ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Vik Muniz - Artist
Vik Muniz delights in subverting a viewer's expectations. He uses unexpected materials to create portraits, landscapes and still lifes, which he then photographs.

Why you should listen

Slf-effacing, frankly open and thought-provoking, all at the same time, Vik Muniz explores the power of representation. He's known for his masterful use of unexpected materials such as chocolate syrup, toy soldiers and paper confetti, but his resulting images transcend mere gimmickry. Most recently, he's been working with a team at MIT to inscribe a castle on a grain of sand ... 

Muniz is often hailed as a master illusionist, but he says he's not interested in fooling people. Rather, he wants his images to show people a measure of their own belief. Muniz has exhibited his playfully provocative work in galleries all over the world and was featured in the documentary Waste Land, which follows Muniz around the largest garbage dump in Rio de Janeiro, as he photographs the collectors of recycled materials in which he finds inspiration and beauty. Describing the history of photography as "the history of blindness," his images simply but powerfully remind a viewer of what it means to see, and how our preconceptions can color every experience.

More profile about the speaker
Vik Muniz | Speaker | TED.com
TED2003

Vik Muniz: Art with wire, sugar, chocolate and string

Filmed:
1,364,503 views

Vik Muniz makes art from pretty much anything, be it shredded paper, wire, clouds or diamonds. Here he describes the thinking behind his work and takes us on a tour of his incredible images.
- Artist
Vik Muniz delights in subverting a viewer's expectations. He uses unexpected materials to create portraits, landscapes and still lifes, which he then photographs. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:25
I was asked to come here and speak about creation.
0
0
3000
00:28
And I only have 15 minutes, and I see they're counting already.
1
3000
4000
00:32
And I can -- in 15 minutes, I think I can touch only a very rather janitorial branch of creation,
2
7000
7000
00:39
which I call "creativity."
3
14000
3000
00:42
Creativity is how we cope with creation.
4
17000
4000
00:46
While creation sometimes seems a bit un-graspable, or even pointless,
5
21000
6000
00:52
creativity is always meaningful.
6
27000
3000
00:55
See, for instance, in this picture.
7
30000
1000
00:56
You know, creation is what put that dog in that picture,
8
31000
4000
01:00
and creativity is what makes us see a chicken on his hindquarters.
9
35000
5000
01:05
When you think about -- you know, creativity has a lot to do with causality too.
10
40000
6000
01:11
You know, when I was a teenager, I was a creator.
11
46000
3000
01:14
I just did things.
12
49000
2000
01:17
Then I became an adult and started knowing who I was,
13
52000
2000
01:19
and tried to maintain that persona -- I became creative.
14
54000
3000
01:23
It wasn't until I actually did a book and a retrospective exhibition, that I could track exactly --
15
58000
8000
01:31
looks like all the craziest things that I had done, all my drinking, all my parties --
16
66000
4000
01:35
they followed a straight line that brings me to the point
17
70000
2000
01:37
that actually I'm talking to you at this moment.
18
72000
2000
01:39
Though it's actually true, you know,
19
74000
4000
01:43
the reason I'm talking to you right now is because I was born in Brazil.
20
78000
3000
01:46
If I was born in Monterey, probably would be in Brazil.
21
81000
4000
01:52
You know, I was born in Brazil and grew up in the '70s
22
87000
2000
01:54
under a climate of political distress,
23
89000
3000
01:58
and I was forced to learn to communicate in a very specific way --
24
93000
3000
02:01
in a sort of a semiotic black market.
25
96000
2000
02:03
You couldn't really say what you wanted to say;
26
98000
3000
02:06
you had to invent ways of doing it.
27
101000
2000
02:08
You didn't trust information very much.
28
103000
2000
02:10
That led me to another step of why I'm here today,
29
105000
3000
02:13
is because I really liked media of all kinds.
30
108000
3000
02:16
I was a media junkie, and eventually got involved with advertising.
31
111000
4000
02:20
My first job in Brazil
32
115000
2000
02:22
was actually to develop a way to improve the readability of billboards,
33
117000
5000
02:27
and based on speed, angle of approach and actually blocks of text.
34
122000
4000
02:31
It was very -- actually, it was a very good study,
35
126000
3000
02:34
and got me a job in an ad agency.
36
129000
2000
02:36
And they also decided that I had to --
37
131000
3000
02:39
to give me a very ugly Plexiglas trophy for it.
38
134000
3000
02:44
And another point -- why I'm here --
39
139000
2000
02:46
is that the day I went to pick up the Plexiglas trophy,
40
141000
4000
02:50
I rented a tuxedo for the first time in my life,
41
145000
2000
02:53
picked the thing -- didn't have any friends.
42
148000
2000
02:55
On my way out, I had to break a fight apart.
43
150000
3000
02:58
Somebody was hitting somebody else with brass knuckles.
44
153000
3000
03:01
They were in tuxedos, and fighting. It was very ugly.
45
156000
2000
03:03
And also -- advertising people do that all the time -- (Laughter) --
46
158000
6000
03:09
and I -- well, what happened is when I went back, it was on the way back to my car,
47
164000
5000
03:14
the guy who got hit decided to grab a gun --
48
169000
2000
03:16
I don't know why he had a gun --
49
171000
2000
03:18
and shoot the first person he decided to be his aggressor.
50
173000
2000
03:20
The first person was wearing a black tie, a tuxedo. It was me.
51
175000
5000
03:26
Luckily, it wasn't fatal, as you can all see.
52
181000
3000
03:29
And, even more luckily, the guy said that he was sorry
53
184000
5000
03:34
and I bribed him for compensation money, otherwise I press charges.
54
189000
4000
03:38
And that's how -- with this money I paid for a ticket to come to the United States in 1983,
55
193000
6000
03:44
and that's very -- the basic reason I'm talking to you here today:
56
199000
4000
03:48
because I got shot. (Laughter) (Applause)
57
203000
3000
03:51
Well, when I started working with my own work, I decided that I shouldn't do images.
58
206000
8000
03:59
You know, I became -- I took this very iconoclastic approach.
59
214000
3000
04:03
Because when I decided to go into advertising, I wanted to do --
60
218000
3000
04:06
I wanted to airbrush naked people on ice, for whiskey commercials,
61
221000
6000
04:12
that's what I really wanted to do. (Laughter)
62
227000
1000
04:13
But I -- they didn't let me do it, so I just -- you know,
63
228000
3000
04:16
they would only let me do other things.
64
231000
2000
04:18
But I wasn't into selling whiskey; I was into selling ice.
65
233000
4000
04:22
The first works were actually objects.
66
237000
2000
04:24
It was kind of a mixture of found object, product design and advertising.
67
239000
5000
04:29
And I called them relics.
68
244000
2000
04:31
They were displayed first at Stux Gallery in 1983.
69
246000
3000
04:35
This is the clown skull.
70
250000
2000
04:37
Is a remnant of a race of -- a very evolved race of entertainers.
71
252000
3000
04:40
They lived in Brazil, long time ago. (Laughter)
72
255000
4000
04:44
This is the Ashanti joystick.
73
259000
2000
04:46
Unfortunately, it has become obsolete because it was designed for Atari platform.
74
261000
5000
04:51
A Playstation II is in the works, maybe for the next TED I'll bring it.
75
266000
5000
04:56
The rocking podium. (Laughter)
76
271000
2000
05:01
This is the pre-Columbian coffeemaker. (Laughter)
77
276000
2000
05:06
Actually, the idea came out of an argument that I had at Starbucks,
78
281000
4000
05:10
that I insisted that I wasn't having Colombian coffee;
79
285000
2000
05:12
the coffee was actually pre-Columbian.
80
287000
2000
05:14
The Bonsai table.
81
289000
3000
05:20
The entire Encyclopedia Britannica bound in a single volume, for travel purposes.
82
295000
6000
05:30
And the half tombstone, for people who are not dead yet.
83
305000
6000
05:36
I wanted to take that into the realm of images,
84
311000
3000
05:39
and I decided to make things that had the same identity conflicts.
85
314000
5000
05:44
So I decided to do work with clouds.
86
319000
2000
05:46
Because clouds can mean anything you want.
87
321000
2000
05:49
But now I wanted to work in a very low-tech way,
88
324000
3000
05:52
so something that would mean at the same time
89
327000
3000
05:55
a lump of cotton, a cloud and Durer's praying hands --
90
330000
4000
05:59
although this looks a lot more like Mickey Mouse's praying hands.
91
334000
4000
06:03
But I was still, you know -- this is a kitty cloud.
92
338000
4000
06:07
They're called "Equivalents," after Alfred Stieglitz's work.
93
342000
5000
06:12
"The Snail."
94
347000
1000
06:13
But I was still working with sculpture,
95
348000
2000
06:15
and I was really trying to go flatter and flatter.
96
350000
2000
06:18
"The Teapot."
97
353000
1000
06:20
I had a chance to go to Florence, in -- I think it was '94,
98
355000
3000
06:23
and I saw Ghiberti's "Door of Paradise."
99
358000
4000
06:27
And he did something that was very tricky.
100
362000
3000
06:30
He put together two different media from different periods of time.
101
365000
3000
06:33
First, he got an age-old way of making it, which was relief,
102
368000
5000
06:38
and he worked this with three-point perspective, which was brand-new technology at the time.
103
373000
5000
06:43
And it's totally overkill.
104
378000
2000
06:46
And your eye doesn't know which level to read.
105
381000
2000
06:48
And you become trapped into this kind of representation.
106
383000
3000
06:51
So I decided to make these very simple renderings,
107
386000
4000
06:55
that at first they are taken as a line drawing --
108
390000
3000
06:58
you know, something that's very -- and then I did it with wire.
109
393000
4000
07:02
The idea was to -- because everybody overlooks white -- like pencil drawings, you know?
110
397000
6000
07:08
And they would look at it -- "Ah, it's a pencil drawing."
111
403000
2000
07:10
Then you have this double take and see that it's actually something that existed in time.
112
405000
4000
07:14
It had a physicality,
113
409000
2000
07:16
and you start going deeper and deeper into sort of narrative
114
411000
4000
07:20
that goes this way, towards the image. So this is "Monkey with Leica."
115
415000
5000
07:28
"Relaxation."
116
423000
2000
07:30
"Fiat Lux."
117
425000
4000
07:34
And the same way the history of representation
118
429000
3000
07:37
evolved from line drawings to shaded drawings.
119
432000
3000
07:40
And I wanted to deal with other subjects.
120
435000
2000
07:42
I started taking that into the realm of landscape,
121
437000
3000
07:45
which is something that's almost a picture of nothing.
122
440000
4000
07:49
I made these pictures called "Pictures of Thread,"
123
444000
2000
07:51
and I named them after the amount of yards that I used to represent each picture.
124
446000
4000
07:55
These always end up being a photograph at the end,
125
450000
2000
07:57
or more like an etching in this case.
126
452000
2000
07:59
So this is a lighthouse.
127
454000
3000
08:06
This is "6,500 Yards," after Corot. "9,000 Yards," after Gerhard Richter.
128
461000
7000
08:13
And I don't know how many yards, after John Constable.
129
468000
4000
08:19
Departing from the lines, I decided to tackle the idea of points,
130
474000
3000
08:22
like which is more similar to the type of representation that we find in photographs themselves.
131
477000
5000
08:27
I had met a group of children in the Caribbean island of Saint Kitts,
132
482000
4000
08:31
and I did work and play with them.
133
486000
4000
08:35
I got some photographs from them.
134
490000
2000
08:37
Upon my arrival in New York, I decided --
135
492000
2000
08:39
they were children of sugar plantation workers.
136
494000
4000
08:43
And by manipulating sugar over a black paper, I made portraits of them.
137
498000
5000
08:48
These are -- (Applause) --
138
503000
4000
08:52
Thank you. This is "Valentina, the Fastest."
139
507000
4000
08:56
It was just the name of the child,
140
511000
2000
08:58
with the little thing you get to know of somebody that you meet very briefly.
141
513000
4000
09:02
"Valicia."
142
517000
3000
09:06
"Jacynthe."
143
521000
2000
09:10
But another layer of representation was still introduced.
144
525000
2000
09:12
Because I was doing this while I was making these pictures,
145
527000
3000
09:15
I realized that I could add still another thing
146
530000
3000
09:18
I was trying to make a subject --
147
533000
2000
09:20
something that would interfere with the themes,
148
535000
5000
09:25
so chocolate is very good, because it has --
149
540000
4000
09:29
it brings to mind ideas that go from scatology to romance.
150
544000
5000
09:34
And so I decided to make these pictures,
151
549000
3000
09:37
and they were very large, so you had to walk away from it to be able to see them.
152
552000
3000
09:40
So they're called "Pictures of Chocolate."
153
555000
1000
09:41
Freud probably could explain chocolate better than I. He was the first subject.
154
556000
5000
09:46
And Jackson Pollock also.
155
561000
3000
09:52
Pictures of crowds are particularly interesting,
156
567000
1000
09:54
because, you know, you go to that --
157
569000
2000
09:56
you try to figure out the threshold with something you can define very easily,
158
571000
3000
09:59
like a face, goes into becoming just a texture.
159
574000
4000
10:03
"Paparazzi."
160
578000
1000
10:07
I used the dust at the Whitney Museum to render some pieces of their collection.
161
582000
4000
10:11
And I picked minimalist pieces because they're about specificity.
162
586000
4000
10:15
And you render this with the most non-specific material,
163
590000
3000
10:18
which is dust itself.
164
593000
2000
10:20
Like, you know, you have the skin particles of every single museum visitor.
165
595000
4000
10:24
They do a DNA scan of this, they will come up with a great mailing list.
166
599000
6000
10:30
This is Richard Serra.
167
605000
2000
10:38
I bought a computer, and [they] told me it had millions of colors in it.
168
613000
4000
10:42
You know an artist's first response to this is, who counted it? You know?
169
617000
4000
10:46
And I realized that I never worked with color,
170
621000
3000
10:49
because I had a hard time controlling the idea of single colors.
171
624000
4000
10:53
But once they're applied to numeric structure,
172
628000
3000
10:56
then you can feel more comfortable.
173
631000
2000
10:58
So the first time I worked with colors was by making these mosaics of Pantone swatches.
174
633000
5000
11:03
They end up being very large pictures,
175
638000
2000
11:05
and I photographed with a very large camera --
176
640000
2000
11:07
an 8x10 camera.
177
642000
2000
11:09
So you can see the surface of every single swatch --
178
644000
2000
11:11
like in this picture of Chuck Close.
179
646000
2000
11:13
And you have to walk very far to be able to see it.
180
648000
5000
11:18
Also, the reference to Gerhard Richter's use of color charts --
181
653000
6000
11:25
and the idea also entering another realm of representation that's very common to us today,
182
660000
4000
11:29
which is the bit map.
183
664000
2000
11:31
I ended up narrowing the subject to Monet's "Haystacks."
184
666000
4000
11:37
This is something I used to do as a joke --
185
672000
1000
11:38
you know, make -- the same like -- Robert Smithson's "Spiral Jetty" --
186
673000
5000
11:43
and then leaving traces, as if it was done on a tabletop.
187
678000
4000
11:47
I tried to prove that he didn't do that thing in the Salt Lake.
188
682000
4000
11:51
But then, just doing the models, I was trying to explore the relationship
189
686000
4000
11:55
between the model and the original.
190
690000
2000
11:57
And I felt that I would have to actually go there and make some earthworks myself.
191
692000
6000
12:03
I opt for very simple line drawings -- kind of stupid looking.
192
698000
4000
12:08
And at the same time, I was doing these very large constructions,
193
703000
3000
12:11
being 150 meters away.
194
706000
3000
12:14
Now I would do very small ones, which would be like --
195
709000
4000
12:18
but under the same light, and I would show them together,
196
713000
3000
12:21
so the viewer would have to really figure it out what one he was looking.
197
716000
3000
12:24
I wasn't interested in the very large things, or in the small things.
198
719000
3000
12:27
I was more interested in the things in between,
199
722000
3000
12:30
you know, because you can leave an enormous range for ambiguity there.
200
725000
3000
12:36
This is like you see -- the size of a person over there.
201
731000
4000
12:41
This is a pipe.
202
736000
3000
12:46
A hanger.
203
741000
1000
12:48
And this is another thing that I did -- you know working
204
743000
3000
12:53
-- everybody loves to watch somebody draw,
205
748000
2000
12:55
but not many people have a chance to watch somebody draw in --
206
750000
3000
12:58
a lot of people at the same time, to evidence a single drawing.
207
753000
4000
13:02
And I love this work,
208
757000
3000
13:05
because I did these cartoonish clouds over Manhattan for a period of two months.
209
760000
5000
13:10
And it was quite wonderful, because I had an interest -- an early interest -- in theater,
210
765000
4000
13:14
that's justified on this thing.
211
769000
2000
13:16
In theater, you have the character and the actor in the same place,
212
771000
4000
13:20
trying to negotiate each other in front of an audience.
213
775000
2000
13:22
And in this, you'd have like a --
214
777000
2000
13:24
something that looks like a cloud, and it is a cloud at the same time.
215
779000
4000
13:28
So they're like perfect actors.
216
783000
2000
13:31
My interest in acting, especially bad acting, goes a long way.
217
786000
6000
13:37
Actually, I once paid like 60 dollars
218
792000
2000
13:39
to see a very great actor to do a version of "King Lear,"
219
794000
4000
13:43
and I felt really robbed, because by the time the actor started being King Lear,
220
798000
5000
13:48
he stopped being the great actor that I had paid money to see.
221
803000
3000
13:51
On the other hand, you know, I paid like three dollars, I think --
222
806000
8000
13:59
and I went to a warehouse in Queens
223
814000
2000
14:01
to see a version of "Othello" by an amateur group.
224
816000
5000
14:06
And it was quite fascinating, because you know the guy --
225
821000
3000
14:09
his name was Joey Grimaldi --
226
824000
2000
14:11
he impersonated the Moorish general
227
826000
3000
14:14
-- you know, for the first three minutes he was really that general,
228
829000
2000
14:16
and then he went back into plumber, he worked as a plumber, so --
229
831000
4000
14:20
plumber, general, plumber, general --
230
835000
3000
14:23
so for three dollars, I saw two tragedies for the price of one.
231
838000
4000
14:29
See, I think it's not really about impression,
232
844000
4000
14:34
making people fall for a really perfect illusion,
233
849000
2000
14:36
as much as it is to make -- I usually work at the lowest threshold of visual illusion.
234
851000
6000
14:42
Because it's not about fooling somebody,
235
857000
3000
14:45
it's actually giving somebody a measure of their own belief:
236
860000
3000
14:48
how much you want to be fooled.
237
863000
2000
14:50
That's why we pay to go to magic shows and things like that.
238
865000
4000
14:54
Well, I think that's it.
239
869000
2000
14:56
My time is nearly up.
240
871000
1000
14:57
Thank you very much.
241
872000
1000

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Vik Muniz - Artist
Vik Muniz delights in subverting a viewer's expectations. He uses unexpected materials to create portraits, landscapes and still lifes, which he then photographs.

Why you should listen

Slf-effacing, frankly open and thought-provoking, all at the same time, Vik Muniz explores the power of representation. He's known for his masterful use of unexpected materials such as chocolate syrup, toy soldiers and paper confetti, but his resulting images transcend mere gimmickry. Most recently, he's been working with a team at MIT to inscribe a castle on a grain of sand ... 

Muniz is often hailed as a master illusionist, but he says he's not interested in fooling people. Rather, he wants his images to show people a measure of their own belief. Muniz has exhibited his playfully provocative work in galleries all over the world and was featured in the documentary Waste Land, which follows Muniz around the largest garbage dump in Rio de Janeiro, as he photographs the collectors of recycled materials in which he finds inspiration and beauty. Describing the history of photography as "the history of blindness," his images simply but powerfully remind a viewer of what it means to see, and how our preconceptions can color every experience.

More profile about the speaker
Vik Muniz | Speaker | TED.com