ABOUT THE SPEAKER
John McWhorter - Linguist
Linguist John McWhorter thinks about language in relation to race, politics and our shared cultural history.

Why you should listen

John McWhorter is Associate Professor of English and Comparative Literature at Columbia University, teaching linguistics, Western Civilization and music history. He is a regular columnist on language matters and race issues for Time and CNN, writes for the Wall Street Journal "Taste" page, and writes a regular column on language for The Atlantic. His work also appears in the Washington Post, the Chronicle of Higher Education, Aeon magazine, The American Interest and other outlets. He was Contributing Editor at The New Republic from 2001 until 2014.

McWhorter earned his PhD in linguistics from Stanford University in 1993 and is the author of The Power of BabelDoing Our Own ThingOur Magnificent Bastard TongueThe Language Hoax and most recently Words on the Move and Talking Back, Talking Black. The Teaching Company has released four of his audiovisual lecture courses on linguistics. He guest hosted the Lexicon Valley podcast at Slate during the summer of 2016.

Beyond his work in linguistics, McWhorter is the author of Losing the Race and other books on race. He has appeared regularly on Bloggingheads.TV since 2006, and he produces and plays piano for a group cabaret show, New Faces, at the Cornelia Street Cafe in New York City.

More profile about the speaker
John McWhorter | Speaker | TED.com
TED2013

John McWhorter: Txtng is killing language. JK!!!

Filmed:
2,527,500 views

Does texting mean the death of good writing skills? John McWhorter posits that there’s much more to texting -- linguistically, culturally -- than it seems, and it’s all good news.
- Linguist
Linguist John McWhorter thinks about language in relation to race, politics and our shared cultural history. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:12
We always hear that texting is a scourge.
0
743
2862
00:15
The idea is that texting spells the decline and fall
1
3605
4840
00:20
of any kind of serious literacy, or at least writing ability,
2
8445
3500
00:23
among young people in the United States
3
11945
2643
00:26
and now the whole world today.
4
14588
2301
00:28
The fact of the matter is that it just isn't true,
5
16889
3504
00:32
and it's easy to think that it is true,
6
20393
2503
00:34
but in order to see it in another way,
7
22896
1899
00:36
in order to see that actually texting is a miraculous thing,
8
24795
3669
00:40
not just energetic, but a miraculous thing,
9
28464
2565
00:43
a kind of emergent complexity
10
31029
1747
00:44
that we're seeing happening right now,
11
32776
2461
00:47
we have to pull the camera back for a bit
12
35237
2306
00:49
and look at what language really is,
13
37543
3418
00:52
in which case, one thing that we see
14
40961
2073
00:55
is that texting is not writing at all.
15
43034
4624
00:59
What do I mean by that?
16
47658
1822
01:01
Basically, if we think about language,
17
49480
2556
01:04
language has existed for perhaps 150,000 years,
18
52036
3801
01:07
at least 80,000 years,
19
55837
2137
01:09
and what it arose as is speech. People talked.
20
57974
4151
01:14
That's what we're probably genetically specified for.
21
62125
3024
01:17
That's how we use language most.
22
65149
2191
01:19
Writing is something that came along much later,
23
67340
3482
01:22
and as we saw in the last talk,
24
70822
2056
01:24
there's a little bit of controversy as to exactly when that happened,
25
72878
2668
01:27
but according to traditional estimates,
26
75546
2316
01:29
if humanity had existed for 24 hours,
27
77862
3522
01:33
then writing only came along at about 11:07 p.m.
28
81384
5191
01:38
That's how much of a latterly thing writing is.
29
86575
3645
01:42
So first there's speech, and then writing comes along
30
90220
3388
01:45
as a kind of artifice.
31
93608
1762
01:47
Now don't get me wrong, writing has certain advantages.
32
95370
4006
01:51
When you write, because it's a conscious process,
33
99376
2583
01:53
because you can look backwards,
34
101959
2138
01:56
you can do things with language that are much less likely
35
104097
2830
01:58
if you're just talking.
36
106927
2464
02:01
For example, imagine a passage from Edward Gibbon's
37
109391
3901
02:05
"The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire:"
38
113292
3806
02:09
"The whole engagement lasted above twelve hours,
39
117098
3251
02:12
till the graduate retreat of the Persians was changed
40
120349
2302
02:14
into a disorderly flight, of which the shameful example
41
122651
2773
02:17
was given by the principal leaders and the Surenas himself."
42
125424
2587
02:20
That's beautiful, but let's face it, nobody talks that way.
43
128011
4319
02:24
Or at least, they shouldn't if they're interested
44
132330
4236
02:28
in reproducing. That --
45
136566
2514
02:31
(Laughter)
46
139080
2719
02:33
is not the way any human being speaks casually.
47
141799
2978
02:36
Casual speech is something quite different.
48
144777
2585
02:39
Linguists have actually shown
49
147362
1856
02:41
that when we're speaking casually in an unmonitored way,
50
149218
2711
02:43
we tend to speak in word packets of maybe
51
151929
2678
02:46
seven to 10 words.
52
154607
1810
02:48
You'll notice this if you ever have occasion to record
53
156417
2679
02:51
yourself or a group of people talking.
54
159096
2993
02:54
That's what speech is like.
55
162089
1455
02:55
Speech is much looser. It's much more telegraphic.
56
163544
4305
02:59
It's much less reflective -- very different from writing.
57
167849
3690
03:03
So we naturally tend to think, because we see language
58
171539
2936
03:06
written so often, that that's what language is,
59
174475
2442
03:08
but actually what language is, is speech. They are two things.
60
176917
3968
03:12
Now of course, as history has gone by,
61
180885
3254
03:16
it's been natural for there to be a certain amount of bleed
62
184139
2791
03:18
between speech and writing.
63
186930
3014
03:21
So, for example, in a distant era now,
64
189944
4823
03:26
it was common when one gave a speech
65
194767
2502
03:29
to basically talk like writing.
66
197269
3117
03:32
So I mean the kind of speech that you see someone giving
67
200386
2350
03:34
in an old movie where they clear their throat, and they go,
68
202736
2533
03:37
"Ahem, ladies and gentlemen," and then they speak
69
205269
2533
03:39
in a certain way which has nothing to do with casual speech.
70
207802
3271
03:43
It's formal. It uses long sentences like this Gibbon one.
71
211073
3859
03:46
It's basically talking like you write, and so, for example,
72
214932
3962
03:50
we're thinking so much these days about Lincoln
73
218894
1995
03:52
because of the movie.
74
220889
2211
03:55
The Gettysburg Address was not the main meal of that event.
75
223100
3083
03:58
For two hours before that, Edward Everett spoke
76
226183
3915
04:02
on a topic that, frankly, cannot engage us today
77
230098
3240
04:05
and barely did then.
78
233338
1497
04:06
The point of it was to listen to him
79
234835
2381
04:09
speaking like writing.
80
237216
1556
04:10
Ordinary people stood and listened to that for two hours.
81
238772
2348
04:13
It was perfectly natural.
82
241120
1433
04:14
That's what people did then, speaking like writing.
83
242553
2491
04:17
Well, if you can speak like writing,
84
245044
2466
04:19
then logically it follows that you might want to also
85
247510
3798
04:23
sometimes write like you speak.
86
251308
2866
04:26
The problem was just that in the material,
87
254174
2050
04:28
mechanical sense, that was harder back in the day
88
256224
3455
04:31
for the simple reason that materials don't lend themselves to it.
89
259679
3307
04:34
It's almost impossible to do that with your hand
90
262986
2020
04:37
except in shorthand, and then communication is limited.
91
265006
3435
04:40
On a manual typewriter it was very difficult,
92
268441
2516
04:42
and even when we had electric typewriters,
93
270957
2287
04:45
or then computer keyboards, the fact is
94
273244
2159
04:47
that even if you can type easily enough to keep up
95
275403
2299
04:49
with the pace of speech, more or less, you have to have
96
277702
2793
04:52
somebody who can receive your message quickly.
97
280495
2345
04:54
Once you have things in your pocket that can receive that message,
98
282840
3211
04:58
then you have the conditions that allow
99
286051
2604
05:00
that we can write like we speak.
100
288655
3511
05:04
And that's where texting comes in.
101
292166
3218
05:07
And so, texting is very loose in its structure.
102
295384
3769
05:11
No one thinks about capital letters or punctuation when one texts,
103
299153
4297
05:15
but then again, do you think about those things when you talk?
104
303450
2358
05:17
No, and so therefore why would you when you were texting?
105
305808
3673
05:21
What texting is, despite the fact that it involves
106
309481
3129
05:24
the brute mechanics of something that we call writing,
107
312610
2826
05:27
is fingered speech. That's what texting is.
108
315436
3298
05:30
Now we can write the way we talk.
109
318734
3465
05:34
And it's a very interesting thing, but nevertheless
110
322199
2779
05:36
easy to think that still it represents some sort of decline.
111
324978
4856
05:41
We see this general bagginess of the structure,
112
329834
3284
05:45
the lack of concern with rules and the way that we're used to
113
333118
3349
05:48
learning on the blackboard, and so we think
114
336467
2272
05:50
that something has gone wrong.
115
338739
3239
05:53
It's a very natural sense.
116
341978
2963
05:56
But the fact of the matter is that what is going on
117
344941
4034
06:00
is a kind of emergent complexity.
118
348975
3571
06:04
That's what we're seeing in this fingered speech.
119
352546
2756
06:07
And in order to understand it, what we want to see
120
355302
2986
06:10
is the way, in this new kind of language,
121
358288
4745
06:15
there is new structure coming up.
122
363033
3576
06:18
And so, for example, there is in texting a convention,
123
366609
5723
06:24
which is LOL.
124
372332
2922
06:27
Now LOL, we generally think of
125
375254
2744
06:29
as meaning "laughing out loud."
126
377998
2464
06:32
And of course, theoretically, it does,
127
380462
2293
06:34
and if you look at older texts, then people used it
128
382755
2429
06:37
to actually indicate laughing out loud.
129
385184
2520
06:39
But if you text now, or if you are someone who
130
387704
4243
06:43
is aware of the substrate of texting the way it's become,
131
391947
3297
06:47
you'll notice that LOL
132
395244
1690
06:48
does not mean laughing out loud anymore.
133
396934
2070
06:51
It's evolved into something that is much subtler.
134
399004
3790
06:54
This is an actual text that was done
135
402794
3447
06:58
by a non-male person of about 20 years old
136
406241
3932
07:02
not too long ago.
137
410173
1495
07:03
"I love the font you're using, btw."
138
411668
2952
07:06
Julie: "lol thanks gmail is being slow right now"
139
414620
3762
07:10
Now if you think about it, that's not funny.
140
418382
1742
07:12
No one's laughing. (Laughter)
141
420124
2900
07:15
And yet, there it is, so you assume
142
423024
1970
07:16
there's been some kind of hiccup.
143
424994
1357
07:18
Then Susan says "lol, I know,"
144
426351
1834
07:20
again more guffawing than we're used to
145
428185
2297
07:22
when you're talking about these inconveniences.
146
430482
3230
07:25
So Julie says, "I just sent you an email."
147
433712
2744
07:28
Susan: "lol, I see it."
148
436456
1551
07:30
Very funny people, if that's what LOL means.
149
438007
3618
07:33
This Julie says, "So what's up?"
150
441625
2128
07:35
Susan: "lol, I have to write a 10 page paper."
151
443753
2642
07:38
She's not amused. Let's think about it.
152
446395
2314
07:40
LOL is being used in a very particular way.
153
448709
2681
07:43
It's a marker of empathy. It's a marker of accommodation.
154
451390
3691
07:47
We linguists call things like that pragmatic particles.
155
455081
3249
07:50
Any spoken language that's used by real people has them.
156
458330
3839
07:54
If you happen to speak Japanese, think about
157
462169
1776
07:55
that little word "ne" that you use at the end of a lot of sentences.
158
463945
3358
07:59
If you listen to the way black youth today speak,
159
467303
2345
08:01
think about the use of the word "yo."
160
469648
1786
08:03
Whole dissertations could be written about it,
161
471434
1946
08:05
and probably are being written about it.
162
473380
2274
08:07
A pragmatic particle, that's what LOL has gradually become.
163
475654
3794
08:11
It's a way of using the language between actual people.
164
479448
4049
08:15
Another example is "slash."
165
483497
3239
08:18
Now, we can use slash in the way that we're used to,
166
486736
2768
08:21
along the lines of, "We're going to have
167
489504
1640
08:23
a party-slash-networking session."
168
491144
3482
08:26
That's kind of like what we're at.
169
494626
2094
08:28
Slash is used in a very different way
170
496720
3539
08:32
in texting among young people today.
171
500259
2958
08:35
It's used to change the scene.
172
503217
1853
08:37
So for example, this Sally person says,
173
505070
2949
08:40
"So I need to find people to chill with"
174
508019
1805
08:41
and Jake says, "Haha" --
175
509824
1519
08:43
you could write a dissertation about "Haha" too, but we don't have time for that —
176
511343
2888
08:46
"Haha so you're going by yourself? Why?"
177
514231
2489
08:48
Sally: "For this summer program at NYU."
178
516720
2610
08:51
Jake: "Haha. Slash I'm watching this video with suns players
179
519330
2894
08:54
trying to shoot with one eye."
180
522224
1797
08:56
The slash is interesting.
181
524021
1275
08:57
I don't really even know what Jake is talking about after that,
182
525296
3156
09:00
but you notice that he's changing the topic.
183
528452
4741
09:05
Now that seems kind of mundane,
184
533193
1818
09:07
but think about how in real life,
185
535011
1442
09:08
if we're having a conversation and we want to change the topic,
186
536453
2658
09:11
there are ways of doing it gracefully.
187
539111
1612
09:12
You don't just zip right into it.
188
540723
1719
09:14
You'll pat your thighs and look wistfully off into the distance,
189
542442
4195
09:18
or you'll say something like, "Hmm, makes you think --"
190
546637
4110
09:22
when it really didn't, but what you're really --
191
550747
2360
09:25
(Laughter) —
192
553107
2235
09:27
what you're really trying to do is change the topic.
193
555342
2708
09:30
You can't do that while you're texting,
194
558050
1927
09:31
and so ways are developing of doing it within this medium.
195
559977
3731
09:35
All spoken languages have what a linguist calls
196
563708
2252
09:37
a new information marker -- or two, or three.
197
565960
3393
09:41
Texting has developed one from this slash.
198
569353
4294
09:45
So we have a whole battery of new constructions
199
573647
2985
09:48
that are developing, and yet it's easy to think,
200
576632
2587
09:51
well, something is still wrong.
201
579219
2447
09:53
There's a lack of structure of some sort.
202
581666
3775
09:57
It's not as sophisticated
203
585441
1906
09:59
as the language of The Wall Street Journal.
204
587347
2206
10:01
Well, the fact of the matter is,
205
589553
1774
10:03
look at this person in 1956,
206
591327
2451
10:05
and this is when texting doesn't exist,
207
593778
2282
10:08
"I Love Lucy" is still on the air.
208
596060
1835
10:09
"Many do not know the alphabet or multiplication table,
209
597895
3763
10:13
cannot write grammatically -- "
210
601658
1337
10:14
We've heard that sort of thing before,
211
602995
2209
10:17
not just in 1956. 1917, Connecticut schoolteacher.
212
605204
3991
10:21
1917. This is the time when we all assume
213
609195
2701
10:23
that everything somehow in terms of writing was perfect
214
611896
3251
10:27
because the people on "Downton Abbey" are articulate,
215
615147
2418
10:29
or something like that.
216
617565
1211
10:30
So, "From every college in the country goes up the cry,
217
618776
2944
10:33
'Our freshmen can't spell, can't punctuate.'"
218
621720
2633
10:36
And so on. You can go even further back than this.
219
624353
2408
10:38
It's the President of Harvard. It's 1871.
220
626761
3184
10:41
There's no electricity. People have three names.
221
629945
2542
10:44
"Bad spelling,
222
632487
2425
10:46
incorrectness as well as inelegance of expression in writing."
223
634912
3268
10:50
And he's talking about people who are otherwise
224
638180
2149
10:52
well prepared for college studies.
225
640329
1891
10:54
You can go even further back.
226
642220
1846
10:56
1841, some long-lost superintendent of schools is upset
227
644066
3853
10:59
because of what he has for a long time "noted with regret
228
647919
3177
11:03
the almost entire neglect of the original" blah blah blah blah blah.
229
651096
3509
11:06
Or you can go all the way back to 63 A.D. -- (Laughter) --
230
654605
5288
11:11
and there's this poor man who doesn't like the way
231
659893
2381
11:14
people are speaking Latin.
232
662274
1221
11:15
As it happens, he was writing about what had become French.
233
663495
3156
11:18
And so, there are always — (Laughter) (Applause) —
234
666651
6402
11:25
there are always people worrying about these things
235
673053
2171
11:27
and the planet somehow seems to keep spinning.
236
675224
3273
11:30
And so, the way I'm thinking of texting these days is
237
678497
4647
11:35
that what we're seeing is a whole new way of writing
238
683144
3580
11:38
that young people are developing,
239
686724
1626
11:40
which they're using alongside their ordinary writing skills,
240
688350
3760
11:44
and that means that they're able to do two things.
241
692110
3167
11:47
Increasing evidence is that being bilingual
242
695277
2897
11:50
is cognitively beneficial.
243
698174
2233
11:52
That's also true of being bidialectal.
244
700407
2155
11:54
That's certainly true of being bidialectal in terms of your writing.
245
702562
3090
11:57
And so texting actually is evidence of a balancing act
246
705652
4918
12:02
that young people are using today, not consciously, of course,
247
710570
3302
12:05
but it's an expansion of their linguistic repertoire.
248
713872
3687
12:09
It's very simple.
249
717559
1229
12:10
If somebody from 1973 looked at
250
718788
3710
12:14
what was on a dormitory message board in 1993,
251
722498
4106
12:18
the slang would have changed a little bit
252
726604
1833
12:20
since the era of "Love Story,"
253
728437
1818
12:22
but they would understand what was on that message board.
254
730255
3313
12:25
Take that person from 1993 -- not that long ago,
255
733568
2724
12:28
this is "Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure" -- those people.
256
736292
3258
12:31
Take those people and they read
257
739550
2369
12:33
a very typical text written by a 20-year-old today.
258
741919
2900
12:36
Often they would have no idea what half of it meant
259
744819
2891
12:39
because a whole new language has developed
260
747710
3928
12:43
among our young people doing something as mundane
261
751638
2294
12:45
as what it looks like to us when they're batting around
262
753932
2271
12:48
on their little devices.
263
756203
1675
12:49
So in closing, if I could go into the future,
264
757878
3661
12:53
if I could go into 2033,
265
761539
4375
12:57
the first thing I would ask is whether David Simon
266
765914
2913
13:00
had done a sequel to "The Wire." I would want to know.
267
768827
3893
13:04
And — I really would ask that —
268
772720
2983
13:07
and then I'd want to know actually what was going on on "Downton Abbey."
269
775703
3090
13:10
That'd be the second thing.
270
778793
1509
13:12
And then the third thing would be,
271
780302
2536
13:14
please show me a sheaf of texts
272
782838
3191
13:18
written by 16-year-old girls,
273
786029
1957
13:19
because I would want to know where this language
274
787986
2454
13:22
had developed since our times,
275
790440
1955
13:24
and ideally I would then send them back to you and me now
276
792395
3633
13:28
so we could examine this linguistic miracle
277
796028
2520
13:30
happening right under our noses.
278
798548
2350
13:32
Thank you very much.
279
800898
1516
13:34
(Applause)
280
802414
5168
13:39
Thank you. (Applause)
281
807582
3607
Translated by Joseph Geni
Reviewed by Morton Bast

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
John McWhorter - Linguist
Linguist John McWhorter thinks about language in relation to race, politics and our shared cultural history.

Why you should listen

John McWhorter is Associate Professor of English and Comparative Literature at Columbia University, teaching linguistics, Western Civilization and music history. He is a regular columnist on language matters and race issues for Time and CNN, writes for the Wall Street Journal "Taste" page, and writes a regular column on language for The Atlantic. His work also appears in the Washington Post, the Chronicle of Higher Education, Aeon magazine, The American Interest and other outlets. He was Contributing Editor at The New Republic from 2001 until 2014.

McWhorter earned his PhD in linguistics from Stanford University in 1993 and is the author of The Power of BabelDoing Our Own ThingOur Magnificent Bastard TongueThe Language Hoax and most recently Words on the Move and Talking Back, Talking Black. The Teaching Company has released four of his audiovisual lecture courses on linguistics. He guest hosted the Lexicon Valley podcast at Slate during the summer of 2016.

Beyond his work in linguistics, McWhorter is the author of Losing the Race and other books on race. He has appeared regularly on Bloggingheads.TV since 2006, and he produces and plays piano for a group cabaret show, New Faces, at the Cornelia Street Cafe in New York City.

More profile about the speaker
John McWhorter | Speaker | TED.com