ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Kevin Kelly - Digital visionary
There may be no one better to contemplate the meaning of cultural change than Kevin Kelly, whose life story reads like a treatise on the value and impacts of technology.

Why you should listen

Kelly has been publisher of the Whole Earth Review, executive editor at Wired magazine (which he co-founded, and where he now holds the title of Senior Maverick), founder of visionary nonprofits and writer on biology, business and “cool tools.” He’s renounced all material things save his bicycle (which he then rode 3,000 miles), founded an organization (the All-Species Foundation) to catalog all life on Earth, championed projects that look 10,000 years into the future (at the Long Now Foundation), and more. He’s admired for his acute perspectives on technology and its relevance to history, biology and society. His new book, The Inevitable, just published, explores 12 technological forces that will shape our future.

More profile about the speaker
Kevin Kelly | Speaker | TED.com
TED2005

Kevin Kelly: How technology evolves

Kevin Kelly 談科技如何演化

Filmed:
2,037,387 views

科技狂熱者 Kevin Kelly 問:「科技要的是什麼?」,並發現它趨向普遍及複雜,就像生命的演化一樣。
- Digital visionary
There may be no one better to contemplate the meaning of cultural change than Kevin Kelly, whose life story reads like a treatise on the value and impacts of technology. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:25
I don't know about you, but I haven't沒有 quite相當 figured想通 out
0
0
4000
我不知你怎麼想,但我想不出
00:29
exactly究竟 what technology技術 means手段 in my life.
1
4000
3000
科技對我的生命真正的意義為何。
00:32
I've spent花費 the past過去 year thinking思維 about what it really should be about.
2
7000
7000
我花了過去一年在想,那到底該怎樣。
00:39
Should I be pro-technology親技術? Should I embrace擁抱 it full充分 arms武器?
3
14000
3000
我要親科技嗎?我要全心擁抱它嗎?
00:42
Should I be wary警惕? Like you, I'm very tempted動心 by the latest最新 thing.
4
17000
5000
我要擔心嗎?和你們一樣,我嚮往新事物。
00:47
But at the other hand, a couple一對 of years年份 ago
5
22000
2000
但另方面,幾年前
00:49
I gave up all of my possessions財產,
6
24000
3000
我放棄我所有的物品,
00:52
sold出售 all my technology技術 -- except for a bicycle自行車 --
7
27000
2000
賣掉我的科技用品,只留一輛腳踏車,
00:54
and rode騎著車 across橫過 3,000 miles英里 on the U.S. back roads道路 under the power功率 of my one body身體,
8
29000
6000
騎了三千哩的美國小路,用自身的力量,
01:00
fuelled燃料 mostly大多 by TwinkiesTwinkies and junk破爛 food餐飲.
9
35000
3000
大部分只吃海棉蛋糕和垃圾食物。
01:03
(Laughter笑聲)
10
38000
1000
(笑聲)
01:04
And I've since以來 then tried試著 to keep technology技術
11
39000
2000
自此,我試著和科技保持距離,
01:06
at arm's武器 length長度 in many許多 ways方法, so it doesn't master my life.
12
41000
4000
不受它支配我的生活。
01:10
At the same相同 time, I run a website網站 on cool tools工具,
13
45000
4000
同時,我卻管理一個酷品網站,
01:14
where I issue問題 a daily日常 obsession困擾 of the latest最新 things in technology技術.
14
49000
4000
每天暢談最新的科技物品。
01:18
So I'm still perplexed困惑 about what the true真正 meaning含義 of technology技術 is
15
53000
6000
因此,我仍感到困惑,科技的真義是什麼 -
01:24
as it relates涉及 to humanity人性, as it relates涉及 to nature性質,
16
59000
4000
它與人的關係,與自然的關係,
01:28
as it relates涉及 to the spiritual精神.
17
63000
3000
與心靈的關係。
01:31
And I'm not even sure we know what technology技術 is.
18
66000
4000
我甚至不確定,我們真的認識科技嗎?
01:35
And one definition定義 of technology技術 is that which哪一個 is first recorded記錄.
19
70000
6000
有一個最早對科技的定義。
01:41
This is the first example of the modern現代 use of technology技術 that I can find.
20
76000
5000
這是我找到的「科技」一詞現代用法的首例。
01:46
It was the suggested建議 syllabus教學大綱 for dealing交易 with
21
81000
4000
它出現在一個教學大綱中,是關於
01:50
the Applied應用的 Arts藝術 and Science科學 at Cambridge劍橋 University大學 in 1829.
22
85000
6000
「應用藝術與科學」,在劍橋大學,1829年。
01:56
Before that, obviously明顯, technology技術 didn't exist存在. But obviously明顯 it did.
23
91000
5000
那之前,顯然「科技」一詞並不存在。但顯然科技是存在的。
02:01
I like one of the definitions定義 that Alan艾倫 Kay has for technology技術.
24
96000
4000
我喜歡 Alan Kay 對科技的一個定義。
02:05
He says technology技術 is anything that was invented發明 after you were born天生.
25
100000
4000
他說:科技是你出生後才發明的任何東西。
02:09
(Laughter笑聲)
26
104000
1000
(笑聲)
02:10
So it sums總和 up a lot of what we're talking about.
27
105000
4000
但它總結了許多我們討論的事。
02:14
Danny丹尼 Hillis希利斯 actually其實 has an update更新 on that --
28
109000
2000
Danny Hillis 事實上有個更新版本 -
02:16
he says technology技術 is anything that doesn't quite相當 work yet然而.
29
111000
4000
他說:科技是還不怎麼能用的任何東西。
02:20
(Laughter笑聲)
30
115000
1000
(笑聲)
02:21
Which哪一個 also, I think, gets得到 into a little bit of our current當前 idea理念.
31
116000
5000
我認為,這也和我們現在的想法有關。
02:26
But I was interested有興趣 in another另一個 definition定義 of technology技術.
32
121000
3000
但我卻對科技的另一個定義感興趣。
02:29
Something, again, that went back to something more fundamental基本的.
33
124000
4000
它再次回到更基本的某些事物。
02:33
Something that was deeper更深. And as I struggled掙扎 to understand理解 that,
34
128000
6000
更深奧的事。當我盡力去理解它時,
02:39
I came來了 up with a way of framing取景 the question
35
134000
3000
我得到一個方法去看待問題
02:42
that seemed似乎 to work for me in my investigations調查.
36
137000
2000
使它看來符合我的探索需求。
02:44
And I'm, this morning早上, going to talk about this for the first time.
37
139000
3000
今天上午我就首次來談它。
02:47
So this is a very rough attempt嘗試 to think out loud.
38
142000
5000
因此這是一種出聲想的粗略嘗試。
02:52
The question that I came來了 up with was this question:
39
147000
4000
我得到的問題就是這個問題,
02:56
what does technology技術 want? And by that, I don't mean,
40
151000
3000
科技要的是什麼?這裡的意思不是指
02:59
does it want chocolate巧克力 or vanilla香草? By what it wants, I mean,
41
154000
5000
它要巧克力或香草。我指的是:
03:04
what are its inherent固有 trends趨勢 and biases偏見?
42
159000
2000
它的固有趨勢與偏向如何?
03:06
What are its tendencies傾向 over time? One way to think about this is
43
161000
5000
長此以往,它的趨勢如何?這樣來思考它:
03:11
thinking思維 about biological生物 organisms生物, which哪一個 we've我們已經 heard聽說 a lot about.
44
166000
4000
想想生物組織體,我們聽到很多了。
03:15
And the trick that Richard理查德 Dawkins道金斯 does, which哪一個 is to say,
45
170000
3000
理查德·道金斯的技巧是:
03:18
to look at them as simply只是 as genes基因, as vehicles汽車 for genes基因.
46
173000
4000
將它們看成只是基因,是基因載體。
03:22
So he's saying, what do genes基因 want? The selfish自私 gene基因.
47
177000
3000
因此他說,基因要什麼?自私的基因。
03:25
And I'm applying應用 a similar類似 trick to say,
48
180000
3000
我用相似的技巧說:
03:28
what if we looked看著 at the universe宇宙 in our culture文化
49
183000
3000
如果我們透過科技眼光
03:31
through通過 the eyes眼睛 of technology技術? What does technology技術 want?
50
186000
5000
觀看我們文化中的宇宙,科技要的是什麼?
03:36
Obviously明顯, this in an incomplete殘缺 question,
51
191000
2000
顯然,這是個不完整的問題,
03:38
just as looking at an organism生物 as only a gene基因
52
193000
2000
就像把生物體看成只是基因
03:40
is an incomplete殘缺 way of looking at it.
53
195000
2000
也是不完整的看法。
03:42
But it's still very, very productive生產的. So I'm attempting嘗試 to say,
54
197000
4000
但這仍然很有建設性。因此我試著說,
03:46
if we take technology's技術的 view視圖 of the world世界, what does it want?
55
201000
4000
如果我們採取科技的世界觀,它要的是什麼?
03:50
And I think once一旦 we ask that question
56
205000
3000
我認為,一旦我們問這個問題
03:53
we have to go back, actually其實, to life. Because obviously明顯,
57
208000
5000
我們必須實際上回到生命。因為很明顯,
03:58
if we keep extending擴展 the origins起源 of technology技術 far back,
58
213000
3000
如果我們遠遠推回科技的起源,
04:01
I think we come back to life at some point.
59
216000
2000
我認為在某一點我們回到生命。
04:03
So that's where I want to begin開始 my little exploration勘探, is in life.
60
218000
3000
因此,我要開始我的小小探索,是在生命。
04:06
And like you heard聽說 from the previous以前 speakers音箱,
61
221000
3000
就如你聽到前幾個演講者,
04:09
we don't really know what life there is on Earth地球 right now.
62
224000
3000
我們不真正知道地球上現有的生命。
04:12
We have really no idea理念.
63
227000
2000
我們真的毫無概念。
04:14
Craig克雷格 Venter'sVenter的 tremendous巨大 and brilliant輝煌 attempt嘗試
64
229000
4000
克萊格·凡特的雄大抱負
04:18
to DNA脫氧核糖核酸 sequence序列 things in the ocean海洋 is great.
65
233000
3000
要為海洋生物 DNA 定序是偉大的。
04:21
Brian布賴恩 Farrell's法瑞爾的 work is all part部分 of this agenda議程 to try
66
236000
3000
Brian Farrell 的工作是其中一部分,
04:24
and actually其實 discover發現 all the species種類 on Earth地球.
67
239000
2000
試著實際發現地球上所有的物種。
04:26
And one of the things that we should do is just make a grid of the globe地球
68
241000
3000
我們該做的一件事就是為地球畫格子
04:29
and randomly隨機 go and inspect檢查 all the places地方 that the grid intersects相交,
69
244000
5000
並隨機檢視格子的交叉點,
04:34
just to see what's on life. And if we did that
70
249000
2000
看看那裡有什麼生命。如果我們使用
04:36
with our little Martian火星 probe探測, which哪一個 we have not doneDONE on Earth地球,
71
251000
3000
火星探測儀,將它用在地球上,
04:39
we would begin開始 to see some incredible難以置信 species種類.
72
254000
4000
我們將會看到難以置信的物種。
04:43
This is not on another另一個 planet行星. These are things
73
258000
2000
這不是在另個星球。這些都是
04:45
that are hidden away on our planet行星.
74
260000
2000
躱在我們星球的東西。
04:47
This is an ant螞蟻 that stores商店 its colleagues'同事' honey蜜糖 in its abdomen腹部.
75
262000
5000
這是一隻螞蟻,它將同伴的蜜放在肚子裡。
04:52
Each one of these organisms生物 that we've我們已經 described描述 -- that you've seen看到
76
267000
3000
這些生物體的每一個 - 你從詹姆斯等人
04:55
from Jamie傑米 and others其他, these magnificent華麗的 things --
77
270000
3000
看過的,這些偉大事物 -
04:58
what they're doing, each one of them,
78
273000
2000
它們每一個在做的
05:00
is they're hacking黑客 the rules規則 of life.
79
275000
3000
都是在「修整」生命規則。
05:03
I can't think of a single general一般 principle原理 of biology生物學
80
278000
5000
我想不出單一的生物學通則
05:08
that does not have an exception例外 somewhere某處 by some organism生物.
81
283000
4000
到處對任何生物體都沒有例外的。
05:12
Every一切 single thing that we can think of --
82
287000
2000
我們想得到的任何一件事 -
05:14
and if you heard聽說 Olivia'sOlivia的 talk about the sexual有性 habits習慣,
83
289000
3000
如果你聽過 Oliver 談性習慣,
05:17
you'll你會 realize實現 that there isn't anything we can say that's true真正 for all life,
84
292000
3000
你將知道,沒有任何一件事適用所有生命。
05:20
because every一切 single one of them is hacking黑客 something about it.
85
295000
4000
因為每一個都在修整它的某部分。
05:24
This is a solar-powered太陽能 sea slug金屬塊. It's a nudibranch海蛞蝓
86
299000
4000
這是太陽能海蛞蝓。它屬裸鰓亞目
05:28
that has incorporated合併 chloroplast葉綠體 inside it to drive駕駛 its energy能源.
87
303000
6000
它結合葉綠體在體內當它的能源。
05:34
This is another另一個 version of that. This is a sea dragon,
88
309000
3000
這是另外一種。這是海龍。
05:37
and the one on the bottom底部, the blue藍色 one, is a juvenile少年 that has not yet然而
89
312000
6000
那隻在底部,藍色的,是幼蟲,
05:43
swallowed吞食 the acid, has not yet然而 taken採取 in
90
318000
2000
尚未吞進酸,也尚未食用
05:45
the brown-green棕綠色 algae藻類 pond池塘 scum浮渣 into its body身體 to give it energy能源.
91
320000
7000
棕綠色的海藻浮渣到體內提供能源。
05:52
These are hacks黑客, and if we looked看著 at the general一般 shape形狀
92
327000
5000
這些都是修整,如果我們看修整生命取向
05:57
of the approaches方法 to hacking黑客 life there are, current當前 consensus共識,
93
332000
4000
的一般形式,依目前的共識,
06:01
six kingdoms王國. Six different不同 broad廣闊 approaches方法: the plants植物,
94
336000
4000
共有六個界。六個廣泛的取向:
06:05
the animals動物, the fungi菌類, the protests抗議 -- the little things -- the bacteria
95
340000
3000
植物、動物、真菌、原生生物、
06:08
and the Archaea bacteria. The ArchaeasArchaeas.
96
343000
3000
細菌、古菌。
06:11
Those are the general一般 approaches方法 to life. That's one way to look at life on Earth地球 today今天.
97
346000
6000
這是生命的一般取向,是看今日地球生命的一種方式。
06:17
But a more interesting有趣 way,
98
352000
2000
但另一個較有趣的方式,
06:19
the current當前 way to take the long view視圖,
99
354000
3000
拉長來看現在的方式,
06:22
is to look at it in an evolutionary發展的 perspective透視.
100
357000
3000
是以演化的觀點來看它。
06:25
And here we have a view視圖 of evolution演化 where rather than having evolution演化
101
360000
6000
這裡我們有個演化觀,它不是線性時間的演化,
06:31
go over the linear線性 time, we have it coming未來 out from the center中央.
102
366000
3000
我們將它從中心往外擴延。
06:34
So in the center中央 is the most primitive原始, and this is a genealogical系譜的 chart圖表
103
369000
4000
在中心是最原始的,這是地球所有生命的系譜。
06:38
of all life on earth地球. This is all the same相同 six kingdoms王國.
104
373000
4000
所有相同的六個界都看得到。
06:42
You see 4,000 representative代表 species種類, and you can see where we are.
105
377000
4000
四千個代表性物種,你看到我們在何處。
06:46
But what I like about this is it shows節目 that
106
381000
1000
我喜歡這個,因為它顯示
06:47
every一切 living活的 organism生物 on Earth地球 today今天 is equally一樣 evolved進化.
107
382000
6000
地球上每種生物體都是同等演化的。
06:53
Those fungi菌類 and bacteria are as highly高度 evolved進化 as humans人類.
108
388000
4000
那些真菌和細菌和人類都是高度演化的。
06:57
They've他們已經 been around just as long and gone走了 through通過
109
392000
2000
它們同樣久存,
06:59
just the same相同 kind of trial審訊 and error錯誤 to get here.
110
394000
4000
並經歷相同的試煉而到達這裡。
07:03
But we see that each one of these is actually其實 hacking黑客,
111
398000
5000
但我們看到,這些每個都實際上在修整,
07:08
and has a different不同 way of finding發現 out how to do life.
112
403000
2000
且各有不同方式去求取生存。
07:10
And if we take the long-term長期 trends趨勢 of life, if we begin開始 to say,
113
405000
4000
如果我們看生命的長期趨勢,如果我們開始說,
07:14
what does evolution演化 want? There's several一些 things that we see.
114
409000
3000
演化要的是什麼?我們看到若干事。
07:17
One of the things about evolution演化 is that nowhere無處 on Earth地球
115
412000
6000
演化的一件事就是,
07:23
have we ever been where we don't find life.
116
418000
4000
地球上無處找不到生命。
07:27
We find life at the bottom底部 of every一切 long-term長期,
117
422000
4000
我們發現生命在每個長期、
07:31
long-distance遠距離 drilling鑽孔 core核心 into the center中央 of rock
118
426000
3000
長距離鑽探地心岩石
07:34
that we bring帶來 up -- and there's bacteria in the pores毛孔 of that rock.
119
429000
4000
所取出的核心 - 岩石孔隙中就有細菌。
07:38
And wherever哪裡 life is, it never retreats務虛會. It's ubiquitous普及 and it wants to be more.
120
433000
4000
生命所在之處,它從不撤退。它無所不在,不斷增多。
07:42
More and more of the inert惰性的 matter of the globe地球
121
437000
3000
地球上越來越多的無生命物質
07:45
is being存在 touched感動 and animated動畫 by life.
122
440000
3000
受到生命的刺激及活化。
07:48
The second第二 thing is is we see diversity多樣. We also see specialization專業化.
123
443000
4000
另一件我們看到的是多樣性。我們也看到特殊化。
07:52
We see the movement運動 from a general-purpose一般用途 cell細胞
124
447000
3000
我們看到的是由一般目的的細胞
07:55
to the more specific具體 and specialized專門.
125
450000
4000
移動到更特定、特殊化的。
07:59
And we see a drift漂移 towards complexity複雜 that's very intuitive直觀的.
126
454000
4000
我們看到移向複雜,直覺可察。
08:03
And actually其實, we have current當前 data數據 that does show顯示
127
458000
2000
實際上,我們現有數據顯示
08:05
that there is an actual實際 drift漂移 towards complexity複雜 over time.
128
460000
4000
實際上長期來是在移向複雜。
08:09
And the last thing, I bring帶來 back this nudibranch海蛞蝓.
129
464000
2000
最後我再提一下裸鰓亞目。
08:11
One of the things we see about life is that it moves移動
130
466000
3000
我們看到生命的一件事,即它由內部
08:14
from the inner to increasing增加 sociability社交性. And by that it means手段
131
469000
4000
移向漸增的社會性。也就是
08:18
that there is more and more of life whose誰的 entire整個 environment環境 is other life.
132
473000
4000
有越來越多的生命,其整體環境是其他生命。
08:22
Like those chloroplast葉綠體 cells細胞 --
133
477000
2000
就像那些葉綠體細胞 -
08:24
they're completely全然 surrounded包圍 by other life.
134
479000
1000
它們全被其他生命所包圍。
08:25
They never touch觸摸 the inner matter. There is more and more co-evolution協同進化.
135
480000
6000
它們從不觸及內部物質。有更多的共同演化。
08:31
And so the general一般, long-term長期 trends趨勢 of evolution演化
136
486000
3000
因此,演化的一般長期趨勢
08:34
are roughly大致 these five: ubiquity無處不在, diversity多樣, specialization專業化,
137
489000
4000
大約有五個:普遍、多樣、特殊、
08:38
complexity複雜 and socialization社會化. Now, I took that and said,
138
493000
5000
複雜、及社群。我採取此一觀點,
08:43
OK, what are the long-term長期 trends趨勢 in technology技術?
139
498000
5000
那麼,科技的長期趨勢如何?
08:48
And again, my question is, what does technology技術 want?
140
503000
4000
再次我問:科技要的是什麼?
08:52
And so, remarkably異常, I discovered發現
141
507000
3000
因此,顯然,我發現了
08:55
that there's also a drift漂移 toward specialization專業化.
142
510000
3000
它也是移向特殊化。
08:58
That we see there's a general一般 hammer錘子,
143
513000
3000
這裡我們看到普通的鎚子,
09:01
and hammers become成為 more and more specific具體 over time.
144
516000
3000
鎚子隨著時間越來越特殊化。
09:04
There's obviously明顯 diversity多樣. Huge巨大 numbers數字 of things.
145
519000
5000
顯然有多樣性。許許多多的物品。
09:09
This is all the contents內容 of a Japanese日本 home.
146
524000
2000
這是日本家庭的所有東西。
09:11
I actually其實 had my daughter女兒 -- gave her a tally相符 counter計數器,
147
526000
3000
我要我女兒 - 送她一個計數器,
09:14
and I gave her an assignment分配 last summer夏季 to go around
148
529000
2000
去年夏天我要她四處看看
09:16
and count計數 the number of species種類 of technology技術 in our household家庭.
149
531000
4000
算算我們家中有多少科技物種。
09:20
And it came來了 up with 6,000 different不同 species種類 of products製品.
150
535000
3000
結果有六千個產品種類。
09:23
I did some research研究 and found發現 out that the King國王 of England英國, Henry亨利 VIII,
151
538000
3000
我做過研究,發現英格蘭王享利八世
09:26
had only about 7,000 items項目 in his household家庭.
152
541000
3000
只有大約七千件物品在他家中。
09:29
And he was the King國王 of England英國,
153
544000
1000
而他是英格蘭王,
09:30
and that was the entire整個 wealth財富 of England英國 at the time.
154
545000
2000
那是當時英格蘭的全部財富了。
09:32
So we're seeing眼看 huge巨大 numbers數字 of diversity多樣 in the kinds of things.
155
547000
5000
因此我們看到大量的物品多樣性。
09:37
This is a scene現場 from Star Wars戰爭 where the 3POPO comes out
156
552000
4000
這是星際戰爭的一景,3PO 出現了
09:41
and he sees看到 machines making製造 machines. How depraved墮落!
157
556000
3000
他看到了機器在製作機器。真敗壞呀!
09:44
Well, this is actually其實 what we're headed當家 towards: world世界 machines.
158
559000
4000
嗯,這正是我們的走向:世界機器
09:48
And the technology技術 is only being存在 thrown拋出 out by other technologies技術.
159
563000
3000
科技只是由其他科技發展出來。
09:51
Most machines will only ever be in contact聯繫 with other technology技術
160
566000
3000
大部分機器將只和其他科技打交道
09:54
and not non-technology非技術, or even life.
161
569000
3000
而不管非科技,甚至生命。
09:57
And thirdly第三, the idea理念 that machines are becoming變得 biological生物 and complex複雜
162
572000
3000
第三,機器生物化、複雜化的想法
10:00
is at this point a cliche陳詞濫調. And I'm happy快樂 to say,
163
575000
4000
已是陳腔濫調。而我很高興地說,
10:04
I was partly部分地 responsible主管 for that cliche陳詞濫調
164
579000
2000
我要為那個陳腔濫調負部分責任:
10:06
that machines are becoming變得 biological生物, but that's pretty漂亮 evident明顯.
165
581000
3000
機器生物化了,那很明顯。
10:09
So the major重大的 trends趨勢 in technology技術 evolution演化 actually其實
166
584000
6000
因此科技演化的主要趨勢,實際上
10:15
are the same相同 as in biological生物 evolution演化. The same相同 drives驅動器 that we see
167
590000
5000
就像生物演化。我們看到相同的趨勢
10:20
towards ubiquity無處不在, towards diversity多樣, towards socialization社會化,
168
595000
3000
走向普遍、多樣、社群、
10:23
towards complexity複雜. That is maybe not a big surprise
169
598000
4000
複雜。這或許不是大驚奇
10:27
because if we map地圖 out, say, the evolution演化 of armor盔甲,
170
602000
5000
因為如果我們圖示,舉例說:盔甲的演化,
10:32
you can actually其實 follow跟隨 a sort分類 of an evolutionary-type進化型 cladistic支序 tree.
171
607000
4000
你可以實際上跟隨一種演化式的血緣族譜。
10:36
I suggest建議 that, in fact事實, technology技術 is the seventh第七 kingdom王國 of life.
172
611000
5000
我認為,事實上科技是生命的第七界。
10:41
That its operations操作 and how it works作品 is so similar類似
173
616000
4000
它的運作及功能都如此相似
10:45
that we can think of it as the seventh第七 kingdom王國.
174
620000
4000
我們可以將它當成第七界。
10:49
And so it would be sort分類 of approximately up there,
175
624000
3000
因此它大略就在上方,
10:52
coming未來 out of the animal動物 kingdom王國. And if we were to do that,
176
627000
6000
出自於動物界。如果這麼做,
10:58
we would find out -- we could actually其實 approach途徑 technology技術 in this way.
177
633000
3000
我們將發現 - 我們實質上可以這樣面對科技。
11:01
This is Niles奈爾斯 Eldredge埃爾德雷奇. He was the co-developer合作開發 with Stephen斯蒂芬 Jay松鴉 Gould古爾德
178
636000
5000
這是尼爾斯·艾崔奇,他和史蒂芬·古爾德一起發展
11:06
of the theory理論 of punctuated打斷 equilibrium平衡.
179
641000
2000
間斷平衡理論。
11:08
But as a sideline副業, he happens發生 to collect蒐集 cornets短號.
180
643000
3000
附帶地,他也收藏小銅喇叭。
11:11
He has one of the world's世界 largest最大 collections集合 -- about 500 of them.
181
646000
4000
他有著世界上最大的收藏 - 大約有 500 只。
11:15
And he has decided決定 to treat對待 them as if they were trilobites三葉蟲, or snails蝸牛,
182
650000
3000
他決定把它們當成旋螺或蝸牛,
11:18
and to do a morphological形態 analysis分析,
183
653000
2000
進行形態分析,
11:20
and try to derive派生 their genealogical系譜的 history歷史 over time.
184
655000
4000
試著導出它們在時間上的系譜史。
11:24
This is his chart圖表, which哪一個 is not quite相當 published發表 yet然而.
185
659000
2000
這是他得到的圖表,還沒完全公開。
11:26
But the most interesting有趣 aspect方面 about this
186
661000
3000
但這最有趣的面向是
11:29
is that if you look at those red lines at the bottom底部,
187
664000
3000
如果你看那些底下的紅線,
11:32
those indicate表明 basically基本上 a parentage血統 of a type類型 of cornet信號旗
188
667000
7000
它基本上表示某種小銅喇叭的上一代
11:39
that was no longer made製作. That does not happen發生 in biology生物學.
189
674000
4000
現在已沒人製造了。生物學上不是這樣。
11:43
When something is extinct絕種, you can't have it as your parent.
190
678000
3000
當某物滅絕後,你無法以它為上一代。
11:46
But that does happen發生 in technology技術. And it turns out
191
681000
3000
但在科技它會發生。結果呢
11:49
that that's so distinctive獨特 that you can actually其實 look at this tree,
192
684000
4000
它非常獨特,你可以看這個系譜,
11:53
and you can actually其實 use it to determine確定
193
688000
3000
可以用它來確定
11:56
that this is a technological技術性 system系統 versus a biological生物 system系統.
194
691000
4000
這是科技系統而非生物系統。
12:00
In fact事實, this idea理念 of resurrecting復活 the whole整個 idea理念 is so important重要
195
695000
4000
事實上,觀念復活的想法是非常重要的,
12:04
that I began開始 to think about what happens發生 with old technology技術.
196
699000
4000
因而,我開始思考舊的科技怎麼了。
12:08
And it turns out that, in fact事實, technologies技術 don't die.
197
703000
5000
結果呢,事實上科技不會死。
12:13
So I suggested建議 this to an historian歷史學家 of science科學, and he said,
198
708000
2000
我向一位科學史學家提起,他說:
12:15
"Well, what about, you know, come on, what about steam蒸汽 cars汽車?
199
710000
5000
「嗯,那麼蒸汽車還在嗎?
12:20
They're not around anymore." Well actually其實, they are.
200
715000
4000
它們已消失了。」而事實上,它們還在。
12:24
In fact事實, they're so around that you can buy購買 new parts部分 for a Stanley斯坦利 steam蒸汽 automobile汽車.
201
719000
7000
它們不但在,你還能買到 Stanley 蒸汽車的新零件。
12:31
And this is a website網站 of a guy who's誰是 selling銷售 brand new parts部分
202
726000
3000
這個網站有賣全新的零件
12:34
for the Stanley斯坦利 automobile汽車. And the thing that I liked喜歡
203
729000
4000
供應 Stanley 汽車之用。我很欣賞
12:38
is sort分類 of this one-click一鍵式, add-to-your-cart添加到您的推車 button按鍵 --
204
733000
3000
它也有點擊選貨進購物車的按鍵 -
12:41
(Laughter笑聲) --
205
736000
1000
(笑聲)
12:42
for buying購買 steam蒸汽 valves閥門. I mean, it was just -- it was really there.
206
737000
5000
可以買蒸汽閥。我是說,真的有人在賣。
12:47
And so, I began開始 to think about, well, maybe that's just a random隨機 sample樣品.
207
742000
5000
因此,我開始想,也許這只是個特例。
12:52
Maybe I should do this sort分類 of in a more conservative保守 way.
208
747000
3000
也許我該用比較保守的方式去查看。
12:55
So I took the great big 1895 Montgomery蒙哥馬利 Ward's沃德 catalog目錄
209
750000
5000
我拿大部頭的 1895年 Montgomery Ward 型錄
13:00
and I randomly隨機 went through通過 it. And I took a page -- not quite相當 a random隨機 page --
210
755000
3000
隨機翻翻,我選了一頁 - 不怎麼隨機 -
13:03
I took a page that was actually其實 more difficult than others其他
211
758000
3000
我選的這樣實際上是比較難的
13:06
because lots of the pages網頁 are filled填充 with things
212
761000
2000
因為許多頁面中的東西
13:08
that are still being存在 made製作. But I took this page
213
763000
3000
都還有在製造。但我選了這一頁
13:11
and I said, how many許多 of these things are still being存在 made製作?
214
766000
4000
我說:這些東西有多少還在製造?
13:15
And not antiques古董. I want to know how many許多 of these things are still in production生產.
215
770000
5000
而不是古董。我要知道這些東西有多少還在製造。
13:20
And the answer回答 is: all of them.
216
775000
3000
答案是:全部。
13:23
All of them are still being存在 produced生成. So you've got corn玉米 shellers剝殼.
217
778000
7000
它們都還在製造。因此你能買到玉米脫殼機。
13:30
I don't know who needs需求 a corn玉米 sheller脫粒機.
218
785000
2000
我不知道誰需要玉米脫殼機。
13:32
Be it corn玉米 shellers剝殼 -- you've got ploughs; you've got fan風扇 mills鋼廠;
219
787000
4000
就是玉米脫殼機 - 你還可買到犁、風車磨,
13:36
all these things -- and these are not, again, antiques古董. These are --
220
791000
3000
所有這些東西都不是古董。這些是 -
13:39
you can order訂購 these. You can go to the web捲筒紙 and you can buy購買 them now,
221
794000
3000
你可以訂購。你可以上網,現在就去買,
13:42
brand-new全新的 made製作. So in a certain某些 sense, technologies技術 don't die.
222
797000
5000
全新製造的。因此,某種觀點而言,科技不死。
13:47
In fact事實, you can buy購買, for 50 bucks雄鹿, a stone-age石器時代 knife
223
802000
7000
事實上,你能花 50 美元買到石器時代的刀
13:54
made製作 exactly究竟 the same相同 way that they were made製作 10,000 years年份 ago.
224
809000
4000
以一萬年前完全一樣的方式做成的。
13:58
It's short, bone handle處理, 50 bucks雄鹿. And in fact事實,
225
813000
4000
它有短的骨柄,50 美元。而事實上,
14:02
what's important重要 is that this information信息 actually其實 never died死亡 out.
226
817000
3000
重要的是這項資訊從未消逝。
14:05
It's not just that it was resurrected復活. It's continued繼續 all along沿.
227
820000
2000
它不只是復活。它一直存在著。
14:07
And in Papua巴布亞 New Guinea幾內亞, they were making製造 stone axes
228
822000
3000
而在巴布亞新幾亞,他們做石斧
14:10
until直到 two decades幾十年 ago, just as a course課程 of practical實際的 matters事項.
229
825000
7000
直到二十年前,它還是件實用的事。
14:17
Even when we try to get rid擺脫 of a technology技術, it's actually其實 very hard.
230
832000
4000
甚至當我們試圖放棄一項科技,那實在很難。
14:21
So we've我們已經 all heard聽說 about the Amish阿米甚 giving up cars汽車.
231
836000
4000
我們都聽過阿米希人放棄車子。
14:25
We've我們已經 heard聽說 about the Japanese日本 giving up guns槍砲.
232
840000
2000
我們也聽過日本人放棄槍砲。
14:27
We've我們已經 heard聽說 about this and that. But I actually其實 went back and
233
842000
2000
我們聽過這個、那個。但我回頭去找
14:29
took what I could find, the examples例子 in history歷史
234
844000
3000
找到歷史實例
14:32
where there have been prohibitions禁令 against反對 technology技術,
235
847000
3000
曾經禁制過科技的實例,
14:35
and then I tried試著 to find out when they came來了 back in,
236
850000
3000
我試著找出何時它們又回頭了,
14:38
because they always came來了 back in. And it turns out that the time,
237
853000
3000
因為它們總是回頭。結果是:時間
14:41
the duration持續時間 of when they were outlawed取締 and prohibited被禁止,
238
856000
2000
受禁止和限制的時期
14:43
is decreasing減少 over time. And that basically基本上, you can delay延遲 technology技術,
239
858000
5000
隨著時間而減少。那基本上只是延遲了科技,
14:48
but you can't kill it. So this makes品牌 sense, because in a certain某些 sense
240
863000
3000
而無法棄絕它。這是有意義的。就某種意義而言,
14:51
what culture文化 is, is the accumulation積累 of ideas思路.
241
866000
5000
所謂文化就是觀念的累積。
14:56
That's what it's for. It's so that ideas思路 don't die out.
242
871000
3000
其目的是要使觀念生生不息。
14:59
And when we take that, we take this idea理念 of what culture文化 is doing
243
874000
6000
當我們採取,我們採取這個文化作用的觀念
15:05
and add it to what the long-term長期 trajectory彈道 -- again, in life's人生 evolution演化 --
244
880000
6000
並將它加到生命演化的長程軌道中
15:11
we find that each case案件 -- each of the major重大的 transitions過渡 in life --
245
886000
3000
我們發現每次 - 生命的每次主要轉換 -
15:14
what they're really about is accelerating加速 and changing改變
246
889000
3000
它們真正是在加速與改變
15:17
the way in which哪一個 evolution演化 happens發生.
247
892000
3000
演化發生的方式。
15:20
They're actually其實 changing改變 the way in which哪一個 ideas思路 are generated產生.
248
895000
3000
它們實際上改變著觀念產生的方式。
15:23
So all these steps腳步 in evolution演化 are increasing增加, basically基本上,
249
898000
4000
因此,演化的這些步驟基本上都是在
15:27
the evolution演化 of evolvability可進化.
250
902000
2000
增加演化的可演化性。
15:29
So what's happening事件 over time in life is
251
904000
2000
因此,生命在時間軸上發生的是
15:31
that the ways方法 in which哪一個 you generate生成 these new ideas思路, these new hacks黑客,
252
906000
3000
產生新觀念、新俢整的方式
15:34
are increasing增加. And the real真實 tricks技巧 are ways方法
253
909000
4000
一直在增加。真正的技巧是
15:38
in which哪一個 you kind of explore探索 the way of exploring探索.
254
913000
3000
你去探索「探索方式」的方式。
15:41
And then what we see in the singularity奇點,
255
916000
2000
而我們在這獨特性中看到的
15:43
that prophesized預言 by Kurzweil庫茲威爾 and others其他 --
256
918000
3000
由庫茨魏爾和其他人所預言的 -
15:46
his idea理念 that technology技術 is accelerating加速 evolution演化.
257
921000
4000
他認為的科技正在加速演化。
15:50
It's accelerating加速 the way in which哪一個 we search搜索 for ideas思路.
258
925000
3000
它正在加速我們尋找觀念的方式。
15:53
So if you have life hacking黑客 --
259
928000
3000
因此,如果你有生命修整 -
15:56
life means手段 hacking黑客, the game遊戲 of survival生存 --
260
931000
2000
生命就是修整,生存的競賽 -
15:58
then evolution演化 is a way to extend延伸 the game遊戲 by changing改變 the rules規則 of the game遊戲.
261
933000
4000
那麼,演化就是改變競賽規則來延長賽局的方式。
16:02
And what technology技術 is really about is better ways方法 to evolve發展.
262
937000
4000
而科技真正涉及的,是較好的演化方式。
16:06
That is what we call an "infinite無窮 game遊戲."
263
941000
3000
那就是我們所說的無限賽局,
16:09
That's the definition定義 of "infinite無窮 game遊戲." A finite有限 game遊戲 is play to win贏得,
264
944000
3000
是無限賽局的定義。有限賽局是要贏,
16:12
and an infinite無窮 game遊戲 is played發揮 to keep playing播放.
265
947000
3000
無限賽局是要賽個不停。
16:15
And I believe that technology技術 is actually其實 a cosmic宇宙的 force.
266
950000
5000
我相信科技實際上是一種宇宙力。
16:20
The origins起源 of technology技術 was not in 1829,
267
955000
3000
科技的起源不是在 1829 年,
16:23
but was actually其實 at the beginning開始 of the Big Bang,
268
958000
3000
實際上是在「大爆炸」的開始,
16:26
and at that moment時刻 the entire整個 huge巨大 billions數十億 of stars明星 in the universe宇宙
269
961000
4000
在宇宙中巨量億萬星球被壓縮的時刻。
16:30
were compressed壓縮. The entire整個 universe宇宙 was compressed壓縮 into a little quantum量子 dot,
270
965000
4000
整個宇宙被壓縮為一個小量子點,
16:34
and it was so tight in there, there was no room房間 for any difference區別 at all.
271
969000
3000
它是那麼緊,緊得不可能有任何差別。
16:37
That's the definition定義. There was no temperature溫度.
272
972000
2000
這就是定義。沒有溫度。
16:39
There was no difference區別 whatsoever任何. And at the Big Bang,
273
974000
3000
沒有任何差別。而在「大爆炸」,
16:42
what it expanded擴大 was the potential潛在 for difference區別.
274
977000
3000
擴散開的是差別的潛能。
16:45
So as it expands展開 and as things expand擴大 what we have
275
980000
3000
因此,當它擴散,當事物擴散開來,
16:48
is the potential潛在 for differences分歧, diversity多樣, options選項, choices選擇,
276
983000
5000
我們即可能有差別、多樣、替換、選擇、
16:53
opportunities機會, possibilities可能性 and freedoms自由.
277
988000
2000
機會、可能、和自由。
16:55
Those are all basically基本上 the same相同 thing.
278
990000
2000
這些基本上是相同的事。
16:57
And those are the things that technology技術 brings帶來 us.
279
992000
4000
那些就是科技帶給我們的事。
17:01
That's what technology技術 is bringing使 us: choices選擇, possibilities可能性, freedoms自由.
280
996000
4000
科技帶給我們:選擇、可能、自由。
17:05
That's what it's about. It's this expansion擴張 of room房間 to make differences分歧.
281
1000000
4000
它就是關於這個,就是擴大造成差別。
17:09
And so a hammer錘子, when we grab a hammer錘子, that's what we're grabbing.
282
1004000
4000
因此,當我們握鐡鎚,我們握的是鐡鎚。
17:13
And that's why we continue繼續 to grab technology技術 --
283
1008000
3000
因而我們繼續握住科技 -
17:16
because we want those things. Those things are good.
284
1011000
2000
因為我們要這些事物。這些事物是好的。
17:18
Differences差異, freedom自由, choices選擇, possibilities可能性.
285
1013000
4000
差別、自由、選擇、可能。
17:22
And each time we make a new opportunity機會 place地點,
286
1017000
2000
每次我們製造一個新機會點,
17:24
we're allowing允許 a platform平台 to make new ones那些.
287
1019000
4000
我們即容許一個平台去製造更多新的。
17:28
And I think it's really important重要. Because if you can imagine想像
288
1023000
3000
我認為這真的很重要。因為如果你能想像
17:31
Mozart莫扎特 before the technology技術 of the piano鋼琴 was invented發明 --
289
1026000
3000
莫札特生在鋼琴科技發明之前,
17:34
what a loss失利 to society社會 there would be.
290
1029000
2000
那會是社會的多大損失。
17:36
Imagine想像 Van麵包車 Gogh梵高 being存在 born天生
291
1031000
2000
想像梵谷生在
17:38
before the technologies技術 of cheap低廉 oil paints油漆.
292
1033000
3000
廉價油彩的科技之前。
17:41
Imagine想像 Hitchcock希區柯克 before the technologies技術 of film電影.
293
1036000
4000
想像希區考克在電影科技之前。
17:45
Somewhere某處, today今天, there are millions百萬 of young年輕 children孩子 being存在 born天生
294
1040000
5000
今天某處有好幾百萬小孩出生
17:50
whose誰的 technology技術 of self-expression自我表現 has not yet然而 been invented發明.
295
1045000
5000
他們自我表達的科技尚未發明。
17:55
We have a moral道德 obligation義務 to invent發明 technology技術
296
1050000
3000
我們有發明科技的道德義務
17:58
so that every一切 person on the globe地球 has the potential潛在
297
1053000
2000
使地球上每個人有潛能去
18:00
to realize實現 their true真正 difference區別.
298
1055000
3000
實現他們的真正差別。
18:03
We want a trillion zillion無數 species種類 of one individuals個人.
299
1058000
3000
我們要幾兆、幾京物種的單一個體。
18:06
That's what technology技術 really wants.
300
1061000
3000
那就是科技真正要的。
18:09
I'm going to skip跳躍 through通過 some of the objections反對
301
1064000
2000
我要跳過一些反對意見
18:11
because I don't have answers答案 to why there's deforestation森林砍伐.
302
1066000
4000
因為我不知道為何有森林濫伐。
18:15
I don't have an answer回答 to the fact事實 that there seem似乎 to be
303
1070000
3000
我也不知道事實上有著 - 看來是
18:18
bad technologies技術. I don't have an answer回答 to
304
1073000
2000
壞的科技。我也不知道
18:20
how this impacts影響 on our dignity尊嚴, other than to suggest建議 that
305
1075000
4000
這如何衝擊我們的尊嚴,我只是提議
18:24
maybe the seventh第七 kingdom王國, because it's so close to what life is about,
306
1079000
6000
這個第七界,因為它非常接近生命形式,
18:30
maybe we can bring帶來 it back and have it help us monitor監控 life.
307
1085000
3000
也許我們可以帶回它,要它幫我們監測生命。
18:33
Maybe in some ways方法
308
1088000
2000
或許以某些方式
18:35
the fact事實 that what we're trying to do with technology技術 is find a good home for it.
309
1090000
5000
事實上我們試著搞定科技,是替它找個家。
18:40
It's a terrible可怕 thing to spray噴霧 DDTDDT on cotton fields領域,
310
1095000
3000
噴灑 DDT 在棉花田是可怕的事,
18:43
but it's a really good thing to use
311
1098000
2000
但好的一面是用它來
18:45
to eliminate消除 millions百萬 of cases of death死亡 due應有 to malaria瘧疾 in a small village.
312
1100000
4000
消滅小村莊瘧疾導致的數百萬死亡案例。
18:49
Our humanity人性 is actually其實 defined定義 by technology技術.
313
1104000
3000
人道實際上是由科技定義的。
18:52
All the things that we think that we really like about humanity人性
314
1107000
3000
所有我們認為我們喜歡的人道事項
18:55
is being存在 driven驅動 by technology技術. This is the infinite無窮 game遊戲.
315
1110000
5000
都是由科技驅導的。這就是無限賽局。
19:00
That's what we're talking about.
316
1115000
2000
我們談的就是這個。
19:02
You see, technology技術 is a way to evolve發展 the evolution演化.
317
1117000
4000
看,科技是推展演化的方法。
19:06
It's a way to explore探索 possibilities可能性 and opportunities機會 and create創建 more.
318
1121000
6000
它是個方法用來探索可能和機會,並創造更多。
19:12
And it's actually其實 a way of playing播放 the game遊戲, of playing播放 all the games遊戲.
319
1127000
5000
它實際上是參與賽局、玩各種賽局的方法。
19:17
That's what technology技術 wants.
320
1132000
2000
那就是科技要的。
19:19
And so when I think about what technology技術 wants,
321
1134000
3000
因此,當我想到科技要的是什麼,
19:22
I think that it has to do with the fact事實 that every一切 person here -- and I really believe this --
322
1137000
5000
我認為,它涉及這裡的每個人,我深信:
19:27
every一切 person here has an assignment分配. And your assignment分配 is
323
1142000
5000
這裡的每個人都有一項任務。你的任務就是
19:32
to spend your life discovering發現 what your assignment分配 is.
324
1147000
3000
究其一生找出你的任務是什麼。
19:35
That recursive遞歸 nature性質 is the infinite無窮 game遊戲.
325
1150000
3000
那個遞回的本質就是無限賽局。
19:38
And if you play that well, you'll你會 have other people involved參與,
326
1153000
3000
如果你玩得好,你將有他人參與,
19:41
so even that game遊戲 extends擴展 and continues繼續 even when you're gone走了.
327
1156000
4000
賽局會延長並持續,即使你已離開。
19:45
That is the infinite無窮 game遊戲. And what technology技術 is
328
1160000
3000
那就是無限賽局。科技就是
19:48
is the medium in which哪一個 we play that infinite無窮 game遊戲.
329
1163000
3000
我們玩無限賽局的中介。
19:51
And so I think that we should embrace擁抱 technology技術
330
1166000
3000
因此,我認為我們該接納科技
19:54
because it is an essential必要 part部分 of our journey旅程
331
1169000
3000
因為它是我們找出自我的旅程中,
19:57
in finding發現 out who we are.
332
1172000
2000
至為關鍵的部分。
19:59
Thank you.
333
1174000
2000
謝謝大家。
20:01
(Applause掌聲)
334
1176000
1000
(掌聲)
Translated by Manlai You
Reviewed by Tony Yet

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Kevin Kelly - Digital visionary
There may be no one better to contemplate the meaning of cultural change than Kevin Kelly, whose life story reads like a treatise on the value and impacts of technology.

Why you should listen

Kelly has been publisher of the Whole Earth Review, executive editor at Wired magazine (which he co-founded, and where he now holds the title of Senior Maverick), founder of visionary nonprofits and writer on biology, business and “cool tools.” He’s renounced all material things save his bicycle (which he then rode 3,000 miles), founded an organization (the All-Species Foundation) to catalog all life on Earth, championed projects that look 10,000 years into the future (at the Long Now Foundation), and more. He’s admired for his acute perspectives on technology and its relevance to history, biology and society. His new book, The Inevitable, just published, explores 12 technological forces that will shape our future.

More profile about the speaker
Kevin Kelly | Speaker | TED.com