TEDGlobal>NYC
Per Espen Stoknes: How to transform apocalypse fatigue into action on global warming
波艾斯本史托克尼斯: 如何把對世界末日的疲乏轉變成對全球暖化採取的行動
Filmed:
Readability: 4.5
3,001,058 views
心理學家兼經濟學家波艾斯本史托克尼斯認為，要處理氣候崩壞問題，最大的阻礙其實位在人的兩耳之間。他花了數年的時間，研究我們用來避免思考地球滅亡的防禦方式，並想出新方法來談論全球暖化，讓我們願意去聽。別再使用註定厄運的故事了，來聽聽這場有趣又有內容的演說，學習如何把對地球的關懷變得優雅又可行。
Per Espen Stoknes - Psychologist, economist
Per Espen Stoknes weaves together psychology and economics in imaginative ways, often revolving around our human relationships to the natural world and to each other. Full bio
Per Espen Stoknes weaves together psychology and economics in imaginative ways, often revolving around our human relationships to the natural world and to each other. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:12
How do we get people engaged
in solving global warming?
in solving global warming?
0
760
3480
我們要如何讓人們參與
解決全球暖化的問題？
解決全球暖化的問題？
00:17
I'd like to start with running
two short experiments with you all.
two short experiments with you all.
1
5440
4040
我想跟各位做兩個
簡短的實驗來當作開端。
簡短的實驗來當作開端。
00:22
So your task is to notice
if you feel any difference as I speak.
if you feel any difference as I speak.
2
10560
5216
你們的任務是要留意
對我說的話是否感受不同。
對我說的話是否感受不同。
00:27
OK?
3
15800
1200
好嗎？
00:30
Here we go.
4
18120
1200
開始囉。
00:32
We are seeing rising
carbon dioxide levels,
carbon dioxide levels,
5
20200
3216
現在我們發現二氧化碳量上升了
00:35
now about 410 ppms.
6
23440
2280
約 410 ppms。
為了避免 RCP 8.5 的情況，
（註：嚴重的溫室氣體排放）
（註：嚴重的溫室氣體排放）
00:38
To avoid the RCP 8.5 scenario,
7
26960
2856
00:41
we need rapid decarbonization.
8
29840
2480
我們需要快速減碳。
00:45
The global carbon budget
9
33240
2056
全球的碳預算
00:47
for 66 percent likelihood
to meet the two-degree target
to meet the two-degree target
10
35320
3496
在有 66% 可能性會達成
溫度 2 度之目標的條件下，
溫度 2 度之目標的條件下，
00:50
is approximately 800 gigatons.
11
38840
2640
大約是八十萬兆噸。
00:55
(Laughter)
12
43640
2536
（笑聲）
00:58
OK, now let me try something else.
13
46200
2240
好，現在，讓我試試別的方式。
01:01
We are heading for an uninhabitable earth:
14
49600
4040
我們未來的地球將會無法居住：
01:06
monster storms,
15
54520
2096
超級大暴風、
01:08
killer floods,
16
56640
1736
致命的大洪水、
01:10
devastating wildfires,
17
58400
2296
毀滅性的野火、
01:12
crazy heat waves that will cook us
under a blazing sun.
under a blazing sun.
18
60720
3519
失常的熱浪，會在熾烈的
太陽之下把我們煮熟。
太陽之下把我們煮熟。
01:18
2017 is already so unexpectedly warm,
19
66840
3656
2017 年的暖化
已經超出我們的預期，
已經超出我們的預期，
01:22
it's freaking out climate scientists.
20
70520
2296
氣候科學家都被嚇壞了。
01:24
We have a three-year window
to cut emissions, three years.
to cut emissions, three years.
21
72840
3936
我們有三年的空窗時間
可以縮減排放，三年。
可以縮減排放，三年。
01:28
If not, we will soon live
in a boiling earth, a hellhole.
in a boiling earth, a hellhole.
22
76800
3920
如果沒做到，我們很快就要
住在地獄般的沸騰地球上。
住在地獄般的沸騰地球上。
01:36
OK. So --
23
84000
2296
好，所以，
01:38
(Applause)
24
86320
1496
（掌聲）
01:39
Now your task:
25
87840
1320
現在，你們的任務：
01:42
How did these ways
of speaking make you feel?
of speaking make you feel?
26
90600
2936
這兩種說法讓你們的感覺如何？
01:45
The first, detached maybe
or just confused?
or just confused?
27
93560
4096
第一種，也許很抽離？
或只是困惑，這傢伙在說什麼啊？
01:49
What's this guy talking about?
28
97680
1429
01:52
The other, fearful or just numb?
29
100040
3320
另一種，恐懼或是只是麻木？
01:56
So again, the question I asked:
30
104960
1496
所以，我再問一次：
01:58
How do we get people engaged
in solving global warming?
in solving global warming?
31
106480
3496
我們要如何讓人們參與
解決全球暖化的問題？
解決全球暖化的問題？
02:02
And why don't these two ways
of communicating work?
of communicating work?
32
110000
2680
為什麼這兩種溝通方式沒有用？
02:06
You see, the biggest obstacle
to dealing with climate disruptions
to dealing with climate disruptions
33
114000
4336
處理氣候崩壞問題的最大阻礙
02:10
lies between your ears.
34
118360
1600
其實位在你的兩耳之間。
02:13
Building on a rapidly growing body
of psychology and social science,
of psychology and social science,
35
121360
3976
我以快速成長的心理學
和社會科學為基礎，
和社會科學為基礎，
02:17
I spent years looking
into the five inner defenses
into the five inner defenses
36
125360
3976
我花了數年的時間探究
阻止人們去參與的五種內在防禦，
02:21
that stop people from engaging.
37
129360
1760
02:23
When people hear news about the climate
coming straight at them,
coming straight at them,
38
131960
3656
當人們聽到關於氣候的消息
直直朝他們而來時，
直直朝他們而來時，
02:27
the first defense comes up rapidly:
39
135640
2520
最先快速升起的防禦就是：
02:31
distance.
40
139280
1200
距離。
02:33
When we hear about the climate,
41
141040
1536
當我們聽到氣候，
02:34
we hear about something
far away in space --
far away in space --
42
142600
2096
聽得到是在很遙遠的空間：
02:36
think Arctic ice, polar bears --
43
144720
2656
北極冰、北極熊；
02:39
far away in time -- think 2100.
44
147400
2400
在很遙遠的時間：想到 2100 年。
02:43
It's huge and slow-moving --
think gigatons and centuries.
think gigatons and centuries.
45
151320
3560
它很巨大，進行得很慢：
想像數十億噸、數個世紀。
想像數十億噸、數個世紀。
02:48
So it's not here. It's not now.
46
156480
2960
所以，它不在這裡，不是現在。
02:53
Since it feels so far away from me,
47
161000
1696
既然覺得它離我這麼遠，
02:54
it seems outside my circle of influence,
48
162720
2680
似乎是在我的影響圈之外，
02:58
so I feel helpless about it.
49
166520
1896
所以我覺得對它也無可奈何。
03:00
There's nothing I can do.
50
168440
1360
沒什麼我能做的。
03:03
In our everyday lives,
51
171000
1416
在我們的日常生活中，
03:04
most of us prefer to think
about nearer things,
about nearer things,
52
172440
2856
我們都偏向去思考比較近的事物，
03:07
such as our jobs, our kids,
53
175320
2216
比如我們的工作、我們的孩子、
03:09
how many likes we get on Facebook.
54
177560
2816
臉書上有幾個人按讚。
03:12
Now, that, that's real.
55
180400
1600
那些是真實的。
03:16
Next defense is doom.
56
184080
2920
第二種防禦是注定的厄運。
03:20
Climate change is usually framed
57
188040
2976
氣候變遷通常會被表達成
03:23
as a looming disaster,
58
191040
2056
令人生畏的災難，
03:25
bringing losses, cost and sacrifice.
59
193120
2776
帶來損失、成本、犧牲。
03:27
That makes us fearful.
60
195920
1480
那會讓我們懼怕。
03:30
But after the first fear is gone,
61
198240
3456
但當最初的懼怕消失之後，
03:33
my brain soon wants
to avoid this topic altogether.
to avoid this topic altogether.
62
201720
3800
我的頭腦很快就會
想要完全避開這個話題。
想要完全避開這個話題。
03:38
After 30 years of scary
climate change communications,
climate change communications,
63
206360
3376
經過三十天讓人害怕的
氣候變遷溝通之後，
氣候變遷溝通之後，
03:41
more than 80 percent of media articles
still use disaster framings,
still use disaster framings,
64
209760
4816
超過 80% 的媒體文章
仍然用災難型的表達，
仍然用災難型的表達，
03:46
but people habituate to and then --
65
214600
2520
但人們會開始習慣，接下來，
03:51
desensitize
66
219160
1656
對注定厄運的過度使用
03:52
to doom overuse.
67
220840
1496
開始無感、麻木。
03:54
So many of us are now suffering
a kind of apocalypse fatigue,
a kind of apocalypse fatigue,
68
222360
3520
所以我們許多人現在遇到的
是種「世界末日疲勞」，
是種「世界末日疲勞」，
03:59
getting numb from too much collapse porn.
69
227080
2760
因為太多的崩壞式煽情而麻木。
04:03
The third defense is dissonance.
70
231760
3016
第三種防禦是不一致。
04:06
Now, if what we know,
71
234800
2896
如果我們所知道的事，
如化石燃料會造成全球暖化，
04:09
that fossil fuel use
contributes to global warming,
contributes to global warming,
72
237720
2416
和我們所做的事，如開車、
搭飛機、吃牛肉等，有所衝突，
搭飛機、吃牛肉等，有所衝突，
04:12
conflicts with what we do --
drive, fly, eat beef --
drive, fly, eat beef --
73
240160
2696
04:14
then so-called
cognitive dissonance sets in.
cognitive dissonance sets in.
74
242880
2320
就會有所謂的「認知不一致」出現。
04:18
This is felt as an inner discomfort.
75
246280
1896
這是種內在的不舒服感。
04:20
We may feel like hypocrites.
76
248200
1560
我們會覺得像偽善者。
04:22
To get rid of this discomfort,
77
250600
1560
為了擺脫這種不舒服，
04:25
our brain starts coming up
with justifications.
with justifications.
78
253000
3136
我們的頭腦會開始找理由辯解。
04:28
So I can say, for instance,
79
256160
2016
讓我可以說，比如：
04:30
"My neighbor, he has
a much bigger car than I do."
a much bigger car than I do."
80
258200
2800
「我的鄰居，他的車比我的還大。」
04:34
Or, "Changing my diet
doesn't amount to anything
doesn't amount to anything
81
262480
3816
或「如果只有我一個人改變飲食，
04:38
if I am the only one to do it."
82
266320
2160
太微不足道，沒有用。」
04:41
Or, I could even want
to doubt climate science itself.
to doubt climate science itself.
83
269720
3656
或我甚至可能會想要
懷疑氣候科學本身。
懷疑氣候科學本身。
04:45
I could say, "You know,
climate is always changing."
climate is always changing."
84
273400
3640
我可以說：「你知道，
氣候總是一直在改變的。」
氣候總是一直在改變的。」
04:51
So these justifications
make us all feel better,
make us all feel better,
85
279000
2936
因此這些理由會讓我們覺得好過些，
04:53
but at the expense
86
281960
2616
但代價就是
04:56
of dismissing what we know.
87
284600
2096
不再去想我們知道的事。
04:58
Thus, behavior drives attitudes.
88
286720
3360
因此，行為影響態度。
05:03
My personal cognitive dissonance comes up
89
291920
2736
我個人的認知不一致發生在
05:06
when I recognize that I've been
flying from Oslo to New York
flying from Oslo to New York
90
294680
3336
發現自己已經從奧斯陸飛到紐約，
又再飛回奧斯陸時，
05:10
and back to Oslo
91
298040
1256
為的是做氣候演講。
（註：指本次 TED 演說）
（註：指本次 TED 演說）
05:11
in order to speak about the climate.
92
299320
2896
05:14
(Laughter)
93
302240
1736
（笑聲）
05:16
For 14 minutes.
94
304000
1256
十四分鐘的演說。
05:17
(Laughter)
95
305280
3896
（笑聲）
05:21
So that makes me
want to move on to denial.
want to move on to denial.
96
309200
2696
那會讓我想要用下一種防禦：否認。
05:23
(Laughter)
97
311920
2256
（笑聲）
05:26
So if we keep silent,
98
314200
1776
所以，如果我們保持沉默，
05:28
ignore or ridicule facts
about climate disruptions,
about climate disruptions,
99
316000
4056
忽視或是揶揄關於氣候混亂的事實，
05:32
then we might find inner refuge
100
320080
2816
那麼我們可能會找到內在的庇護所，
05:34
from fear and guilt.
101
322920
1440
來躲避恐懼和罪惡感。
05:37
Denial doesn't really come
from lack of intelligence or knowledge.
from lack of intelligence or knowledge.
102
325200
3696
否認並不是來自於缺乏智慧或知識。
05:40
No, denial is a state of mind
103
328920
3296
不，否認是一種心理狀態，
在這狀態中，我可能知道
一些讓人煩惱的知識，
一些讓人煩惱的知識，
05:44
in which I may be aware
of some troubling knowledge,
of some troubling knowledge,
104
332240
2856
但我就當不知道，
繼續我的生活和行為。
繼續我的生活和行為。
05:47
but I live and act as if I don't know.
105
335120
2280
05:50
So you could call it
a kind of double life,
a kind of double life,
106
338560
2120
所以你可以稱之為某種雙面生活，
05:53
both knowing and not knowing,
107
341280
1496
同時知道和不知道，
05:54
and often this is reinforced by others,
108
342800
2336
通常，因為他人、家庭、或社群
05:57
my family or community,
109
345160
1416
同意不再提起這難搞的話題，
05:58
agreeing not to raise this tricky topic.
110
346600
3120
否認就會被強化。
06:03
Finally, identity.
111
351240
1680
最後一項防禦，身份。
06:07
Alarmed climate activists
112
355440
1720
有警覺的氣候激進份子
06:10
demand that government takes action,
113
358680
2296
要求政府要在法規上
06:13
either with regulation or carbon taxes.
114
361000
2696
或碳稅上採取行動。
06:15
But consider what happens
115
363720
1856
但，想想這個例子：
06:17
when people who hold
conservative values, for instance,
conservative values, for instance,
116
365600
3736
當價值觀保守的人聽到激進份子說
06:21
hear from an activist that government
ought to expand even further.
ought to expand even further.
117
369360
3800
政府應該要再進一步擴展，
會發生什麼事？
會發生什麼事？
06:26
Particularly in rich Western democracies,
118
374760
2016
特別是在富有的西方民主國家，
06:28
they are then less likely
to believe that science.
to believe that science.
119
376800
2920
他們比較不可能會相信那種科學。
06:33
How is that?
120
381320
1336
為什麼會這樣？
06:34
Well, if I hold conservative
values, for instance,
values, for instance,
121
382680
3416
舉例來說，如果我的價值觀很保守，
06:38
I probably prefer big proper cars
and small government
and small government
122
386120
4736
我可能會偏愛大車子和小政府，
06:42
over tiny, tiny cars and huge government.
123
390880
3000
而不是小小車子和大政府。
06:47
And if climate science comes and then says
124
395240
3376
如果氣候科學跳出來說
06:50
government should expand further,
125
398640
2016
政府應該要進一步擴展，
06:52
then I probably
will trust that science less.
will trust that science less.
126
400680
3760
我可能不會太相信那科學。
06:58
In this way, cultural identity
127
406320
2080
文化身份會用這種方式
07:01
starts to override the facts.
128
409320
1976
開始推翻或無視事實。
07:03
The values eat the facts,
129
411320
2176
價值觀會吃掉事實，
07:05
and my identity trumps truth any day.
130
413520
3840
我的身份在任何一天
都能夠打贏真相。
都能夠打贏真相。
07:11
So, after recognizing
how these five D's kill engagement,
how these five D's kill engagement,
131
419240
5016
所以，在知道了這五個 D（防禦）
如何讓人們不去參與之後，
如何讓人們不去參與之後，
07:16
how can we move beyond them?
132
424280
1680
我們要如何超越這些防禦？
07:19
New research shows
how we can flip these five defenses
how we can flip these five defenses
133
427240
3576
新研究說明我們
能如何翻轉這五種防禦，
能如何翻轉這五種防禦，
07:22
over into key success criteria
134
430840
2136
轉成重要的成功標準，
07:25
for a more brain-friendly
climate communication.
climate communication.
135
433000
2440
來做對頭腦更友善的氣候溝通。
07:28
So this is where it gets really exciting
136
436880
3096
這就是很讓人興奮的地方，
07:32
and where we find the five S's,
137
440000
1840
也是我們能找到五個 S 的地方，
07:35
the five evidence-based solutions
for what does work.
for what does work.
138
443040
3880
五種以證據為基礎的有效解決方案。
07:40
First, we can flip distance to social.
139
448120
2800
首先，我們把距離翻轉為社會。
07:43
We can make climate feel
near, personal and urgent
near, personal and urgent
140
451960
3456
我們可以讓氣候感覺比較近、
比較個人化、比較緊急，
比較個人化、比較緊急，
07:47
by bringing it home,
141
455440
3056
做法就是把它帶回家，
07:50
and we can do that
by spreading social norms
by spreading social norms
142
458520
3096
我們可以透過散播對於解決方案
有正向作用的社會規範
有正向作用的社會規範
07:53
that are positive to solutions.
143
461640
2136
來做到這一點。
07:55
If I believe my friends or neighbors,
144
463800
2336
如果我相信我的朋友或鄰居，
07:58
you guys, will do something,
145
466160
1656
或你們，會做些什麼，
07:59
then I will, too.
146
467840
1200
那麼我也會做些什麼。
08:02
We can see, for instance,
this from rooftop solar panels.
this from rooftop solar panels.
147
470000
2840
屋頂太陽能板就是一個這樣的例子。
08:05
They are spreading from neighbor
to neighbor like a virus.
to neighbor like a virus.
148
473360
2776
它們就像病毒一樣，
從一個鄰居散播到另一個鄰居。
從一個鄰居散播到另一個鄰居。
08:08
It's contagious.
149
476160
1496
它是有感染力的。
08:09
This is the power of peer-to-peer
creating the new normal.
creating the new normal.
150
477680
3480
這是同儕對同儕的力量，
能創造出新的常態標準。
能創造出新的常態標準。
08:14
Next, we can flip doom to supportive.
151
482120
3080
接著，我們可以把注定的厄運翻轉為支持。
08:17
Rather than backfiring frames
152
485800
1896
不要用逆火式的表述，
08:19
such as disaster and cost,
153
487720
2040
比如災難和成本，
08:22
we can reframe climate
as being really about human health,
as being really about human health,
154
490720
3720
我們在表述氣候時可以著重
它和人類健康有多大的關係，
它和人類健康有多大的關係，
08:28
for instance, with plant-based
delicious burgers,
delicious burgers,
155
496520
4016
比如，全植物食材製作的美味漢堡，
08:32
good for you and good for the climate.
156
500560
2696
對你有好處，對氣候也有好處。
08:35
We can also reframe climate
as being about new tech opportunities,
as being about new tech opportunities,
157
503280
3456
我們也可以在表述氣候時，
強調新科技的機會，
強調新科技的機會，
08:38
about safety and about new jobs.
158
506760
3120
提及安全性和新工作。
08:43
Solar jobs, for instance,
are seeing an amazing growth.
are seeing an amazing growth.
159
511000
2616
比如，太陽能相關工作
就有很大的成長。
就有很大的成長。
08:45
They just passed
the three million jobs mark.
the three million jobs mark.
160
513640
2560
不久前已經達成超過三百萬個工作。
08:49
Psychology says,
in order to create engagement,
in order to create engagement,
161
517440
2575
心理學家說，為了要創造參與，
08:52
we should present, on balance,
162
520039
2577
我們每提到一項氣候威脅，
08:54
three positive or supportive framings
163
522640
3416
就應該要用三種正面
或支持性的表述方式
或支持性的表述方式
08:58
for each climate threat we mention.
164
526080
1720
來取得平衡。
09:00
Then we can flip dissonance
165
528680
1720
這樣我們就可以把不一致
09:03
to simpler actions.
166
531360
2136
翻轉成更「簡單」的行動。
09:05
This is often called nudging.
167
533520
1456
這通常稱為「輕推」。
09:07
The idea is, by better
choice architecture,
choice architecture,
168
535000
4360
想法是，透過更好的選擇結構，
09:12
we can make the climate-friendly behaviors
169
540680
3816
我們能讓對氣候友善的行為變成是
09:16
default and convenient.
170
544520
1920
預設的、方便的行為。
09:19
Let me illustrate this. Take food waste.
171
547480
2200
讓我以食物浪費為例來說明。
09:22
Food waste at buffets goes way down
172
550400
3416
吃到飽餐廳可以大大減少食物浪費，
09:25
if the plate or the box size
is reduced a little,
is reduced a little,
173
553840
3576
只要把盤子或盒子的尺寸
稍微縮小一點點，
稍微縮小一點點，
09:29
because on the smaller plate it looks full
174
557440
3256
因為在小的盤子看起來會比較滿，
在大的盤子看起來還有一半空著，
09:32
but in the big box it looks half empty,
175
560720
2696
我們就會放更多食物進去。
09:35
so we put more in.
176
563440
1456
09:36
So smaller plates make
a big difference for food waste.
a big difference for food waste.
177
564920
3536
所以小盤子就能
大大地減少食物的浪費。
大大地減少食物的浪費。
09:40
And there are hundreds
of smart nudges like this.
of smart nudges like this.
178
568480
2696
還有數百種像這樣的聰明「輕推」。
09:43
The point is, dissonance goes down
as more behaviors are nudged.
as more behaviors are nudged.
179
571200
4040
重點是，當有更多行為
被輕推之後，不一致就會減少。
被輕推之後，不一致就會減少。
09:47
Then we can flip denial
180
575840
3616
接著，我們就可以翻轉否認了，
09:51
by tailoring signals
that visualize our progress.
that visualize our progress.
181
579480
3696
做法是去修改那些
將我們的進步給視覺化的信號。
將我們的進步給視覺化的信號。
09:55
We can provide motivating feedback
182
583200
2416
我們可以提供有激發性的回饋意見，
09:57
on how well we're doing
with our problem-solving.
with our problem-solving.
183
585640
2320
說明我們在解決問題方面做得如何。
10:01
Say you improved your transport footprint
184
589000
2296
比如，你改善了你的交通足跡，
10:03
or cut energy waste in your buildings.
185
591320
2520
或是減少了你的大樓的能源浪費。
10:06
Then one app that can
share this well is called Ducky.
share this well is called Ducky.
186
594480
3240
有個叫做 Ducky 的應用程式
能針對此做很好的分享。
能針對此做很好的分享。
想法是，你把你的行動記錄在這裡，
10:10
The idea is, you log your actions there,
187
598240
1936
10:12
and then you can see how well
your team or company is doing,
your team or company is doing,
188
600200
3816
然後你就可以看到
你的團隊或公司做得如何，
你的團隊或公司做得如何，
10:16
so you get real-time signals.
189
604040
1840
你就能得到即時的信號。
10:18
Finally, identity.
190
606720
2000
最後，身份。
10:22
We can flip identity with better stories.
191
610120
2200
我們能把身份翻轉為更好的故事。
10:25
Our brain loves stories.
192
613520
2000
我們的頭腦喜愛故事。
針對我們想要達成的目標，
我們需要更好的故事，
我們需要更好的故事，
10:28
So we need better stories
of where we all want to go,
of where we all want to go,
193
616880
2506
10:31
and we need more stories
of the heroes and heroines
of the heroes and heroines
194
619400
2816
我們需要更多英雄和女英雄的故事，
10:34
of all stripes that are
making real change happen.
making real change happen.
195
622240
3400
各種類型的人真正
在做出改變的故事。
在做出改變的故事。
10:39
I'm proud that my hometown of Oslo
196
627560
3736
我對我的家鄉奧斯陸感到很驕傲，
10:43
is now embarking on a bold journey
of electrifying all transport,
of electrifying all transport,
197
631320
4336
奧斯陸正在進行一項大膽的旅程，
把所有交通運輸都電氣化，
把所有交通運輸都電氣化，
10:47
whether cars, bikes or buses.
198
635680
2840
包括汽車、腳踏車、及公車。
10:51
One of the people
spearheading this is Christina Bu.
spearheading this is Christina Bu.
199
639240
2880
先鋒部隊的其中一員是
克莉絲汀娜布。
克莉絲汀娜布。
10:54
She is heading the Electric
Vehicle Association for years
Vehicle Association for years
200
642760
3736
她擔任電動車協會的領導人很多年，
10:58
and she has been fighting every day.
201
646520
2016
她每天都在奮戰。
11:00
Now, the UK and France, India and China
have also announced plans
have also announced plans
202
648560
4496
英國、法國、印度、中國
都已經宣佈了計畫，
都已經宣佈了計畫，
11:05
for ending the sales of fossil cars.
203
653080
2816
打算要停止販售石油車。
11:07
Now, that's massive.
204
655920
1856
那是很大規模的。
11:09
And in Oslo, we can see
how enthusiastic EV owners
how enthusiastic EV owners
205
657800
4976
在奧斯陸，我們能看到
熱忱的電動車車主
熱忱的電動車車主
11:14
go and tell their electric stories
to friends and neighbors
to friends and neighbors
206
662800
3456
到處告訴他們的朋友和鄰居
關於電動車的故事，
關於電動車的故事，
11:18
and bring them along.
207
666280
1296
讓他們一同加入。
11:19
So we come full circle
from story back to social.
from story back to social.
208
667600
3870
從故事再回到社會，
就是個完整的圓。
就是個完整的圓。
11:25
So thousands of climate communicators
209
673520
3176
全世界數以千計的氣候溝通者
11:28
are now starting to use these solutions
210
676720
2416
現在都開始用這些
11:31
all over the world.
211
679160
1200
解決方案。
11:32
It is clear, however,
that individual solutions
that individual solutions
212
680800
3216
然而，很顯然，單一的解決方案
11:36
are not sufficient
to solving climate alone,
to solving climate alone,
213
684040
2840
不足以解決氣候問題，
11:39
but they do build
stronger bottom-up support
stronger bottom-up support
214
687920
4760
但它們的確能由下而上
建立更強的支持，
建立更強的支持，
11:46
for policies and solutions that can.
215
694000
3216
支持能真正解決氣候問題的
政策和解決方案。
政策和解決方案。
11:49
That is why engaging people is so crucial.
216
697240
2830
那就是為什麼
讓人們參與是如此重要。
讓人們參與是如此重要。
11:54
I started this talk
217
702120
2176
我開始這場演講時，
11:56
with testing two ways
of communicating climate with you.
of communicating climate with you.
218
704320
3600
對各位測試了兩種溝通氣候的方式。
12:01
There is another way, too,
219
709720
1936
還有另一種方式，
12:03
I'd like to share with you.
220
711680
1320
我想和各位分享。
12:05
It starts with reimagining climate itself
221
713800
2736
這種方式始於重新想像氣候本身，
12:08
as the living air.
222
716560
1760
把它想像活生生的空氣。
12:11
Climate isn't really
about some abstract, distant climate
about some abstract, distant climate
223
719080
2896
氣候的重點其實並不是
抽象、遙遠的氣候，
抽象、遙遠的氣候，
12:14
far, far away from us.
224
722000
1256
離我們很遠很遠。
12:15
It's about this air that surrounds us.
225
723280
2520
它的重點是我們周圍的這些空氣。
12:18
This air, you can feel in this room, too,
226
726720
3056
在這間房間中，
你們也能感受到這些空氣，
你們也能感受到這些空氣，
12:21
the air that moves
right now in your nostrils.
right now in your nostrils.
227
729800
2840
現在在你們的鼻孔中流動的空氣。
12:25
This air is our earth's skin.
228
733800
2680
這些空氣是地球的皮膚。
12:29
It's amazingly thin,
229
737320
2096
它薄得驚人，
12:31
compared to the size of the earth
and the cosmos it shields us from,
and the cosmos it shields us from,
230
739440
4656
和地球的大小以及它為我們抵擋
的宇宙相比，它是薄得驚人，
的宇宙相比，它是薄得驚人，
12:36
far thinner than the skin of an apple
231
744120
2496
從和直徑的比例來看，
它遠比蘋果的皮還要薄。
12:38
compared to its diameter.
232
746640
1920
當我們向上看，它看來無邊無際，
12:41
It may look infinite when we look up,
233
749840
2040
12:45
but the beautiful, breathable air
is only like five to seven miles thin,
is only like five to seven miles thin,
234
753280
5136
但這美麗、可呼吸的空氣，
只有 5~7 英哩的厚度，
只有 5~7 英哩的厚度，
12:50
a fragile wrapping around a massive ball.
235
758440
3680
一個巨大圓球的脆弱包覆。
12:55
Inside this skin,
236
763640
1856
在皮膚內部，
12:57
we're all closely connected.
237
765520
2160
我們都密切連結著。
13:00
The breath that you just took
238
768920
2416
你們剛剛吸入的空氣，
13:03
contained around 400,000
of the same argon atoms
of the same argon atoms
239
771360
4736
包含了大約 400,000 個氬原子，
13:08
that Gandhi breathed during his lifetime.
240
776120
3000
和甘地在他的年代所呼吸的一樣。
13:12
Inside this thin,
fluctuating, unsettled film,
fluctuating, unsettled film,
241
780960
3456
在這層晃動不穩定的薄膜中，
13:16
all of life is nourished,
protected and held.
protected and held.
242
784440
3800
所有的生命都受到滋養、
被保護著、被維持著。
被保護著、被維持著。
13:21
It insulates and regulates temperatures
243
789440
1936
它能隔離和調節溫度，
13:23
in a range that is just right
for water and for life as we know it,
for water and for life as we know it,
244
791400
4016
讓溫度保持在一個
剛好適合水和生命的範圍，
剛好適合水和生命的範圍，
13:27
and mediating between
the blue ocean and black eternity,
the blue ocean and black eternity,
245
795440
3040
在藍色海洋和黑色永恆之間做中介，
13:31
the clouds carry
all the billions of tons of water
all the billions of tons of water
246
799440
3016
雲朵載著數十億噸的水，
13:34
needed for the soils.
247
802480
1200
土壤需要這些水。
13:36
The air fills the rivers,
248
804480
2896
空氣能將河流充滿，
13:39
stirs the waters,
249
807400
1616
能攪動水，
13:41
waters the forests.
250
809040
1200
能為森林澆水。
13:42
With a global weirding of the weather,
251
810920
2096
隨著全球天氣越來越怪異，
13:45
there are good reasons
for feeling fear and despair,
for feeling fear and despair,
252
813040
4360
的確有很好的理由
應該要感到恐懼和絕望，
應該要感到恐懼和絕望，
13:51
yet we may first grieve
today's sorry state and losses
today's sorry state and losses
253
819120
5336
但，我們可能會先哀悼
現在的可憐狀態以及損失，
現在的可憐狀態以及損失，
13:56
and then turn to face the future
with sober eyes and determination.
with sober eyes and determination.
254
824480
4720
然後帶著清醒的雙眼以及決心，
轉過去面對未來。
轉過去面對未來。
14:02
The new psychology of climate action
255
830640
1920
氣候行動的新心理學
14:05
lies in letting go, not of science,
256
833720
2816
是在於放手，不是放掉科學，
14:08
but of the crutches
of abstractions and doomism,
of abstractions and doomism,
257
836560
3040
而是放掉對抽象和
注定厄運主義的支持，
注定厄運主義的支持，
14:12
and then choosing to tell the new stories.
258
840600
2160
然後選擇說新的故事。
14:15
These are the stories
259
843640
1816
故事的內容
14:17
of how we achieve drawdown,
the reversing of global warming.
the reversing of global warming.
260
845480
3336
是我們如何達成
減少和反轉全球暖化。
減少和反轉全球暖化。
14:20
These are the stories of the steps we take
261
848840
3040
故事的內容是我們採取的步驟，
14:25
as peoples, cities, companies
262
853080
3816
人類、城市、公司
14:28
and public bodies
263
856920
1376
和公眾實體
14:30
in caring for the air
264
858320
1896
為了照顧空氣
14:32
in spite of strong headwinds.
265
860240
2800
而頂著逆風。
14:36
These are the stories of the steps we take
266
864040
2096
我們採取這些步驟，
14:38
because they ground us
in what we are as humans:
in what we are as humans:
267
866160
3720
正是因為它們讓我們能
立基在我們人類的本質上：
立基在我們人類的本質上：
14:42
earthlings inside this living air.
268
870840
4520
在這活生生的空氣之中的俗人。
14:48
Thank you.
269
876640
1216
謝謝。
14:49
(Applause)
270
877880
3280
（掌聲）
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Per Espen Stoknes - Psychologist, economistPer Espen Stoknes weaves together psychology and economics in imaginative ways, often revolving around our human relationships to the natural world and to each other.
Why you should listen
Are humans inevitably short-term? This question has guided Per Espen Stoknes's research over the last decades, from psychology through economics to strategic business scenarios. But gradually, he's reframed it into a more positive twist: Under what conditions will humans take action for the long term in their everyday behaviors?
Stoknes works as the director for Center for Green Growth at the Norwegian Business School in Oslo. He's received several "Best Professor" awards for his original teaching style. As both an economist, author and psychologist, he's been working closely with organizational and business leaders throughout Scandinavia, the European Union as well as the Americas and Asia. In 2017-2018 he’s representing the Green Party in the Norwegian parliament.
His latest book is What We Think About When We Try Not To Think About Global Warming, which won the American Libraries Association’s "Outstanding Academic Title" award for 2015.
Educated as a psychologist at the University of Oslo, Stoknes has since supplemented this with studies in organizational theory, philosophy and a PhD in economics. He has worked both as a clinical psychologist and strategy consultant, bringing imagination and creative expression into these spheres.
A popular speaker throughout Scandinavia, Stoknes lives in central Oslo. But he heads off to northern mountains or to his forest cabin in order to feel the free winds and get awe-struck as often as occasion allows.
Per Espen Stoknes | Speaker | TED.com