ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Chris Bliss - Writer
Chris Bliss explores the inherent challenge of communication, and how comedy opens paths to new perspectives.

Why you should listen

Chris Bliss is a national headline comedian, with credits including the Tonight Show and the Late Show with David Letterman, as well as an internationally renowned variety artist, opening for superstars from Eric Clapton to Michael Jackson.

In 2005, he founded MyBillofRights.org, with the mission of creating monuments and permanent displays of the Bill of Rights in civic spaces across America. The organization expects to dedicate America’s first monument celebrating the Bill of Rights at the Arizona Capitol Mall, in December 2012.

More profile about the speaker
Chris Bliss | Speaker | TED.com
TEDxRainier

Chris Bliss: Comedy is translation

Filmed:
764,430 views

Every act of communication is, in some way, an act of translation. Writer Chris Bliss talks about the way that great comedy can translate deep truths for a mass audience.
- Writer
Chris Bliss explores the inherent challenge of communication, and how comedy opens paths to new perspectives. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:15
Gabriel García Márquez is one of my favorite writers,
0
0
2000
00:17
for his storytelling,
1
2000
2000
00:19
but even more, I think,
2
4000
2000
00:21
for the beauty and precision of his prose.
3
6000
2000
00:23
And whether it's the opening line from "One Hundred Years of Solitude"
4
8000
4000
00:27
or the fantastical stream of consciousness
5
12000
2000
00:29
in "Autumn of the Patriarch,"
6
14000
2000
00:31
where the words rush by,
7
16000
2000
00:33
page after page of unpunctuated imagery
8
18000
2000
00:35
sweeping the reader along
9
20000
2000
00:37
like some wild river
10
22000
2000
00:39
twisting through a primal South American jungle,
11
24000
2000
00:41
reading Márquez is a visceral experience.
12
26000
3000
00:44
Which struck me as particularly remarkable
13
29000
2000
00:46
during one session with the novel
14
31000
2000
00:48
when I realized that I was being swept along
15
33000
2000
00:50
on this remarkable, vivid journey
16
35000
3000
00:53
in translation.
17
38000
2000
00:55
Now I was a comparative literature major in college,
18
40000
2000
00:57
which is like an English major,
19
42000
2000
00:59
only instead of being stuck studying Chaucer for three months,
20
44000
2000
01:01
we got to read great literature in translation
21
46000
2000
01:03
from around the world.
22
48000
2000
01:05
And as great as these books were,
23
50000
2000
01:07
you could always tell
24
52000
2000
01:09
that you were getting close to the full effect.
25
54000
2000
01:11
But not so with Márquez
26
56000
2000
01:13
who once praised his translator's versions
27
58000
2000
01:15
as being better than his own,
28
60000
3000
01:18
which is an astonishing compliment.
29
63000
3000
01:21
So when I heard that the translator, Gregory Rabassa,
30
66000
2000
01:23
had written his own book on the subject,
31
68000
2000
01:25
I couldn't wait to read it.
32
70000
2000
01:27
It's called apropos of the Italian adage
33
72000
2000
01:29
that I lifted from his forward,
34
74000
2000
01:31
"If This Be Treason."
35
76000
2000
01:33
And it's a charming read.
36
78000
2000
01:35
It's highly recommended for anyone who's interested
37
80000
2000
01:37
in the translator's art.
38
82000
2000
01:39
But the reason that I mention it
39
84000
2000
01:41
is that early on, Rabassa offers
40
86000
2000
01:43
this elegantly simple insight:
41
88000
4000
01:47
"Every act of communication
42
92000
2000
01:49
is an act of translation."
43
94000
3000
01:52
Now maybe that's been obvious to all of you for a long time,
44
97000
3000
01:55
but for me,
45
100000
2000
01:57
as often as I'd encountered
46
102000
2000
01:59
that exact difficulty on a daily basis,
47
104000
2000
02:01
I had never seen the inherent challenge of communication
48
106000
3000
02:04
in so crystalline a light.
49
109000
2000
02:06
Ever since I can remember
50
111000
2000
02:08
thinking consciously about such things,
51
113000
2000
02:10
communication has been my central passion.
52
115000
2000
02:12
Even as a child,
53
117000
2000
02:14
I remember thinking that what I really wanted most in life
54
119000
3000
02:17
was to be able to understand everything
55
122000
3000
02:20
and then to communicate it to everyone else.
56
125000
3000
02:23
So no ego problems.
57
128000
3000
02:26
It's funny, my wife, Daisy,
58
131000
2000
02:28
whose family is littered with schizophrenics --
59
133000
2000
02:30
and I mean littered with them --
60
135000
3000
02:33
once said to me, "Chris, I already have a brother who thinks he's God.
61
138000
4000
02:37
I don't need a husband who wants to be."
62
142000
2000
02:39
(Laughter)
63
144000
2000
02:41
Anyway, as I plunged through my 20s
64
146000
2000
02:43
ever more aware of how unobtainable
65
148000
2000
02:45
the first part of my childhood ambition was,
66
150000
3000
02:48
it was that second part,
67
153000
2000
02:50
being able to successfully communicate to others
68
155000
2000
02:52
whatever knowledge I was gaining,
69
157000
2000
02:54
where the futility of my quest really set in.
70
159000
3000
02:57
Time after time,
71
162000
2000
02:59
whenever I set out to share some great truth
72
164000
2000
03:01
with a soon-to-be grateful recipient,
73
166000
2000
03:03
it had the opposite effect.
74
168000
3000
03:06
Interestingly, when your opening line of communication is,
75
171000
2000
03:08
"Hey, listen up,
76
173000
2000
03:10
because I'm about to drop some serious knowledge on you,"
77
175000
4000
03:14
it's amazing how quickly you'll discover
78
179000
2000
03:16
both ice and the firing squad.
79
181000
3000
03:20
Finally, after about 10 years
80
185000
2000
03:22
of alienating friends and strangers alike,
81
187000
3000
03:25
I finally got it,
82
190000
2000
03:27
a new personal truth all my own,
83
192000
3000
03:30
that if I was going to ever communicate well with other people
84
195000
4000
03:34
the ideas that I was gaining,
85
199000
2000
03:36
I'd better find a different way of going about it.
86
201000
2000
03:38
And that's when I discovered comedy.
87
203000
3000
03:41
Now comedy travels along a distinct wavelength
88
206000
3000
03:44
from other forms of language.
89
209000
2000
03:46
If I had to place it on an arbitrary spectrum,
90
211000
2000
03:48
I'd say it falls somewhere
91
213000
2000
03:50
between poetry and lies.
92
215000
3000
03:54
And I'm not talking about all comedy here,
93
219000
2000
03:56
because, clearly, there's plenty of humor
94
221000
2000
03:58
that colors safely within the lines of what we already think and feel.
95
223000
3000
04:01
What I want to talk about
96
226000
2000
04:03
is the unique ability that the best comedy and satire has
97
228000
3000
04:06
at circumventing our ingrained perspectives --
98
231000
3000
04:09
comedy as the philosopher's stone.
99
234000
3000
04:12
It takes the base metal of our conventional wisdom
100
237000
3000
04:15
and transforms it through ridicule
101
240000
2000
04:17
into a different way of seeing
102
242000
2000
04:19
and ultimately being in the world.
103
244000
2000
04:21
Because that's what I take
104
246000
2000
04:23
from the theme of this conference: Gained in Translation.
105
248000
3000
04:26
That it's about communication
106
251000
2000
04:28
that doesn't just produce greater understanding
107
253000
2000
04:30
within the individual,
108
255000
2000
04:32
but leads to real change.
109
257000
2000
04:34
Which in my experience means communication
110
259000
2000
04:36
that manages to speak to and expand
111
261000
3000
04:39
our concept of self-interest.
112
264000
3000
04:42
Now I'm big on speaking to people's self-interest
113
267000
2000
04:44
because we're all wired for that.
114
269000
2000
04:46
It's part of our survival package,
115
271000
2000
04:48
and that's why it's become so important for us,
116
273000
3000
04:51
and that's why we're always listening at that level.
117
276000
3000
04:54
And also because that's where,
118
279000
3000
04:57
in terms of our own self-interest,
119
282000
2000
04:59
we finally begin to grasp
120
284000
2000
05:01
our ability to respond, our responsibility
121
286000
3000
05:04
to the rest of the world.
122
289000
2000
05:06
Now as to what I mean by the best comedy and satire,
123
291000
3000
05:09
I mean work that comes first and foremost
124
294000
2000
05:11
from a place of honesty and integrity.
125
296000
3000
05:14
Now if you think back
126
299000
2000
05:16
on Tina Fey's impersonations on Saturday Night Live
127
301000
3000
05:19
of the newly nominated vice presidential candidate
128
304000
2000
05:21
Sarah Palin,
129
306000
2000
05:23
they were devastating.
130
308000
2000
05:25
Fey demonstrated far more effectively than any political pundit
131
310000
3000
05:28
the candidate's fundamental lack of seriousness,
132
313000
3000
05:31
cementing an impression
133
316000
2000
05:33
that the majority of the American public still holds today.
134
318000
3000
05:36
And the key detail of this
135
321000
2000
05:38
is that Fey's scripts weren't written by her
136
323000
2000
05:40
and they weren't written by the SNL writers.
137
325000
2000
05:42
They were lifted verbatim
138
327000
2000
05:44
from Palin's own remarks.
139
329000
2000
05:46
(Laughter)
140
331000
4000
05:50
Here was a Palin impersonator
141
335000
2000
05:52
quoting Palin word for word.
142
337000
2000
05:54
Now that's honesty and integrity,
143
339000
2000
05:56
and it's also why Fey's performances
144
341000
2000
05:58
left such a lasting impression.
145
343000
2000
06:00
On the other side of the political spectrum,
146
345000
3000
06:03
the first time that I heard Rush Limbaugh
147
348000
2000
06:05
refer to presidential hopeful John Edwards as the Breck girl
148
350000
4000
06:09
I knew that he'd made a direct hit.
149
354000
3000
06:12
Now it's not often that I'm going to associate
150
357000
2000
06:14
the words honesty and integrity with Limbaugh,
151
359000
3000
06:17
but it's really hard to argue with that punchline.
152
362000
3000
06:20
The description perfectly captured
153
365000
2000
06:22
Edwards' personal vanity.
154
367000
2000
06:24
And guess what?
155
369000
2000
06:26
That ended up being the exact personality trait
156
371000
2000
06:28
that was at the core of the scandal that ended his political career.
157
373000
3000
06:33
Now The Daily Show with John Stewart
158
378000
2000
06:35
is by far the most --
159
380000
2000
06:37
(Applause)
160
382000
5000
06:44
(Laughter)
161
389000
2000
06:46
it's by far the most well-documented example
162
391000
3000
06:49
of the effectiveness of this kind of comedy.
163
394000
3000
06:52
Survey after survey,
164
397000
2000
06:54
from Pew Research to the Annenberg Center for Public Policy,
165
399000
3000
06:57
has found that Daily Show viewers are better informed about current events
166
402000
3000
07:00
than the viewers of all major network and cable news shows.
167
405000
4000
07:04
(Applause)
168
409000
3000
07:07
Now whether this says more
169
412000
2000
07:09
about the conflict between integrity and profitability
170
414000
3000
07:12
of corporate journalism
171
417000
2000
07:14
than it does about the attentiveness of Stewart's viewers,
172
419000
2000
07:16
the larger point remains
173
421000
2000
07:18
that Stewart's material
174
423000
2000
07:20
is always grounded in a commitment to the facts --
175
425000
3000
07:23
not because his intent is to inform. It's not.
176
428000
2000
07:25
His intent is to be funny.
177
430000
2000
07:27
It just so happens that Stewart's brand of funny
178
432000
3000
07:30
doesn't work unless the facts are true.
179
435000
3000
07:33
And the result is great comedy
180
438000
2000
07:35
that's also an information delivery system
181
440000
3000
07:38
that scores markedly higher in both credibility and retention
182
443000
3000
07:41
than the professional news media.
183
446000
3000
07:44
Now this is doubly ironic
184
449000
2000
07:46
when you consider that what gives comedy its edge
185
451000
3000
07:49
at reaching around people's walls
186
454000
2000
07:51
is the way that it uses deliberate misdirection.
187
456000
3000
07:54
A great piece of comedy is a verbal magic trick,
188
459000
3000
07:57
where you think it's going over here
189
462000
2000
07:59
and then all of a sudden you're transported over here.
190
464000
3000
08:02
And there's this mental delight
191
467000
2000
08:04
that's followed by the physical response of laughter,
192
469000
2000
08:06
which, not coincidentally,
193
471000
2000
08:08
releases endorphins in the brain.
194
473000
2000
08:10
And just like that, you've been seduced
195
475000
2000
08:12
into a different way of looking at something
196
477000
2000
08:14
because the endorphins have brought down your defenses.
197
479000
3000
08:17
This is the exact opposite
198
482000
2000
08:19
of the way that anger and fear and panic,
199
484000
2000
08:21
all of the flight-or-fight responses, operate.
200
486000
3000
08:24
Flight-or-fight releases adrenalin,
201
489000
3000
08:27
which throws our walls up sky-high.
202
492000
2000
08:29
And the comedy comes along,
203
494000
2000
08:31
dealing with a lot of the same areas
204
496000
2000
08:33
where our defenses are the strongest --
205
498000
2000
08:35
race, religion, politics, sexuality --
206
500000
3000
08:38
only by approaching them through humor instead of adrenalin,
207
503000
3000
08:41
we get endorphins
208
506000
2000
08:43
and the alchemy of laughter turns our walls into windows,
209
508000
3000
08:46
revealing a fresh and unexpected point of view.
210
511000
3000
08:49
Now let me give you an example from my act.
211
514000
3000
08:52
I have some material
212
517000
2000
08:54
about the so-called radical gay agenda,
213
519000
2000
08:56
which starts off by asking,
214
521000
2000
08:58
how radical is the gay agenda?
215
523000
2000
09:00
Because from what I can tell, the three things gay Americans seem to want most
216
525000
3000
09:03
are to join the military, get married and start a family.
217
528000
3000
09:06
(Laughter)
218
531000
4000
09:10
Three things I've tried to avoid my entire life.
219
535000
4000
09:14
(Laughter)
220
539000
2000
09:16
Have at it you radical bastards. The field is yours.
221
541000
3000
09:19
(Laughter)
222
544000
3000
09:22
And that's followed by these lines
223
547000
2000
09:24
about gay adoption:
224
549000
2000
09:26
What is the problem with gay adoption?
225
551000
2000
09:28
Why is this remotely controversial?
226
553000
2000
09:30
If you have a baby and you think that baby's gay,
227
555000
3000
09:33
you should be allowed to put it up for adoption.
228
558000
2000
09:35
(Laughter)
229
560000
2000
09:37
You have given birth to an abomination.
230
562000
2000
09:39
Remove it from your household.
231
564000
3000
09:43
Now by taking the biblical epithet "abomination"
232
568000
3000
09:46
and attaching it to the ultimate image of innocence, a baby,
233
571000
4000
09:50
this joke short circuits the emotional wiring
234
575000
2000
09:52
behind the debate
235
577000
2000
09:54
and it leaves the audience with the opportunity, through their laughter,
236
579000
3000
09:57
to question its validity.
237
582000
2000
09:59
Misdirection isn't the only trick
238
584000
2000
10:01
that comedy has up its sleeve.
239
586000
2000
10:03
Economy of language
240
588000
2000
10:05
is another real strong suit of great comedy.
241
590000
2000
10:07
There are few phrases
242
592000
2000
10:09
that pack a more concentrated dose of subject and symbol
243
594000
3000
10:12
than the perfect punchline.
244
597000
2000
10:14
Bill Hicks -- and if you don't know his work,
245
599000
2000
10:16
you should really Google him --
246
601000
2000
10:18
Hicks had a routine
247
603000
2000
10:20
about getting into one of those childhood bragging contests on the playground,
248
605000
3000
10:23
where finally the other kid says to him,
249
608000
2000
10:25
"Huh? Well my dad can beat up your dad,"
250
610000
3000
10:28
to which Hicks replies,
251
613000
2000
10:30
"Really? How soon?"
252
615000
2000
10:32
(Laughter)
253
617000
5000
10:37
That's an entire childhood
254
622000
2000
10:39
in three words.
255
624000
2000
10:41
(Laughter)
256
626000
3000
10:44
Not to mention what it reveals
257
629000
2000
10:46
about the adult who's speaking them.
258
631000
2000
10:48
And one last powerful attribute
259
633000
2000
10:50
that comedy has as communication
260
635000
2000
10:52
is that it's inherently viral.
261
637000
2000
10:54
People can't wait
262
639000
2000
10:56
to pass along that new great joke.
263
641000
2000
10:58
And this isn't some new phenomenon of our wired world.
264
643000
3000
11:01
Comedy has been crossing country
265
646000
2000
11:03
with remarkable speed
266
648000
2000
11:05
way before the Internet, social media,
267
650000
2000
11:07
even cable TV.
268
652000
2000
11:09
Back in 1980
269
654000
2000
11:11
when comedian Richard Pryor accidentally set himself on fire
270
656000
3000
11:14
during a freebasing accident,
271
659000
2000
11:16
I was in Los Angeles the day after it happened
272
661000
2000
11:18
and then I was in Washington D.C. two days after that.
273
663000
4000
11:22
And I heard the exact same punchline on both coasts --
274
667000
3000
11:25
something about the Ignited Negro College Fund.
275
670000
4000
11:29
Clearly, it didn't come out of a Tonight Show monologue.
276
674000
4000
11:33
And my guess here -- and I have no research on this --
277
678000
2000
11:35
is that if you really were to look back at it and if you could research it,
278
680000
3000
11:38
you'd find out that comedy
279
683000
2000
11:40
is the second oldest viral profession.
280
685000
2000
11:42
First there were drums
281
687000
2000
11:44
and then knock-knock jokes.
282
689000
2000
11:46
(Laughter)
283
691000
2000
11:48
But it's when you put all of these elements together --
284
693000
3000
11:51
when you get the viral appeal of a great joke
285
696000
3000
11:54
with a powerful punchline
286
699000
2000
11:56
that's crafted from honesty and integrity,
287
701000
2000
11:58
it can have a real world impact
288
703000
3000
12:01
at changing a conversation.
289
706000
2000
12:03
Now I have a close friend, Joel Pett,
290
708000
2000
12:05
who's the editorial cartoonist
291
710000
2000
12:07
for the Lexington Herald-Leader.
292
712000
2000
12:09
And he used to be the USA Today Monday morning guy.
293
714000
3000
12:12
I was visiting with Joel
294
717000
2000
12:14
the weekend before the Copenhagen conference on climate change opened
295
719000
3000
12:17
in December of 2009.
296
722000
2000
12:19
And Joel was explaining to me
297
724000
2000
12:21
that, because USA Today
298
726000
2000
12:23
was one of America's four papers of record,
299
728000
2000
12:25
it would be scanned by virtually everyone in attendance at the conference,
300
730000
4000
12:29
which meant that, if he hit it out of the park with his cartoon
301
734000
3000
12:32
on Monday, the opening day of the conference,
302
737000
2000
12:34
it could get passed around
303
739000
2000
12:36
at the highest level among actual decision-makers.
304
741000
3000
12:39
So we started talking about climate change.
305
744000
3000
12:42
And it turned out that Joel and I
306
747000
2000
12:44
were both bothered by the same thing,
307
749000
2000
12:46
which was how so much of the debate
308
751000
2000
12:48
was still focused on the science
309
753000
2000
12:50
and how complete it was or wasn't,
310
755000
2000
12:52
which, to both of us,
311
757000
2000
12:54
seems somewhat intentionally off point.
312
759000
3000
12:57
Because first of all, there's this false premise
313
762000
3000
13:00
that such a thing as complete science exists.
314
765000
4000
13:04
Now Governor Perry of my newly-adopted state of Texas
315
769000
3000
13:07
was pushing this same line this past summer
316
772000
3000
13:10
at the beginning of his oops-fated campaign
317
775000
4000
13:14
for the Republican presidential nomination,
318
779000
3000
13:17
proclaiming over and over that the science wasn't complete
319
782000
3000
13:20
at the same time that 250
320
785000
3000
13:23
out of 254 counties in the state of Texas
321
788000
3000
13:26
were on fire.
322
791000
3000
13:29
And Perry's policy solution
323
794000
2000
13:31
was to ask the people of Texas
324
796000
2000
13:33
to pray for rain.
325
798000
3000
13:36
Personally, I was praying for four more fires
326
801000
2000
13:38
so we could finally complete the damn science.
327
803000
3000
13:41
(Laughter)
328
806000
5000
13:46
But back in 2009,
329
811000
2000
13:48
the question Joel and I kept turning over and over
330
813000
3000
13:51
was why this late in the game
331
816000
2000
13:53
so much energy was being spent talking about the science
332
818000
3000
13:56
when the policies necessary to address climate change
333
821000
3000
13:59
were unequivocally beneficial for humanity in the long run
334
824000
4000
14:03
regardless of the science.
335
828000
2000
14:05
So we tossed it back and forth until Joel came up with this.
336
830000
3000
14:08
Cartoon: "What if it's a big hoax and we create a better world for nothing?"
337
833000
8000
14:16
(Laughter)
338
841000
3000
14:19
You've got to love that idea.
339
844000
2000
14:21
(Applause)
340
846000
7000
14:28
How about that? How about we create a better world for nothing?
341
853000
4000
14:32
Not for God, not for country, not for profit --
342
857000
3000
14:35
just as a basic metric for global decision-making.
343
860000
4000
14:39
And this cartoon hit the bull's eye.
344
864000
3000
14:42
Shortly after the conference was over,
345
867000
2000
14:44
Joel got a request for a signed copy
346
869000
2000
14:46
from the head of the EPA in Washington
347
871000
2000
14:48
whose wall it now hangs on.
348
873000
2000
14:50
And not long after that, he got another request for a copy
349
875000
3000
14:53
from the head of the EPA in California
350
878000
2000
14:55
who used it as part of her presentation
351
880000
3000
14:58
at an international conference on climate change
352
883000
3000
15:01
in Sacramento last year.
353
886000
2000
15:03
And it didn't stop there.
354
888000
2000
15:05
To date, Joel's gotten requests from over 40 environmental groups,
355
890000
3000
15:08
in the United States, Canada and Europe.
356
893000
3000
15:11
And earlier this year,
357
896000
2000
15:13
he got a request from the Green Party in Australia
358
898000
2000
15:15
who used it in their campaign
359
900000
2000
15:17
where it became part of the debate
360
902000
2000
15:19
that resulted in the Australian parliament
361
904000
3000
15:22
adopting the most rigorous carbon tax regime
362
907000
2000
15:24
of any country in the world.
363
909000
3000
15:27
(Applause)
364
912000
5000
15:32
That is a lot of punch
365
917000
2000
15:34
for 14 words.
366
919000
3000
15:37
So my suggestion to those of you out here
367
922000
2000
15:39
who are seriously focused on creating a better world
368
924000
3000
15:42
is to take a little bit of time each day
369
927000
2000
15:44
and practice thinking funny,
370
929000
3000
15:47
because you might just find the question that you've been looking for.
371
932000
3000
15:50
Thank you.
372
935000
2000
15:52
(Applause)
373
937000
2000

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Chris Bliss - Writer
Chris Bliss explores the inherent challenge of communication, and how comedy opens paths to new perspectives.

Why you should listen

Chris Bliss is a national headline comedian, with credits including the Tonight Show and the Late Show with David Letterman, as well as an internationally renowned variety artist, opening for superstars from Eric Clapton to Michael Jackson.

In 2005, he founded MyBillofRights.org, with the mission of creating monuments and permanent displays of the Bill of Rights in civic spaces across America. The organization expects to dedicate America’s first monument celebrating the Bill of Rights at the Arizona Capitol Mall, in December 2012.

More profile about the speaker
Chris Bliss | Speaker | TED.com