ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Juliet Brophy - Paleoanthropologist
Juliet Brophy explores human evolution in southern Africa.

Why you should listen

Juliet Brophy's research interests involve using morphometric analyses of fossil teeth to examine taxonomic differences among Plio-Pleistocene fossil human ancestors (hominins) and to evaluate their evolutionary relationships. Her most recent focus investigates the teeth of Australopithecus sediba and Homo naledi from South Africa. Her ongoing research helped establish the phylogenetic position of these fossils.

Brophy also documents the paleoenvironments associated with the South African hominins and assesses how changes in these environments might have influenced human evolution. She works as an assistant professor biological anthropologist with a specialization in paleoanthropology in the Department of Geography and Anthropology at Louisiana State University.

More profile about the speaker
Juliet Brophy | Speaker | TED.com
TEDxLSU

Juliet Brophy: How a new species of ancestors is changing our theory of human evolution

Filmed:
2,265,268 views

In 2013, a treasure trove of unusual fossils were uncovered in a cave in South Africa, and researchers soon realized: these were the remains of a new species of ancient humans. Paleoanthropologist Juliet Brophy takes us inside the discovery of Homo naledi, explaining how this mysterious ancestor is forcing us to rethink where we come from -- and what it means to be human.
- Paleoanthropologist
Juliet Brophy explores human evolution in southern Africa. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:13
Human origins.
0
1451
1150
00:15
Who are we?
1
3225
1150
00:16
Where do we come from,
2
4741
1584
00:18
and how do we know?
3
6349
1211
00:20
In my field, paleoanthropology,
4
8391
2545
00:22
we explore human origins --
5
10960
1772
00:24
the "who" and "where" questions --
6
12756
2063
00:26
by analyzing fossils that date back
thousands and even millions of years.
7
14843
3759
00:32
In 2015, a team of colleagues and I
named a new species in the genus Homo --
8
20085
5596
00:37
our genus --
9
25705
1600
00:39
Homo naledi.
10
27329
1150
00:42
Let's take a step back
and put that into context.
11
30669
2464
00:47
The last common ancestors
between humans and chimps
12
35019
2961
00:50
date somewhere between six
and eight million years.
13
38004
2631
00:54
The earliest hominins,
14
42071
1925
00:56
or earliest human ancestors,
15
44020
1941
00:57
evolved into a group
known as the australopithecines.
16
45985
2715
01:01
The australopithecines
evolved into the genus Homo
17
49844
3343
01:05
and eventually modern humans -- us.
18
53211
2799
01:09
With each new fossil discovery,
19
57152
2344
01:11
we get a little bit closer
to better understanding who we are
20
59520
3989
01:15
and where we came from.
21
63533
1299
01:17
With these new fossil finds,
22
65653
2012
01:19
we realize we now have to make
changes to this tree.
23
67689
2655
01:24
Until this discovery,
24
72835
1670
01:26
we thought we had a pretty good idea
about the patterns of evolutionary change.
25
74529
3766
01:31
Current fossil evidence suggests
26
79389
1764
01:33
that the earliest populations
of the genus Homo evolved in Africa
27
81177
3751
01:36
somewhere between two
and three million years.
28
84952
2230
01:39
Fast-forward to approximately
300,000 years to where we see the origins
29
87787
3963
01:43
of the first modern humans.
30
91774
1586
01:46
While the fossil record
between these time frames in Africa
31
94106
2955
01:49
is relatively sparse,
32
97085
2168
01:51
the fossils nonetheless
demonstrated certain trends
33
99277
3503
01:54
from our earliest ancestors
to modern humans.
34
102804
2976
01:58
For example, our brains
were becoming larger
35
106822
2445
02:01
relative the rest of our body.
36
109291
1530
02:03
Our pelves were becoming more bowl-shaped,
37
111417
2720
02:06
and our hand-wrist morphology, or form,
38
114161
3036
02:09
suggested a change in our grip
as we began to make and use stone tools
39
117221
4355
02:13
and spend less time in the trees.
40
121600
1775
02:16
These new fossils disrupt everything
we thought we knew about these trends
41
124777
5623
02:22
and force us to change the way
that we think about human evolution.
42
130424
3564
02:28
South Africa in general,
43
136745
1491
02:30
but the Cradle of Humankind in particular,
44
138260
2043
02:32
contains numerous sites where hundreds
of thousands of fossils have been found.
45
140327
3744
02:36
As an undergraduate student,
I fell in love with one of them ...
46
144729
3506
02:40
Mrs. Ples.
47
148259
1153
02:41
The skull of a 2.1-million-year-old
early human ancestor.
48
149436
3333
02:45
From that point on,
49
153561
1158
02:46
I was determined to go to South Africa
and study human evolution.
50
154743
3111
02:50
I first traveled there in 2003,
51
158601
2198
02:52
and I did get to see my beloved Mrs. Ples.
52
160823
2524
02:55
(Laughter)
53
163371
1140
02:56
But words can hardly convey my excitement
54
164535
3001
02:59
when I was chosen
as an early career scientist
55
167560
3398
03:02
by Lee Berger,
56
170982
1287
03:04
a world-renowned paleoanthropologist,
57
172293
2427
03:06
to be one of the primary analysts
of recently excavated unpublished fossils.
58
174744
5801
03:13
This treasure trove of fossils
was being recovered from a new site
59
181760
4410
03:18
called the Dinaledi Chamber
in the Rising Star cave system.
60
186194
3342
03:23
Species are often named
based on a skull, a lower jaw,
61
191094
4015
03:27
or, very rarely,
62
195133
1357
03:28
a handful of postcranial,
or below-the-neck, elements.
63
196514
3605
03:32
The fossils from Dinaledi
were another story altogether.
64
200838
2928
03:36
An unprecedented
approximately 1800 specimens --
65
204462
3594
03:40
so far --
66
208080
1410
03:41
have been excavated
from the Rising Star system,
67
209514
2713
03:44
representing at least
15 individual skeletons.
68
212251
2793
03:50
The research team
that I was invited to join
69
218009
2330
03:52
was tasked with describing,
comparing and analyzing the fossils,
70
220363
3768
03:56
with the difficult goal of identifying
to what species the fossils belonged.
71
224155
4459
04:01
We were divided up
into our different areas of expertise.
72
229590
2844
04:04
We were divided up
in different areas of the lab, too.
73
232925
2543
04:07
So there was "Hand Land,"
for the fossil hand people,
74
235492
3498
04:11
"Hip Heaven" for the pelvis ...
75
239014
1690
04:13
I was in the "Tooth Booth."
76
241457
1673
04:15
(Laughter)
77
243154
1528
04:16
And after long, intense days in the lab,
78
244706
2700
04:19
the different teams would meet up at night
and discuss our findings,
79
247430
3235
04:22
still consumed by questions
from our analyses.
80
250689
3076
04:25
It was incredible how different
the interpretations were.
81
253789
2729
04:29
Each body part seemed to come
from a different species,
82
257137
3186
04:32
based on what we knew
from the fossil record.
83
260347
2168
04:35
The suite of characteristics we were
seeing didn't match any known species.
84
263300
4690
04:40
And if we had only recovered the skull,
we might have called it one thing;
85
268630
3485
04:44
if we had only recovered the pelvis,
we might have called it another.
86
272139
3403
04:48
The anatomy of the skeletons
didn't make sense
87
276388
2881
04:51
with the framework of what we thought
we knew of human evolution.
88
279293
3404
04:55
Did it belong in the genus Homo?
89
283898
1599
04:58
Should it be an australopithecine?
90
286108
1909
05:00
Those bipedal, more apelike ancestors?
91
288041
2475
05:03
Or perhaps it should be its own species.
92
291036
2063
05:06
Ultimately, after much deliberation,
93
294110
2948
05:09
we decided the Rising Star specimens
did indeed warrant a new species,
94
297082
4118
05:13
which we called "Homo naledi."
95
301224
1913
05:16
From the head to the feet,
96
304934
1556
05:18
the fossils present a mosaic
of primitive, or ancestral,
97
306514
3601
05:22
and derived or more modern-like features.
98
310139
2355
05:25
The skull is quite derived,
99
313039
3103
05:28
appearing most similar to early
representatives of the genus Homo,
100
316166
3640
05:31
like Homo habilis and Homo erectus.
101
319830
2348
05:35
However, the brain is scarcely
half the size of a modern human one.
102
323001
4174
05:39
One that is smaller than any other
early Homo that has ever been found.
103
327840
3770
05:45
As someone who studies teeth,
104
333437
1831
05:47
I might argue these are the coolest
fossils found at the site.
105
335292
2905
05:50
(Laughter)
106
338221
1050
05:51
The assemblage consists of 190
whole or fragmentary teeth
107
339295
3264
05:54
that range in age
from very old to very young.
108
342583
2483
05:58
Like the skeletons,
109
346501
1252
05:59
the teeth present a mix
of primitive and derived traits.
110
347777
2763
06:03
In modern humans,
111
351444
1493
06:04
the third molar is typically the smallest,
while the first molar is the biggest,
112
352961
4639
06:09
but Homo naledi
has the primitive condition
113
357624
2141
06:11
where the third molar is the biggest
and the first molar is the smallest.
114
359789
3528
06:16
The anterior teeth,
115
364111
1151
06:17
or the incisors and canines,
116
365286
2101
06:19
are small for the genus Homo,
117
367411
2873
06:22
and the lower canine
has a cuspulid on it --
118
370308
3139
06:25
an extra cuspule that gives it
a distinct mitten-like shape
119
373471
4056
06:29
that it shares with some specimens
of the early human, Homo erectus.
120
377551
4881
06:35
The overall shape of the teeth
looked odd to me,
121
383744
3226
06:38
so I performed crown-shape analysis
122
386994
2526
06:41
on the occlusal surfaces
of deciduous teeth, or baby teeth --
123
389544
4547
06:46
on your left --
124
394115
1415
06:47
and the permanent premolars
and molars on your right.
125
395554
2762
06:51
The deciduous teeth are especially narrow,
126
399672
3310
06:55
and the premolars are unique
in their outline shape
127
403006
3412
06:58
compared to other hominids.
128
406442
1502
07:00
In fact, when I compare the outlines,
129
408577
2454
07:03
when I lay them on top of each other,
130
411055
1888
07:04
they look very similar.
131
412967
1622
07:07
We say they have
"low intraspecific variations,"
132
415203
2885
07:10
so the variation
within the species is low.
133
418112
2259
07:12
When I compare this to groups
like the australopithecines,
134
420395
2927
07:15
the intraspecific variation
is much larger.
135
423346
2762
07:20
Postcranially, the team concluded
136
428172
2235
07:22
that the position of the shoulders
suggesting naledi was a climber;
137
430431
3390
07:25
the flared pelvis and curved fingers
are all primitive for the genus Homo.
138
433845
4940
07:31
On the other hand,
139
439554
1461
07:33
the humanlike wrist,
long slender legs and modern feet
140
441039
4411
07:37
are all consistent
with other members of the genus.
141
445474
2568
07:42
In 2017, we announced
more specimens of Homo naledi
142
450992
4721
07:47
from the nearby Lesedi Chamber,
143
455737
1996
07:49
also in the Rising Star cave system.
144
457757
1993
07:52
In addition, our geology team
managed to produce an age estimate.
145
460439
3867
07:57
The date's a big deal
because, up until now,
146
465150
2994
08:00
we had based our analysis solely
on the morphology of the specimens,
147
468168
4760
08:04
without previous knowledge
of how old something is --
148
472952
2600
08:07
something which could unconsciously
bias our interpretations.
149
475576
3357
08:11
With its small brain and flared pelvis,
150
479623
3025
08:14
we would not have been surprised
151
482672
1525
08:16
if the fossils turned out to be
two million years old.
152
484221
2537
08:19
Instead, the fossils dated
153
487171
2277
08:21
to 235 to 336 thousand years,
154
489472
4806
08:26
an incredibly young date
for such a small-brained individual.
155
494302
2878
08:29
So think back to what I said earlier:
156
497889
1763
08:31
we thought that our brains were becoming
larger relative to the rest of our body.
157
499676
3864
08:35
Now we have a small-brained,
young individual complicating this idea.
158
503564
4487
08:41
What does all this mean?
159
509122
1663
08:44
Homo naledi has taught us
160
512097
1370
08:45
that we need to reassess
what it means to be in the genus Homo.
161
513491
3315
08:49
We need to rethink
what it means to be human.
162
517217
2177
08:51
In fact, most of the characteristics
that we use to define the genus Homo,
163
519986
4244
08:56
such as brain size and hip morphology,
164
524254
2649
08:58
are no longer valid.
165
526927
1416
09:01
No other species exists with this mix
of primitive and derived traits.
166
529235
4583
09:07
Why is there so much morphological
variation in the genus Homo?
167
535127
3122
09:10
And what force is driving that variation?
168
538273
2243
09:14
Another implication for these fossils
is that for the first time,
169
542172
3623
09:17
we have concrete evidence
of a species coexisting in Africa,
170
545819
3948
09:21
at 300,000 years,
171
549791
1239
09:23
with modern humans.
172
551054
1307
09:25
Until this discovery,
173
553029
1322
09:26
we only had large-brained
modern humans that existed in Africa.
174
554375
4954
09:33
Did they interbreed with each other?
175
561091
1746
09:35
Did they compete with each other?
176
563208
1598
09:38
Another implication
that these fossils have
177
566906
3409
09:42
is for the archaeologists
studying stone tools in South Africa.
178
570339
3018
09:45
Keep in mind that neither the Dinaledi
nor the Lesedi Chambers
179
573924
3256
09:49
have any artifacts in them.
180
577204
1869
09:51
However, they do overlap in time
with several stone-tool industries,
181
579489
4506
09:56
the makers of which are considered
to be either modern humans
182
584019
3893
09:59
or direct human ancestors.
183
587936
1737
10:02
This begs the question:
184
590645
1592
10:04
Who made the stone tools of South Africa?
185
592261
2109
10:07
Brain size has historically
played a key role
186
595369
2179
10:09
in identifying a species as a tool user.
187
597572
2529
10:12
The idea is that you need
to have a large brain
188
600125
2191
10:14
to have even the capacity
to make stone tools.
189
602340
2689
10:17
But that notion has been questioned.
190
605053
1779
10:19
Furthermore, Homo naledi,
even with its small brain size,
191
607660
3103
10:22
has a hand-wrist morphology
similar to other species
192
610787
3153
10:25
that did make and use stone tools,
193
613964
2624
10:28
suggesting it had the capability.
194
616612
1842
10:31
With two species coexisting
in Africa at 300,000 years,
195
619314
4607
10:35
we can no longer assume
we know the maker of tools
196
623945
2575
10:38
at sites with no associated species.
197
626544
3378
10:43
So where does Homo naledi fit
in our human evolutionary lineage?
198
631771
3025
10:47
Who is it most closely related to?
199
635217
2111
10:49
Who did it evolve from?
200
637352
1401
10:51
We're still trying to figure all that out.
201
639255
2014
10:53
It's ironic, because
paleoanthropologists are renowned
202
641778
2535
10:56
for having small sample sizes.
203
644337
2000
10:58
We now have a large sample size,
204
646361
1953
11:00
and more questions than answers.
205
648338
1728
11:02
Homo naledi has taught us,
206
650829
1767
11:04
has brought us a little bit closer
207
652620
1686
11:06
to better understanding
our evolutionary past.
208
654330
3031
11:10
So while Mrs. Ples will always hold
a special place in my heart,
209
658466
3839
11:14
she now shares that space
with several thousand others.
210
662329
2616
11:16
(Laughter)
211
664969
1030
11:18
Thank you.
212
666023
1152
11:19
(Applause)
213
667199
2656
Translated by Leslie Gauthier
Reviewed by Krystian Aparta

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Juliet Brophy - Paleoanthropologist
Juliet Brophy explores human evolution in southern Africa.

Why you should listen

Juliet Brophy's research interests involve using morphometric analyses of fossil teeth to examine taxonomic differences among Plio-Pleistocene fossil human ancestors (hominins) and to evaluate their evolutionary relationships. Her most recent focus investigates the teeth of Australopithecus sediba and Homo naledi from South Africa. Her ongoing research helped establish the phylogenetic position of these fossils.

Brophy also documents the paleoenvironments associated with the South African hominins and assesses how changes in these environments might have influenced human evolution. She works as an assistant professor biological anthropologist with a specialization in paleoanthropology in the Department of Geography and Anthropology at Louisiana State University.

More profile about the speaker
Juliet Brophy | Speaker | TED.com