ABOUT THE SPEAKER
David Brooks - Op-ed columnist
Writer and thinker David Brooks has covered business, crime and politics over a long career in journalism.

Why you should listen

David Brooks became an Op-Ed columnist for The New York Times in September 2003. He is currently a commentator on "The PBS Newshour," NPR’s "All Things Considered" and NBC's "Meet the Press."

He is the author of Bobos in Paradise and The Social Animal. In April 2015, he released with his fourth book, The Road to Character, which was a #1 New York Times bestseller.

Brooks also teaches at Yale University, and is a member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences.

Born on August 11, 1961 in Toronto, Canada, Brooks graduated a bachelor of history from the University of Chicago in 1983. He became a police reporter for the City News Bureau, a wire service owned jointly by the Chicago Tribune and Sun-Times.

He worked at The Washington Times and then The Wall Street Journal for nine years. His last post at the Journal was as Op-ed Editor. Prior to that, he was posted in Brussels, covering Russia, the Middle East, South Africa and European affairs. His first post at the Journal was as editor of the book review section, and he filled in as the Journal's movie critic.

He also served as a senior editor at The Weekly Standard for 9 years, as well as contributing editor for The Atlantic and Newsweek.

More profile about the speaker
David Brooks | Speaker | TED.com
TED2014

David Brooks: Should you live for your résumé ... or your eulogy?

戴維德.布魯克斯: 你應該為哪個奮鬥——你的簡歷還是你的頌詞?

Filmed:
2,720,594 views

我們每個人都有兩個自己,戴維德.布魯克斯在這個簡短的演講中為我們介紹:一個是為了成功,為了寫簡歷;另外一個自己則尋求溝通、社群、愛 - 那些會在悼詞中出現的價值。 (約瑟夫.索羅維奇克把這兩個自我分別命名為“亞當第一”跟“亞當第二。”)布魯克斯追問的是:我們能自己平衡這兩個自我嗎?
- Op-ed columnist
Writer and thinker David Brooks has covered business, crime and politics over a long career in journalism. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

我之前一直在思考
00:12
So I've been thinking思維 about the difference區別 between之間
0
885
1522
00:14
the résumé virtues美德 and
the eulogy virtues美德.
1
2407
3134
寫在簡歷的美德跟寫在悼詞中的美德的區別
00:17
The résumé virtues美德 are the
ones那些 you put on your résumé,
2
5541
2902
顯而易見,放在簡歷中的優點
00:20
which哪一個 are the skills技能
you bring帶來 to the marketplace市井.
3
8443
3466
是你向公眾展示你的技能
00:23
The eulogy virtues美德 are the ones那些
4
11909
1738
然而,悼詞中出現的德行
00:25
that get mentioned提到 in the eulogy,
5
13647
1482
那些人們在喪禮中提到的特質
00:27
which哪一個 are deeper更深: who are you,
in your depth深度,
6
15129
2938
你更深層的本質,
00:30
what is the nature性質 of your relationships關係,
7
18067
1776
人際關係的模式,
00:31
are you bold膽大, loving愛心, dependable可信, consistency一致性?
8
19843
3564
你是否勇敢、有愛心、值得信賴、持之以恆?
00:35
And most of us, including包含
me, would say
9
23407
1494
大部分人中,包括我在內,會覺得
00:36
that the eulogy virtues美德 are the
more important重要 of the virtues美德.
10
24901
3216
悼詞中的美德比其他形式的美德更重要。
00:40
But at least最小 in my case案件,
are they the ones那些 that
11
28127
2073
但是依我看來,它們是我最常想到的嗎?
00:42
I think about the most?
And the answer回答 is no.
12
30200
2802
其實不是
00:45
So I've been thinking思維 about that problem問題,
13
33002
2293
所以我一直在思考這個問題,
00:47
and a thinker思想家 who has
helped幫助 me think about it
14
35295
1168
而一名思想家幫助了我
00:48
is a guy named命名 Joseph約瑟夫 SoloveitchikSoloveitchik, who was a rabbi拉比
15
36463
1613
他的名字是約瑟夫 .斯洛維奇克,一名猶太神學家
00:50
who wrote a book called "The
Lonely孤獨 Man Of Faith信仰" in 1965.
16
38076
3370
他在1965年寫了一本書,名字叫《孤獨的信仰之人》
00:53
SoloveitchikSoloveitchik said there are two sides雙方 of our natures本性,
17
41446
3320
斯洛維奇克講述說每個人都有兩個特性
00:56
which哪一個 he called Adam亞當 I
and Adam亞當 IIII.
18
44766
2390
一個是亞當第一,另外一個是亞當第二
00:59
Adam亞當 I is the worldly世俗, ambitious有雄心,
19
47156
1732
亞當第一是追逐名利,有野心的
01:00
external外部 side of our nature性質.
20
48888
2223
代表我們表露的特性
01:03
He wants to build建立, create創建,
create創建 companies公司,
21
51111
2073
亞當第一想建立事業,
01:05
create創建 innovation革新.
22
53184
1546
開創創新。
01:06
Adam亞當 IIII is the humble謙卑
side of our nature性質.
23
54730
2738
亞當第二代表著人性中謙遜的一面
01:09
Adam亞當 IIII wants not only
to do good but to be good,
24
57468
2817
他不僅僅想做好事,而是想做好人,
01:12
to live生活 in a way internally國內
25
60285
1947
這是一種内在的生活方式--
01:14
that honors榮譽 God, creation創建 and our possibilities可能性.
26
62232
3803
敬重神明,這大千世界跟我們的無限可能。
01:18
Adam亞當 I wants to conquer征服 the world世界.
27
66035
1888
亞當第一想要征服這個世界
01:19
Adam亞當 IIII wants to hear
a calling調用 and obey遵守 the world世界.
28
67923
2764
亞當第二想要傾聽並服從內心的召喚。
01:22
Adam亞當 I savors品味 accomplishment成就.
29
70687
2488
亞當第一傾心於成就,
01:25
Adam亞當 IIII savors品味 inner
consistency一致性 and strength強度.
30
73175
2682
亞當第二欣賞內在的堅持與力量。
01:27
Adam亞當 I asks how things work.
31
75857
2743
亞當第一會關心事情如何運作,
01:30
Adam亞當 IIII asks why we're here.
32
78600
2318
亞當第二會問”我們為何在這裡"。
01:32
Adam亞當 I's我的 motto座右銘 is "success成功."
33
80918
2104
亞當第一的座右銘是“成功”
01:35
Adam亞當 II's二世 motto座右銘 is "love, redemption贖回 and return返回."
34
83022
4246
亞當第二的座右銘是“愛,救贖與給予”
01:39
And SoloveitchikSoloveitchik argued爭論
that these two sides雙方
35
87268
1850
斯洛維奇克認為,
01:41
of our nature性質 are
at war戰爭 with each other.
36
89118
2648
人性的兩面會發生衝突。
01:43
We live生活 in perpetual永動的 self-confrontation自我對抗
37
91766
2064
我們生活在永久的自我對峙中:
01:45
between之間 the external外部 success成功 and the internal內部 value.
38
93830
3264
外在的成功跟內在的價值是衝突的。
01:49
And the tricky狡猾 thing,
I'd say, about these
39
97094
2484
而對我而言最難以捉摸的事情,
01:51
two sides雙方 of our nature性質 is they work
40
99578
1692
人性的兩面
01:53
by different不同 logics邏輯.
41
101270
2410
是靠不同的邏輯方式運轉的。
01:55
The external外部 logic邏輯 is
an economic經濟 logic邏輯:
42
103680
2234
外在的邏輯是顧全經濟效益的邏輯:
01:57
input輸入 leads引線 to output產量,
risk風險 leads引線 to reward獎勵.
43
105914
3466
輸入帶來輸出,冒險引導出獎勵。
02:01
The internal內部 side of our nature性質
44
109380
1776
我們的內在一面
02:03
is a moral道德 logic邏輯 and
often經常 an inverse logic邏輯.
45
111156
3421
是一種道德的邏輯,常常不合乎常理。
要施捨才能獲得。
02:06
You have to give to receive接收.
46
114577
1874
你必須要放棄外在東西,
02:08
You have to surrender投降
to something outside yourself你自己
47
116451
1716
才能讓自己的內在更強大。
02:10
to gain獲得 strength強度 within yourself你自己.
48
118167
2282
02:12
You have to conquer征服 the
desire慾望 to get what you want.
49
120449
2321
你要征服自私的欲望。
02:14
In order訂購 to fulfill履行 yourself你自己,
you have to forget忘記 yourself你自己.
50
122770
2791
為了滿足你自己,你要去忘掉你自己
02:17
In order訂購 to find yourself你自己,
you have to lose失去 yourself你自己.
51
125561
4312
為了找到你自己,你要先去迷失你自己
02:21
We happen發生 to live生活 in a society社會
that favors好處 Adam亞當 I,
52
129873
2936
我們當今生活在一個對亞當第一有利的社會中,
02:24
and often經常 neglects忽視 Adam亞當 IIII.
53
132809
2240
並且經常疏忽亞當第二。
02:27
And the problem問題 is, that turns
you into a shrewd精明 animal動物
54
135049
3232
問題是,這讓人變成了精明的動物,
02:30
who treats對待 life as a game遊戲,
55
138281
1557
把生活當成了一場遊戲,
02:31
and you become成為 a cold,
calculating計算 creature生物
56
139838
2725
然後人們變成了一種冷酷,會算計的生物,
02:34
who slips卡瓦 into a sort分類 of mediocrity庸人
57
142563
2806
不知不覺的就變成了一個平庸的人:
02:37
where you realize實現 there's a difference區別
58
145369
1460
你會發現你渴望的自己
02:38
between之間 your desired期望
self and your actual實際 self.
59
146829
2572
和現實中的自己不大相同。
02:41
You're not earning盈利 the sort分類 of eulogy you want,
60
149401
3973
你不在積攢你想要的悼詞,
你希望其他人會給你的那種。
02:45
you hope希望 someone有人 will give to you.
61
153374
1560
02:46
You don't have the
depth深度 of conviction定罪.
62
154934
1726
你沒有堅定的信念,
02:48
You don't have an emotional情緒化 sonorousnesssonorousness.
63
156660
2537
沒有動人的情感。
02:51
You don't have
commitment承諾 to tasks任務
64
159197
1769
在那些需要花一輩子去經營的任務中,
02:52
that would take more than a lifetime一生 to commit承諾.
65
160966
3214
你並沒有投身於其中。
02:56
I was reminded提醒 of a common共同
response響應 through通過 history歷史
66
164180
3447
這讓我想起歷史中常見的,
建造一個扎實的亞當第二的方法。
02:59
of how you build建立 a solid固體 Adam亞當 IIII,
67
167627
2762
你怎麼去發掘亞當第二的深度
03:02
how you build建立 a depth深度 of character字符.
68
170389
2010
03:04
Through通過 history歷史, people
have gone走了 back
69
172399
2725
回歸歷史
人們回到自己的過去
03:07
into their own擁有 pasts的過去,
70
175124
1886
回到很珍貴的那段時期,童年
03:09
sometimes有時 to a precious珍貴
time in their life,
71
177010
2250
03:11
to their childhood童年,
72
179260
1459
03:12
and often經常, the mind心神
gravitates在重力作用下 in the past過去
73
180719
3966
經常
思緒會被牽引至過去的
03:16
to a moment時刻 of shame恥辱,
74
184685
1388
曾經羞愧的那一刻,
03:18
some sin committed提交,
some act法案 of selfishness自私,
75
186073
2927
回到你犯下錯誤的時候,
你自私自利的時候。
03:21
an act法案 of omission省略, of shallowness淺薄,
76
189000
2290
你忽略其他人的時候,淺薄的時候
生氣的時候
03:23
the sin of anger憤怒, the sin of self-pity自憐,
77
191290
2743
自憐自哀的時候
跟不停的取悅他人,
03:26
trying to be a people-pleaser討好別人,
a lack缺乏 of courage勇氣.
78
194033
3585
迷失自己的勇氣的時刻。
03:29
Adam亞當 I is built內置 by
building建造 on your strengths優勢.
79
197618
4695
亞當第一
是在我們的優勢上建立而成
亞當第二
03:34
Adam亞當 IIII is built內置 by fighting戰鬥
your weaknesses弱點.
80
202313
4096
是在我們與我們的弱點戰鬥時建立而成
03:38
You go into yourself你自己,
you find the sin
81
206409
2858
你要反省你自己,
找到你根深蒂固的罪惡,
03:41
which哪一個 you've committed提交 over
and again through通過 your life,
82
209267
1672
03:42
your signature簽名 sin
83
210939
1801
那個最屬於你的,
03:44
out of which哪一個 the others其他 emerge出現,
84
212740
2691
帶來其他罪惡的根源。
03:47
and you fight鬥爭 that sin and you wrestle搏鬥 with that sin,
85
215431
2864
然後你去與你的罪惡搏鬥
03:50
and out of that wrestling摔角,
that suffering痛苦,
86
218295
3136
除了搏鬥以外
你要去忍受。
03:53
then a depth深度 of character字符 is constructed.
87
221431
3618
最後,深刻的個性才開始成形
03:57
And we're often經常 not
taught to recognize認識
88
225049
1902
我們沒有被教導如何學習認知
03:58
the sin in ourselves我們自己,
89
226951
1136
我們人性中的罪惡
04:00
in that we're not taught in this culture文化
90
228087
1848
我們在這個文化中也沒學習到
04:01
how to wrestle搏鬥 with it,
91
229935
1947
怎麼與我們的罪惡搏鬥
怎麼去面對罪惡
04:03
how to confront面對 it,
and how to combat戰鬥 it.
92
231882
2673
跟怎麼戰勝我們的罪惡
我們生活在一個崇尚第一亞當的社會中
04:06
We live生活 in a culture文化
with an Adam亞當 I mentality心理
93
234555
3330
也是對第二亞有者模糊概念的社會。
04:09
where we're inarticulate口齒不清
about Adam亞當 IIII.
94
237885
3169
最後,雷茵霍爾德 尼布爾
04:13
Finally最後, Reinhold萊因霍爾德 Niebuhr尼布爾
95
241054
1656
04:14
summed總結 up the confrontation對抗, the fully充分 lived生活
96
242710
2135
對亞當第一和第二的對立
04:16
Adam亞當 I and Adam亞當 IIII life, this way:
97
244845
3553
給予了這樣的總結:
04:20
"Nothing that is worth價值 doing
can be achieved實現 in our lifetime一生;
98
248398
3262
“沒有一件值得去做的事情,可以在你這一生中完成”
04:23
therefore因此 we must必須
be saved保存 by hope希望.
99
251660
2382
“因此我們必須心存希望。”
04:26
Nothing which哪一個 is true真正 or
beautiful美麗 or good makes品牌
100
254042
3106
“沒有一件美麗,真實的東西,”
04:29
complete完成 sense in any immediate即時 context上下文 of history歷史;
101
257148
2956
“會馬上被人欣賞,”
04:32
therefore因此 we must必須 be saved保存 by faith信仰.
102
260104
2678
“‘因此我們要心存信念。”
04:34
Nothing we do, however然而 virtuous,
can be accomplished完成 alone單獨;
103
262782
3890
"我們不能獨自完成任何一件事情,就算是善意的,"
04:38
therefore因此 we must必須
be saved保存 by love.
104
266672
3046
“因此我們要心存愛。”
04:41
No virtuous act法案 is quite相當 as virtuous
105
269718
2437
“所謂善意的事情,"
04:44
from the standpoint立場 of our friend朋友
or foe敵人 as from our own擁有 standpoint立場.
106
272155
3986
”從朋友或敵人的角度看,“
”都不比從自己的角度看來得善意。”
04:48
Therefore因此 we must必須 be saved保存
by that final最後 form形成 of love,
107
276141
2827
“因此我們一定要心存這種最終的愛 --”
04:50
which哪一個 is forgiveness饒恕.”
108
278968
1636
“原諒。“
04:52
Thanks謝謝.
109
280604
2076
謝謝!
04:54
(Applause掌聲)
110
282680
1718
(掌聲)
Translated by Kelly Sun
Reviewed by Yi Fei

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
David Brooks - Op-ed columnist
Writer and thinker David Brooks has covered business, crime and politics over a long career in journalism.

Why you should listen

David Brooks became an Op-Ed columnist for The New York Times in September 2003. He is currently a commentator on "The PBS Newshour," NPR’s "All Things Considered" and NBC's "Meet the Press."

He is the author of Bobos in Paradise and The Social Animal. In April 2015, he released with his fourth book, The Road to Character, which was a #1 New York Times bestseller.

Brooks also teaches at Yale University, and is a member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences.

Born on August 11, 1961 in Toronto, Canada, Brooks graduated a bachelor of history from the University of Chicago in 1983. He became a police reporter for the City News Bureau, a wire service owned jointly by the Chicago Tribune and Sun-Times.

He worked at The Washington Times and then The Wall Street Journal for nine years. His last post at the Journal was as Op-ed Editor. Prior to that, he was posted in Brussels, covering Russia, the Middle East, South Africa and European affairs. His first post at the Journal was as editor of the book review section, and he filled in as the Journal's movie critic.

He also served as a senior editor at The Weekly Standard for 9 years, as well as contributing editor for The Atlantic and Newsweek.

More profile about the speaker
David Brooks | Speaker | TED.com