up approach.
148
398000
3000
06:56
Secondly, these metabolic materials
149
401000
2000
06:58
have some of the properties of living systems,
150
403000
2000
07:00
which means they can perform in similar ways.
151
405000
3000
07:03
They can expect to have a lot of forms and functions
152
408000
3000
07:06
within the practice of architecture.
153
411000
2000
07:08
And finally, an observer in the future
154
413000
3000
07:11
marveling at a beautiful structure in the environment
155
416000
3000
07:14
may find it almost impossible to tell
156
419000
3000
07:17
whether this structure
157
422000
2000
07:19
has been created by a natural process
158
424000
2000
07:21
or an artificial one.
159
426000
2000
07:23
Thank you.
160
428000
2000
07:25
(Applause)
161
430000
4000

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Rachel Armstrong - Applied scientist, innovator
TED Fellow Rachel Armstrong is a sustainability innovator who creates new materials that possess some of the properties of living systems, and can be manipulated to "grow" architecture.

Why you should listen

Rachel Armstrong innovates and designs sustainable solutions for the built and natural environment using advanced new technologies such as, Synthetic Biology – the rational engineering of living systems - and smart chemistry. Her research prompts a reevaluation of how we think about our homes and cities and raises questions about sustainable development of the built environment. She creates open innovation platforms for academia and industry to address environmental challenges such as carbon capture & recycling, smart ‘living’ materials and sustainable design.

Her award winning research underpins her bold approach to the way that she challenges perceptions, presumptions and established principles related to scientific concepts and the building blocks of life and society. She embodies and promotes new transferrable ways of thinking ‘outside of the box’ and enables others to also develop innovative environmental solutions. Her innovative approaches are outlined in her forthcoming TED Book on Living Architecture.

Watch Rachel Armstrong's TED Fellows talk, "Creating Carbon-Negative Architecture" >>

More profile about the speaker
Rachel Armstrong | Speaker | TED.com