ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Karina Galperin - Literary scholar
Karina Galperin studies the culture, language and literature of early modern Iberia.

Why you should listen

Karina Galperin spends long hours reading old books, with old spelling, in her office at Universidad Torcuato Di Tella in Buenos Aires, Argentina. She received her Ph.D. in Romance Languages and Literatures from Harvard University in 2002, specializing in early modern Spanish literature.

In her scholarship and teaching, she became familiar with the discussions on spelling that took place in Spanish and other languages from as early as the 15th century to today. However, what ended up calling her attention to the spelling issue was the convergence of her academic awareness with other experiences. As a social media user, she noticed how spelling mistakes are frequently pointed out with unusual harshness and contempt. As a mother, she saw her children devote huge amounts of time to memorizing words and rules, in detriment to other aspects of language.

More profile about the speaker
Karina Galperin | Speaker | TED.com
TEDxRiodelaPlata

Karina Galperin: Should we simplify spelling?

Filmed:
590,752 views

How much energy and brain power do we devote to learning how to spell? Language evolves over time, and with it the way we spell -- is it worth it to spend so much time memorizing rules that are filled with endless exceptions? Literary scholar Karina Galperin suggests that it may be time for an update in the way we think about and record language. (In Spanish with English subtitles)
- Literary scholar
Karina Galperin studies the culture, language and literature of early modern Iberia. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:12
We lost a lot of time at school
learning spelling.
0
861
4361
00:17
Kids are still losing a lot of time
at school with spelling.
1
5964
6005
00:24
That's why I want to share
a question with you:
2
12585
3651
00:29
Do we need new spelling rules?
3
17720
3111
00:33
I believe that yes, we do.
4
21572
2294
00:35
Or even better, I think we need
to simplify the ones we already have.
5
23890
4630
00:41
Neither the question nor the answer
are new in the Spanish language.
6
29187
4278
00:45
They have been bouncing around
from century to century
7
33489
4214
00:49
since 1492, when in the first grammar
guide of the Spanish language,
8
37727
5603
00:55
Antonio de Nebrija, set a clear and simple
principle for our spelling:
9
43354
5742
01:01
"... thus, we have to write words
as we pronounce them,
10
49120
2919
01:04
and pronounce words as we write them."
11
52063
2380
01:06
Each sound was to correspond
to one letter,
12
54467
3302
01:09
each letter was to represent
a single sound,
13
57793
3325
01:13
and those which did not represent
any sound should be removed.
14
61142
5203
01:19
This approach, the phonetic approach,
15
67517
2455
01:21
which says we have to write
words as we pronounce them,
16
69996
3617
01:25
both is and isn't at the root of spelling
as we practice it today.
17
73637
4709
01:30
It is, because the Spanish language,
in contrast to English, French or others,
18
78901
5501
01:36
always strongly resisted
writing words too differently
19
84426
5311
01:41
to how we pronounce them.
20
89761
1698
01:43
But the phonetic approach
is also absent today,
21
91483
2269
01:45
because when, in the 18th century,
we decided how we would standardize
22
93776
3336
01:49
our writing,
23
97136
1212
01:50
there was another approach which guided
a good part of the decisions.
24
98372
4013
01:54
It was the etymological approach,
25
102409
2842
01:57
the one that says we have to write words
26
105275
2193
01:59
according to how they were written
in their original language,
27
107492
3154
02:02
in Latin, in Greek.
28
110670
1542
02:04
That's how we ended up with silent H's,
which we write but don't pronounce.
29
112236
4800
02:09
That's how we have B's and V's that,
contrary to what many people believe,
30
117060
5288
02:14
were never differentiated
in Spanish pronunciation.
31
122372
3667
02:18
That's how we wound up with G's,
32
126460
2048
02:20
that are sometimes aspirated,
as in "gente,"
33
128532
2681
02:23
and other times unaspirated, as in "gato."
34
131237
2381
02:25
That's how we ended up
with C's, S's and Z's,
35
133642
3510
02:29
three letters that in some places
correspond to one sound,
36
137990
3228
02:33
and in others, to two,
but nowhere to three.
37
141242
2965
02:37
I'm not here to tell you anything
you don't know from your own experience.
38
145800
4978
02:43
We all went to school,
39
151368
2949
02:46
we all invested big amounts
of learning time,
40
154341
4647
02:51
big amounts of pliant,
childlike brain time
41
159012
4698
02:55
in dictation,
42
163734
1607
02:57
in the memorization of spelling rules
filled, nevertheless, with exceptions.
43
165365
5031
03:02
We were told in many ways,
implicitly and explicitly,
44
170919
3787
03:06
that in spelling, something fundamental
to our upbringing was at stake.
45
174730
5690
03:13
Yet, I have the feeling
46
181261
2301
03:15
that teachers didn't ask themselves
why it was so important.
47
183586
3635
03:19
In fact, they didn't ask themselves
a previous question:
48
187245
3128
03:22
What is the purpose of spelling?
49
190397
2542
03:25
What do we need spelling for?
50
193993
2872
03:30
And the truth is, when someone
asks themselves this question,
51
198619
2917
03:33
the answer is much simpler
and less momentous
52
201560
3089
03:36
than we'd usually believe.
53
204673
1433
03:38
We use spelling to unify the way we write,
so we can all write the same way,
54
206672
6719
03:45
making it easier for us to understand
when we read to each other.
55
213415
4358
03:50
But unlike in other aspects of language
such as punctuation,
56
218407
5572
03:56
in spelling, there's no
individual expression involved.
57
224003
6099
04:02
In punctuation, there is.
58
230126
1444
04:04
With punctuation, I can choose
to change the meaning of a phrase.
59
232117
3956
04:08
With punctuation, I can impose
a particular rhythm to what I am writing,
60
236097
5425
04:13
but not with spelling.
61
241546
2239
04:15
When it comes to spelling,
it's either wrong or right,
62
243809
3577
04:19
according to whether it conforms
or not to the current rules.
63
247410
3594
04:23
But then, wouldn't it be more sensible
to simplify the current rules
64
251694
5354
04:29
so it would be easier to teach, learn
and use spelling correctly?
65
257072
5972
04:35
Wouldn't it be more sensible
to simplify the current rules
66
263678
4507
04:40
so that all the time we devote today
to teaching spelling,
67
268209
5352
04:45
we could devote to other language issues
68
273585
3068
04:48
whose complexities do, in fact,
deserve the time and effort?
69
276677
3967
04:54
What I propose is not to abolish spelling,
70
282433
4964
04:59
and have everyone write however they want.
71
287421
3992
05:03
Language is a tool of common usage,
72
291878
3920
05:07
and so I believe it's fundamental
that we use it following common criteria.
73
295822
5332
05:13
But I also find it fundamental
74
301609
2172
05:15
that those common criteria
be as simple as possible,
75
303805
4346
05:20
especially because
if we simplify our spelling,
76
308175
3834
05:24
we're not leveling it down;
77
312033
2813
05:26
when spelling is simplified,
78
314870
2673
05:29
the quality of the language
doesn't suffer at all.
79
317567
3778
05:34
I work every day with Spanish
Golden Age literature,
80
322109
3909
05:38
I read Garcilaso, Cervantes,
Góngora, Quevedo,
81
326042
3604
05:41
who sometimes write "hombre" without H,
82
329670
2947
05:44
sometimes write "escribir" with V,
83
332641
3228
05:47
and it's absolutely clear to me
84
335893
2439
05:50
that the difference between those texts
and ours is one of convention,
85
338356
5401
05:55
or rather, a lack of convention
during their time.
86
343781
3593
05:59
But it's not a difference of quality.
87
347398
2029
06:02
But let me go back to the masters,
88
350344
2424
06:04
because they're key characters
in this story.
89
352792
3354
06:08
Earlier, I mentioned this slightly
thoughtless insistence
90
356170
5441
06:13
with which teachers pester and pester us
91
361635
2914
06:16
over spelling.
92
364573
1500
06:18
But the truth is,
things being as they are,
93
366097
3472
06:21
this makes perfect sense.
94
369593
2292
06:23
In our society, spelling serves
as an index of privilege,
95
371909
5339
06:29
separating the cultured from the brute,
the educated from the ignorant,
96
377272
4388
06:33
independent of the content
that's being written.
97
381684
4988
06:38
One can get or not get a job
98
386696
3311
06:42
because of an H that one put or did not.
99
390031
2669
06:44
One can become
an object of public ridicule
100
392724
3189
06:47
because of a misplaced B.
101
395937
2651
06:50
Therefore, in this context,
102
398612
2176
06:52
of course, it makes sense to dedicate
all this time to spelling.
103
400812
5073
06:57
But we shouldn't forget
104
405909
2538
07:00
that throughout the history
of our language,
105
408471
2200
07:02
it has always been teachers
106
410695
1940
07:04
or people involved
in the early learning of language
107
412659
3925
07:08
who promoted spelling reforms,
108
416608
2520
07:11
who realized that in our spelling
there was often an obstacle
109
419152
4439
07:15
to the transmission of knowledge.
110
423615
2389
07:18
In our case, for example,
111
426028
1667
07:19
Sarmiento, together with Andrés Bello,
spearheaded the biggest spelling reform
112
427719
4553
07:24
to take place in the Spanish language:
113
432296
3405
07:27
the mid-19th century Chilean reform.
114
435725
4510
07:33
Then, why not take over
the task of those teachers
115
441894
4461
07:38
and start making progress in our spelling?
116
446379
3393
07:41
Here, in this intimate group of 10,000,
117
449796
3252
07:45
I'd like to bring to the table
118
453072
1554
07:46
some changes that I find reasonable
to start discussing.
119
454650
4471
07:52
Let's remove the silent H.
120
460207
2368
07:54
In places where we write an H
but pronounce nothing,
121
462599
5088
07:59
let's not write anything.
122
467711
1291
08:01
(Applause)
123
469026
1016
08:02
It's hard for me to imagine
what sentimental attachment
124
470066
2638
08:04
can justify to someone
all the hassle caused by the silent H.
125
472728
4991
08:09
B and V, as we said before,
126
477743
2345
08:12
were never differentiated
in the Spanish language --
127
480112
2870
08:15
(Applause)
128
483006
1017
08:16
Let's choose one; it could be either.
We can discuss it, talk it over.
129
484047
3305
08:19
Everyone will have their preferences
and can make their arguments.
130
487376
3630
08:23
Let's keep one, remove the other.
131
491030
2844
08:25
G and J, let's separate their roles.
132
493898
3007
08:28
G should keep the unaspirated sound,
like in "gato," "mago," and "águila,"
133
496929
4422
08:33
and J should keep the aspirated sound,
134
501375
3296
08:36
as in "jarabe," "jirafa,"
"gente," "argentino."
135
504695
4894
08:42
The case of C, S and Z is interesting,
136
510441
5328
08:47
because it shows that the phonetic
approach must be a guide,
137
515793
3837
08:51
but it can't be an absolute principle.
138
519654
3065
08:54
In some cases, the differences
in pronunciation must be addressed.
139
522743
4759
08:59
As I said before, C, S and Z,
140
527526
2906
09:02
in some places, correspond
to one sound, in others to two.
141
530456
3342
09:05
If we go from three letters
to two, we're all better off.
142
533822
5186
09:12
To some, these changes
may seem a bit drastic.
143
540247
4870
09:17
They're really not.
144
545141
2181
09:19
The Royal Spanish Academy,
all of language academies,
145
547346
3263
09:22
also believes that spelling
should be progressively modified;
146
550633
4905
09:27
that language is linked to history,
tradition and custom,
147
555562
4886
09:32
but that at the same time,
it is a practical everyday tool
148
560472
4623
09:37
and that sometimes this attachment
to history, tradition and custom
149
565119
4894
09:42
becomes an obstacle for its current usage.
150
570037
5084
09:47
Indeed, this explains the fact
151
575619
2109
09:49
that our language, much more than
the others we are geographically close to,
152
577752
6953
09:56
has been historically
modifying itself based on us,
153
584729
3528
10:00
for example, we went
from "ortographia" to "ortografía,"
154
588281
3654
10:03
from "theatro" to "teatro,"
from "quantidad" to "cantidad,"
155
591959
4101
10:08
from "symbolo" to "símbolo."
156
596084
2388
10:10
And some silent H's are slowly
being stealthily removed:
157
598496
5407
10:15
in the Dictionary of the Royal Academy,
158
603927
2240
10:18
"arpa" and "armonía" can be written
with or without an H.
159
606191
5792
10:24
And everybody is OK.
160
612007
1500
10:27
I also believe
161
615452
2748
10:30
that this is a particularly appropriate
moment to have this discussion.
162
618224
5945
10:37
It's always said that language
changes spontaneously,
163
625397
4011
10:41
from the bottom up,
164
629432
1866
10:43
that its users are the ones
who incorporate new words
165
631322
3273
10:46
and who introduce grammatical changes,
166
634619
3535
10:50
and that the authority --
in some places an academy,
167
638178
3817
10:54
in others a dictionary,
in others a ministry --
168
642019
3911
10:57
accepts and incorporates them
long after the fact.
169
645954
3826
11:02
This is true only
for some levels of language.
170
650576
3648
11:06
It is true on the lexical level,
the level of words.
171
654248
3395
11:09
It is less true on the grammatical level,
172
657667
3254
11:12
and I would almost say
it is not true for the spelling level,
173
660945
4186
11:17
that has historically changed
from the top down.
174
665155
4041
11:21
Institutions have always been the ones
to establish the rules
175
669220
4035
11:25
and propose changes.
176
673279
2340
11:29
Why do I say this is a particularly
appropriate moment?
177
677143
4790
11:33
Until today,
178
681957
1368
11:35
writing always had a much more restricted
and private use than speech.
179
683349
6140
11:42
But in our time,
the age of social networks,
180
690118
4474
11:46
this is going through
a revolutionary change.
181
694616
3147
11:50
Never before have people written so much;
182
698311
3044
11:53
never before have people written
for so many others to see.
183
701379
4548
11:58
And in these social networks,
for the first time,
184
706536
3117
12:01
we're seeing innovative uses
of spelling on a large scale,
185
709677
5040
12:06
where even more-than-educated people
with impeccable spelling,
186
714741
4609
12:11
when using social networks,
187
719374
2280
12:13
behave a lot like the majority of users
of social networks behave.
188
721678
5549
12:19
That is to say, they slack
on spell-checking
189
727251
3682
12:22
and prioritize speed and efficacy
in communication.
190
730957
4835
12:28
For now, on social networks,
we see chaotic, individual usages.
191
736309
5431
12:33
But I think we have
to pay attention to them,
192
741764
3017
12:36
because they're probably telling us
193
744805
2347
12:39
that an era that designates
a new place for writing
194
747176
4598
12:43
seeks new criteria for that writing.
195
751798
4309
12:48
I think we'd be wrong
to reject them, to discard them,
196
756448
5118
12:53
because we identify them as symptoms
of the cultural decay of our times.
197
761590
4972
12:58
No, I believe we have to observe them,
organize them and channel them
198
766586
4938
13:03
within guidelines that better correspond
to the needs of our times.
199
771548
5662
13:10
I can anticipate some objections.
200
778741
3732
13:15
There will be those who'll say
201
783524
1430
13:16
that if we simplify spelling
we'll lose etymology.
202
784978
5110
13:22
Strictly speaking, if we wanted
to preserve etymology,
203
790923
3090
13:26
it would go beyond just spelling.
204
794037
2430
13:28
We'd also have to learn
Latin, Greek, Arabic.
205
796491
4005
13:33
With simplified spelling,
206
801239
2631
13:35
we would normalize etymology
in the same place we do now:
207
803894
5190
13:41
in etymological dictionaries.
208
809108
2349
13:44
A second objection will come
from those who say:
209
812117
3007
13:47
"If we simplify spelling,
we'll stop distinguishing
210
815148
3718
13:50
between words that differ
in just one letter."
211
818890
3676
13:54
That is true, but it's not a problem.
212
822590
4090
13:58
Our language has homonyms,
words with more than one meaning,
213
826704
4976
14:03
yet we don't confuse
the "banco" where we sit
214
831704
2762
14:06
with the "banco" where we deposit money,
215
834490
2072
14:08
or the "traje" that we wear
with the things we "trajimos."
216
836586
3249
14:11
In the vast majority of situations,
context dispels any confusion.
217
839859
6639
14:19
But there's a third objection.
218
847192
2953
14:24
To me,
219
852102
1172
14:27
it's the most understandable,
even the most moving.
220
855053
3445
14:30
It's the people who'll say:
"I don't want to change.
221
858522
3468
14:34
I was brought up like this,
I got used to doing it this way,
222
862536
3709
14:38
when I read a written word
in simplified spelling, my eyes hurt."
223
866269
6273
14:44
(Laughter)
224
872566
1801
14:46
This objection is, in part, in all of us.
225
874391
4873
14:52
What do I think we should do?
226
880183
1489
14:53
The same thing that's always
done in these cases:
227
881696
2709
14:56
changes are made looking forward;
children are taught the new rules,
228
884429
5413
15:01
those of us who don't want to adapt
can write the way we're used to writing,
229
889866
4533
15:06
and hopefully, time will cement
the new rules in place.
230
894423
4301
15:11
The success of every spelling reform
that affects deeply rooted habits
231
899264
6507
15:17
lies in caution, agreement,
gradualism and tolerance.
232
905795
5306
15:23
At the same time, can't allow
the attachment to old customs
233
911663
4318
15:28
impede us from moving forward.
234
916005
2315
15:30
The best tribute we can pay to the past
235
918775
3436
15:34
is to improve upon what it's given us.
236
922235
2514
15:37
So I believe that we must
reach an agreement,
237
925255
2573
15:39
that academies must reach an agreement,
238
927852
3011
15:42
and purge from our spelling rules
239
930887
2938
15:45
all the habits we practice
just for the sake of tradition,
240
933849
3705
15:49
even if they are useless now.
241
937578
1661
15:51
I'm convinced that if we do that
242
939685
3476
15:55
in the humble but extremely
important realm of language,
243
943185
4000
15:59
we'll be leaving a better future
to the next generations.
244
947209
5334
16:05
(Applause)
245
953122
3408
Translated by Gisela Giardino
Reviewed by Camille Martínez

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Karina Galperin - Literary scholar
Karina Galperin studies the culture, language and literature of early modern Iberia.

Why you should listen

Karina Galperin spends long hours reading old books, with old spelling, in her office at Universidad Torcuato Di Tella in Buenos Aires, Argentina. She received her Ph.D. in Romance Languages and Literatures from Harvard University in 2002, specializing in early modern Spanish literature.

In her scholarship and teaching, she became familiar with the discussions on spelling that took place in Spanish and other languages from as early as the 15th century to today. However, what ended up calling her attention to the spelling issue was the convergence of her academic awareness with other experiences. As a social media user, she noticed how spelling mistakes are frequently pointed out with unusual harshness and contempt. As a mother, she saw her children devote huge amounts of time to memorizing words and rules, in detriment to other aspects of language.

More profile about the speaker
Karina Galperin | Speaker | TED.com