ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Robb Willer - Social psychologist
Robb Willer's political research has investigated various topics, including economic inequality, racial prejudice, masculine overcompensation and Americans' views of climate change.

Why you should listen

Robb Willer is a professor of sociology, psychology and organizational behavior at Stanford University. He studies the role of morality in politics. His research shows how moral values, typically a source of ideological division, can also be used to bring people together. His political research has investigated various topics, including economic inequality, racial prejudice, masculine overcompensation and Americans' views of climate change.

Willer has won numerous awards for his teaching and research, including the Golden Apple Teaching Award, the only award given by UC-Berkeley’s student body. Willer's class, "Self and Society," was the highest enrollment class at UC-Berkeley. His consulting clients have included the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Open Society Foundation, the Last Resort Exoneration Project and the Department of Justice.

Willer's writing has appeared in the New York Times and the Washington Post, including his op-eds "The Secret to Political Persuasion" and "Is the Environment a Moral Cause?"

Willer received a Ph.D from Cornell University and a BA from the University of Iowa. Before becoming a professor, he worked as a dishwasher, construction worker, mover, line cook and union organizer.

More profile about the speaker
Robb Willer | Speaker | TED.com
TEDxMarin

Robb Willer: How to have better political conversations

Filmed:
2,681,111 views

Robb Willer studies the forces that unite and divide us. As a social psychologist, he researches how moral values -- typically a source of division -- can also be used to bring people together. Willer shares compelling insights on how we might bridge the ideological divide and offers some intuitive advice on ways to be more persuasive when talking politics.
- Social psychologist
Robb Willer's political research has investigated various topics, including economic inequality, racial prejudice, masculine overcompensation and Americans' views of climate change. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:12
So you probably have the sense,
as most people do,
0
760
3056
00:15
that polarization
is getting worse in our country,
1
3840
3656
00:19
that the divide
between the left and the right
2
7520
3456
00:23
is as bad as it's been
in really any of our lifetimes.
3
11000
3536
00:26
But you might also reasonably wonder
if research backs up your intuition.
4
14560
5280
00:32
And in a nutshell,
the answer is sadly yes.
5
20560
4680
00:38
In study after study, we find
6
26920
2016
00:40
that liberals and conservatives
have grown further apart.
7
28960
3680
00:45
They increasingly wall themselves off
in these ideological silos,
8
33440
4776
00:50
consuming different news,
talking only to like-minded others
9
38240
4136
00:54
and more and more choosing
to live in different parts of the country.
10
42400
3240
00:58
And I think that
most alarming of all of it
11
46720
3216
01:01
is seeing this rising
animosity on both sides.
12
49960
3800
01:06
Liberals and conservatives,
13
54440
1656
01:08
Democrats and Republicans,
14
56120
1896
01:10
more and more they just
don't like one another.
15
58040
3120
01:14
You see it in many different ways.
16
62320
2016
01:16
They don't want to befriend one another.
They don't want to date one another.
17
64360
3656
01:20
If they do, if they find out,
they find each other less attractive,
18
68040
3296
01:23
and they more and more don't want
their children to marry someone
19
71360
3096
01:26
who supports the other party,
20
74480
1696
01:28
a particularly shocking statistic.
21
76200
1760
01:31
You know, in my lab,
the students that I work with,
22
79640
2816
01:34
we're talking about
some sort of social pattern --
23
82480
3456
01:37
I'm a movie buff, and so I'm often like,
24
85960
3536
01:41
what kind of movie are we in here
with this pattern?
25
89520
2960
01:45
So what kind of movie are we in
with political polarization?
26
93080
3280
01:49
Well, it could be a disaster movie.
27
97080
2720
01:52
It certainly seems like a disaster.
28
100880
1680
01:54
Could be a war movie.
29
102920
2000
01:57
Also fits.
30
105640
1200
01:59
But what I keep thinking is that
we're in a zombie apocalypse movie.
31
107480
3816
02:03
(Laughter)
32
111320
1456
02:04
Right? You know the kind.
33
112800
2296
02:07
There's people wandering around in packs,
34
115120
2416
02:09
not thinking for themselves,
35
117560
1776
02:11
seized by this mob mentality
36
119360
1616
02:13
trying to spread their disease
and destroy society.
37
121000
3240
02:17
And you probably think, as I do,
38
125480
2336
02:19
that you're the good guy
in the zombie apocalypse movie,
39
127840
3456
02:23
and all this hate and polarization,
it's being propagated by the other people,
40
131320
3696
02:27
because we're Brad Pitt, right?
41
135040
1880
02:29
Free-thinking, righteous,
42
137760
2896
02:32
just trying to hold on
to what we hold dear,
43
140680
2296
02:35
you know, not foot soldiers
in the army of the undead.
44
143000
3576
02:38
Not that.
45
146600
1456
02:40
Never that.
46
148080
1200
02:42
But here's the thing:
47
150080
1496
02:43
what movie do you suppose
they think they're in?
48
151600
2720
02:47
Right?
49
155480
1216
02:48
Well, they absolutely think
that they're the good guys
50
156720
2536
02:51
in the zombie apocalypse movie. Right?
51
159280
1856
02:53
And you'd better believe
that they think that they're Brad Pitt
52
161160
2976
02:56
and that we, we are the zombies.
53
164160
2120
03:01
And who's to say that they're wrong?
54
169120
2360
03:04
I think that the truth is
that we're all a part of this.
55
172440
3120
03:08
And the good side of that
is that we can be a part of the solution.
56
176240
3160
03:12
So what are we going to do?
57
180280
2000
03:15
What can we do to chip away
at polarization in everyday life?
58
183320
4256
03:19
What could we do to connect with
and communicate with
59
187600
3816
03:23
our political counterparts?
60
191440
1720
03:25
Well, these were exactly the questions
that I and my colleague, Matt Feinberg,
61
193720
4136
03:29
became fascinated with a few years ago,
62
197880
1858
03:31
and we started
doing research on this topic.
63
199762
2200
03:34
And one of the first things
that we discovered
64
202920
2976
03:37
that I think is really helpful
for understanding polarization
65
205920
3456
03:41
is to understand
66
209400
1216
03:42
that the political divide in our country
is undergirded by a deeper moral divide.
67
210640
4416
03:47
So one of the most robust findings
in the history of political psychology
68
215080
4776
03:51
is this pattern identified
by Jon Haidt and Jesse Graham,
69
219880
3696
03:55
psychologists,
70
223600
1216
03:56
that liberals and conservatives
tend to endorse different values
71
224840
4016
04:00
to different degrees.
72
228880
1200
04:02
So for example, we find that liberals
tend to endorse values like equality
73
230600
5496
04:08
and fairness and care
and protection from harm
74
236120
3656
04:11
more than conservatives do.
75
239800
2136
04:13
And conservatives tend to endorse
values like loyalty, patriotism,
76
241960
5256
04:19
respect for authority and moral purity
77
247240
3456
04:22
more than liberals do.
78
250720
2080
04:25
And Matt and I were thinking
that maybe this moral divide
79
253920
4056
04:30
might be helpful
for understanding how it is
80
258000
3096
04:33
that liberals and conservatives
talk to one another
81
261120
2416
04:35
and why they so often
seem to talk past one another
82
263560
2416
04:38
when they do.
83
266000
1216
04:39
So we conducted a study
84
267240
1976
04:41
where we recruited liberals to a study
85
269240
3096
04:44
where they were supposed
to write a persuasive essay
86
272360
2456
04:46
that would be compelling to a conservative
in support of same-sex marriage.
87
274840
4440
04:51
And what we found was that liberals
tended to make arguments
88
279800
3256
04:55
in terms of the liberal moral values
of equality and fairness.
89
283080
4176
04:59
So they said things like,
90
287280
1736
05:01
"Everyone should have the right
to love whoever they choose,"
91
289040
3376
05:04
and, "They" -- they being gay Americans --
92
292440
2576
05:07
"deserve the same equal rights
as other Americans."
93
295040
2760
05:10
Overall, we found
that 69 percent of liberals
94
298360
3216
05:13
invoked one of the more liberal
moral values in constructing their essay,
95
301600
5416
05:19
and only nine percent invoked
one of the more conservative moral values,
96
307040
3696
05:22
even though they were supposed
to be trying to persuade conservatives.
97
310760
3416
05:26
And when we studied conservatives
and had them make persuasive arguments
98
314200
4296
05:30
in support of making English
the official language of the US,
99
318520
2896
05:33
a classically conservative
political position,
100
321440
2536
05:36
we found that they weren't
much better at this.
101
324000
2216
05:38
59 percent of them made arguments
102
326240
1616
05:39
in terms of one of the more
conservative moral values,
103
327880
2696
05:42
and just eight percent
invoked a liberal moral value,
104
330600
2496
05:45
even though they were supposed
to be targeting liberals for persuasion.
105
333120
3360
05:49
Now, you can see right away
why we're in trouble here. Right?
106
337480
4040
05:54
People's moral values,
they're their most deeply held beliefs.
107
342280
3496
05:57
People are willing
to fight and die for their values.
108
345800
3400
06:01
Why are they going to give that up
just to agree with you
109
349720
2696
06:04
on something that they don't particularly
want to agree with you on anyway?
110
352440
3536
06:08
If that persuasive appeal that
you're making to your Republican uncle
111
356000
3256
06:11
means that he doesn't
just have to change his view,
112
359280
2416
06:13
he's got to change
his underlying values, too,
113
361720
2166
06:15
that's not going to go very far.
114
363910
1560
06:18
So what would work better?
115
366080
1320
06:20
Well, we believe it's a technique
that we call moral reframing,
116
368200
4296
06:24
and we've studied it
in a series of experiments.
117
372520
2616
06:27
In one of these experiments,
118
375160
1496
06:28
we recruited liberals
and conservatives to a study
119
376680
3136
06:31
where they read one of three essays
120
379840
2296
06:34
before having their environmental
attitudes surveyed.
121
382160
3040
06:37
And the first of these essays
122
385640
1496
06:39
was a relatively conventional
pro-environmental essay
123
387160
3376
06:42
that invoked the liberal values
of care and protection from harm.
124
390560
4016
06:46
It said things like,
"In many important ways
125
394600
2536
06:49
we are causing real harm
to the places we live in,"
126
397160
2816
06:52
and, "It is essential
that we take steps now
127
400000
2816
06:54
to prevent further destruction
from being done to our Earth."
128
402840
2920
06:59
Another group of participants
129
407120
1416
07:00
were assigned to read
a really different essay
130
408560
2216
07:02
that was designed to tap into
the conservative value of moral purity.
131
410800
4440
07:08
It was a pro-environmental essay as well,
132
416190
1986
07:10
and it said things like,
133
418200
1496
07:11
"Keeping our forests, drinking water,
and skies pure is of vital importance."
134
419720
4240
07:17
"We should regard the pollution
135
425000
1496
07:18
of the places we live in
to be disgusting."
136
426520
2040
07:21
And, "Reducing pollution
can help us preserve
137
429160
2096
07:23
what is pure and beautiful
about the places we live."
138
431280
3160
07:27
And then we had a third group
139
435880
1416
07:29
that were assigned
to read just a nonpolitical essay.
140
437320
2496
07:31
It was just a comparison group
so we could get a baseline.
141
439840
2736
07:34
And what we found when we surveyed people
142
442600
1953
07:36
about their environmental
attitudes afterwards,
143
444577
2199
07:38
we found that liberals,
it didn't matter what essay they read.
144
446800
2936
07:41
They tended to have highly
pro-environmental attitudes regardless.
145
449760
3096
07:44
Liberals are on board
for environmental protection.
146
452880
2416
07:47
Conservatives, however,
147
455320
1216
07:48
were significantly more supportive
of progressive environmental policies
148
456560
4416
07:53
and environmental protection
149
461000
1536
07:54
if they had read the moral purity essay
150
462560
2056
07:56
than if they read
one of the other two essays.
151
464640
2400
08:00
We even found that conservatives
who read the moral purity essay
152
468160
3096
08:03
were significantly more likely to say
that they believed in global warming
153
471280
3496
08:06
and were concerned about global warming,
154
474800
1905
08:08
even though this essay
didn't even mention global warming.
155
476729
2727
08:11
That's just a related environmental issue.
156
479480
2456
08:13
But that's how robust
this moral reframing effect was.
157
481960
3080
08:17
And we've studied this on a whole slew
of different political issues.
158
485960
3736
08:21
So if you want to move conservatives
159
489720
3736
08:25
on issues like same-sex marriage
or national health insurance,
160
493480
3096
08:28
it helps to tie these liberal
political issues to conservative values
161
496600
3456
08:32
like patriotism and moral purity.
162
500080
2800
08:35
And we studied it the other way, too.
163
503800
2096
08:37
If you want to move liberals
to the right on conservative policy issues
164
505920
3816
08:41
like military spending and making English
the official language of the US,
165
509760
4616
08:46
you're going to be more persuasive
166
514400
1656
08:48
if you tie those conservative
policy issues to liberal moral values
167
516080
3336
08:51
like equality and fairness.
168
519440
1880
08:54
All these studies
have the same clear message:
169
522640
2856
08:57
if you want to persuade
someone on some policy,
170
525520
2936
09:00
it's helpful to connect that policy
to their underlying moral values.
171
528480
3840
09:05
And when you say it like that
172
533520
2176
09:07
it seems really obvious. Right?
173
535720
1496
09:09
Like, why did we come here tonight?
174
537240
1776
09:11
Why --
175
539040
1216
09:12
(Laughter)
176
540280
1536
09:13
It's incredibly intuitive.
177
541840
2040
09:17
And even though it is,
it's something we really struggle to do.
178
545400
3296
09:20
You know, it turns out that when we go
to persuade somebody on a political issue,
179
548720
3856
09:24
we talk like we're speaking into a mirror.
180
552600
2736
09:27
We don't persuade so much
as we rehearse our own reasons
181
555360
4376
09:31
for why we believe
some sort of political position.
182
559760
2880
09:35
We kept saying when we were designing
these reframed moral arguments,
183
563400
4416
09:39
"Empathy and respect,
empathy and respect."
184
567840
2640
09:43
If you can tap into that,
185
571040
1456
09:44
you can connect
186
572520
1656
09:46
and you might be able to persuade
somebody in this country.
187
574200
2800
09:49
So thinking again
188
577560
2416
09:52
about what movie we're in,
189
580000
2280
09:55
maybe I got carried away before.
190
583200
1576
09:56
Maybe it's not a zombie apocalypse movie.
191
584800
1960
09:59
Maybe instead it's a buddy cop movie.
192
587520
1920
10:02
(Laughter)
193
590040
2016
10:04
Just roll with it, just go with it please.
194
592080
2016
10:06
(Laughter)
195
594120
1440
10:08
You know the kind:
there's a white cop and a black cop,
196
596480
2696
10:11
or maybe a messy cop and an organized cop.
197
599200
2136
10:13
Whatever it is, they don't get along
198
601360
2056
10:15
because of this difference.
199
603440
1286
10:17
But in the end, when they have
to come together and they cooperate,
200
605520
3216
10:20
the solidarity that they feel,
201
608760
1936
10:22
it's greater because of that gulf
that they had to cross. Right?
202
610720
3640
10:27
And remember that in these movies,
203
615280
1976
10:29
it's usually worst in the second act
204
617280
2896
10:32
when our leads are further apart
than ever before.
205
620200
2400
10:35
And so maybe that's
where we are in this country,
206
623440
2336
10:37
late in the second act
of a buddy cop movie --
207
625800
2176
10:40
(Laughter)
208
628000
2576
10:42
torn apart but about
to come back together.
209
630600
3080
10:47
It sounds good,
210
635400
1656
10:49
but if we want it to happen,
211
637080
1856
10:50
I think the responsibility
is going to start with us.
212
638960
2720
10:54
So this is my call to you:
213
642520
2160
10:57
let's put this country back together.
214
645480
2000
11:01
Let's do it despite the politicians
215
649080
3056
11:04
and the media and Facebook and Twitter
216
652160
2856
11:07
and Congressional redistricting
217
655040
1536
11:08
and all of it,
all the things that divide us.
218
656600
2720
11:12
Let's do it because it's right.
219
660360
2240
11:15
And let's do it
because this hate and contempt
220
663920
4416
11:20
that flows through all of us every day
221
668360
2160
11:23
makes us ugly and it corrupts us,
222
671400
3176
11:26
and it threatens
the very fabric of our society.
223
674600
3320
11:31
We owe it to one another and our country
224
679960
2656
11:34
to reach out and try to connect.
225
682640
2160
11:38
We can't afford to hate them any longer,
226
686000
3160
11:42
and we can't afford
to let them hate us either.
227
690200
2200
11:45
Empathy and respect.
228
693880
1360
11:47
Empathy and respect.
229
695880
1240
11:49
If you think about it, it's the very least
that we owe our fellow citizens.
230
697920
3800
11:54
Thank you.
231
702400
1216
11:55
(Applause)
232
703640
4685

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Robb Willer - Social psychologist
Robb Willer's political research has investigated various topics, including economic inequality, racial prejudice, masculine overcompensation and Americans' views of climate change.

Why you should listen

Robb Willer is a professor of sociology, psychology and organizational behavior at Stanford University. He studies the role of morality in politics. His research shows how moral values, typically a source of ideological division, can also be used to bring people together. His political research has investigated various topics, including economic inequality, racial prejudice, masculine overcompensation and Americans' views of climate change.

Willer has won numerous awards for his teaching and research, including the Golden Apple Teaching Award, the only award given by UC-Berkeley’s student body. Willer's class, "Self and Society," was the highest enrollment class at UC-Berkeley. His consulting clients have included the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Open Society Foundation, the Last Resort Exoneration Project and the Department of Justice.

Willer's writing has appeared in the New York Times and the Washington Post, including his op-eds "The Secret to Political Persuasion" and "Is the Environment a Moral Cause?"

Willer received a Ph.D from Cornell University and a BA from the University of Iowa. Before becoming a professor, he worked as a dishwasher, construction worker, mover, line cook and union organizer.

More profile about the speaker
Robb Willer | Speaker | TED.com