ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Alex Steffen - Planetary futurist
Alex Steffen explores our planet's future, telling powerful, inspiring stories about the hard choices facing humanity ... and our opportunity to create a much better tomorrow.

Why you should listen

Do you ever wonder whether we should be optimistic or pessimistic about the future? If you want more reasons to think things may still turn out for the better, Alex Steffen's your man. He doesn't downplay the scope and scale of the problems we face. Instead, he shows that we have the tools within our grasp for meeting those massive challenges, if we have the will to use them.

This isn't just hopeful thinking, either. Steffen uses real-world examples and big-picture research to show us that a brighter, greener future is ours to choose, and his work has earned him the ear of leading cities, corporations and philanthropic foundations. As the New York Times said a recent profile, "Alex Steffen lays out the blueprint for a successful century."

After working as a journalist on four continents, Steffen co-founded and ran the online magazine Worldchanging.com from 2003-2010. In those seven years, he made Worldchanging one of the world's leading sustainability-related publications with an archive of almost 12,000 articles and a large global audience. He also edited an internationally best-selling book surveying innovative solutions to the planet's most pressing problems: Worldchanging: A User's Guide for the 21st Century. 

His most recent work is Carbon Zero, a book describing cities that create prosperity not climate change, accelerating their economies while reducing their climate emissions to zero. He is now at work on a new book and a television project. "The big open secret about sustainability work," he recently told Design Observer magazine, 'is not how bad things are. It is how good things can get."

More profile about the speaker
Alex Steffen | Speaker | TED.com
TEDGlobal 2011

Alex Steffen: The shareable future of cities

Filmed:
1,072,722 views

How can cities help save the future? Alex Steffen shows some cool neighborhood-based green projects that expand our access to things we want and need -- while reducing the time we spend in cars.
- Planetary futurist
Alex Steffen explores our planet's future, telling powerful, inspiring stories about the hard choices facing humanity ... and our opportunity to create a much better tomorrow. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:15
Climate change is already a heavy topic,
0
0
2000
00:17
and it's getting heavier
1
2000
2000
00:19
because we're understanding
2
4000
2000
00:21
that we need to do more than we are.
3
6000
2000
00:23
We're understanding, in fact,
4
8000
2000
00:25
that those of us who live in the developed world
5
10000
2000
00:27
need to be really pushing towards eliminating our emissions.
6
12000
3000
00:30
That's, to put it mildly, not what's on the table now.
7
15000
3000
00:33
And it tends to feel a little overwhelming
8
18000
2000
00:35
when we look at what is there in reality today
9
20000
3000
00:38
and the magnitude of the problem that we face.
10
23000
3000
00:41
And when we have overwhelming problems in front of us,
11
26000
3000
00:44
we tend to seek simple answers.
12
29000
3000
00:47
And I think this is what we've done with climate change.
13
32000
3000
00:50
We look at where the emissions are coming from --
14
35000
2000
00:52
they're coming out of our tailpipes and smokestacks and so forth,
15
37000
3000
00:55
and we say, okay, well the problem is
16
40000
2000
00:57
that they're coming out of fossil fuels that we're burning,
17
42000
2000
00:59
so therefore, the answer must be
18
44000
3000
01:02
to replace those fossil fuels with clean sources of energy.
19
47000
3000
01:05
And while, of course, we do need clean energy,
20
50000
3000
01:08
I would put to you that it's possible
21
53000
2000
01:10
that by looking at climate change
22
55000
2000
01:12
as a clean energy generation problem,
23
57000
2000
01:14
we're in fact setting ourselves up
24
59000
2000
01:16
not to solve it.
25
61000
2000
01:18
And the reason why
26
63000
2000
01:20
is that we live on a planet
27
65000
2000
01:22
that is rapidly urbanizing.
28
67000
2000
01:24
That shouldn't be news to any of us.
29
69000
2000
01:26
However, it's hard sometimes
30
71000
2000
01:28
to remember the extent of that urbanization.
31
73000
3000
01:31
By mid-century,
32
76000
2000
01:33
we're going to have about eight billion -- perhaps more -- people
33
78000
3000
01:36
living in cities or within a day's travel of one.
34
81000
3000
01:39
We will be an overwhelmingly urban species.
35
84000
3000
01:42
In order to provide
36
87000
2000
01:44
the kind of energy that it would take
37
89000
2000
01:46
for eight billion people living in cities
38
91000
2000
01:48
that are even somewhat like the cities
39
93000
2000
01:50
that those of us in the global North live in today,
40
95000
2000
01:52
we would have to generate
41
97000
2000
01:54
an absolutely astonishing amount of energy.
42
99000
2000
01:56
It may be possible
43
101000
2000
01:58
that we are not even able
44
103000
2000
02:00
to build that much clean energy.
45
105000
3000
02:03
So if we're seriously talking about tackling climate change
46
108000
3000
02:06
on an urbanizing planet,
47
111000
2000
02:08
we need to look somewhere else for the solution.
48
113000
3000
02:11
The solution, in fact, may be closer to hand than we think,
49
116000
3000
02:14
because all of those cities we're building
50
119000
2000
02:16
are opportunities.
51
121000
2000
02:18
Every city determines to a very large extent
52
123000
3000
02:21
the amount of energy used by its inhabitants.
53
126000
3000
02:24
We tend to think of energy use as a behavioral thing --
54
129000
3000
02:27
I choose to turn this light switch on --
55
132000
2000
02:29
but really, enormous amounts of our energy use
56
134000
3000
02:32
are predestined
57
137000
2000
02:34
by the kinds of communities and cities that we live in.
58
139000
3000
02:37
I won't show you very many graphs today,
59
142000
2000
02:39
but if I can just focus on this one for a moment,
60
144000
3000
02:42
it really tells us a lot of what we need to know --
61
147000
2000
02:44
which is, quite simply,
62
149000
2000
02:46
that if you look, for example, at transportation,
63
151000
2000
02:48
a major category of climate emissions,
64
153000
2000
02:50
there is a direct relationship
65
155000
2000
02:52
between how dense a city is
66
157000
2000
02:54
and the amount of climate emissions
67
159000
2000
02:56
that its residents spew out into the air.
68
161000
3000
02:59
And the correlation, of course,
69
164000
2000
03:01
is that denser places tend to have lower emissions --
70
166000
3000
03:04
which isn't really all that difficult to figure out, if you think about it.
71
169000
3000
03:07
Basically,
72
172000
2000
03:09
we substitute, in our lives,
73
174000
3000
03:12
access to the things we want.
74
177000
2000
03:14
We go out there and we hop in our cars
75
179000
2000
03:16
and we drive from place to place.
76
181000
2000
03:18
And we're basically using mobility to get the access we need.
77
183000
3000
03:21
But when we live in a denser community,
78
186000
2000
03:23
suddenly what we find, of course,
79
188000
2000
03:25
is that the things we need are close by.
80
190000
2000
03:27
And since the most sustainable trip
81
192000
2000
03:29
is the one that you never had to make in the first place,
82
194000
3000
03:32
suddenly our lives become instantly more sustainable.
83
197000
3000
03:35
And it is possible, of course,
84
200000
2000
03:37
to increase the density of the communities around us.
85
202000
3000
03:40
Some places are doing this with new eco districts,
86
205000
2000
03:42
developing whole new sustainable neighborhoods,
87
207000
2000
03:44
which is nice work if you can get it,
88
209000
2000
03:46
but most of the time, what we're talking about is, in fact,
89
211000
3000
03:49
reweaving the urban fabric that we already have.
90
214000
2000
03:51
So we're talking about things like infill development:
91
216000
3000
03:54
really sharp little changes
92
219000
2000
03:56
to where we have buildings, where we're developing.
93
221000
2000
03:58
Urban retrofitting:
94
223000
2000
04:00
creating different sorts of spaces and uses
95
225000
2000
04:02
out of places that are already there.
96
227000
2000
04:04
Increasingly, we're realizing
97
229000
2000
04:06
that we don't even need to densify an entire city.
98
231000
3000
04:09
What we need instead is an average density
99
234000
3000
04:12
that rises to a level
100
237000
2000
04:14
where we don't drive as much and so on.
101
239000
2000
04:16
And that can be done
102
241000
2000
04:18
by raising the density in very specific spots a whole lot.
103
243000
3000
04:21
So you can think of it as tent poles
104
246000
3000
04:24
that actually raise the density of the entire city.
105
249000
3000
04:27
And we find that when we do that,
106
252000
2000
04:29
we can, in fact, have a few places that are really hyper-dense
107
254000
2000
04:31
within a wider fabric of places
108
256000
2000
04:33
that are perhaps a little more comfortable
109
258000
2000
04:35
and achieve the same results.
110
260000
2000
04:37
Now we may find that there are places that are really, really dense
111
262000
3000
04:40
and still hold onto their cars,
112
265000
2000
04:42
but the reality is that, by and large,
113
267000
3000
04:45
what we see when we get a lot of people together with the right conditions
114
270000
3000
04:48
is a threshold effect,
115
273000
2000
04:50
where people simply stop driving as much,
116
275000
2000
04:52
and increasingly, more and more people,
117
277000
2000
04:54
if they're surrounded by places that make them feel at home,
118
279000
2000
04:56
give up their cars altogether.
119
281000
2000
04:58
And this is a huge, huge energy savings,
120
283000
3000
05:01
because what comes out of our tailpipe
121
286000
2000
05:03
is really just the beginning of the story
122
288000
2000
05:05
with climate emissions from cars.
123
290000
2000
05:07
We have the manufacture of the car, the disposal of the car,
124
292000
2000
05:09
all of the parking and freeways and so on.
125
294000
3000
05:12
When you can get rid of all of those
126
297000
2000
05:14
because somebody doesn't use any of them really,
127
299000
2000
05:16
you find that you can actually cut transportation emissions
128
301000
2000
05:18
as much as 90 percent.
129
303000
2000
05:20
And people are embracing this.
130
305000
2000
05:22
All around the world, we're seeing more and more people embrace this walkshed life.
131
307000
3000
05:25
People are saying that it's moving from the idea of the dream home
132
310000
3000
05:28
to the dream neighborhood.
133
313000
2000
05:30
And when you layer that over
134
315000
2000
05:32
with the kind of ubiquitous communications that we're starting to see,
135
317000
3000
05:35
what you find is, in fact,
136
320000
2000
05:37
even more access suffused into spaces.
137
322000
3000
05:40
Some of it's transportation access.
138
325000
2000
05:42
This is a Mapnificent map that shows me, in this case,
139
327000
3000
05:45
how far I can get from my home in 30 minutes
140
330000
2000
05:47
using public transportation.
141
332000
2000
05:49
Some of it is about walking. It's not all perfect yet.
142
334000
2000
05:51
This is Google Walking Maps.
143
336000
2000
05:53
I asked how to do the greater Ridgeway,
144
338000
2000
05:55
and it told me to go via Guernsey.
145
340000
2000
05:57
It did tell me that this route
146
342000
2000
05:59
maybe missing sidewalks or pedestrian paths, though.
147
344000
2000
06:01
(Laughter)
148
346000
2000
06:03
But the technologies are getting better,
149
348000
2000
06:05
and we're starting to really kind of crowdsource this navigation.
150
350000
2000
06:07
And as we just heard earlier,
151
352000
2000
06:09
of course, we're also learning how to put information on dumb objects.
152
354000
3000
06:12
Things that don't have any wiring in them at all,
153
357000
2000
06:14
we're learning how to include
154
359000
2000
06:16
in these systems of notation and navigation.
155
361000
3000
06:19
Part of what we're finding with this
156
364000
2000
06:21
is that what we thought
157
366000
2000
06:23
was the major point
158
368000
2000
06:25
of manufacturing and consumption,
159
370000
3000
06:28
which is to get a bunch of stuff,
160
373000
2000
06:30
is not, in fact,
161
375000
2000
06:32
how we really live best in dense environments.
162
377000
2000
06:34
What we're finding is that what we want
163
379000
2000
06:36
is access to the capacities of things.
164
381000
2000
06:38
My favorite example is a drill. Who here owns a drill, a home power drill?
165
383000
3000
06:41
Okay. I do too.
166
386000
2000
06:43
The average home power drill is used somewhere between six and 20 minutes
167
388000
2000
06:45
in its entire lifetime,
168
390000
2000
06:47
depending on who you ask.
169
392000
2000
06:49
And so what we do is we buy these drills
170
394000
3000
06:52
that have a potential capacity of thousands of hours of drill time,
171
397000
3000
06:55
use them once or twice to put a hole in the wall and let them sit.
172
400000
3000
06:58
Our cities, I would put to you,
173
403000
2000
07:00
are stockpiles of these surplus capacities.
174
405000
3000
07:03
And while we could try and figure out
175
408000
2000
07:05
new ways to use those capacities --
176
410000
2000
07:07
such as cooking or making ice sculptures
177
412000
2000
07:09
or even a mafia hit --
178
414000
2000
07:11
what we probably will find
179
416000
2000
07:13
is that, in fact, turning those products into services
180
418000
2000
07:15
that we have access to when we want them,
181
420000
2000
07:17
is a far smarter way to go.
182
422000
3000
07:20
And in fact, even space itself is turning into a service.
183
425000
3000
07:23
We're finding that people can share the same spaces,
184
428000
2000
07:25
do stuff with vacant space.
185
430000
3000
07:28
Buildings are becoming bundles of services.
186
433000
2000
07:30
So we have new designs
187
435000
2000
07:32
that are helping us take mechanical things that we used to spend energy on --
188
437000
3000
07:35
like heating, cooling etc. --
189
440000
2000
07:37
and turn them into things that we avoid spending energy on.
190
442000
3000
07:40
So we light our buildings with daylight.
191
445000
2000
07:42
We cool them with breezes. We heat them with sunshine.
192
447000
3000
07:45
In fact, when we use all these things,
193
450000
2000
07:47
what we've found is that, in some cases,
194
452000
2000
07:49
energy use in a building can drop as much as 90 percent.
195
454000
2000
07:51
Which brings on another threshold effect
196
456000
2000
07:53
I like to call furnace dumping,
197
458000
2000
07:55
which is, quite simply,
198
460000
2000
07:57
if you have a building that doesn't need to be heated with a furnace,
199
462000
2000
07:59
you save a whole bunch of money up front.
200
464000
2000
08:01
These things actually become cheaper to build
201
466000
2000
08:03
than the alternatives.
202
468000
2000
08:05
Now when we look at being able
203
470000
3000
08:08
to slash our product use, slash our transportation use,
204
473000
3000
08:11
slash our building energy use,
205
476000
2000
08:13
all of that is great, but it still leaves something behind.
206
478000
3000
08:16
And if we're going to really, truly become sustainable cities,
207
481000
2000
08:18
we need to think a little differently.
208
483000
2000
08:20
This is one way to do it.
209
485000
2000
08:22
This is Vancouver's propaganda about how green a city they are.
210
487000
2000
08:24
And certainly lots of people have taken to heart
211
489000
2000
08:26
this idea that a sustainable city is covered in greenery.
212
491000
3000
08:29
So we have visions like this.
213
494000
2000
08:31
We have visions like this. We have visions like this.
214
496000
3000
08:34
Now all of these are fine projects,
215
499000
2000
08:36
but they really have missed an essential point,
216
501000
3000
08:39
which is it's not about the leaves above,
217
504000
2000
08:41
it's about the systems below.
218
506000
2000
08:43
Do they, for instance, capture rainwater
219
508000
2000
08:45
so that we can reduce water use?
220
510000
2000
08:47
Water is energy intensive.
221
512000
3000
08:50
Do they, perhaps, include green infrastructure,
222
515000
2000
08:52
so that we can take runoff
223
517000
2000
08:54
and water that's going out of our houses
224
519000
2000
08:56
and clean it and filter it
225
521000
2000
08:58
and grow urban street trees?
226
523000
2000
09:00
Do they connect us back to the ecosystems around us
227
525000
3000
09:03
by, for example, connecting us to rivers
228
528000
2000
09:05
and allowing for restoration?
229
530000
2000
09:07
Do they allow for pollination,
230
532000
2000
09:09
pollinator pathways
231
534000
2000
09:11
that bees and butterflies and such can come back into our cities?
232
536000
3000
09:14
Do they even take the very waste matter
233
539000
2000
09:16
that we have from food and fiber and so forth,
234
541000
3000
09:19
and turn it back into soil
235
544000
2000
09:21
and sequester carbon --
236
546000
2000
09:23
take carbon out of the air
237
548000
2000
09:25
in the process of using our cities?
238
550000
2000
09:27
I would submit to you that all of these things are not only possible,
239
552000
3000
09:30
they're being done right now,
240
555000
2000
09:32
and that it's a darn good thing.
241
557000
2000
09:34
Because right now, our economy by and large
242
559000
3000
09:37
operates as Paul Hawken said,
243
562000
2000
09:39
"by stealing the future, selling it in the present
244
564000
2000
09:41
and calling it GDP."
245
566000
2000
09:43
And if we have another eight billion
246
568000
2000
09:45
or seven billion,
247
570000
2000
09:47
or six billion, even, people,
248
572000
2000
09:49
living on a planet where their cities also steal the future,
249
574000
3000
09:52
we're going to run out of future really fast.
250
577000
2000
09:54
But if we think differently,
251
579000
2000
09:56
I think that, in fact, we can have cities
252
581000
2000
09:58
that are not only zero emissions,
253
583000
2000
10:00
but have unlimited possibilities as well.
254
585000
2000
10:02
Thank you very much.
255
587000
2000
10:04
(Applause)
256
589000
3000

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Alex Steffen - Planetary futurist
Alex Steffen explores our planet's future, telling powerful, inspiring stories about the hard choices facing humanity ... and our opportunity to create a much better tomorrow.

Why you should listen

Do you ever wonder whether we should be optimistic or pessimistic about the future? If you want more reasons to think things may still turn out for the better, Alex Steffen's your man. He doesn't downplay the scope and scale of the problems we face. Instead, he shows that we have the tools within our grasp for meeting those massive challenges, if we have the will to use them.

This isn't just hopeful thinking, either. Steffen uses real-world examples and big-picture research to show us that a brighter, greener future is ours to choose, and his work has earned him the ear of leading cities, corporations and philanthropic foundations. As the New York Times said a recent profile, "Alex Steffen lays out the blueprint for a successful century."

After working as a journalist on four continents, Steffen co-founded and ran the online magazine Worldchanging.com from 2003-2010. In those seven years, he made Worldchanging one of the world's leading sustainability-related publications with an archive of almost 12,000 articles and a large global audience. He also edited an internationally best-selling book surveying innovative solutions to the planet's most pressing problems: Worldchanging: A User's Guide for the 21st Century. 

His most recent work is Carbon Zero, a book describing cities that create prosperity not climate change, accelerating their economies while reducing their climate emissions to zero. He is now at work on a new book and a television project. "The big open secret about sustainability work," he recently told Design Observer magazine, 'is not how bad things are. It is how good things can get."

More profile about the speaker
Alex Steffen | Speaker | TED.com