ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Dan Ariely - Behavioral economist
The dismal science of economics is not as firmly grounded in actual behavior as was once supposed. In "Predictably Irrational," Dan Ariely told us why.

Why you should listen

Dan Ariely is a professor of psychology and behavioral economics at Duke University and a founding member of the Center for Advanced Hindsight. He is the author of the bestsellers Predictably IrrationalThe Upside of Irrationality, and The Honest Truth About Dishonesty -- as well as the TED Book Payoff: The Hidden Logic that Shapes Our Motivations.

Through his research and his (often amusing and unorthodox) experiments, he questions the forces that influence human behavior and the irrational ways in which we often all behave.

More profile about the speaker
Dan Ariely | Speaker | TED.com
TED2015

Dan Ariely: How equal do we want the world to be? You'd be surprised

Filmed:
1,928,125 views

The news of society's growing inequality makes all of us uneasy. But why? Dan Ariely reveals some new, surprising research on what we think is fair, as far as how wealth is distributed over societies ... then shows how it stacks up to the real stats.
- Behavioral economist
The dismal science of economics is not as firmly grounded in actual behavior as was once supposed. In "Predictably Irrational," Dan Ariely told us why. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:12
It would be nice to be
objective in life,
0
926
2645
00:15
in many ways.
1
3571
2022
00:17
The problem is that we have
these color-tinted glasses
2
5593
3378
00:20
as we look at all kinds of situations.
3
8971
4679
00:25
For example, think about
something as simple as beer.
4
13650
3716
00:29
If I gave you a few beers to taste
5
17366
2182
00:31
and I asked you to rate them
on intensity and bitterness,
6
19548
3808
00:35
different beers would occupy
different space.
7
23356
3697
00:39
But what if we tried
to be objective about it?
8
27053
2757
00:41
In the case of beer,
it would be very simple.
9
29810
2160
00:43
What if we did a blind taste?
10
31970
2152
00:46
Well, if we did the same thing,
you tasted the same beer,
11
34122
2724
00:48
now in the blind taste,
things would look slightly different.
12
36846
3971
00:52
Most of the beers will go into one place.
13
40817
2222
00:55
You will basically not
be able to distinguish them,
14
43039
2445
00:57
and the exception, of course,
will be Guinness.
15
45484
3089
01:00
(Laughter)
16
48573
2228
01:02
Similarly, we can think about physiology.
17
50801
2786
01:05
What happens when people expect
something from their physiology?
18
53587
3042
01:08
For example, we sold people
pain medications.
19
56629
2508
01:11
Some people, we told them
the medications were expensive.
20
59137
2739
01:13
Some people, we told them it was cheap.
21
61876
1881
01:15
And the expensive
pain medication worked better.
22
63757
2972
01:18
It relieved more pain from people,
23
66729
2554
01:21
because expectations
do change our physiology.
24
69283
3504
01:24
And of course, we all know that in sports,
25
72787
2062
01:26
if you are a fan of a particular team,
26
74849
1818
01:28
you can't help but see the game
27
76667
2369
01:31
develop from the perspective of your team.
28
79036
3505
01:34
So all of those are cases in which
our preconceived notions
29
82541
4176
01:38
and our expectations color our world.
30
86717
3440
01:42
But what happened
in more important questions?
31
90157
3402
01:45
What happened with questions
that had to do with social justice?
32
93559
3552
01:49
So we wanted to think about
what is the blind tasting version
33
97111
3405
01:52
for thinking about inequality?
34
100516
3065
01:55
So we started looking at inequality,
35
103581
2299
01:57
and we did some large-scale surveys
36
105880
1950
01:59
around the U.S. and other countries.
37
107830
2554
02:02
So we asked two questions:
38
110384
1951
02:04
Do people know what kind of
level of inequality we have?
39
112335
3366
02:07
And then, what level of inequality
do we want to have?
40
115701
4111
02:11
So let's think about the first question.
41
119812
2414
02:14
Imagine I took all the people in the U.S.
42
122226
2113
02:16
and I sorted them from
the poorest on the right
43
124339
2925
02:19
to the richest on the left,
44
127264
2392
02:21
and then I divided them into five buckets:
45
129656
2662
02:24
the poorest 20 percent,
the next 20 percent,
46
132318
2298
02:26
the next, the next,
and the richest 20 percent.
47
134616
2856
02:29
And then I asked you to tell me
how much wealth do you think
48
137472
2996
02:32
is concentrated in each of those buckets.
49
140468
2949
02:35
So to make it simpler,
imagine I ask you to tell me,
50
143417
2461
02:37
how much wealth do you think
is concentrated
51
145878
2260
02:40
in the bottom two buckets,
52
148138
2260
02:42
the bottom 40 percent?
53
150398
2261
02:44
Take a second. Think about it
and have a number.
54
152659
2692
02:47
Usually we don't think.
55
155351
1904
02:49
Think for a second,
have a real number in your mind.
56
157255
2485
02:51
You have it?
57
159740
1625
02:53
Okay, here's what lots
of Americans tell us.
58
161365
3065
02:56
They think that the bottom 20 percent
59
164430
1927
02:58
has about 2.9 percent of the wealth,
60
166357
2322
03:00
the next group has 6.4,
61
168679
2183
03:02
so together it's slightly more than nine.
62
170862
2507
03:05
The next group, they say, has 12 percent,
63
173369
3413
03:08
20 percent,
64
176782
1649
03:10
and the richest 20 percent, people think
has 58 percent of the wealth.
65
178431
4644
03:15
You can see how this relates
to what you thought.
66
183075
3135
03:18
Now, what's reality?
67
186210
1741
03:19
Reality is slightly different.
68
187951
1811
03:21
The bottom 20 percent
has 0.1 percent of the wealth.
69
189762
3813
03:25
The next 20 percent
has 0.2 percent of the wealth.
70
193575
3251
03:28
Together, it's 0.3.
71
196826
2113
03:30
The next group has 3.9,
72
198939
3529
03:34
11.3,
73
202468
2183
03:36
and the richest group
has 84-85 percent of the wealth.
74
204651
5741
03:42
So what we actually have
and what we think we have
75
210392
2966
03:45
are very different.
76
213358
1973
03:47
What about what we want?
77
215331
2090
03:49
How do we even figure this out?
78
217421
1997
03:51
So to look at this,
79
219418
1411
03:52
to look at what we really want,
80
220829
1578
03:54
we thought about
the philosopher John Rawls.
81
222407
3065
03:57
If you remember John Rawls,
82
225472
1835
03:59
he had this notion
of what's a just society.
83
227307
3250
04:02
He said a just society
84
230557
1482
04:04
is a society that if
you knew everything about it,
85
232039
2715
04:06
you would be willing
to enter it in a random place.
86
234754
2433
04:09
And it's a beautiful definition,
87
237187
1524
04:10
because if you're wealthy,
you might want the wealthy
88
238711
2478
04:13
to have more money, the poor to have less.
89
241189
2037
04:15
If you're poor, you might
want more equality.
90
243226
2109
04:17
But if you're going
to go into that society
91
245335
2004
04:19
in every possible situation,
and you don't know,
92
247339
3320
04:22
you have to consider all the aspects.
93
250659
2206
04:24
It's a little bit like blind tasting
in which you don't know
94
252865
2926
04:27
what the outcome will be
when you make a decision,
95
255791
2670
04:30
and Rawls called this
the "veil of ignorance."
96
258461
3715
04:34
So, we took another group,
a large group of Americans,
97
262176
3607
04:37
and we asked them the question
in the veil of ignorance.
98
265783
2755
04:40
What are the characteristics of a country
that would make you want to join it,
99
268538
4110
04:44
knowing that you could end
randomly at any place?
100
272648
3158
04:47
And here is what we got.
101
275806
1479
04:49
What did people want to give
to the first group,
102
277285
2259
04:51
the bottom 20 percent?
103
279544
2183
04:53
They wanted to give them
about 10 percent of the wealth.
104
281727
2694
04:56
The next group, 14 percent of the wealth,
105
284421
2600
04:59
21, 22 and 32.
106
287021
5363
05:04
Now, nobody in our sample
wanted full equality.
107
292384
3506
05:07
Nobody thought that socialism
is a fantastic idea in our sample.
108
295890
4433
05:12
But what does it mean?
109
300323
1288
05:13
It means that we have this knowledge gap
110
301611
2038
05:15
between what we have
and what we think we have,
111
303649
2658
05:18
but we have at least as big a gap
between what we think is right
112
306307
3715
05:22
to what we think we have.
113
310022
2798
05:24
Now, we can ask these questions,
by the way, not just about wealth.
114
312820
3192
05:28
We can ask it about other things as well.
115
316012
2415
05:30
So for example, we asked people
from different parts of the world
116
318427
4203
05:34
about this question,
117
322630
1718
05:36
people who are liberals and conservatives,
118
324348
2343
05:38
and they gave us basically
the same answer.
119
326691
2044
05:40
We asked rich and poor,
they gave us the same answer,
120
328735
2482
05:43
men and women,
121
331217
1301
05:44
NPR listeners and Forbes readers.
122
332518
2693
05:47
We asked people in England,
Australia, the U.S. --
123
335211
3229
05:50
very similar answers.
124
338440
1717
05:52
We even asked different
departments of a university.
125
340157
2771
05:54
We went to Harvard and we checked
almost every department,
126
342928
2758
05:57
and in fact, from Harvard Business School,
127
345686
2012
05:59
where a few people wanted the wealthy
to have more and the [poor] to have less,
128
347698
3712
06:03
the similarity was astonishing.
129
351410
2540
06:05
I know some of you went
to Harvard Business School.
130
353950
2824
06:08
We also asked this question
about something else.
131
356774
3346
06:12
We asked, what about the ratio
of CEO pay to unskilled workers?
132
360120
4969
06:17
So you can see what
people think is the ratio,
133
365089
3157
06:20
and then we can ask the question,
what do they think should be the ratio?
134
368246
3901
06:24
And then we can ask, what is reality?
135
372147
2627
06:26
What is reality? And you could say,
well, it's not that bad, right?
136
374774
3278
06:30
The red and the yellow
are not that different.
137
378052
2153
06:32
But the fact is, it's because
I didn't draw them on the same scale.
138
380205
3920
06:38
It's hard to see, there's yellow
and blue in there.
139
386105
3910
06:42
So what about other outcomes of wealth?
140
390015
2345
06:44
Wealth is not just about wealth.
141
392360
1695
06:46
We asked, what about things like health?
142
394055
2624
06:48
What about availability
of prescription medication?
143
396679
4133
06:52
What about life expectancy?
144
400812
2020
06:54
What about life expectancy of infants?
145
402832
2415
06:57
How do we want this to be distributed?
146
405247
2345
06:59
What about education for young people?
147
407592
2809
07:02
And for older people?
148
410401
1870
07:04
And across all of those things,
what we learned was that people
149
412271
2983
07:07
don't like inequality of wealth,
150
415254
3158
07:10
but there's other things where inequality,
which is an outcome of wealth,
151
418412
3506
07:13
is even more aversive to them:
152
421918
2043
07:15
for example, inequality
in health or education.
153
423961
3971
07:19
We also learned that people
are particularly open
154
427932
2461
07:22
to changes in equality
when it comes to people
155
430393
2554
07:24
who have less agency --
156
432947
2044
07:26
basically, young kids and babies,
157
434991
2345
07:29
because we don't think of them
as responsible for their situation.
158
437336
4667
07:34
So what are some lessons from this?
159
442003
2345
07:36
We have two gaps:
160
444348
1160
07:37
We have a knowledge gap
and we have a desirability gap
161
445508
2580
07:40
And the knowledge gap
is something that we think about,
162
448088
2622
07:42
how do we educate people?
163
450710
1370
07:44
How do we get people to think
differently about inequality
164
452080
2716
07:46
and the consequences of inequality
in terms of health, education,
165
454796
3762
07:50
jealousy, crime rate, and so on?
166
458558
2391
07:52
Then we have the desirability gap.
167
460949
1881
07:54
How do we get people to think differently
about what we really want?
168
462830
3823
07:58
You see, the Rawls definition,
the Rawls way of looking at the world,
169
466653
3375
08:02
the blind tasting approach,
170
470028
1742
08:03
takes our selfish motivation
out of the picture.
171
471770
2925
08:06
How do we implement that
to a higher degree
172
474695
2577
08:09
on a more extensive scale?
173
477272
2624
08:11
And finally, we also have an action gap.
174
479896
2856
08:14
How do we take these things
and actually do something about it?
175
482752
2949
08:17
I think part of the answer
is to think about people
176
485701
2902
08:20
like young kids and babies
that don't have much agency,
177
488603
3112
08:23
because people seem to be
more willing to do this.
178
491715
3808
08:27
To summarize, I would say,
next time you go to drink beer or wine,
179
495523
5270
08:32
first of all, think about, what is it
in your experience that is real,
180
500793
4087
08:36
and what is it in your experience
that is a placebo effect
181
504880
3274
08:40
coming from expectations?
182
508154
1604
08:41
And then think about what it also means
for other decisions in your life,
183
509758
3529
08:45
and hopefully also for policy questions
184
513287
2075
08:47
that affect all of us.
185
515362
1305
08:48
Thanks a lot.
186
516667
1727
08:50
(Applause)
187
518394
2337

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Dan Ariely - Behavioral economist
The dismal science of economics is not as firmly grounded in actual behavior as was once supposed. In "Predictably Irrational," Dan Ariely told us why.

Why you should listen

Dan Ariely is a professor of psychology and behavioral economics at Duke University and a founding member of the Center for Advanced Hindsight. He is the author of the bestsellers Predictably IrrationalThe Upside of Irrationality, and The Honest Truth About Dishonesty -- as well as the TED Book Payoff: The Hidden Logic that Shapes Our Motivations.

Through his research and his (often amusing and unorthodox) experiments, he questions the forces that influence human behavior and the irrational ways in which we often all behave.

More profile about the speaker
Dan Ariely | Speaker | TED.com