ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Scott McCloud - Cartoonist
Scott McCloud is author of Understanding Comics, a comic book about comics. He's an evangelist for comics as a valid literary form (as more than pulp and kids' stuff) and his admiring fans include a laundry list of superstar cartoonists.

Why you should listen

If not for Scott McCloud, graphic novels and webcomics might be enjoying a more modest Renaissance. The flourishing of cartooning in the '90s and '00s, particularly comic-smithing on the web, can be traced back to his major writings on the comics form. The first, Understanding Comics, is translated into 13 languages, and along with Reinventing Comics and Making Comics, its playful and profound investigations are justly revered as something like the Poetics of sequential art.

McCloud coined the term "infinite canvas" -- for the new comics medium made possible by web browsers. He's an avid user of the medium: My Obsession With Chess was widely popular online, as was The Right Number. Back on the printed page, he wrote and illustrated Zot!, a colorful response to then-trendy grimness and gore in comic books. (He describes the book as "a cross between Peter Pan, Buck Rogers and Marshall McLuhan.")

He's the inventor of the game 5-Card Nancy.

More profile about the speaker
Scott McCloud | Speaker | TED.com
TED2005

Scott McCloud: The visual magic of comics

Filmed:
1,211,621 views

In this unmissable look at the magic of comics, Scott McCloud bends the presentation format into a cartoon-like experience, where colorful diversions whiz through childhood fascinations and imagined futures that our eyes can hear and touch.
- Cartoonist
Scott McCloud is author of Understanding Comics, a comic book about comics. He's an evangelist for comics as a valid literary form (as more than pulp and kids' stuff) and his admiring fans include a laundry list of superstar cartoonists. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:18
Of the five senses,
0
0
1000
00:19
vision is the one that I appreciate the most,
1
1000
3000
00:22
and it's the one that I can least take for granted.
2
4000
3000
00:25
I think this is partially due to my father, who was blind.
3
7000
3000
00:29
It was a fact that he didn't make much of a fuss about, usually.
4
11000
2000
00:31
One time in Nova Scotia,
5
13000
1000
00:32
when we went to see a total eclipse of the sun --
6
14000
2000
00:35
yeah, same one as in the Carly Simon song,
7
17000
2000
00:37
which may or may not refer
8
19000
2000
00:39
to James Taylor, Warren Beatty or Mick Jagger; we're not really sure.
9
21000
3000
00:42
They handed out these dark plastic viewers
10
24000
3000
00:45
that allowed us to look directly at the sun
11
27000
2000
00:47
without damaging our eyes.
12
29000
1000
00:49
But Dad got really scared:
13
31000
1000
00:50
he didn't want us doing that.
14
32000
1000
00:52
He wanted us instead to use these cheap cardboard viewers
15
34000
3000
00:55
so that there was no chance at all that our eyes would be damaged.
16
37000
3000
00:59
I thought this was a little strange at the time.
17
41000
1000
01:01
What I didn't know at the time
18
43000
1000
01:02
was that my father had actually been born with perfect eyesight.
19
44000
2000
01:05
When he and his sister Martha were just very little,
20
47000
2000
01:07
their mom took them out to see a total eclipse --
21
49000
3000
01:10
or actually, a solar eclipse --
22
52000
1000
01:11
and not long after that,
23
53000
1000
01:12
both of them started losing their eyesight.
24
54000
3000
01:16
Decades later,
25
58000
1000
01:17
it turned out that the source of their blindness
26
59000
2000
01:19
was most likely some sort of bacterial infection.
27
61000
3000
01:22
As near as we can tell,
28
64000
1000
01:23
it had nothing whatsoever to do with that solar eclipse,
29
65000
4000
01:27
but by then my grandmother had already gone to her grave
30
69000
2000
01:29
thinking it was her fault.
31
71000
1000
01:32
So, Dad graduated Harvard in 1946,
32
74000
3000
01:35
married my mom,
33
77000
1000
01:36
and bought a house in Lexington, Massachusetts,
34
78000
3000
01:39
where the first shots were fired against the British in 1775,
35
81000
4000
01:43
although we didn't actually hit any of them until Concord.
36
85000
2000
01:45
He got a job working for Raytheon,
37
87000
2000
01:47
designing guidance systems,
38
89000
2000
01:49
which was part of the Route 128 high-tech axis in those days --
39
91000
3000
01:52
so the equivalent of Silicone Valley in the '70s.
40
94000
3000
01:55
Dad wasn't a real militaristic kind of guy;
41
97000
3000
01:58
he just really felt bad that he wasn't able to fight in World War II
42
100000
3000
02:01
on account of his handicap,
43
103000
1000
02:02
although they did let him get through
44
104000
2000
02:04
the several-hour-long army physical exam
45
106000
4000
02:08
before they got to the very last test,
46
110000
1000
02:09
which was for vision.
47
111000
1000
02:10
(Laughter)
48
112000
4000
02:14
So, Dad started racking up all of these patents
49
116000
3000
02:17
and gaining a reputation as a blind genius, rocket scientist, inventor.
50
119000
3000
02:20
But to us he was just Dad,
51
122000
1000
02:21
and our home life was pretty normal.
52
123000
4000
02:25
As a kid, I watched a lot of television
53
127000
2000
02:27
and had lots of nerdy hobbies
54
129000
2000
02:29
like mineralogy and microbiology and the space program
55
131000
3000
02:32
and a little bit of politics.
56
134000
1000
02:33
I played a lot of chess.
57
135000
2000
02:35
But at the age of 14,
58
137000
1000
02:36
a friend of mine got me interested in comic books,
59
138000
1000
02:37
and I decided that was what I wanted to do for a living.
60
139000
3000
02:41
So, here's my dad:
61
143000
1000
02:42
he's a scientist, he's an engineer and he's a military contractor.
62
144000
5000
02:48
So, he has four kids, right?
63
150000
3000
02:51
One grows up to become a computer scientist,
64
153000
1000
02:52
one grows up to join the Navy,
65
154000
2000
02:55
one grows up to become an engineer,
66
157000
1000
02:57
and then there's me:
67
159000
1000
02:59
the comic book artist.
68
161000
2000
03:01
(Laughter)
69
163000
3000
03:04
Which, incidentally, makes me the opposite of Dean Kamen,
70
166000
1000
03:05
because I'm a comic book artist, son of an inventor,
71
167000
2000
03:07
and he's an inventor, son of a comic book artist.
72
169000
2000
03:10
(Laughter)
73
172000
1000
03:11
Right, it's true.
74
173000
2000
03:13
(Applause)
75
175000
3000
03:16
The funny thing is, Dad had a lot of faith in me.
76
178000
2000
03:18
He had faith in my abilities as a cartoonist,
77
180000
3000
03:21
even though he had no direct evidence that I was any good whatsoever:
78
183000
3000
03:24
everything he saw was just a blur.
79
186000
2000
03:26
Now, this gives a real meaning to the term "blind faith,"
80
188000
2000
03:28
which doesn't have the same negative connotation for me that it does for other people.
81
190000
4000
03:33
Now, faith in things which cannot be seen, which cannot be proved,
82
195000
3000
03:36
is not the sort of faith that I've ever really related to all that much.
83
198000
4000
03:40
I tend to like science,
84
202000
1000
03:41
where what we see
85
203000
2000
03:43
and can ascertain are the foundation of what we know.
86
205000
3000
03:47
But there's a middle ground, too.
87
209000
2000
03:49
A middle ground tread by people like poor old Charles Babbage,
88
211000
3000
03:52
and his steam-driven computers that were never built.
89
214000
4000
03:56
Nobody really understood what it was that he had in mind,
90
218000
2000
03:58
except for Ada Lovelace,
91
220000
3000
04:02
and he went to his grave trying to pursue that dream.
92
224000
3000
04:05
Vannevar Bush with his Memex --
93
227000
2000
04:07
this idea of all of human knowledge at your fingertips --
94
229000
3000
04:10
he had this vision.
95
232000
2000
04:12
And I think a lot of people in his day
96
234000
1000
04:13
probably thought he was a bit of a kook.
97
235000
2000
04:15
And, yeah, we can look back in retrospect and say,
98
237000
2000
04:17
yeah, ha-ha, you know -- it's all microfilm. But that's --
99
239000
4000
04:21
that's not the point. He understood the shape of the future.
100
243000
3000
04:24
So did J.C.R. Licklider and his notions for computer-human interaction.
101
246000
4000
04:28
Same thing: he understood the shape of the future,
102
250000
3000
04:31
even though it was something that would
103
253000
3000
04:34
only be implemented by people much later.
104
256000
3000
04:37
Or Paul Baran, and his vision for packet switching.
105
259000
3000
04:40
Hardly anybody listened to him in his day.
106
262000
2000
04:43
Or even the people who actually pulled it off,
107
265000
2000
04:45
the people at Bolt, Beranek and Newman in Boston,
108
267000
3000
04:48
who just would sketch out these structures
109
270000
2000
04:50
of what would eventually become a worldwide network,
110
272000
3000
04:53
and sketching things on the back of napkins and on note papers
111
275000
4000
04:57
and arguing over dinner at Howard Johnson's --
112
279000
2000
04:59
on Route 128 in Lexington, Massachusetts,
113
281000
2000
05:01
just two miles from where I was studying the Queen's Gambit Deferred
114
283000
3000
05:04
and listening to Gladys Knight & the Pips
115
286000
2000
05:06
singing "Midnight Train to Georgia," while --
116
288000
2000
05:08
(Laughter)
117
290000
1000
05:09
-- in my dad's big easy chair, you know?
118
291000
3000
05:12
So, three types of vision, right?
119
294000
2000
05:14
Vision based on what one cannot see:
120
296000
3000
05:17
the vision of that unseen and unknowable.
121
299000
3000
05:20
The vision of that which has already been proven or can be ascertained.
122
302000
3000
05:23
And this third kind
123
305000
2000
05:26
of vision, of something which
124
308000
2000
05:28
can be, which may be,
125
310000
1000
05:30
based on knowledge, but is as yet unproven.
126
312000
3000
05:33
Now, we've seen a lot of examples of people who are pursuing that sort of vision in science,
127
315000
5000
05:38
but I think it's also true in the arts, it's true in politics,
128
320000
2000
05:40
it's even true in personal endeavors.
129
322000
3000
05:43
What it comes down to, really, is four basic principles:
130
325000
2000
05:45
learn from everyone,
131
327000
2000
05:47
follow no one,
132
329000
2000
05:49
watch for patterns,
133
331000
2000
05:51
and work like hell.
134
333000
1000
05:52
I think these are the four principles that go into this.
135
334000
3000
05:55
And it's that third one, especially,
136
337000
2000
05:57
where visions of the future
137
339000
2000
05:59
begin to manifest themselves.
138
341000
2000
06:01
What's interesting is that this particular way of looking at the world,
139
343000
2000
06:04
is, I think, only one of four different ways
140
346000
2000
06:06
that manifest themselves in different fields of endeavor.
141
348000
2000
06:08
In comics, I know that
142
350000
2000
06:10
it results in sort of a formalist attitude
143
352000
3000
06:13
towards trying to understand how it works.
144
355000
2000
06:15
Then there's another, more classical, attitude
145
357000
3000
06:18
which embraces beauty and craft.
146
360000
2000
06:20
Another one which believes in the pure transparency of content.
147
362000
4000
06:24
And then another
148
366000
2000
06:26
which emphasizes the authenticity of human experience --
149
368000
2000
06:28
and honesty, and rawness.
150
370000
2000
06:30
These are four very different ways of looking at the world. I even gave them names.
151
372000
2000
06:32
The classicist, the animist, and formalist and iconoclast.
152
374000
4000
06:36
Interestingly, it seemed to correspond more or less
153
378000
1000
06:37
to Jung's four subdivisions of human thought.
154
379000
3000
06:42
And they reflect a dichotomy of art and delight
155
384000
2000
06:44
on left and the right;
156
386000
2000
06:46
tradition and revolution on the top and the bottom.
157
388000
2000
06:48
And if you go on the diagonal, you get content and form --
158
390000
2000
06:50
and then beauty and truth.
159
392000
2000
06:52
And it probably applies just as much
160
394000
1000
06:53
to music and to movies and to fine art,
161
395000
3000
06:56
which has nothing whatsoever to do with vision at all,
162
398000
3000
06:59
or for that matter, nothing to do with our conference theme of
163
401000
3000
07:02
"Inspired by Nature" --
164
404000
1000
07:03
except to the extent of the fable of the frog
165
405000
3000
07:06
who gives the ride to the scorpion on his back to get across the river
166
408000
3000
07:09
because the scorpion promises not to sting him,
167
411000
2000
07:11
but then the scorpion does sting him anyway and they both die,
168
413000
2000
07:13
but not before the frog asks him why and the scorpion says,
169
415000
3000
07:16
"Because it's my nature" --
170
418000
1000
07:17
in that sense, yes.
171
419000
2000
07:19
(Laughter)
172
421000
2000
07:21
So --
173
423000
1000
07:23
so this was my nature. The thing was, I saw
174
425000
3000
07:26
that the route that I took to discovering
175
428000
2000
07:28
this focus in my work
176
430000
3000
07:31
and who I was,
177
433000
2000
07:33
I saw it as just this road to discovery.
178
435000
2000
07:35
Actually, it was just me embracing my nature,
179
437000
2000
07:37
which means
180
439000
2000
07:39
that I didn't actually fall that far from the tree after all.
181
441000
3000
07:44
So what does a "scientific mind"
182
446000
2000
07:46
do in the arts?
183
448000
2000
07:49
Well, I started making comics,
184
451000
1000
07:50
but I also started trying to understand them, almost immediately.
185
452000
2000
07:52
And one of the most important things about comics, I discovered,
186
454000
3000
07:55
was that comics are a visual medium,
187
457000
2000
07:57
but they try to embrace all of the senses within it.
188
459000
4000
08:01
So, the different elements of comics, like pictures and words,
189
463000
4000
08:05
and the different symbols and everything in between
190
467000
3000
08:08
that comics presents
191
470000
1000
08:09
are all funneled through the single conduit of vision.
192
471000
2000
08:11
So you have things like resemblance,
193
473000
2000
08:13
where something which resembles the physical world can be abstracted
194
475000
3000
08:16
in a couple of different directions:
195
478000
2000
08:18
abstracted from resemblance,
196
480000
2000
08:20
but still retaining the complete meaning,
197
482000
2000
08:22
or abstracted away from both resemblance and meaning towards the picture plan.
198
484000
4000
08:26
Put all these three together, and you have a nice little map
199
488000
2000
08:28
of the entire boundary of visual iconography
200
490000
3000
08:31
which comics can embrace.
201
493000
2000
08:33
And if you move to the right you also get language,
202
495000
3000
08:36
because that's abstracting even further from resemblance,
203
498000
3000
08:39
but still maintaining meaning.
204
501000
2000
08:42
Vision is called upon to represent sound
205
504000
2000
08:44
and to understand the common properties of those two
206
506000
3000
08:47
and their common heritage, as well.
207
509000
2000
08:49
Also, to try to represent the texture of sound
208
511000
3000
08:52
to capture its essential character through visuals.
209
514000
4000
08:57
And there's also a balance
210
519000
2000
08:59
between the visible and the invisible in comics.
211
521000
2000
09:02
Comics is a kind of call and response
212
524000
2000
09:04
in which the artist gives you
213
526000
1000
09:05
something to see within the panels,
214
527000
1000
09:06
and then gives you something to imagine between the panels.
215
528000
4000
09:11
Also, another sense
216
533000
2000
09:13
which comics' vision represents, and that's time.
217
535000
3000
09:17
Sequence is a very important aspect of comics.
218
539000
3000
09:21
Comics presents a kind of temporal map.
219
543000
2000
09:24
And this temporal map was something that energizes modern comics,
220
546000
3000
09:27
but I was wondering if perhaps it also energizes
221
549000
3000
09:30
other sorts of forms,
222
552000
2000
09:32
and I found some in history.
223
554000
1000
09:34
And you can see this same principle operating
224
556000
3000
09:37
in these ancient versions of the same idea.
225
559000
3000
09:40
What's happening is, the art form is colliding
226
562000
2000
09:42
with the given technology,
227
564000
1000
09:43
whether it's paint on stone, like the Tomb of the Scribe in ancient Egypt,
228
565000
4000
09:47
or a bas-relief sculpture rising up a stone column,
229
569000
2000
09:50
or a 200-foot-long embroidery,
230
572000
2000
09:52
or painted deerskin and tree bark
231
574000
2000
09:54
running across 88 accordion-folded pages.
232
576000
3000
09:57
What's interesting is, once you hit print --
233
579000
2000
09:59
and this is from 1450, by the way --
234
581000
2000
10:01
all of the artifacts of modern comics start to present themselves:
235
583000
2000
10:03
rectilinear panel arrangements,
236
585000
2000
10:05
simple line drawings without tone
237
587000
2000
10:07
and a left-to-right reading sequence.
238
589000
3000
10:11
And within 100 years,
239
593000
1000
10:12
you already start to see word balloons and captions,
240
594000
3000
10:16
and it's really just a hop, skip and a jump from here to here.
241
598000
2000
10:19
So I wrote a book about this in '93,
242
601000
2000
10:21
but as I was finishing the book,
243
603000
2000
10:23
I had to do a little bit of typesetting,
244
605000
1000
10:24
and I was tired of going to my local copy shop to do it,
245
606000
2000
10:26
so I bought a computer.
246
608000
2000
10:29
And it was just a little thing -- it wasn't good for much except text entry --
247
611000
3000
10:32
but my father had told me about Moore's Law,
248
614000
3000
10:35
about Moore's Law back in the '70s, and I knew what was coming.
249
617000
3000
10:39
And so, I kept my eyes peeled
250
621000
2000
10:41
to see if the sort of changes that happened
251
623000
2000
10:43
when we went from pre-print comics to print comics
252
625000
3000
10:46
would happen when we went beyond, to post-print comics.
253
628000
3000
10:49
So, one of the first things that were proposed
254
631000
2000
10:51
was that we could mix the visuals of comics
255
633000
2000
10:53
with the sound, motion and interactivity
256
635000
2000
10:55
of the CD-ROMs that were being made in those days.
257
637000
2000
10:57
This was even before the Web.
258
639000
2000
10:59
And one of the first things they did was,
259
641000
1000
11:00
they tried to take the comics page as-is
260
642000
2000
11:02
and transplant it to monitors,
261
644000
1000
11:03
which was a classic McLuhanesque mistake
262
645000
2000
11:06
of appropriating the shape of the previous technology
263
648000
3000
11:09
as the content of the new technology.
264
651000
2000
11:11
And so, what they would do is,
265
653000
1000
11:12
they'd have these comic pages that resemble print comics pages,
266
654000
2000
11:14
and they would introduce all this sound and motion.
267
656000
3000
11:18
The problem was, that if you go with this idea --
268
660000
2000
11:20
this basic idea that space equals time in comics --
269
662000
3000
11:23
what happens is that when you introduce sound and motion,
270
665000
2000
11:25
which are temporal phenomena that can only be represented through time,
271
667000
4000
11:29
then they break with that continuity of presentation.
272
671000
5000
11:35
Interactivity was another thing.
273
677000
1000
11:36
There were hypertext comics.
274
678000
1000
11:37
But the thing about hypertext
275
679000
1000
11:38
is that everything in hypertext is either here, not here or connected to here;
276
680000
3000
11:41
it's profoundly non-spatial.
277
683000
2000
11:43
The distance from Abraham Lincoln to a Lincoln penny,
278
685000
3000
11:46
the Penny Marshall to the Marshall Plan
279
688000
2000
11:48
to "Plan 9" to nine lives:
280
690000
1000
11:49
it's all the same.
281
691000
2000
11:51
(Laughter)
282
693000
1000
11:52
And -- but in comics, in comics,
283
694000
2000
11:55
every aspect of the work, every element of the work
284
697000
2000
11:58
has a spatial relationship to every other element at all times.
285
700000
3000
12:01
So the question was:
286
703000
1000
12:02
was there any way to preserve that spatial relationship
287
704000
3000
12:05
while still taking advantage of all of the things
288
707000
2000
12:07
that digital had to offer us?
289
709000
2000
12:09
And I found my personal answer for this
290
711000
2000
12:11
in those ancient comics that I was showing you.
291
713000
2000
12:14
Each of them has a single unbroken reading line,
292
716000
3000
12:17
whether it's going zigzag across the walls
293
719000
2000
12:19
or spiraling up a column
294
721000
2000
12:21
or just straight left to right, or even going in a backwards zigzag
295
723000
3000
12:24
across those 88 accordion-folded pages.
296
726000
2000
12:26
The same thing is happening, and that is that the basic idea
297
728000
2000
12:29
that as you move through space you move through time
298
731000
2000
12:31
is being carried out without any compromise,
299
733000
2000
12:33
but there were compromises when print hit.
300
735000
3000
12:36
Adjacent spaces were no longer adjacent moments,
301
738000
3000
12:39
so the basic idea of comics was being broken again and again
302
741000
3000
12:42
and again and again.
303
744000
1000
12:43
And I thought, O.K., well,
304
745000
1000
12:44
if that's true, is there any way,
305
746000
2000
12:47
when we go beyond today's print,
306
749000
2000
12:49
to somehow bring that back?
307
751000
2000
12:52
Now, the monitor
308
754000
2000
12:55
is just as limited as the page, technically, right?
309
757000
2000
12:57
It's a different shape, but other than that
310
759000
2000
12:59
it's the same basic limitation.
311
761000
2000
13:01
But that's only if you look at the monitor as a page,
312
763000
3000
13:05
but not if you look at the monitor as a window.
313
767000
2000
13:08
And that's what I proposed: that perhaps we could create these comics
314
770000
2000
13:10
on an infinite canvas:
315
772000
1000
13:12
along the X axis and the Y axis and staircases.
316
774000
4000
13:17
We could do circular narratives that were literally circular.
317
779000
2000
13:19
We could do a turn in a story that was literally a turn.
318
781000
3000
13:23
Parallel narratives could be literally parallel.
319
785000
2000
13:27
X, Y and also Z.
320
789000
2000
13:30
So I had all these notions. This was back in the late '90s,
321
792000
2000
13:32
and other people in my business thought I was pretty crazy,
322
794000
3000
13:36
but a lot of people then went on and actually did it.
323
798000
2000
13:38
I'm going to show you a couple now.
324
800000
2000
13:41
This was an early collage comic by a fellow named Jason Lex.
325
803000
3000
13:48
And notice what's going on here.
326
810000
2000
13:50
What I'm searching for is a durable mutation --
327
812000
2000
13:52
that's what all of us are searching for.
328
814000
2000
13:54
As media head into this new era,
329
816000
2000
13:56
we are looking for mutations
330
818000
3000
13:59
that are durable, that have some sort of staying power.
331
821000
4000
14:03
Now, we're taking this basic idea of presenting comics in a visual medium,
332
825000
4000
14:07
and then we're carrying it through all the way from beginning to end.
333
829000
3000
14:10
That's that entire comic you just saw
334
832000
2000
14:12
is up on the screen right now.
335
834000
2000
14:14
But even though we're only experiencing it one piece at a time,
336
836000
3000
14:17
that's just where the technology is right now.
337
839000
2000
14:19
As the technology evolves,
338
841000
2000
14:21
as you get full immersive displays and whatnot,
339
843000
3000
14:24
this sort of thing will only grow.
340
846000
2000
14:26
It will adapt. It will
341
848000
2000
14:28
adapt to its environment:
342
850000
2000
14:30
it's a durable mutation.
343
852000
2000
14:33
Here's another one I'll show you. This is by Drew Weing;
344
855000
2000
14:35
this is called,
345
857000
1000
14:36
"Pup Contemplates the Heat Death of the Universe."
346
858000
2000
15:04
See what's going on here
347
886000
1000
15:06
as we draw these stories on an infinite canvas
348
888000
3000
15:11
is you're creating a more pure expression
349
893000
3000
15:15
of what this medium is all about.
350
897000
2000
15:22
We'll go by this a little quickly -- you get the idea.
351
904000
2000
15:24
I just want to get to the last panel.
352
906000
2000
15:32
(Laughter)
353
914000
3000
15:35
There we go.
354
917000
1000
15:38
(Laughter)
355
920000
2000
15:43
(Laughter)
356
925000
3000
15:49
Just one more.
357
931000
1000
15:52
Talk about your infinite canvas.
358
934000
2000
15:55
It's by a guy named Daniel Merlin Goodbrey in Britain.
359
937000
2000
15:58
Why is this important?
360
940000
2000
16:01
I think this is important because media,
361
943000
2000
16:04
all media,
362
946000
1000
16:06
provide us a window back into our world.
363
948000
3000
16:09
Now, it could be that motion pictures --
364
951000
2000
16:11
and eventually, virtual reality, or something equivalent to it --
365
953000
3000
16:14
some sort of immersive display,
366
956000
2000
16:16
is going to provide us with our most efficient escape from the world that we're in.
367
958000
5000
16:21
That's why most people turn to storytelling, is to escape.
368
963000
3000
16:24
But media provides us with a window
369
966000
3000
16:27
back into the world that we live in.
370
969000
3000
16:31
And when media evolve
371
973000
2000
16:34
so that the identity of the media becomes increasingly unique.
372
976000
5000
16:39
Because what you're looking at is, you're looking at comics cubed:
373
981000
3000
16:42
you're looking at comics that are more comics-like than they've ever been before.
374
984000
3000
16:46
When that happens, you provide people with multiple ways
375
988000
3000
16:49
of re-entering the world through different windows,
376
991000
3000
16:53
and when you do that, it allows them to triangulate the world that they live in
377
995000
3000
16:56
and see its shape.
378
998000
2000
16:58
And that's why I think this is important.
379
1000000
2000
17:00
One of many reasons, but I've got to go now.
380
1002000
2000
17:02
Thank you for having me.
381
1004000
1000

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Scott McCloud - Cartoonist
Scott McCloud is author of Understanding Comics, a comic book about comics. He's an evangelist for comics as a valid literary form (as more than pulp and kids' stuff) and his admiring fans include a laundry list of superstar cartoonists.

Why you should listen

If not for Scott McCloud, graphic novels and webcomics might be enjoying a more modest Renaissance. The flourishing of cartooning in the '90s and '00s, particularly comic-smithing on the web, can be traced back to his major writings on the comics form. The first, Understanding Comics, is translated into 13 languages, and along with Reinventing Comics and Making Comics, its playful and profound investigations are justly revered as something like the Poetics of sequential art.

McCloud coined the term "infinite canvas" -- for the new comics medium made possible by web browsers. He's an avid user of the medium: My Obsession With Chess was widely popular online, as was The Right Number. Back on the printed page, he wrote and illustrated Zot!, a colorful response to then-trendy grimness and gore in comic books. (He describes the book as "a cross between Peter Pan, Buck Rogers and Marshall McLuhan.")

He's the inventor of the game 5-Card Nancy.

More profile about the speaker
Scott McCloud | Speaker | TED.com