ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Tristan Harris - Design thinker
Tristan Harris helps the technology industry more consciously and ethically shape the human spirit and human potential.

Why you should listen

Tristan Harris has been called "the closest thing Silicon Valley has to a conscience" by The Atlantic magazine. Prior to founding the new Center for Humane Technology, he was Google's Design Ethicist, developing a framework for how technology should "ethically" steer the thoughts and actions of billions of people from screens.  

Harris has spent a decade understanding the invisible influences that hijack human thinking and action. Drawing on literature from addiction, performative magic, social engineering, persuasive design and behavioral economics, he is currently developing a framework for ethical persuasion, especially as it relates to the moral responsibility of technology companies.

Rolling Stone magazine named Harris one of "25 People Shaping the World" in 2017. His work has been featured on TED, "60 Minutes," HBO's "RealTime with Bill Maher," "PBS NewsHour," Recode, The Atlantic, WIRED, the New York Times, Der Spiegel, The Economist and many more. Harris has briefed heads of state, technology company CEOs and members of the US Congress about the attention economy.

More profile about the speaker
Tristan Harris | Speaker | TED.com
TEDxBrussels

Tristan Harris: How better tech could protect us from distraction

崔斯坦 • 哈里斯: 科技如何帮助我们专注

Filmed:
1,765,149 views

科技是不是经常使我们从真正想做的事情中分心呢?无论在工作中还是在休息时,我们有大量的时间都被突然跳出来的推送和通知占用了——感觉上,科技没有帮助我们更好地安排时间,反而正在偷走我们的时间。设计者崔斯坦 • 哈里斯提供了关于科技的发人深省的新观念,他相信这能创造更多有价值的互动。他问,“当设计者为了满足更深层的人类需求,未来的科技会是什么样呢?”
- Design thinker
Tristan Harris helps the technology industry more consciously and ethically shape the human spirit and human potential. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:13
What does it mean to spend our time well?
0
1863
3690
充分利用时间意味着什么?
我花了很多时间
00:20
I spend a lot of my time
1
8111
1871
00:22
thinking思维 about how to spend my time.
2
10463
3153
思考如何花费我的时间。
00:26
Probably大概 too much --
I probably大概 obsess缠住 over it.
3
14914
2287
也许花了太多时间——
我可能是对此过度着迷了。
我的朋友是这样认为的。
00:29
My friends朋友 think I do.
4
17225
1445
不过从某种意义上说,
我觉得我一定得这样做,
00:30
But I feel like I kind of have to,
because these days,
5
18694
4487
最近我感觉我的时间
一小块一小块地溜走了,
00:35
it feels感觉 like little bits of my time
kind of slip away from me,
6
23205
3881
每当这发生的时候,
感觉我一部分生命就这样浪费了。
00:39
and when that happens发生, it feels感觉 like
parts部分 of my life are slipping滑倒 away.
7
27110
4518
00:45
Specifically特别,
8
33086
1151
具体点说,
我觉得我的时间流失在
00:46
it feels感觉 like little bits
of my time get slipped下滑 away
9
34261
2849
各种像这样的东西,
00:49
to various各个 things like this,
10
37134
1604
比如科技——我会不断查看更新的消息。
00:50
like technology技术 -- I check things.
11
38762
1967
00:53
I'll give you an example.
12
41515
1289
举个例子。
00:55
If this email电子邮件 shows节目 up --
13
43586
1991
假如这个邮件出现了,
你们中的不少人收到过
这样的邮件,对吧?
00:57
how many许多 of you have gotten得到
an email电子邮件 like this, right?
14
45601
2685
我在一张照片中被圈出来了。
01:00
I've been tagged标记 in a photo照片.
15
48310
2298
01:03
When this appears出现,
16
51684
1803
当这个出现的时候,
我情不自禁就要立刻点开。
01:05
I can't help but click点击 on it right now.
17
53511
3411
对吧?因为如果这是一张
不好的照片怎么办?
01:08
Right? Because, like,
what if it's a bad photo照片?
18
56946
2541
所以我一定要立刻点开。
01:11
So I have to click点击 it right now.
19
59511
1705
01:13
But I'm not just going
to click点击 "See photo照片,"
20
61582
2447
但我不仅仅是点击 “看照片”,
我实际上是把接下来的
二十多分钟都花在上面了。
01:16
what I'm actually其实 going to do
is spend the next下一个 20 minutes分钟.
21
64053
2898
(观众笑声)
01:18
(Laughter笑声)
22
66975
1177
但是更坏的是,
我明知道会发生这种事,
01:20
But the worst最差 part部分 is that I know
this is what's going to happen发生,
23
68176
4037
但即使是知道将会发生什么,
01:24
and even knowing会心
that's what's going to happen发生
24
72237
3445
也不能阻止我下一次再这样做。
01:27
doesn't stop me
from doing it again the next下一个 time.
25
75706
2816
01:31
Or I find myself in a situation情况 like this,
26
79871
2762
或者我发现自己处于这样的情况,
01:36
where I check my email电子邮件
and I pull down to refresh刷新,
27
84097
3574
当我在检查邮箱时,
我总会下拉刷新,
01:41
But the thing is that 60 seconds later后来,
28
89164
3351
但问题是,60 秒之后,
我又会再次下拉刷新。
01:44
I'll pull down to refresh刷新 again.
29
92539
3131
01:50
Why am I doing this?
30
98145
1802
我为什么要这样做?
完全没意义啊。
01:51
This doesn't make any sense.
31
99971
1808
01:55
But I'll give you a hint暗示
why this is happening事件.
32
103010
3498
但我会给你们一点提示,
为什么会发生这样的事。
02:00
What do you think makes品牌
more money in the United联合的 States状态
33
108357
4508
你们认为在美国什么东西
比电影,主题公园和棒球业
加起来还要赚钱?
02:05
than movies电影, game游戏 parks公园
and baseball棒球 combined结合?
34
113547
5674
02:13
Slot插槽 machines.
35
121742
1241
老虎机。
02:17
How can slot插槽 machines make all this money
36
125195
2697
老虎机为什么能赚这么多钱,
我们每个人都只投了
很少量的钱进去,对吧?
02:20
when we play with such这样 small
amounts of money?
37
128799
4784
02:26
We play with coins硬币.
38
134022
1658
我们投进去的是硬币。
02:27
How is this possible可能?
39
135704
1275
这怎么可能?
02:30
Well, the thing is ...
40
138137
1945
其实,事实是这样的.......
02:33
my phone电话 is a slot插槽 machine.
41
141490
3085
我的手机就是一部老虎机。
02:37
Every一切 time I check my phone电话,
42
145809
1988
每次我检查自己的手机,
我就像在玩老虎机,
02:39
I'm playing播放 the slot插槽 machine to see,
43
147821
2317
看看我能得到什么。
02:42
what am I going to get?
44
150162
1192
02:43
What am I going to get?
45
151925
1160
我能得到什么?
每次我检查自己的邮箱,
02:45
Every一切 time I check my email电子邮件,
46
153109
1841
我就在玩这个老虎机,
02:46
I'm playing播放 the slot插槽 machine,
47
154974
1452
想着 “我会得到什么?”
02:48
saying, "What am I going to get?"
48
156450
1611
每一次我滚动去看新闻提要,
02:50
Every一切 time I scroll滚动 a news新闻 feed饲料,
49
158085
2721
02:53
I'm playing播放 the slot插槽 machine to see,
50
161334
1942
我就在玩这个老虎机,
去看我下次能得到些什么。
02:55
what am I going to get next下一个?
51
163300
1582
02:58
And the thing is that,
52
166346
1151
就是这样,
又一次,明确知道这事情
怎么运作——我是一个设计者,
02:59
again, knowing会心 exactly究竟
how this works作品 -- and I'm a designer设计师,
53
167521
3092
我明确地知道
这件事情背后的心理活动,
03:02
I know exactly究竟 how
the psychology心理学 of this works作品,
54
170637
2277
我确切地知道在发生什么,
03:04
I know exactly究竟 what's going on --
55
172938
1855
我却没有其他任何选择,
03:06
but it doesn't leave离开 me with any choice选择,
56
174817
2242
我很明显是陷在里面了。
03:09
I still just get sucked into it.
57
177083
2051
03:12
So what are we going to do?
58
180173
1810
那么我们要怎么办呢?
03:14
Because it leaves树叶 us
with this all-or-nothing全有或全无 relationship关系
59
182991
3021
科技让我们陷入了
这样极端的关系之中,
对吧?
03:18
with technology技术, right?
60
186036
1480
03:20
You're either on,
61
188478
1538
你要不沉浸在里面,
03:22
and you're connected连接的
and distracted分心 all the time,
62
190510
2375
始终都沉浸其中不能自拔,
要不就是隔绝干扰,
03:24
or you're off,
63
192909
1850
但这时候你会好奇,
03:26
but then you're wondering想知道,
64
194783
1254
我是不是错过了什么重要的消息?
03:28
am I missing失踪 something important重要?
65
196061
1625
03:30
In other words, you're either distracted分心
66
198352
2254
换句话说,你要不就分心,
03:33
or you have fear恐惧 of missing失踪 out.
67
201443
2061
要不就因害怕错过什么而备受煎熬。
03:36
Right?
68
204363
1157
对吧?
03:38
So we need to restore恢复 choice选择.
69
206822
4102
所以我们需要重新构建我们的选择。
03:43
We want to have
a relationship关系 with technology技术
70
211942
2520
我们希望和科技建立一个
能够反馈给我们关于怎样
在技术上花时间的选择,
03:46
that gives us back choice选择
about how we spend time with it,
71
214486
4206
而且我们需要设计者的帮助,
03:50
and we're going to need
help from designers设计师,
72
218716
3057
03:54
because knowing会心 this stuff东东 doesn't help.
73
222662
2805
因为仅仅知道这些不会改善现状。
我们需要设计来帮忙。
03:57
We're going to need design设计 help.
74
225491
2052
那么具体是怎么样的呢?
03:59
So what would that look like?
75
227567
1927
04:02
So let's take an example that we all face面对:
76
230656
2807
让我举一个普遍的例子:
聊天——发短信。
04:05
chat -- text文本 messaging消息.
77
233487
2046
04:08
So let's say there's two people.
78
236089
1577
那么假设这里有两个人,
屏幕左边的是南希 ,
她正在写文件,
04:09
Nancy's南希的 on the left
and she's working加工 on a document文件,
79
237690
3156
屏幕右边的是约翰。
04:12
and John's约翰 on the right.
80
240870
1207
04:14
And John约翰 suddenly突然 remembers记得,
81
242669
1637
约翰突然想起来
“我得赶紧找南希要这份文件,
不然就忘了。”
04:16
"I need to ask Nancy南希
for that document文件 before I forget忘记."
82
244330
3603
04:22
So when he sends发送 her that message信息,
83
250291
1667
所以他给她发了这个短信,
这分散了她的注意力。
04:23
it blows打击 away her attention注意.
84
251982
2086
04:27
That's what we're doing all the time,
bulldozing推土 each other's其他 attention注意,
85
255436
3408
这就是我们经常做的事情,
互相分散对方的注意力,
正如屏幕左右边的人。
04:30
left and right.
86
258868
1414
这里有一个不可忽视的成本,
04:32
And there's serious严重 cost成本 to this,
87
260306
1766
04:34
because every一切 time
we interrupt打断 each other,
88
262534
2631
因为每一次我们互相干扰,
04:38
it takes us about 23 minutes分钟, on average平均,
89
266729
3247
我们平均需要 23 分钟
去重新集中注意力。
04:42
to refocus重新聚焦 our attention注意.
90
270000
1840
在我们重回之前在做的事情之前,
04:43
We actually其实 cycle周期 through通过
two different不同 projects项目
91
271864
3348
我们实际上是在交替
进行两个不同的项目。
04:47
before we come back
to the original原版的 thing we were doing.
92
275236
2709
04:50
This is Gloria格洛丽亚 Mark's分数 research研究
combined结合 with Microsoft微软 research研究,
93
278806
4341
格罗里亚(加州大学尔湾分校信息学教授)
和微软合作的研究
说明了这一点。
04:55
that showed显示 this.
94
283171
1358
而且她的研究也表明
这实际上培养了坏习惯。
04:56
And her research研究 also shows节目
that it actually其实 trains火车 bad habits习惯.
95
284553
3955
我们在外部得到的干扰越多,
05:00
The more interruptions中断 we get externally外部,
96
288532
2445
05:03
it's conditioning空调 and training训练 us
to interrupt打断 ourselves我们自己.
97
291482
4280
就越会加强我们自我干扰的能力。
05:08
We actually其实 self-interrupt自中断
every一切 three-and-a-half三和半 minutes分钟.
98
296303
3580
实际上我们每三分半钟
就会自我干扰一次。
05:13
This is crazy.
99
301176
1151
就是这么夸张。
那么我们要怎么解决这个问题?
05:14
So how do we fix固定 this?
100
302351
1301
因为南希和约翰
在这个极端的关系中,
05:15
Because Nancy南希 and John约翰 are in this
all-or-nothing全有或全无 relationship关系.
101
303676
3250
南希可能希望避开干扰,
05:18
Nancy南希 might威力 want to disconnect断开,
102
306950
1501
但这样的话她会担心,
05:20
but then she'd be worried担心:
103
308475
1353
如果我错过了一些重要的事情怎么办?
05:21
What if I'm missing失踪 something important重要?
104
309852
2051
05:24
Design设计 can fix固定 this problem问题.
105
312296
1963
而设计就可以解决这个问题。
05:27
Let's say you have
Nancy南希 again on the left,
106
315311
2033
再次假设屏幕左边的是南希,
右边的是约翰。
05:29
John约翰 on the right.
107
317368
1172
约翰想起了
“我需要把这个文件发给南希。”
05:30
And John约翰 remembers记得,
"I need to send发送 Nancy南希 that document文件."
108
318564
2691
但是这一次,
05:33
Except this time,
109
321279
1229
南希可以标记
她正处于专注状态。
05:34
Nancy南希 can mark标记 that she's focused重点.
110
322532
1937
比如说她标记,
05:36
Let's say she drags拖动 a slider滑块 and says,
111
324493
1968
“我需要专注 30 分钟,”
05:38
"I want to be focused重点 for 30 minutes分钟,"
112
326485
1923
那么,她保持专注了。
05:40
so -- bam哄骗 -- she's focused重点.
113
328432
1435
现在当约翰想给她发短信,
05:42
Now when John约翰 wants to message信息 her,
114
330771
2620
他想要实践这个想法——
05:45
he can get the thought off of his mind心神 --
115
333415
2127
因为他有一个需要,
他有这个想法,
05:47
because he has a need,
he has this thought,
116
335566
2073
他需要在他忘记之前
把这个想法付诸实践。
05:49
and he needs需求 to dump倾倒 it out
before he forgets忘记.
117
337663
2427
05:52
Except this time,
118
340744
1522
但是这一次,
系统会延迟接收他的消息,
那么南希可以保持专注,
05:54
it holds持有 the messages消息
so that Nancy南希 can still focus焦点,
119
342290
4304
同时约翰也可以处理掉这个想法。
05:58
but John约翰 can get the thought
off of his mind心神.
120
346618
2543
06:02
But this only works作品
if one last thing is true真正,
121
350875
3199
但这只在最后一件事成为事实的时候可行,
也就是南希需要知道
如果事情真的很重要的时候,
06:06
which哪一个 is that Nancy南希 needs需求 to know
that if something is truly important重要,
122
354098
4486
约翰仍然可以打断她。
06:11
John约翰 can still interrupt打断.
123
359564
1678
但是,我们现在仅允许有意识的干扰,
06:16
But instead代替 of having constant不变
accidental偶然 or mindless没头脑 interruptions中断,
124
364158
4113
06:20
we're now only creating创建
conscious意识 interruptions中断,
125
368295
2682
而不是频繁的无心的干扰。
所以我们想达成两个目的,
06:24
So we're doing two things here.
126
372985
1521
一是我们正为南希和约翰
创造一个新的选择,
06:26
We're creating创建 a new choice选择
for both Nancy南希 and John约翰,
127
374530
3102
06:30
But there's a second第二, subtle微妙 thing
we're doing here, too.
128
378436
2806
但同时我们也在
做一件细节上的事情。
06:34
And it's that we're changing改变
the question we're answering回答.
129
382022
3129
那就是我们正在改变
我们正在回答的问题。
06:37
Instead代替 of the goal目标 of chat being存在:
130
385922
2988
我们聊天的目的不是:
06:42
"Let's design设计 it so it's easy简单
to send发送 a message信息" --
131
390056
3197
“让我们设计一个让发信息更方便的东西”——
那是聊天的目的,
06:45
that's the goal目标 of chat,
132
393277
1430
发信息给某人应该是很容易的——
06:46
it should be really easy简单 to send发送
a message信息 to someone有人 --
133
394731
2695
06:49
we change更改 the goal目标 to something
deeper更深 and a human人的 value,
134
397808
3080
我们改变了我们的目的,
去探索更深层次的东西和人性的价值,
也就是说 “让我们在人和人之间创造
06:52
which哪一个 is: "Let's create创建 the highest最高
possible可能 quality质量 communication通讯
135
400912
4204
尽可能高的交流质量。”
06:57
in a relationship关系 between之间 two people.
136
405140
2483
07:00
So we upgraded升级 the goal目标.
137
408162
1865
所以我们更新了我们的目标。
07:03
Now, do designers设计师
actually其实 care关心 about this?
138
411832
2811
然而,设计者们真的关心这个吗?
我们真的想去讨论人性
更深层的目标是什么吗?
07:06
Do we want to have conversations对话
about what these deeper更深 human人的 goals目标 are?
139
414667
5029
07:12
Well, I'll tell you one story故事.
140
420538
1759
我给你们讲个故事吧。
一年多以前,
07:14
A little over a year ago,
141
422321
3070
我去协助组织一个
07:17
I got to help organize组织 a meeting会议
142
425415
3080
由顶级技术设计者和
释一行禅师参加的会议。
07:20
between之间 some of technology's技术的 leading领导
designers设计师 and Thich Nhat新山一 Hanh禅师.
143
428519
4872
07:26
Thich Nhat新山一 Hanh禅师 is an international国际
spokesperson发言人 for mindfulness正念 meditation冥想.
144
434297
4837
释一行禅师是正念禅修的
国际倡导者。
这是我经历过的最有趣的会议。
07:31
And it was the most amazing惊人 meeting会议.
145
439158
1751
你可以想象一个房间,
07:32
You have to imagine想像 -- picture图片 a room房间 --
146
440933
2020
在房间的一边有一群技术宅;
07:34
on one side of the room房间,
you have a bunch of tech高科技 geeks怪才;
147
442977
3853
房间的另一边,
07:38
on the other side of the room房间,
148
446854
1496
是一群穿着褐色长袍,
剃了头的佛教僧侣。
07:40
you have a bunch of long brown棕色 robes长袍,
shaved剃光 heads, Buddhist佛教徒 monks和尚.
149
448374
4981
07:46
And the questions问题 were about
the deepest最深 human人的 values,
150
454442
3231
会议探讨的问题是
人性最深处的价值观,
未来的科技是什么样子,
07:49
like what does the future未来
of technology技术 look like
151
457697
2318
当你为最深层次的问题
07:52
when you're designing设计
for the deepest最深 questions问题
152
460039
2215
07:54
and the deepest最深 human人的 values?
153
462278
1483
和人性最深层次的价值设计问题。
07:56
And our conversation会话 centered中心
on listening more deeply
154
464445
3690
我们的谈话聚焦在更深入地
倾听那些价值观会是什么样。
08:00
to what those values might威力 be.
155
468159
1928
08:02
He joked开玩笑 in our conversation会话
156
470929
1707
他在谈话时开了玩笑,
他说假如,我们不进行拼写检查,
08:04
that what if, instead代替 of a spell拼写 check,
157
472660
1948
08:07
you had a compassion同情 check,
158
475551
2031
而且改成一个同情心的检查,
也就是,你可能会强调一个会
无意间冒犯他人的词——
08:09
meaning含义, you might威力 highlight突出 a word
that might威力 be accidentally偶然 abrasive磨料 --
159
477606
4363
被他人视为冒犯的词。
08:13
perceived感知 as abrasive磨料 by someone有人 else其他.
160
481993
1914
08:16
So does this kind of conversation会话
happen发生 in the real真实 world世界,
161
484844
3971
那么这样的对话会
发生在现实生活中,
而不仅仅在设计者会议中吗?
08:20
not just in these design设计 meetings会议?
162
488839
2122
08:23
Well, the answer回答 is yes,
163
491917
1175
答案是肯定的。
我最喜欢的例子之一就是沙发客网站。
08:25
and one of my favorites最爱 is CouchsurfingCouchsurfing.
164
493116
2297
08:28
If you didn't know,
CouchsurfingCouchsurfing is a website网站
165
496413
2453
先介绍一下,
沙发客网站是一个
帮助借宿者,和愿意提供住宿的人
08:30
that matches火柴 people
who are looking for a place地点 to stay
166
498890
3885
08:34
with a free自由 couch长椅, from someone有人
who's谁是 trying to offer提供 it.
167
502799
2871
进行匹配的网站。
08:38
So, great service服务 --
168
506185
1543
这服务很不错——
他们的设计理念会是什么?
08:39
what would their design设计 goal目标 be?
169
507752
1664
假如你在沙发客网站工作的话,
你的设计目标是什么呢?
08:41
What are you designing设计
for if you work at CouchsurfingCouchsurfing?
170
509440
2747
可能你会觉得是
帮助主人和客人配对。
08:44
Well, you would think
it's to match比赛 guests宾客 with hosts主机.
171
512211
4524
08:49
Right?
172
517589
1150
对吧?
这是一个挺好的目标。
08:50
That's a pretty漂亮 good goal目标.
173
518763
1255
但这就有点像我们之前提到的
那个发信息的目标,
08:52
But that would kind of be like
our goal目标 with messaging消息 before,
174
520042
2919
那时我们的目标只是传递消息。
08:54
where we're just trying
to deliver交付 a message信息.
175
522985
2365
那么,更深层次的人性化的
目标是什么呢?
08:57
So what's the deeper更深, human人的 goal目标?
176
525374
2142
09:00
Well, they set their goal目标
177
528175
1945
沙发客员工把自己的目标设定为
在从未见面的陌生人之间
创造持续的,积极的
09:02
as the need to create创建 lasting持久,
positive experiences经验 and relationships关系
178
530144
5654
09:07
between之间 people who've谁一直 never met会见 before.
179
535822
2159
经历和关系的需求。
09:11
And the most amazing惊人 thing
about this was in 2007,
180
539343
2583
有关的最有趣的事情
发生在 2007 年,
他们推出一种评估的方法,
09:13
they introduced介绍 a way to measure测量 this,
181
541950
2641
真的很棒。
09:16
which哪一个 is incredible难以置信.
182
544615
1451
它的工作原理是这样:
09:18
I'll tell you how it works作品.
183
546090
1307
你的每一个设计目标
09:19
For every一切 design设计 goal目标 you have,
184
547421
1547
都一定要有相应的评估方法
09:20
you have to have
a corresponding相应 measurement测量
185
548992
2068
才能知道你做的好不好——
09:23
to know how you're doing --
186
551084
1549
这是一种评估成功的方式。
09:24
a way of measuring测量 success成功.
187
552657
1335
所以他们做的是,
09:26
So what they do is,
188
554016
1296
假设有两个即将见面的人,
09:27
let's say you take two people who meet遇到 up,
189
555336
2443
09:32
and they take the number of days
those two people spent花费 together一起,
190
560120
3645
他们会取出这两个人
共同相处的天数,
09:37
and then they estimate估计 how many许多
hours小时 were in those days --
191
565010
3470
然后估算这几天中——
09:41
how many许多 hours小时 did
those two people spend together一起?
192
569136
2817
这两人共同相处了多少个小时?
然后在他们共处的那一段时间之后,
09:43
And then after they spend
that time together一起,
193
571977
2135
工作人员询问他们两人:
09:46
they ask both of them:
194
574136
1190
09:47
How positive was your experience经验?
195
575350
1958
你觉得你的经历有趣吗?
你和你遇到的这个人相处得融洽吗?
09:49
Did you have a good experience经验
with this person that you met会见?
196
577332
3049
09:52
And they subtract减去
from those positive hours小时
197
580952
3370
然后他们从这些愉快的时间中
减去人们在网站上花费的时间,
09:56
the amount of time
people spent花费 on the website网站,
198
584346
3317
10:00
because that's a cost成本 to people's人们 lives生活.
199
588425
2714
因为后者是人们生活的成本。
10:03
Why should we value that as success成功?
200
591661
1765
我们为什么要把这视为成功呢?
10:06
And what you were left with
201
594066
1456
然后两个时间相减后剩下的
就是他们所称的 “净快乐”。
10:07
is something they refer参考 to as "net
orchestrated策划 conviviality欢乐,"
202
595546
4741
或者说,是一个被创造的
净“快乐时光”。
10:12
or, really, just a net
"Good Times" created创建.
203
600311
2682
10:15
The net hours小时 that would have never
existed存在, had CouchsurfingCouchsurfing not existed存在.
204
603017
5032
假如沙发客不存在,
这些净快乐时光也根本不会存在。
10:20
Can you imagine想像 how inspiring鼓舞人心 it would be
to come to work every一切 day
205
608799
3960
你能想象这该有多振奋人心吗?
当你每天来工作,
然后评估你的成功,
10:24
and measure测量 your success成功
206
612783
1493
10:26
in the actual实际 net new contribution贡献
of hours小时 in people's人们 lives生活
207
614300
5029
评估在人们生命里实际的“净贡献”,
那些假如你今天没有做本职工作
10:31
that are positive,
that would have never existed存在
208
619353
2601
就不会存在的积极的成就?
10:33
if you didn't do what you were
about to do at work today今天?
209
621978
2810
10:37
Can you imagine想像 a whole整个 world世界
that worked工作 this way?
210
625692
4980
你能想象如果整个世界
都这样运作会如何吗?
10:43
Can you imagine想像 a social社会 network网络 that --
211
631564
2755
你能想象一个社交网络——
假设你很喜欢做饭,
10:46
let's say you care关心 about cooking烹饪,
212
634343
1583
那么这个社交网络的
成功的衡量标准是你做晚餐的天数
10:47
and it measured测量 its success成功
in terms条款 of cooking烹饪 nights organized有组织的
213
635950
3031
和你喜爱阅读的烹饪文章的数量,
10:51
and the cooking烹饪 articles用品
that you were glad高兴 you read,
214
639005
2965
减去你不喜欢读的文章,
10:53
and subtracted扣除 from that the articles用品
you weren't glad高兴 you read
215
641994
2977
或者你浪费在看
你不喜欢的东西上的时间。
10:56
or the time you spent花费 scrolling滚动
that you didn't like?
216
644995
2563
11:00
Imagine想像 a professional专业的 social社会 network网络
217
648009
3496
想象一个专业的社交网站,
它不再以创造人与人之间的联系
作为成功的标准,
11:03
that, instead代替 of measuring测量 its success成功
in terms条款 of connections连接 created创建
218
651529
3915
或者是发出多少信息,
11:07
or messages消息 sent发送,
219
655468
1589
而是以人们得到的工作机会,
11:09
instead代替 measured测量 its success成功 in terms条款
of the job工作 offers报价 that people got
220
657081
4312
那些人们很期待能够得到的工作机会。
11:13
that they were excited兴奋 to get.
221
661417
1829
11:16
And subtracted扣除 the amount of time
people spent花费 on the website网站.
222
664281
3638
减掉人们在网站上花费的时间。
11:20
Or imagine想像 dating约会 services服务,
223
668643
3035
或者想象一个约会服务,
就像 Tinder 或者其他的应用,
11:23
like maybe Tinder火种 or something,
224
671702
1738
它们不以人们更喜欢往左滑还是
往右滑为评估方法,
11:25
where instead代替 of measuring测量 the number
of swipes刷卡 left and right people did,
225
673464
3478
也就是它们现在评估成功的方法,
11:28
which哪一个 is how they measure测量 success成功 today今天,
226
676966
2084
而是衡量人们创造的深入的,
浪漫的,令人满足的关系。
11:31
instead代替 measured测量 the deep, romantic浪漫,
fulfilling履行 connections连接 people created创建.
227
679074
6145
11:38
Whatever随你 that was for them, by the way.
228
686613
2059
无论这种关系对他们来说意味着什么。
11:43
But can you imagine想像 a whole整个 world世界
that worked工作 this way,
229
691886
3228
但是你能想象一整个世界
都是这样运转,
从而能帮助你更好地运用时间吗?
11:47
that was helping帮助 you spend your time well?
230
695138
2252
11:51
Now to do this you also need a new system系统,
231
699009
2029
为了达成这个目的你也需要一个新的系统,
因为你可能在想,
11:53
because you're probably大概 thinking思维,
232
701062
1678
现在的互联网经济——
11:54
today's今天的 Internet互联网 economy经济 --
233
702764
1555
现在的总体经济
11:56
today's今天的 economy经济 in general一般 --
234
704343
1433
是以花费的时间来测量的。
11:57
is measured测量 in time spent花费.
235
705800
1270
11:59
The more users用户 you have,
236
707094
2047
更多的用户,
更多的使用量,
12:01
the more usage用法 you have,
237
709165
1378
人们花的更多的时间,
12:02
the more time people spend,
238
710567
1318
那就是我们如何衡量成功的。
12:03
that's how we measure测量 success成功.
239
711909
1658
12:06
But we've我们已经 solved解决了 this problem问题 before.
240
714419
1932
但我们之前也解决过这个问题。
12:09
We solved解决了 it with organic有机,
241
717335
2566
我们以有机概念来解决的,
当我们说我们需要
以不同的标准去衡量事情的价值。
12:11
when we said we need
to value things a different不同 way.
242
719925
2934
我们说的是一种不同的食物。
12:14
We said this is a different不同 kind of food餐饮.
243
722883
2936
12:19
So we can't compare比较 it
just based基于 on price价钱;
244
727067
2049
所以我们不能
单纯通过价钱来比较;
这是完全不同种类的食物。
12:21
this is a different不同 category类别 of food餐饮.
245
729140
1840
我们也用 LEED 认证解决问题,
12:23
We solved解决了 it with LeedLEED Certification证明,
246
731004
2733
我们说这是不一样的建筑,
12:25
where we said this
is a different不同 kind of building建造
247
733761
3447
在环境的可持续性上
代表不同的价值。
12:29
that stood站在 for different不同 values
of environmental环境的 sustainability可持续性.
248
737232
4147
12:34
What if we had something
like that for technology技术?
249
742500
4048
假如我们在科技上
也引入类似的标准呢?
12:39
What if we had something
whose谁的 entire整个 purpose目的 and goal目标
250
747772
5197
假如我们有一些东西,
它们全部目的和目标
是去为人类的生活
创造一个新的积极的贡献?
12:44
was to help create创建 net new positive
contributions捐款 to human人的 life?
251
752993
4273
12:50
And what if we could
value it a different不同 way,
252
758971
3355
假如我们能以一个
不同的标准来测量价值,
让这种标准真正起作用呢?
12:54
so it would actually其实 work?
253
762350
1498
12:56
Imagine想像 you gave this different不同
premium额外费用 shelf space空间 on app应用 stores商店.
254
764634
3931
想象在应用商城
提供与众不同的至尊货架空间。
想象网络浏览器能帮助引导你
13:00
Imagine想像 you had web卷筒纸 browsers浏览器
that helped帮助 route路线 you
255
768589
2335
13:02
to these kinds of design设计 products制品.
256
770948
2474
找到这些设计产品。
13:07
Can you imagine想像 how exciting扣人心弦 it would be
to live生活 and create创建 that world世界?
257
775475
4498
你能想象创造和生活在
这样的世界有多令人兴奋吗?
13:13
We can create创建 this world世界 today今天.
258
781211
2721
我们今天就可以创造一个这样的世界。
13:16
Company公司 leaders领导者, all you have to do --
259
784978
2772
公司的领导们,你们要做的,
只有你可以优先选择一个新的衡量机制,
13:19
only you can prioritize优先 a new metric,
260
787774
2888
13:23
which哪一个 is your metric for net positive
contribution贡献 to human人的 life.
261
791146
4403
去衡量为人类生活所做的那些
积极的净贡献。
同时在这个话题上要保持坦诚。
13:27
And have an honest诚实
conversation会话 about that.
262
795573
2051
也许你一开始做得不会很好,
13:29
Maybe you're not
doing so well to start开始 with,
263
797648
2161
但是我们不要回避这个话题。
13:31
but let's start开始 that conversation会话.
264
799833
1691
13:35
Designers设计师, you can redefine重新定义 success成功;
you can redefine重新定义 design设计.
265
803035
5695
设计者们,你们可以重新定义成功;
重新定义设计。
证明你们比组织里的很多人都更有能力
13:40
Arguably按理说, you have more power功率
than many许多 people in your organization组织
266
808754
3933
去创造我们赖以生存的选择。
13:44
to create创建 the choices选择
that all of us live生活 by.
267
812711
2923
13:48
Maybe like in medicine医学,
268
816311
1401
也许就像在医疗行业
我们有希波克拉底誓词,
13:49
where we have a Hippocratic希波克拉底 oath誓言
269
817736
1858
13:51
to recognize认识 the responsibility责任
and this higher更高 value
270
819618
4122
去认识到医生的责任,
和以医治病人为目标的
13:55
that we have to treat对待 patients耐心.
271
823764
1567
更高的价值。
13:57
What if designers设计师 had something like that,
272
825355
2040
假如设计者也有像这样的
关于新设计的誓言呢?
13:59
in terms条款 of this new kind of design设计?
273
827419
1832
14:02
And users用户, for all of us --
274
830668
2005
用户们,我们所有人——
我们可以呼吁这样的科技。
14:04
we can demand需求 technology技术
that works作品 this way.
275
832697
3503
14:09
Now it may可能 seem似乎 hard,
276
837176
1667
这看起来也许很困难,
但是麦当在顾客提出
要求之前也并不提供沙拉。
14:10
but McDonald's麦当劳 didn't have salads沙拉
until直到 the consumer消费者 demand需求 was there.
277
838867
4397
14:16
Walmart沃尔玛(Walmart) didn't have organic有机 food餐饮
until直到 the consumer消费者 demand需求 was there.
278
844529
4193
沃尔玛在顾客需求产生之前也
没有有机食物。
我们需要对这样的新科技表达需求。
14:20
We have to demand需求
this new kind of technology技术.
279
848746
4745
14:26
And we can do that.
280
854194
1281
而且我们能做到。
14:28
And doing that
281
856092
1512
通过这样,
就可能把以时间为代价和尺度
14:29
would amount to shifting
from a world世界 that's driven驱动 and run
282
857628
3517
14:33
entirely完全 on time spent花费,
283
861169
2570
运转的世界转变成
一个被合理,高效利用的时间推动的世界。
14:37
to world世界 that's driven驱动 by time well spent花费.
284
865151
4035
14:43
I want to live生活 in this world世界,
285
871569
2087
我想生活在这样的世界,
而且我想引发坦诚的对话。
14:45
and I want this conversation会话 to happen发生.
286
873680
2088
14:48
Let's start开始 that conversation会话 now.
287
876586
1850
让我们现在就开始这样的对话吧。
14:51
Thank you.
288
879707
1151
谢谢。
(观众鼓掌)
14:52
(Applause掌声)
289
880882
1895
Translated by Yolanda Wei
Reviewed by Chen Zou

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Tristan Harris - Design thinker
Tristan Harris helps the technology industry more consciously and ethically shape the human spirit and human potential.

Why you should listen

Tristan Harris has been called "the closest thing Silicon Valley has to a conscience" by The Atlantic magazine. Prior to founding the new Center for Humane Technology, he was Google's Design Ethicist, developing a framework for how technology should "ethically" steer the thoughts and actions of billions of people from screens.  

Harris has spent a decade understanding the invisible influences that hijack human thinking and action. Drawing on literature from addiction, performative magic, social engineering, persuasive design and behavioral economics, he is currently developing a framework for ethical persuasion, especially as it relates to the moral responsibility of technology companies.

Rolling Stone magazine named Harris one of "25 People Shaping the World" in 2017. His work has been featured on TED, "60 Minutes," HBO's "RealTime with Bill Maher," "PBS NewsHour," Recode, The Atlantic, WIRED, the New York Times, Der Spiegel, The Economist and many more. Harris has briefed heads of state, technology company CEOs and members of the US Congress about the attention economy.

More profile about the speaker
Tristan Harris | Speaker | TED.com